STAT

Opinion: The (relative) risk in misinterpreting health spending statistics

A closer look at the absolute numbers tells a different story than the headlines about health spending statistics.

Humans are generally lousy when it comes to understanding statistics. We tend to panic over remote risks (shark attacks are on the rise!) but dismiss larger but more mundane dangers like pedestrian deaths (2016 was the deadliest year on record in the U.S.).

That’s especially true when those risks are presented as relative risks, rather than absolute numbers. An 11 percent jump in shark attacks sounds substantial, but it means nine or so additional bites. Last year’s 11 percent jump in pedestrian fatalities meant hundreds more lives lost. Guess which topic received

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from STAT

STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About A J&J Cough Syrup, A Pfizer And Moderna Patent Suit, And More
A Johnson & Johnson children’s cough syrup found to contain unsafe levels of a toxic industrial solvent was sold in six African countries.
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About Wegovy And Ozempic Sales, Rising Pharma Layoffs, And More
Sales of the blockbuster Wegovy obesity treatment more than doubled in the first quarter as Novo Nordisk races to make more of the drug to meet surging demand.
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About Lilly Buying A Plant, A Pfizer Antibiotic, And More
Eli Lilly agreed to acquire a manufacturing facility in Wisconsin from Nexus Pharmaceuticals to produce injectable medicines amid shortages of Mounjaro and Zepbound.

Related Books & Audiobooks