Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Unavailable
Middlemarch
Unavailable
Middlemarch
Unavailable
Middlemarch
Audiobook (abridged)7 hours

Middlemarch

Written by George Eliot

Narrated by Carole Boyd

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

4.5/5

()

Currently unavailable

Currently unavailable

About this audiobook

One of the great novels of nineteenth-century England, Middlemarch is concerned with the blighted marriage of a young idealistic woman, but also presents a vivid portrait of England during the 1830s.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJun 1, 2000
ISBN9789629545277
Author

George Eliot

George Eliot (1819–1880) was the pseudonym of Mary Ann Evans, one of the defining authors of the Victorian era, who penned influential works such as Adam Bede, Middlemarch, The Mill on the Floss, and Silas Marner. Eliot began her career by writing for local newspapers, eventually running the Westminster Review. During her time there, she decided to become a novelist and chose a masculine pen name in order to avoid the rampant sexism of the day. Her first novel, Adam Bede, was an instant success. Eliot’s realist philosophy and deep characterizations were defining features of her work, and her classic novels have earned her praise as one of the English language’s top authors.

Related to Middlemarch

Related audiobooks

Classics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Middlemarch

Rating: 4.3515625 out of 5 stars
4.5/5

128 ratings133 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A very nicely written book that gives a rounded view of the town of Middlemarch by bringing together the points of view of a cast of different characters. The book went deep into the psychology of each character which was intriguing, and I really loved the characters of Dorothea and Mary. The book has a strong thoughtful streak, and George Eliot has a lot of insightful things to say about the world. It is also a very realistic book, no wild gothic drama.

    On the downside, it is a very long book, and I did lose interest in some parts, particularly in Bulstrode & Lydgate's chapters. And the ending was a little unsatisfying.

    What books would I compare this to? Well, it has a dash of Vanity Fair in its past perspective & ambition, a streak of Le Miserable in its ensemble cast, a dollop of Dickens with its ideology, and a hint of Austen in its wit.

    I wouldn't recommend this as light reading, but if you have the time to commit to it, it is really a quite special book.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A thoughtful yet entertaining read about the people and customs of an English town from the earlier part of the 19th century. The characters are very well drawn, their personalities are not superficial, and I was willingly dragged into the story, something I expect a very well-written book should do. This tale is never boring, but as the sentences often have deeper meanings one needs to take time to read this work slowly, unhurried, and without distraction. Quite good and worth the time and effort. Solid.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    It's most interesting in the ways she differs from Austen. Much more political and philosophical and concerned with morals and the class system. I liked how it swept over many of the citizens of Middlemarch. It was about the whole town.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Trollope loved george eliot & g. lewes, that's enough for me.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Is it blasphemous to say this book disappointed me?

    Listen. It's a fine story. There's nothing inherently wrong with it. It's a lovely look at provincial life, full of the drama and romantic tension one expects from 19th century literature. But that's-- all it was to me. It was nothing special, nothing life hanging.

    I liked it, sure, but maybe I wasn't in the mood to appreciate it.

    I'm glad I read it, but I doubt I'll be picking it up again any time soon.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In Middlemarch, George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans) examines life in the fictional Midlands town of Middlemarch, focusing on various characters and their intersecting narratives in order to examine women’s role in society, the place of religion, contemporary politics, and more. Eliot’s writing comments on the internalized misogyny of her time. In one instance, Mrs. Vincy says in conversation with Rosamond, “Oh, my dear, you must allow for young men. Be thankful if they have good hearts. A woman must lean to put up with little things. You will be married some day” (pg. 105). This view of marriage runs through most of the book, with both Dorothea and Lydgate experiencing failed marriages. Eliot continues, “[Mrs. Garth] was not without her criticism of [her neighbors] in return, being more accurately instructed than most matrons in Middlemarch, and… apt to be a little severe towards her own sex, which in her opinion was framed to be entirely subordinate. On the other hand, she was disproportionately indulgent towards the failings of men, and was often heard to say that these were natural” (pg. 262).In discussing the role of art, Will Ladislaw and Dorothea Casaubon debate the work of Tamburlaine, which Will argues represents “earthquakes and volcanoes” as well as “migrations of races and clearings of forests – and America and the stream-engine” (pg. 231). Change runs as a through-line in the book, specifically the Reform Act of 1867, which doubled the adult male enfranchisement rate in England and Wales. Eliot begins hinting at this as she discusses the role of politics in rural life (chapter 18). Further discussions of art include references to significant authors of the day, including Sir Walter Scott, Lady Blessington, and L.E.L. (Letitia Elizabeth Landon), the poet (pg. 291).In a lengthy aside on politics, Eliot writes, “The doubt hinted by Mr. Vincy whether it were only the general election or the end of the world that was coming on, now that George the Fourth was dead. Parliament dissolved, Wellington and Peel generally depreciated, and the new king apologetic was a feeble type of the uncertainties in provincial opinion at that time. With the glow-worm lights of country places, how could men see which were their own thoughts in the confusion of a Tory ministry passing Liberal measures, of Tory nobles and electors being anxious to return Liberals rather than friends of the recreant ministers, and of outcries for remedies which seemed to have a mysteriously remote bearing on private interest and were made suspicious by the advocacy of disagreeable neighbours?” (pg. 383). Here, then, is material that sheds light on the rapid political changes occurring in the latter half of the nineteenth century. While the book can be slow at times, Eliot’s commentary on social issues, in particular the dynamics of marriage and political change, will be of interest to anyone studying the late-Victorian era.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I thoroughly enjoyed reading this. It was not a good idea to read this book alongside The red and the black, that cold research lab where only the main character is real and all the others are plot devices to trigger psychological and/or political observations. It made Stendhal’s books look so much worse, and Eliot’s book so much superior. But Middlemarch isn’t just great in comparison, it’s great, full stop. Eliot's quiet snarkiness worked its magic on me from the first few pages, where there are plenty of leisurely descriptions of country life that she then undercuts with a precisely timed placing of a tongue in her cheek. Expertly done, and it works on two levels -- "let me tell you how these people think things work", and "I'll make a joke so you and I both know that things are actually more complex than that; but we still understand why these people think so". Good stuff. Most of this book centres around the travails of four couples and their immediate families (or lack thereof). That means there’s a fairly large cast to keep track of, but that is exactly where this book’s strength lies: their interactions and conflicts are brilliantly developed. All her characters feel like real, three-dimensional people who act in accordance with their convincingly-portrayed psychological makeup. Relatively few of the conflicts in this book are due to coincidence; it’s real-seeming characters behaving in uncontrived but conflicting ways. Very well done, that. Eliot also makes this seem so effortless and genuine and unartificial, which is another big mark in her favour. And finally, while she cares about all her characters (the omniscient authorial voice will sometimes straight-up tell readers as much), she does not shrink back from subjecting them to ruin and despair -- her caring for these characters does emphatically not trump the consequences of their unfavourable (in)actions or incompatible desires. This was a wonderful read by an author who knows what they are doing. Those are the best books.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Tales of people, how other's expectations don't match the reality.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    (Original Review, 2002-06-15)A drop of water on your head is easy to ignore; a constant drop in the same spot becomes a form of torture.For some women, their big problem is they can't kick out a cheating boyfriend. For others, their problem is they can't say no to a bridezilla best friend. Others are hung up on their bosses, or confused about their careers, or having issues with overbearing mothers, or with parents getting divorced, etc. In fact, the full range of human experience that a young single woman in her twenties might encounter. How about going for a long walk instead of watching TV, putting down your (collective you, not you, VoxGirl) fork, and drinking water, unsweetened tea and black coffee instead of sodas and lattes? High self-esteem out the ying-yang will naturally result, and as a bonus, no more need for chick-lit.As for the 'it's the women's fault for having low self-esteem' argument, well, if you want to be in a loving relationship or married someday, and your looks have been made fun of for most of your life, and then almost every form of media available to you during the course of your entire life, from books to movies to TV shows to advertisements show beautiful women - and almost exclusively beautiful women - finding love, it just may affect you, no matter how strong you are and how confident you may be in other aspects of your life.Quite a lot of TV shows, movies, etc. show average-looking men (even without power or status) who win the hearts of (or are married to) stunningly beautiful women; how many TV shows or movies have average-looking women (without power or status) winning the hearts of (or being married to) stunningly handsome men?It's not just chick-lit; even literature and literary novels about love and marriage, whether George Eliot's “Middlemarch” to Jeffrey Eugenides's “The Marriage Plot”, tend to feature very beautiful women as the romantic leads. If I want to read about a pleasant-looking-but-not-beautiful romantic heroine in “literature,” I can safely turn to Austen or the Brontës, but I'm having trouble thinking of more examples.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Yet another of those books that escaped me far, far longer than it should have. It was a great joy to dive into this world, and while there were definitely a few characters (probably more than a few) that I wanted to reach out and shake some sense into, I enjoyed it thoroughly. The Modern Library edition I read had some odd typos (many d's were replaced with t's, for no discernible reason), so beware that version perhaps, but it's a classic for a reason, and one I'm sure I'll come back to.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    So refreshing to read of characters motivated by their core beliefs, yet clearly modifying their actions based on new information or circumstances.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    It gives you a very broad and holistic view of life; it’s not just about about-to-get-married stuff.......................Incidentally the title refers to a stiflingly average small town: “.... a sore point in his memory in which this petty medium of Middlemarch had been too strong for him.”[“whose opinions had a great weight of grocery on their side.”]Many of the characters have intellectual inclinations, but find it difficult to escape the “petty medium”................................Comparing every English novel to “Pride & Prejudice” is a bit like comparing every rock band to the Beatles; it’s tiresome. However, sometimes I slip into it. [To extend the metaphor, George Eliot is more like Pink Floyd than the Beatles.] It’s impossible not to notice the broader vistas in Eliot compared to the views that Austen almost intentionally constricts around the feminine mystique. In “Pride & Prejudice” you’re supposed to laugh at Darcy for thinking that young women might want to study other languages, or anything even vaguely abstract. In “Middlemarch” Dorothea is earnestly distressed that she has not learned German, the better to drink in God and scholarship. In “Pride & Prejudice” the portrait of the scholar is virtually always painted with a view towards making fun—the popular kid making fun of the nerd. In “Middlemarch”, both the ideal and the flaws are given treatment. It would be a mistake to think that every book published before 1985 has an honest appreciation for learning, but “Middlemarch” does........................Without, I hope, sounding too jealous of glory, it’s a lot better to be told about the things that actually happen, the complete spectrum, and not just to be presented with a carefully constructed fiction. (“In my family, people will never argue over money when people die! Better yet, no one in my family will ever die! We’ll just be rich— or at least we will be, when it’s time to have a party.”).............................“If you only wanted ‘love’, then life would just be one long love-fest.” No, we choose people for flawed reasons, and then we have to live with it.................................One can easily say that it is all “good”, e.g. for a female, simply by forgetting upwards of three-quarters of the thing, and that is the feminine mystique; one can with even greater ease (and not inconsiderable pain) say that is all “bad”, and that is merely the other feminine mystique. The great thing, however, is to say that the thing is *as it is*.................................It’s nice how everyone’s story is everyone else’s story.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    So much has been said in the reviews here, and consequently I find I have little to add. I read this in college and hated it. I suspect I hated it because I had fun things to do and this book is REALLY LONG. I am not sure though how it should have been shortened. I recently noted in another review (for Asymmetry) that great editors often write exceptionally crafted books with nothing remotely extraneous left in the text. I think this qualifies. 905 pages of necessary. I rotated between listening and reading this book, and the audiobook time means I finished this before winter, I found I kept returning to the text to reread. Every word does matter, and that level of focus is not possible for me with audio.So read the other reviews that will tell you this is about the most perfectly crafted novel in the English language. It is. The story is complex, funny, tragic, mundane, honest, and deeply gratifying. I need to re-read it soon, though I typically do not re-read. (I also cannot imagine how anyone thought a man had written this, but that is another conversation.)
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I tried and failed to read Middlemarch back in 2012. But, it is one of my brother's favorite novels and when it comes to literature, I trust his taste above all.

    I want to hug and snuggle with this book, to sleep with it under my pillow so some of George Eliot's genius might seep into my poor little brain while I sleep. Eliot might be the best illustrator of human nature and the many contradictory aspects of a person's self that I've ever read. Dorothea Brook is in the running for my favorite all time heroine. (Sorry Elizabeth Bennet, Margaret Hale and Hermione Granger.) I wanted to slap her and tell her to snap out of it at the beginning, but by the end I was desperate for her to find her happiness. There were storylines that didn't interest me too much, and besides Dorothea and Mary every single character irritated me, but by the end of the book I cared about everyone. Even Bulstrode. But not Rosamond. Never Rosamond.

    I listened to the audiobook narrated by Juliet Stevenson who is, hands down, the premier British literature audio book performer.

    It's a testament to how much I loved this book (thought this disjointed review doesn't do my admiration justice) that I will definitely read it again, all 900 pages or 34 hours of it.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Given that MIDDLEMARCH is an all time favorite of many LT readers, I'll tread lightly here.With the recent rewriting of many classics, here's my new version following Dorothea's marriage:Casaubon's cold public demeanor, superior distancing attitudes, and lack of affectiontoward his bride undergo a radical change in the bedroom.He radiates into a red-hot lover!This transformation conflicts with Dorothea's physical passions and religious sensibilities,resulting in her dim-witted, yet intentional, decision to tell her husband that she thinksthat his nephew, Will, who he loathes, DOES deserve more of her husband's money after his projected death.Casaubon then divorces Dorothea who falls into Will's welcoming arms untilshe enlightens him about the reasons for her defection.Casaubon and Will accidentally meet at an inn where they are introduced to sistersembarking from a carriage and begin new and friendly adventures.Dorothea falls in love with her priestly confessor and ... "Oh dear! Oh dear!"
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    One of the greatest books ever.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Excellent. A traditional novel with a lot of psychological truth, a great panorama of the society, some humour mixed in, and no easy exits.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I am happy to report that I have finally made it through Middlemarch! At 784 densely-packed pages, there were times it was a bit of a slog, but, ultimately, the novel rewards the reader with finely-tuned observations about love, marriage, and human nature. Recommended for those willing to give it the time and patience it deserves.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    This was a slog for me. Certainly it picked up after Casaubon's demise but not to an extent that kept it from feeling like a chore to finish the book. I can see that this is a great novel in many ways, but for sheer reading pleasure, it doesn't compare to the greatness AND readability of Villette or David Copperfield or Emma (just throwing a few superb, old, English novels out there.) There's something sterile about it, there's no mess, no slipping-in of the author's frame-of-mind. It is observant, yes, and deeply so, but clinically.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Classic sweeping amusing
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Middlemarch is, as much as anything, a domestic novel illustrating the importance of marriage. The decision to marry, to entrust one's future and well-being to another person, is not to be taken lightly. In a desire to be useful to a man of letters, beautiful young Dorothea Brooke ties herself to a melancholy and jealous man who is unworthy of her devotion. Dr. Lydgate rashly chooses a wife based on physical attractiveness rather than depth of character and lives to regret his decision. Both Dorothea and Lydgate find a measure of peace by submitting their own desires to those of their mates, without receiving much in return. Mary Garth proves to be as shrewd as she is pretty. Both Mary and her suitor are fully aware of his shortcomings, and their partnership enables him to succeed where he would otherwise have failed. George Eliot's keen insight into human nature makes this character-driven novel feel as fresh as a contemporary novel. Highly recommended.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Varied narratives describing the life of people in and around the fictional town of Middlemarch. Enjoyable victorian realism, if anything too broad in the story telling for me (lost track on occasion as I mostly read this over my lunch breaks and on public transport).
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I've been meaning to read this book for a long time (& by that I mean decades) but somehow Eliot never drew me in. It took me a few months to finish once I started - the first half was slow going although somewhere around the middle it caught and I finished it up in a few nights reading.

    This very personal introduction is to encourage anyone who reads this review not to wait as long as I. Great literature is defined by creating a world you feel you are inhabiting, by creating characters as real as anyone you know and by making the reader care deeply about the fate of those characters. The truly great books also teach you truths about the human condition & help you reflect on your own life. On all four of those characteristics this books excels and shows Eliot is indeed one of the great writers.

    Now that I'm done I can say the biggest problem with her writing is its complexity- her sentences can often be more convoluted than Proust's and you have to sit there and puzzle out what exactly was her intentions. And unlike Proust there is no lyricism to make those twists & turns soar into something poetic. Hence the prose can be heavy at times. Surprisingly, unlike other 19th or even 18th century writers a lot of her language seems archaic - I was very glad to have chosen this edition which has great footnotes as well as an interesting introduction.

    Because of the heaviness of her prose I had to deduct one star, but that does not deduct from my strong recommendation for everyone to read this great classic.

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "Middlemarch" is the antithesis of "Pride and Prejudice," a work at once both feminist and realist. Eliot's prose is richly textured, but at times so heavy that it obscures the plot, which moves very slowly. Like "Anna Karenina," it also interweaves parallel stories of different couples, and just as with "Anna Karenina," I can't manage as a reader to care about all of them equally. I came away from the book feeling that I had read something historically important and timeless in a certain way, but not enjoyable in a timeless way.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A long story about several couples and their relationships/marriages and dealings within a small town. Clergy, politicians, doctors, estate managers. Dorothea and Ladislaw etc, all sorts of characters.
    What else can I say about a classic?
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    It's an impressive must-read classic, but I admire this novel more than I love it. It tries to do too much, and then somehow gets it all done. A small English town is the setting but that entire town is its stage, there are allusions to all manner of things requiring endnotes be consulted, and the author demonstrates a powerful mind in sentences that must be read twice to grasp, character portraits to justify any personality, and with both feet firmly planted in realism. I'm moved to say it's a story about how much one's happiness descends upon making a poor choice in a life partner, however excusable that choosing may be. But I could as easily say it's about the evils of money, or politics large and small. Which story commands the foreground depends more upon your perception than the narrative's guidance, because it fantastically intertwines all of these things. It's the style rather than the impressive content that lends it a dry feeling. Virginia Wolf may have been correct that with Middlemarch fictional characters began to think as well as to feel, in that the characters' thoughts drive their emotions more often than vice versa, but the novel is so wrapped up in thinking that it keeps its gates too tightly fastened at the control dams of the feeling portion. Everyone in this story is to be understood and understandable. George Eliot's narration too often takes charge to ensure this. Then it can read very clinically, weighted with exposition and psychological analysis. In the better portions, enough is left enshrouded in mystery and open to interpretation, actions and motives being justified by the character's citing good homilies while clearly there are other perspectives that are being neglected. In these parts the novel shines and it engages. I did not know sometimes whether she was inventing fiction or psychology, whether I should join in the chorus that credits George Eliot with sharp insight or criticize her for dictating too often. At its worst it can feel as though the novel is placed on pause in frozen tableau while she taps with a pointer on the inner workings of the minds in play. I've met this before in Henry James and others and felt it was done well without becoming so much like an essay. To the extent that thought has been emphasized over emotion, it demands a similar commitment from the reader - thus, for me, more admirable than loved. The broad-ranging insight is undeniably there, sharp enough to balance the novel's lack of particular focus, and eminently makes this novel worth reading once. Nothing more precise can summarize it than to say that no one's life is a fairy tale, be they wealthy or poor, wise or otherwise, prudent or precocious. Perhaps we can also conclude that those who are happiest dwell least on their neighbours' opinions.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    So proud to have read this book at last! And it was wonderful. It's true, you do have to accustom yourself to the style, but the rewards are great. Insightful, sometimes sad, often witty. Thanks to my wonderful book club (are we forever the Middlemarchers?) for the impetus to read this magnificent novel!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I just can't write a good review here. This is the best 19th century English novel I have read. Reminded me of Anna Karenina in the sense of how masterfully the author juggles many, many characters and how those characters are differentiated. A thoroughly delightful read.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Really didn't enjoy this. The female characters were annoying as all heck (as were the simpering males) and it just didn't compare to Dickens Bleak House.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    With all of its 880 pages, I expected “more” in terms of a definitive plot, which I did not find. The characters are rich and the time period displayed beautifully by Eliot. Her descriptive powers are delicious as evidenced by description of Mr. Casaubon: "as genuine a character as any ruminant animal". (pg. 173) The pace of the book is slow and reminds somewhat of Austen and Wharton. I have 2-3 other Eliot’s in my anthology and as of right now I’m not anxious to begin them.