AQ: Australian Quarterly

Science is messy, so why is SciComm clean? Time to get elbow deep.

Nowhere is science’s struggle with public trust more evident than when we look at the disparity between what the science and empirical evidence shows, and what some of the general public thinks the science shows: think climate change, evolution and vaccines.

Arguably, despite years of trying, traditional science news sources are not reaching out to certain sections of the general public. The general public includes everyone. People like you, as well as people without such good taste in magazines.

Buy why isn’t everyone listening?

When it comes to translating the stuffy, formal scientific language into digestible and engaging content for a broader audience, we tend look to the cheerleader of

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from AQ: Australian Quarterly

AQ: Australian Quarterly4 min read
Senator Anne Ruston
You’ve been in politics for over a decade. Were there any science or health issues you wanted to address when you first started? When I entered politics, health and aged care were certainly not policy areas that I came to with hands-on experience. I
AQ: Australian Quarterly10 min readAddiction
Vaping in Australia
Associate Professor Michelle Jongenelis is a Principal Research Fellow at The University of Melbourne’s School of Psychological Sciences and Deputy Director of the Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change. She has expertise in health promotion, interven
AQ: Australian Quarterly7 min read
Shortage or Surplus: Is it Worth Going to University?
The Report has been received favourably, even being described as a document that deserves bipartisan support.1 Yet despite a favourable reception, it is doubtful if its recommendations can be taken seriously. The problem for the Accord is not that it

Related Books & Audiobooks