The Atlantic

Can Women's Marchers Find a Way to Reconcile Their Differences?

Participants have confidence they can sustain the nascent movement’s momentum. But racial and cultural divisions could threaten its future.
Source: Sait Serkan Gurbuz / AP

At the Women’s March on Washington, one of the more striking moments came early on, during a speech from actress America Ferrera. She asked marchers, many of whom protested specifically against President Trump, to “refuse” his divisive rhetoric and the policy proposals that could disproportionately affect women, LGBTQ groups, and communities of color:

“The president is not America. His Cabinet is not America. Congress is not America. We are America, and we are here to stay. ... This is only day one in our united movement.”

It was a call to action that forced listeners to consider what would happen after the march—a natural concern for pumped-up protesters bent on opposing Donald Trump, and one that hung over the event. The Women’s March was unprecedented, with more than 3 million participants estimated worldwide. Yet the marchers face two major questions moving forward: Can

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Atlantic

The Atlantic6 min readPolitics
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Self-Limiting Revolution
Knock Down the House set out to show an inspiring political movement—but instead revealed its boundaries.
The Atlantic5 min readPolitics
To China, All's Fair in Love and Trade Wars
The Atlantic5 min read
Busy Tonight Ended Just as Its Host Was Finding Her Voice