The Christian Science Monitor

Supreme Court ruling has 'huge' implications for voting rights

In a decision split along ideological lines, the United States Supreme Court Monday overturned almost entirely a lower court ruling that had invalidated several political districts in Texas for harming the voting power of racial minorities.

These final weeks of the Supreme Court’s term have been defined by narrow technical rulings in contentious cases on issues such as partisan gerrymandering and religious liberty. Today’s decision on racial gerrymandering in Texas veers from that pattern, experts say. Less than two years away from a new round of redistricting, it could have significant implications for voting rights lawsuits.

“There was a lot of evidence of discriminatory intent in the [Texas] map that the [high] court sort of ignored,” says Michael Li, a senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School, “and today’s ruling shows a huge presumption of good faith even in

Lower court ‘critically flawed’‘What’s the use of Section 3?’States following suit?

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Christian Science Monitor

The Christian Science Monitor2 min readSociety
Healing The Social Wounds Behind Ebola
The new “emergency” over the spread of Ebola in Africa is really a desire to address the fears and distrust that drive this second-worst outbreak of the virus.
The Christian Science Monitor4 min read
‘Excited With Life’: David Crosby Talks Sobriety, Love, And Second Acts
The musician’s creative and spiritual rebirth is the subject of the new film “David Crosby: Remember My Name.”
The Christian Science Monitor2 min read
Readers Write: Seeing Both Sides, Art Theft Solution, And More
See what our readers have to say about our abortion debate coverage, solutions for art theft, and Latin plurals.