Los Angeles Times

Editorial: Who gets to say what the rules mean?

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments about whether federal courts should be required to defer to the executive branch's interpretation of its own rules, if that interpretation is reasonable. This may sound like a technical, legalistic dispute - and it is - but the wrong decision could make it vastly harder for the federal government to protect the public.

If courts start to second-guess executive-branch

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times9 min read
Fast-growing Asparagus Once Flourished On California Farms. Why Is It Disappearing?
FIREBAUGH, Calif. — It was a late March morning and dozens of women and men descended on a San Joaquin Valley asparagus farm — one of the last in the state. The workers walked along the furrows, cutting the newly sprouted spears at precisely nine inc
Los Angeles Times5 min read
Jewish Voices Struggle To Find Words Of Reconciliation In Face Of Campus Violence
LOS ANGELES — Standing at a cloth-draped table where the Torah is read, Rabbi Sharon Brous delivered her Saturday sermon, recounting her experience at a recent UCLA protest. Demonstrators draped in Israeli flags screamed at students in keffiyehs. The
Los Angeles Times7 min read
A Young Actress, An Obsessed Stalker And A Hollywood Murder That Changed America
The prosecutor was studying the killer's confession, trying to understand what was wrong with it. In her first few viewings of the videotape, Marcia Clark had the gnawing sense that he was lying. She took careful notes. She watched to the end, rewoun

Related Books & Audiobooks