Manhattan Institute

Mythology Trumping Facts

The president was wrong to malign the criminal-justice system in his State of the Union speech.

President Trump maligned the criminal-justice system in his State of the Union speech last night. Touting a recent federal law that gives federal judges greater discretion in sentencing violent criminals and drug traffickers, Trump claimed that the previous sentencing regime “wrongly and disproportionately harmed the African-American community.”

The claim that the criminal-justice system is racist is the mantra of left-wing activists the country over. Adopting it for the State of the Union was an unfortunate attempt to score bipartisan political points. The effort has already proven unavailing: Trump and his supporters continue to be charged with racism, while the legitimacy of law enforcement has been undermined.

It is crime, not the punishment of crime, that disproportionately harms the black community. And the demand for strict drug enforcement has always originated most forcefully in the black community. In 1959, Harlem’s New York Age newspaper called for “no leniency for the criminals, the recidivists, the junkies, dope pushers, muggers, prostitutes, or pimps. Clean out this scum—and put them away as long as the law will allow.” New York’s Rockefeller drug laws, now reviled by the elites, were passed in the 1970s because of activism in the black community, as Michael Fortner shows in Black Silent Majority.

The infamous federal crack penalties followed a similar trajectory. It was New York congressman Charles Rangel who initiated the federal crack legislation in 1986 by pointing out crack’s effect on urban youth. Other members of the Congressional Black Caucus agreed. New York congressman Alton Waldon called on his colleagues to increase federal crack penalties: “For those of us who are black this self-inflicted pain is the worst oppression we have known since slavery.”

If those 1986 federal crack-trafficking penalties were anti-black, then the meth-trafficking penalties are anti-white. The same weight of meth—5 grams—netted a five-year minimum sentence, the identical ratio as the original crack penalties. The majority of federal meth defendants are white; only about 2 percent are black. Somehow, this racial injustice has escaped the attention of activists and the media.

Drug enforcement is not responsible for black overrepresentation in prison. In 2016, if all drug convicts had been released from federal and state lockups, the black share of the prison population would have fallen from 37.4 percent to 37.2 percent. In other words, drug convictions have no effect on the proportion of black prisoners; that proportion is driven by violent-crime rates.

Law-abiding residents of inner-city communities continue to ask the police to free them from the pall of open-air drug dealing and the scourge of illegal drug use. It is possible to have a good-faith debate about the optimal sentence length for violence and drug trafficking and even whether drug use and trafficking should be decriminalized entirely. But the charge of racial bias in the criminal-justice system is not supported by the evidence. President Trump and his advisors were wrong to throw this bone to his left-wing critics.

More from Manhattan Institute

Manhattan Institute2 min read
Beating My Dad
I should have listened more when my dad taught me tennis. Instead, I moped on the courts. My dad, Toby, was the only father out there. This was in the 1960s, in suburban Cleveland. My dad was often shirtless on the courts. A bare-chested guy—wearing
Manhattan Institute4 min readPolitics
The Democrats’ Pennsylvania Edge
Rejecting Donald Trump, voters in Greater Philadelphia pose a major obstacle to Republican chances.
Manhattan Institute5 min read
Justice Thomas’s Credo
One of the most striking aspects of Monday’s Supreme Court decision in Gamble v. United States was Clarence Thomas’s eloquent summary of the core precept of his judicial philosophy: that stare decisis—the venerable doctrine that courts should respect