Los Angeles Times

Tech companies unlikely to follow S&P's new Snap-inspired rules

When the company that produces the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index announced this month that it would exclude the corporate parent of Snapchat from its benchmark market measure, the move was cheered by advocates of better corporate governance.

It was seen as an overdue response to a disturbing trend, particularly in tech: Founders, when they take a company public, do whatever they can to maintain control, even when they own relatively small stakes.

In the case of Snap Inc., it had issued only nonvoting shares in its March initial public offering_ as far as it gets from many investors' ideal of all shares having equal voting power.

But it's far from clear that the stand taken

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times7 min read
An Ambulance, An Empty Lot And A Loophole: One Man's Fight For A Place To Live
After a hard day's work, Cameron Gordon sometimes finds a bit of solace as he lounges on the gurney in his yard, surveying a patchwork of weeds, potted plants, garden beds and a hose that meanders across the dirt. This is where his struggle to naviga
Los Angeles Times4 min readCrime & Violence
Editorial: Indiana’s Private-for-profit Asset Forfeiture Scheme Undermines Justice
Policing and prosecuting for profit contradicts reasonable notions of justice and fairness, yet it’s allowed in most U.S. states. Using a process known as civil asset forfeiture, law enforcement agencies seize private property that they claim was som
Los Angeles Times3 min readAmerican Government
LZ Granderson: The Chaos In Congress Is More Dangerous Than The Protests On Campuses
Last week Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) ignored Donald Trump's endorsement of Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.) as House speaker and announced plans to try to force him out. One can only assume she is making that attempt for attention, because it seems

Related Books & Audiobooks