Clarence Thomas Knows Nothing of My Work
The justice used my book to tie abortion to eugenics. But his rendition of the history is incorrect.
by Adam Cohen
May 29, 2019
4 minutes
In Tuesday’s ruling on Indiana’s abortion law, Justice Clarence Thomas took the national debate over the right to choose to a dark new place: eugenics. His 20-page concurring opinion included an extensive discussion of the eugenics movement of the early 20th century. Thomas argued that as the justices consider abortion going forward, they should pay more attention to its potential to become a “tool of eugenic manipulation.”
In making his argument, Thomas cited my book repeatedly. (He also cited an article I wrote about Harvard’s ties to eugenics). I don’t want to appear ungrateful: It’s an honor to be relied on by the highest court in the land, and these days, nonfiction authors
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days