PRODUCT DESIGN CONTESTS invariably lend themselves to superlatives. Winning designs are inevitably the most beautiful, elegant, disruptive, and accessible products yet created. But sometimes what’s most important in recognizing excellent design is acknowledging—and celebrating—what it is not: fussy, overly tech-reliant, poorly explained, or most of all, needlessly expensive. That became quickly apparent this year, during the judging of Inc.’s third annual Iconic Design Awards.

“As an art project, this is great. But as a go-to-market product, it doesn’t feel ready. It’s not scalable,” as Vivian Rosenthal, the founder of tech design firm Snaps and a co-founder of Google’s 30 Weeks design incubator, says of one beautifully impractical finalist.

Fortunately, she and her fellow members of our judging panel (below) found much that does make sense from the entrepreneurial designers and makers whose products

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from Inc.

Inc.3 min read
Beating the Office-Space Blues
The occupancy limits, nursing rooms, and fine print of finding the right real estate for your business.
Inc.1 min read
How Inc. Selected Its Best Workplaces
With labor tight, firms are getting creative to attract and retain talent. Your foosball table won’t cut it anymore.
Inc.3 min readTech
How to Grow Wings
Congratulations—you have enough money to start investing in fellow startups. What to know to become a supportive—and successful—angel investor.