Unavailable
Unavailable
Unavailable
Audiobook12 hours
Three Empires on the Nile: The Victorian Jihad, 1869-1899
Written by Dominic Green
Narrated by Stephen Hoye
Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
3.5/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this audiobook
A secular regime is toppled by Western intervention, but an Islamic backlash turns the liberators into occupiers. Caught between interventionists at home and fundamentalists abroad, a prime minister flounders as his ministers betray him, alliances fall apart, and a runaway general makes policy in the field. As the media accuse Western soldiers of barbarity and a region slides into chaos, the armies of God clash on an ancient river and an accidental empire arises.
This is not the Middle East of the early twenty-first century. It is Africa in the late nineteenth century, when the river Nile became the setting for an extraordinary collision between Europeans, Arabs, and Africans. A human and religious drama, the conflict defined the modern relationship between the West and the Islamic world. The story is not only essential for understanding the modern clash of civilizations but is also a gripping, epic, tragic adventure.
Three Empires on the Nile tells of the rise of the first modern Islamic state and its fateful encounter with the British Empire of Queen Victoria. Ever since the self-proclaimed Islamic messiah known as the Mahdi gathered an army in the Sudan and besieged and captured Khartoum under its British overlord Charles Gordon, the dream of a new caliphate has haunted modern Islamists. Today, Shiite insurgents call themselves the Mahdi Army, and Sudan remains one of the great fault lines of battle between Muslims and Christians, blacks and Arabs. The nineteenth-century origins of it all were even more dramatic and strange than today's headlines.
In the hands of Dominic Green, the story of the Nile's three empires is an epic in the tradition of Kipling, the bard of empire, and Winston Churchill, who fought in the final destruction of the Mahdi's army. It is a sweeping and very modern tale of God and globalization, slavers and strategists, missionaries and messianists. A pro-Western regime collapses from its own corruption, a jihad threatens the global economy, a liberation movement degenerates into a tyrannical cult, military intervention goes wrong, and a temporary occupation lasts for decades. In the rise and fall of empires, we see a parable for our own times and a reminder that, while American military involvement in the Islamic world is the beginning of a new era for America, it is only the latest chapter in an older story for the people of the region.
This is not the Middle East of the early twenty-first century. It is Africa in the late nineteenth century, when the river Nile became the setting for an extraordinary collision between Europeans, Arabs, and Africans. A human and religious drama, the conflict defined the modern relationship between the West and the Islamic world. The story is not only essential for understanding the modern clash of civilizations but is also a gripping, epic, tragic adventure.
Three Empires on the Nile tells of the rise of the first modern Islamic state and its fateful encounter with the British Empire of Queen Victoria. Ever since the self-proclaimed Islamic messiah known as the Mahdi gathered an army in the Sudan and besieged and captured Khartoum under its British overlord Charles Gordon, the dream of a new caliphate has haunted modern Islamists. Today, Shiite insurgents call themselves the Mahdi Army, and Sudan remains one of the great fault lines of battle between Muslims and Christians, blacks and Arabs. The nineteenth-century origins of it all were even more dramatic and strange than today's headlines.
In the hands of Dominic Green, the story of the Nile's three empires is an epic in the tradition of Kipling, the bard of empire, and Winston Churchill, who fought in the final destruction of the Mahdi's army. It is a sweeping and very modern tale of God and globalization, slavers and strategists, missionaries and messianists. A pro-Western regime collapses from its own corruption, a jihad threatens the global economy, a liberation movement degenerates into a tyrannical cult, military intervention goes wrong, and a temporary occupation lasts for decades. In the rise and fall of empires, we see a parable for our own times and a reminder that, while American military involvement in the Islamic world is the beginning of a new era for America, it is only the latest chapter in an older story for the people of the region.
Unavailable
Author
Dominic Green
Dominic Green studied English Literature at St. John's College, Oxford. After a brief career as a jazz guitarist in London, he returned to academia to pursue graduate study in the history of religion at Harvard University. He lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
More audiobooks from Dominic Green
The Religious Revolution: The Birth of Modern Spirituality, 1848-1898 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThree Empires on the Nile: The Victorian Jihad, 1869-1899 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Three Empires on the Nile
Related audiobooks
A Commonwealth of Thieves: The Improbable Birth of Australia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Crusade: The Epic Voyages of Vasco da Gama Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Explorers of the Nile: The Triumph and Tragedy of a Great Victorian Adventure Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ottoman Endgame: War, Revolution, and the Making of the Modern Middle East, 1908-1923 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Vienna 1814: How the Conquerors of Napoleon Made Love, War, and Peace at the Congress of Vienna Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5March 1917: On the Brink of War and Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5French Senegal: The History of the French Colony and Senegal’s Transition to Independence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sea and Civilization: A Maritime History of the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51494: How a Family Feud in Medieval Spain Divided the World in Half Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Crossroads of Civilization: A History of Vienna Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Windrush Scandal: The History of the Modern Controversy and Race Relations in the British Empire Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Smyrna, September 1922: The American Mission to Rescue Victims of the 20th Century's First Genocide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sultan and the Queen: The Untold Story of Elizabeth and Islam Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ambassador Morgenthau's Story Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Anglo-Ashanti Wars: The History and Legacy of the Conflicts Between the British and the Ashanti Empire in Africa Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Land Beyond the Border: State Formation and Territorial Expansion in Syria, Morocco, and Israel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Rise and Fall of Alexandria: Birthplace of the Modern Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bad-Ass Librarians of Timbuktu: And Their Race to Save the World's Most Precious Manuscripts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Black Joke: One Ship's Battle Against the Slave Trade Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Black Nile: One Man's Amazing Journey Through Peace and War on the World's Longest River Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Until We Have Won Our Liberty: South Africa after Apartheid Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPirates of Barbary: Corsairs, Conquests and Captivity in the Seventeenth-Century Mediterranean Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Italian Invasion of Ethiopia: A Captivating Guide to Mussolini's War in Abyssinia Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Field of Blood: The Battle for Aleppo and the Remaking of the Medieval Middle East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dancing in the Glory of Monsters: The Collapse of the Congo and the Great War of Africa Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Millionaires' Unit: The Aristocratic Flyboys Who Fought the Great War and Invented American Air Power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Empires of the Weak: The Real Story of European Expansion and the Creation of the New World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From Conquest to Colony: Empire, Wealth, and Difference in Eighteenth-Century Brazil Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Middle Eastern History For You
The Genius of Israel: The Surprising Resilience of a Divided Nation in a Turbulent World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Israel: A Simple Guide to the Most Misunderstood Country on Earth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Palestine Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Israel: A Concise History of a Nation Reborn Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Hundred Years' War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917–2017 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Persian Fire: The First World Empire and the Battle for the West Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Enemies and Neighbors: Arabs and Jews in Palestine and Israel, 1917-2017 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: A Very Short Introduction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes: Cultural Studies in the Gospels Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Palestine Peace Not Apartheid: Peace Not Apartheid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Except for Palestine: The Limits of Progressive Politics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Shortest History of Israel and Palestine: From Zionism to Intifadas and the Struggle for Peace Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Biggest Prison on Earth: A History of the Occupied Territories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Day in the Life of Abed Salama: Anatomy of a Jerusalem Tragedy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From Beirut to Jerusalem Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In the Shadow of the Sword: The Birth of Islam and the Rise of the Global Arab Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Generation Kill Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Letters to My Palestinian Neighbor Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5History of Israel – Palestine Conflict Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Palestine: A Four Thousand Year History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Mossad: The History and Legacy of Israel’s National Intelligence Agency Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Babylon: Mesopotamia and the Birth of Civilization Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Terrorist Factory: ISIS, the Yazidi Genocide, and Exporting Terror Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Islam: A Short History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Arc of a Covenant: The United States, Israel, and the Fate of the Jewish People Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Three Empires on the Nile
Rating: 3.6666666666666665 out of 5 stars
3.5/5
3 ratings2 reviews
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5This was one of those books that seems to overlap with lots of others I've read (history of the Suez Canal, history of the European exploration of the Nile, history of Sudan etc), but somehow it doesn't manage to add anything new or memorable. I am surprised because I selected the book expecting to get new insights into the characters involved in the origins of modern Egypt and Sudan. However, the author relies on fairly tired standard sources. Worse, there isn't much critical examination of the relative reliability of those sources, so a variety of old chestnuts get tossed out without any collaborating evidence. Not a bad book, just not anything new or engaging if you've already done any reading on the area and probably not enough narrative coherence if it's new material to the reader.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5This book deserves a longer review than I really have the time for. It is a popular history about the contest for domination over the Nile (Egypt and Sudan) in the late Victorian period which involved 3 (4 actually, or even 6 if you include Abyssinia) empires: The Egyptian, the British, the French and the short-lived Mahdist empire in the Sudan. Generally the pros are that it is a well written, fairly well researched and exciting history about a place and time of great interest. The author manages the difficult task of packing in a great deal of detail about a great deal of different people and events spread across several continents, while never letting the pace of the narrative lag. The action is relentless and we're always in the thick of it, whether its a battle in the Sudan, intrigue in Alexandria, or a parliamentary debate in London. Its accessible in style and I suspect even readers with the most fleeting acquaintance with the era would be able to pick it up and immerse themselves very quickly in the world (or worlds) that Dominic Green describes.However there are also a number of cons. The superficial attempt to give the story a contemporary resonance (thankfully limited to the introduction, the afterword and the blurb on the back) by mentioning Darfur and current political events doesn't really work. One suspects the publisher's marketing arm has had a hand in this. Another drawback is that primary sources (of which admittedly there are a plethora) are limited to English and French. One suspects that this may skew the narrative's perspective in a certain way. For example, the move by the Egyptian nationalists led by Urabi Pasha to end forced labour (the corvee) of poor peasants (the fellahin) to the state and Khedive is presented as a cynical ploy to win over support against the Khedive and his foreign backers. However Charles Gordon's re-legalization of slavery in the Sudan is presented as a necessary measure to win tribal support away from the rebels. Both actions are open to different interpretations. In fact I suspect many Egyptians would be pretty unhappy about the portrayal of Urabi Pasha in this book. Urabi Pasha's appeal to the British and French to not intervene in Egypt and pledge to repay Egyptian loans is scoffed at as unrealistic and barely worthy of contemplation, while swift, efficient British action is the order of the day. After the British occupation installs Lord Cromer in power, he is repeatedly praised for being a prudent and efficient administrator who is able to finally put Egyptian finances back on track. Later its briefly mentioned that only a rescheduling of the loans prevented a default. One can't help wondering what the nationalists would have achieved had they been allowed to rule the country and been given the same kind of breathing space vis a vis foreign debt when the Egyptian modernizers were still in charge. Egyptian anger at Cromer's austerity measures are also treated by the author as typical Egyptian obstructionism and inability to run a rational and thrifty administration. As we see in our own day, drastic austerity measures can and often do cause harm to people and are often opposed for very sound reasons. For example (one the author doesn't bother to mention), one of Cromer's austerity measures was to end free public education for girls, which had first been instituted in the 1870s. The number of government-run secondary girls schools was also reduced during the period of British rule. Lord Cromer actually justified these measures by saying that in an Islamic society, girls didn't need an education. Lord Cromer's relationship as the scion of the Baring family (owners of Barings bank, the dominant British merchant bank throughout most of the 19th century) and his connection with the British banking financial elite is not only considered unproblematic and a possible conflict of interest, but a mark in his favour. For the author modernity and liberalism march unreservedly hand in hand with free trade and British administration (though to his credit the author does mention the opium wars which "opened up" China to the British trade in opium as a somewhat problematic aspect of British free market ideology).Some of the major characters that feature prominently in the events seem to be almost caricatures and the portraits we get of them don't seem to explain all their actions or words (e.g. Lord Cromer cared first and foremost about setting Egyptian finances on a sound footing and disliked the idea of Charles Gordon being sent to the Sudan... then why did he start agitating on Gordon's behalf later on and calling for an (expensive) military expedition, etc.?) Jamal al-din Afghani comes across as some kind of raving, paranoid occultist terrorist-in-the-making lurking in the background (which may not be too far off actually - did I mention that many of the people featured in this book were very colourful characters!). Charles Gordon comes off somewhat better, but not by much. Again, the author doesn't really offer any convincing kind of explanation of why he quit the governorship of the Sudan in disgust only to return to the task a couple of years later.It is taken as a given, from public pronouncements, that the British Prime Minister Gladstone, and the British government had no desire to permanently occupy Egypt and that this remains the case until several years later when criticism over the "absence" of an Egyptian policy finally forces Britain to formalize its occupation against its will. The idea that the actual obstacle to an earlier permanent occupation was foreign (mostly French) opposition to British rule and France's ability to hamper British control because of the structure of the international debt commission is not entertained. An alternate reading to the reluctant Gladstone finally giving in to political and humanitarian pressure reading of Britain's take over of Egypt is that it was only following the 1881 Berlin Conference which divided up Africa between the European powers, and where Bismarck used "the Egyptian lever" to gain major concessions from the British in return for supporting their claim to Egypt, that Britain finally had the diplomatic muscle to formalize control. France was compensated elsewhere in Africa.Other criticisms are minor. You'd never know from the author's description of the event that the British bombardment of Alexandria caused much damage, so the reader is somewhat surprised to hear several pages on, the admiral of the British fleet being accused of "destroying Alexandria" by another British military officer who is deeply offended that he and the murderous admiral should be given similar honours, or that the bombardment stirred up a controversy at home. At times one suspects the author also sidelines scholarly skepticism in order to tell a good tale. The death of Charles Gordon at Khartoum is a heroic affair, vividly described, and one of the most stirring episodes in the book, but one has to take a glance at the end-notes to discover that the actual circumstances of Gordon's death are disputed, based on differing "eyewitness" accounts. One would prefer that even if he does stick with the account that best suits the purpose of his narrative, the author might at least mention that there is some dispute about whether it is fact or fiction.Overall its a fun book to read and as I said earlier, the events and people it describes are so inherently interesting that its certainly worth reading. However, I feel it isn't entirely problem-free.
1 person found this helpful