Audiobook (abridged)7 hours
The Wealth of Nations
Written by Adam Smith
Narrated by Sean Barrett
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
()
About this audiobook
It was Adam Smith (1723–90) who first established economics as a separate branch of knowledge, and many would say his work has never been surpassed. The Wealth of Nations, which appeared in 1776, is the definitive text for all who believe that economic decisions are best left to markets, not governments. At the heart of Smith’s doctrine is an optimistic view of the effects of self-interest. Though each individual seeks only personal gain, the collective result is increased prosperity, which benefits society as a whole.
More audiobooks from Adam Smith
The Money Game Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings600 Quotations from the Great 18th Century Writers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Wealth of Nations, Book 1 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5500 Quotations from the Great Philosophers of the 18th Century: intégrale Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Wealth of Nations
Related audiobooks
The Gospel of Wealth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles of Economics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEconomic calculation in the socialist commonwealth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Theory of Money and Credit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrinciples of Economics, Book 2: Some Fundamental Notions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: How New Ways of Living and Working Drive Post-Crash Prosperity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wealth of Nations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Theory of Moral Sentiments Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Common Sense Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Communist Manifesto Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Essay on the Principle of Population Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Liberty Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Republic Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Federalist Papers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Prince Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Men Without Work: America's Invisible Crisis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Leviathan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Communist Manifesto (Unabridged) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Age of Reason Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Anthem Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5War and Peace Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best of Freakonomics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary of Charles T. Munger's Poor Charlies Almanack Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLudwig Von Mises's "The Theory of Money and Credit": A Macat Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Communist Manifesto and Other Writings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Democracy in America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I Am John Galt: Today's Heroic Innovators Building the World and the Villainous Parasites Destroying It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Social Contract Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Economics For You
Freakonomics Rev Ed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How the World Works Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed or Fail Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Killing Sacred Cows: Overcoming the Financial Myths that are Destroying Your Prosperity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Chip War: The Quest to Dominate the World's Most Critical Technology Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5These are the Plunderers: How Private Equity Runs—and Wrecks—America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Color of Money: Black Banks and the Racial Wealth Gap Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Think Like a Freak: The Authors of Freakonomics Offer to Retrain Your Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5San Fransicko: Why Progressives Ruin Cities Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Intelligent Investor Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sovereign Individual: Mastering the Transition to the Information Age Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The War Below: Lithium, Copper, and the Global Battle to Power Our Lives Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Nomadland: Surviving America in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Marvel Comics: The Untold Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meth Lunches: Food and Longing in an American City Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Don't Trust Your Gut: Using Data to Get What You Really Want in Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Genius of Israel: The Surprising Resilience of a Divided Nation in a Turbulent World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nudge: The Final Edition: Improving Decisions About Money, Health, And The Environment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What We Owe Each Other: A New Social Contract for a Better Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Myth of Capitalism: Monopolies and the Death of Competition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A History of the United States in Five Crashes: Stock Market Meltdowns That Defined a Nation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why the Rich Are Getting Richer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Wealth of Nations
Rating: 4.404761904761905 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
84 ratings14 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5One of the most influential books ever. I wish more neo-cons and ultra capitalist would read it. Smith espouses some government involvement in regulating business enterprises. No! Really! Why, that sounds like Marxism! Bull. He surveyed the economies of the world, surveyed assembly of products, reviewed the balance of trade, the influence gold has on national debt, the problem of inflation and other standard economic issues. He was very insightful and should be taught in every high school economic class. The foundation for studying any economic activity should begin with Smith.
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Vast, rambling, dated, and yet compelling. As a founding tome of the study of economics, many of the ideas in this book have become familiar through diffusion into the discourse of everyday life. However, to see them set out in their historical context (admittedly, occasionally too much historical context) gives them a freshness and a real insight into how great the advances made by Smith really were. As elaborated here, his ideas have a richness and humanity which is often missing from the concepts when reduced to their most compact form. It is illuminating to reflect on both how much of this work is still relevant, and how much has been overturned by modern societies. The admonitions against government indebtedness have a certain resonance with current events, even as the detailed analysis of the price of corn in the various cities of Europe has become antiquated due to the passage of time - and, vitally, the increased ease of movement in the modern world. This upsets some of the assumptions of the work, and it will also be interesting to see to what extent mass customisation overturns certain other assumptions about the efficacy of capital-intensive mass production. That these questions can be asked within the framework of a book dating back so far is testament to the soundness of its basic ideas.Worth reading if you've ever partaken in a capitalist society, or are thinking of doing so.
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5What more is there to say about a book that's been around 233 years? That's considered to be the founding text of modern economics? Written by a man who has organizations and lectures named after him, whose name is synonymous with free markets?Well, the following is a list of things not generally talked about - in my casual exposure to economics - in regards to this work.Smith, not surprisingly for a man of the Enlightenment, was a blank slate guy. The philosopher, we're told, differs from the porter "not so much from nature, as from habit, custom, and education". Smith's professional progeny, with less justification and an autistic-like inability to model human nature, has largely kept the notion of people as malleable economic units whose value can simply be altered by some inputs of education.This is a book on the wealth of nations, not an argument for how trade is going to pacify the world and render borders obsolete as is the gospel sometimes preached - for at least a hundred years - by advocates of globalization. While Smith acknowledges that wealthy countries make great trading partners, he also notes their wealth makes them "dangerous in war and politics". (He also makes a not entirely unconvincing argument for standing armies being necessary. Part of it rests on the general efficacy of the specialization of labor.)He also makes some, on the face of it, surprising digressions into what sort of established church should be supported and if public education is worthwhile - all under the section on how the government should be spending its money. He's not big on established churches but thinks they are inevitable unless a country has no tradition of them - like the American colonies who were just rebelling in the "recent disturbances" at the time of the book's publication. (Though, of course, individual colonies did have established churches.) He's a supporter of everyone being educated to a certain minimum degree. Indeed, he seems to argue for a sort of licensure system in which people, before entering economic life, have to prove a minimum standard of education. But he is skeptical of public financing and administration being able to do this. And, given the state of American public education in all its aspects, his skepticism sometimes seems still relevant and appropriate.While Smith is rightly considered a strong advocate of free trade - a large section of the book is a demolition of the then fashionable mercantile system with its attendant emphasis on gold and silver as something more than just merely convenient mediums of exchange, he does note some objections. In an age where the US Pentagon admits some of its supply chains disappear somewhere overseas, Smith's admonition that free trade should not hamper national defense seems forgotten. "Defence" notes Smith, "... is of much more importance than opulence." Smith also is not in favor of free trade for items that are taxed by the importing country. Tariffs, he argues, should equal the tax load on the native manufacturer. He also supports retaliatory tariffs, a gradual elimination of tariffs, and notes that free trade should not proceed if those it unemploys can not easily find other employment. Historically, using the argument of the re-employment of thousands of soldiers and seamen after demobilization, he doesn't see this as usually being a problem though.Smith states four maxims of good tax policy: each citizen paying in proportion to the property the state protects and enables the accumulation of , convenience of payments, certainty of amount and time of payment, convenience of payment, and economy of collection. He seems, at one point, to argue for hidden taxes on luxury consumer goods - the goods that social custom does not dictate are essential to the lives of even the lowest class.What isn't in the book is any sort of mention of monetary policy - governments attempting to manipulate economies by manipulating money supplies. And one also wonders what Smith would have thought of the notion of a service economy. To Smith, productive labor was only that which increased the tangible, material property of a society. No significant mention is made of the idea of intellectual property yet he notes that "philosophers or men of speculation" have invented machines that have increased production of goods.Is Smith readable? Largely, yes. The marginal annotations of the Cannan edition are very good and help easily follow Smith's arguments and find relevant sections. There is a reason there are many famous quotes from this book. Smith is usually a lucid - and occasionally wry - author. Even though he digresses into some less - at least to me - interesting topics like the history of the Bank of Amsterdam or the specifics of Britain's deficit financing in the early 18th century, his economic history is often interesting. I don't know how kind modern scholarship has been to his economic theories on European social development post-Roman Empire and the reasons for the Reformation, but they were interesting and not implausible. He also has an section on the pragmatic reasons why slavery was not conducive to the economic development of societies.Smith's work is largely known for being an extended apologia for the benefits of enlightened self-interest. George Stigler, in a preface that ably sums up Smith's main points, convincingly argues - though the debt is not explicit in the text - that it isn't exactly self-interest, and not socialism's and communism's essential and necessary altruism, that motivates economic efficiency. It's the private vices that become public benefits. It's a notion developed in Smith's The Theory Of Moral Sentiments and may stem from Mandeville's The Fable of the Bees: Or Private Vices, Publick Benefits.
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Overall, this was an informative read; not for its economic insightfulness but for how its supporters use Smith's theories. There are some basic economic truths and a lot of tedious detail but what is really telling are the outdated ideas and the sweeping generalizations which have carried over to our contemporary economic discussions.
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I found it hard to keep focused on the ideas because it's so rich and with an old 19th century English
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Adam Smith revolutionized the study of economics with the publication in 1776 of his epic tome, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. His analysis of how capital and labor move in an economy completely changed how people thought about money and how governments regulated the markets.The first book of The Wealth of Nations reads much like any basic economics textbook would today. Smith opens with a discussion of specialization its importance to economic growth. He does not extend his argument, as modern economists would, beyond the subject of individual specialization to a broader discussion of comparative advantage and national specialization, but he does anticipate where future economists would take his argument when he discusses tariffs. Smith argues that is unwise to tax cheaper goods being imported to Britain and that the British should instead concentrate on exporting goods it can make more cheaply than its trade partners. This initial introduction to the concept of comparative advantage flew in the face of centuries of mercantilist thinking, in which trade was a matter of winners and losers and it was impossible for a country to enrich itself through trade without impoverishing other nations.Beyond essentially inventing modern economic thought, Adam Smith’s greatest contribution was the concept of the Invisible Hand, a force that moves people, through their own self-interest, to engage in commerce that will benefit society as a whole. In fact, it is often possible for people to contribute more to society through greed and an attempt to profit, than through pure altruism. Profit opportunities are created by market inefficiencies and, by seeking to maximize their profits, entrepreneurs will attempt to capitalize on these profit opportunities and will fix these inefficiencies, often without understanding what they are doing. While Smith is certainly a fan of letting markets and entrepreneurs work freely he is not a proponent of laissez-faire economics. He is very distrustful of corporations and argues that the biggest potential downfall of any economic system is collusion between businesses to drive prices up. He believes that a watchful eye needs to be kept on all businesses and that the government needs to be careful in making policies that might favor one firm over another. There is so much more that could be said about The Wealth of Nations, but it should be sufficient to say that any person interested in economics owes it to themselves to read at least the first book of Smith’s work. They may have been revolutionary at the time, but his ideas laid the foundation for the entire field of economics and it remains relevant today.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Published originally in 1776, this is the first book length study of political economy. But in addition to laying the theoretical groundwork for the field, it contains a lively account of economic history, and Smith’s opinions on monopolies, government economic policy, taxes, trade associations, and what he felt were the justices and injustices of the existing European polices and systems.“It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.” Adam Smith. The Wealth of Nations Bk 5 Ch 2 Pt 2.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As I think I noted elsewhere, i was struck by the fact that Smith seemed more physiocratic rather than free-enterprise; his real opponent was what we would now call "crony capitalism" --businessmen manipulating government for their own profit.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The book that launched a thousand theories. Mr.Smith over explains some of them like the price theory. Interesting view of the world of those times.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Actually, the full title is An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations -- perhaps the longest reading everyone should finish. Every basic economic concept is directly addressed or at least touched upon by this work. However, most of the text involves an endless series of examples using commodities, prices, and laws from the 18th century. Adam Smith covers division of labor early on (it's worth noting that his famous pin factory is brought up within the first 20 pages) and moves through international trade, taxation, public goods, and politics of that time. As this was published in 1776, it is most interesting to note his discussion of the recent "disturbances" in the colonies. Towards the end of the 900 pages he further encourages that the Irish and American people should be willing to pay more in taxes. In discussing wage prices, his discourse about the payment of soldiers and sailors was quite interesting. Both take the position for the non-pecuniary benefit of a slight chance for a large payback in glory, with the soldier getting a greater chance but not facing the competition a sailor's place has in light of the large merchant trade. Smith's discussion of laws and business special interest groups shows that not that much has changed. For example, the wool lobby had such laws prohibiting export of unprocessed wool, prohibiting transport within certain miles of certain coasts, prohibiting transport in darkness, and requiring containment only in leather or cloth bags with "WOOL" written on the outside in letters at least 3 inches wide. Other concepts covered: money, rent, profits, economic efficiency (the invisible hand), education, roads, efficient taxation, examples involving trade restrictions, special interest groups, and factors affecting price supply, and demand.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5According to the introduction Adam Smith was the “first modern economist” and “widely credited with laying the theoretical and philosophical foundation for the modern free market system” and “commercial society." He famously wrote that "It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest." And that by pursuing their own interest in competition with others, entrepreneurs are “led by an invisible hand” by economic forces to create a variety of goods and services that benefit the public. But even Karl Marx used ideas of Smith in arguing for communism--particularly his key idea of the labor theory of value can be traced to Smith--as was Marx's idea of the “alienation” of the worker. As the introduction put it, Smith was concerned about the “deformation of humans due to tedious and repetitive work.” He was also concerned about how business interests would use their potential monopoly power--particularly in how they might use politics against the consumer: The proposal of any new law or regulation of commerce which comes from this [business] order, ought always to be listened to with great precaution, and ought never be adopted till after having been long and carefully examined, not only with the most scrupulous, but with the most suspicious attention.What struck me from the first about the book was how flowing and lucid it was to read. I’m not saying there aren’t difficult, dry passages--there are. But if you take the time, it is understandable without reading some Adam Smith for Dummies, and believe me, having read several books of philosophy and economics I appreciated that. And actually I found a lot of the reading quite lively. Like Darwin (and unlike Marx), Smith isn’t just erudite and well-read, but speaks of his personal observations, and in that regard his portrait of a pin-making factory and how it illustrates the efficiencies of the division of labor was very memorable. For Smith such specialization and the gains in productivity are key to the wealth of nations. And I found it interesting Smith stresses geography, not race, as the ultimate reason for differences of wealth between nations--particularly its role in access to markets as there ports and navigable rivers are crucial. An explanation not just enlightened for his time, but anticipating much-lauded recent arguments by Landes in The Wealth and Poverty of Nations and Diamond in Guns, Germs and Steel. Smith’s explanation of the formation and role of money still is among the most lucid and still rings true. All this is to say that Smith is quite readable and enormously influential, and thus well-worth the read. If anything might put a reader off, it’s the sheer length, since complete unabridged editions run to around 600 pages. And as I admit above, I’m not saying some of it isn’t a slog--just that it’s worth it if you want to educate yourself about the basis of modern economics; this is definitely where to start. At the very least, see if you can read an excerpt containing his description of a Pin Factory. It's clear, interesting, short, and influenced both free market and socialist thinkers.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A complicated, multi-layered, cognitive, and deep piece of work surrounding economics. Adam Smith denotes many different facets of the overall broad scope that he sweeps across. Hard to understand, and dense, but worth the read for anyone interested in the subject. The last sections were especially poignant to me.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I just wanted to know what neoliberalism was, and ended up picking up this audiobook. In 1776, the economy was already quite complex, it turns out. I also enjoyed the description of the first types of money in the times of the Roman Empire. For example, copper rods. They had certain properties: were standard, durable, and could be cut in smaller pieces.
The book is long, but most of its bulk is filled with examples that Adam Smith gave to illustrate his examples. I suppose it's because the book was revolutionary for his times, and he needed all the supporting evidence he could get. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5History and Economy This is a review of the audiobook. Adam Smith’s work is a reflection about the history and the economy of the europeans states in the XVIII century. The author laid his principles on economic analysis throughout an exposition of historical facts carefully chosen in order to demonstrate his main thesis: public and private wealth flourish in an environment of liberty. One must not be a specialist in economy to understand the book, though some knowledge of history helps to follow the author’s line of thought. The section of the book in which Adam Smith examines the role played by the americans colonies in the economic development of the europeans states is quite interesting and reminds me of Eduardo Galeano’s book, The Open Veins of Latin American. Despite the poor quality of the recording, the audiobook is worth listening.