STAT

Opinion: We need a temporary moratorium on using gene editing to create babies

The rationale for using #CRISPR and other gene-editing to modify eggs, sperm, and embryos doesn't make sense. We need a moratorium on doing that until it is clearer.

On a cold, drizzly night almost three years ago, I stood inside the nearly deserted Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., I was in town to attend the first International Summit on Human Gene Editing organized by the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine. After a day of intense talks at the meeting, I had gone for a long walk and found myself looking up at Big Abe. A big question was on my mind: Would the organizers of the meeting call for a moratorium on using CRISPR to make gene-edited babies, as I hoped they would?

They didn’t.

When I learned of that decision, my feeling was that someone would report the creation of the first

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from STAT

STAT3 min readSelf-Improvement
Opinion: Quitting Smoking Is Hard. Mindfulness Hacks The Habit Loop, Offering A New Approach
Smoking hijacks the brain's reward-based learning system. Each time a smoker smokes, it reinforces a brain pathway that says, "This is great, do it again." Mindfulness techniques can break the…
STAT5 min readSociety
After Ebola Spills Into Uganda, WHO Decides Against Emergency Declaration
The Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo still doesn’t constitute a global health emergency, the WHO said Friday.
STAT3 min readSociety
Opinion: Shopping Blindly For Post-acute Care Is A Recipe For Disaster
The notion that sick, frail, or elderly patients and their families can somehow figure out on their own the best choice for post-acute care must be discarded.