Opinion: The (relative) risk in misinterpreting health spending statistics

A closer look at the absolute numbers tells a different story than the headlines about health spending statistics.

Humans are generally lousy when it comes to understanding statistics. We tend to panic over remote risks (shark attacks are on the rise!) but dismiss larger but more mundane dangers like pedestrian deaths (2016 was the deadliest year on record in the U.S.).

That’s especially true when those risks are presented as relative risks, rather than absolute numbers. An 11 percent jump in shark attacks sounds substantial, but it means nine or so additional bites. Last year’s 11 percent jump in pedestrian fatalities meant hundreds more lives lost. Guess which topic received

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from STAT

STAT4 min read
How The Drug Industry Keeps Winning In Washington
D.C. Diagnosis is STAT’s weekly newsletter about the politics and policy of health and medicine. Sign up here to receive it in your inbox. What if I told you the Sen. Thom Tillis campaign account was graced with nearly $20,000 in personal donations f
STAT5 min read
In A Small Study, A Cancer Vaccine Assist Beats Immunotherapy Drugs Alone
The largest study to date of a "cancer vaccine" found that combining it with an immunotherapy drug kept patients’ tumors in check longer, on average, than the drug alone.
STAT4 min readScience
HIV’s Genetic Code, Extracted From A Nub Of Tissue, Adds To Evidence Of Virus’ Emergence In Humans A Century Ago
In a nub of issue from the 1960s, scientists have found more clues of HIV’s emergence in humans.