Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    True North: Peary, Cook, and the Race to the Pole
    Unavailable
    True North: Peary, Cook, and the Race to the Pole
    Unavailable
    True North: Peary, Cook, and the Race to the Pole
    Audiobook10 hours

    True North: Peary, Cook, and the Race to the Pole

    Published by Penguin Random House Audio

    4/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this audiobook

    In 1909, two men laid rival claims to the North Pole. They had been friends and shipmates, with Frederic Cook, a doctor, accompanying Robert Peary, a civil engineer, on an expedition to northern Greenland in 1891. When Peary's leg was shattered in an accident, Cook took care of him. But all goodwill was gone by the summer of 1909 when Peary said he had reached the Pole in September 1909, while Cooked presented evidence that he had gotten there earlier-in 1908. "What a consummate cur he is," said Robert Peary of Frederick Cook in 1911. Cook responded by saying, "Peary has stooped to every crime from rape to murder." In this wonderfully engaging and researched narrative, Bruce Henderson writes about one of the most enduring and fiery feuds in the history of exploration.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherPenguin Random House Audio
    Release dateApr 19, 2005
    ISBN9781415920404
    Unavailable
    True North: Peary, Cook, and the Race to the Pole

    Related to True North

    Related audiobooks

    History For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      An Epoch-making Idea

      May 13, 2020

      An Epoch-making Idea
      8 min read

    • Article

      With The Camera At Anzac Cove

      Nov 3, 2021

      With The Camera At Anzac Cove
      7 min read

    • Article

      The Quarrelling Explorers

      Aug 25, 2022

      IT’S NO SECRET THAT Australian-born Hamilton Hume and Captain William Hovell, a former British sea captain, weren’t the best of mates. They saw themselves as rivals and quarrelled for much of their 1824 journey from Appin to Port Phillip Bay (now Por

      1 min read

    • Article

      A Difficulty With Identity

      May 12, 2023

      A Difficulty With Identity
      1 min read

    • Article

      The Scout Who (Almost) Never Was

      Nov 21, 2023

      Cephas William “Dick” Parr (1843–1911) never achieved the fame of fellow scout turned showman William Frederick “Buffalo Bill” Cody, though judging by this 1890s publicity photo, Dick struck as dashing a figure. His name is also linked to one of the

      1 min read

    • Article

      Lesson Not Learned?

      Jul 25, 2023

      Lesson Not Learned?
      2 min read

    • Article

      Treasure Trove

      Jan 21, 2021

      Treasure Trove
      8 min read

    • Article

      ‘Ernie Was One Of Us’

      Oct 6, 2020

      ‘Ernie Was One Of Us’
      19 min read

    • Article

      News Bytes

      Jul 1, 2021

      News Bytes
      1 min read

    • Article

      11. Frederick The Great

      Jan 4, 2021

      Frederick John Kempster was born in the London suburb of Bayswater in 1889, the second youngest boy in a large family. On Christmas Day 1897, his father, the milkman Joseph Kempster, died of asthma and bronchitis aged just 50, and his mother soon str

      2 min read

    • Article

      The Mildenhall Treasure

      Nov 5, 2021

      The Mildenhall Treasure
      2 min read

    • Article

      John Brown’s Body

      Apr 18, 2024

      John Brown’s Body
      5 min read

    • Article

      “A Worthy Cause”

      Jul 12, 2022

      “A Worthy Cause”
      11 min read

    • Article

      The Soldier’s Friend

      Oct 6, 2020

      Ernie Pyle always seemed to be in the right place at the right time—until, on April 18, 1945, he wasn’t. That morning, packed in a jeep with Lieutenant Colonel Joseph B. Coolidge and three other U.S. Army officers, he was heading to a command post on

      3 min read

    • Article

      Annversares

      Mar 17, 2022

      Annversares
      5 min read

    • Article

      Captain Gordon’s Holland

      Mar 11, 2022

      For decades, I have dreamt of owning a Holland & Holland. This dream came true in 2021 when an acquaintance put up his vintage 12-gauge Holland & Holland for sale, and I jumped at the opportunity. The gun under discussion is a hammerless, sidelock, n

      10 min read

    • Article

      Too Slick For His Own Good

      Nov 27, 2018

      Too Slick For His Own Good
      4 min read

    • Article

      Family Historians Must Be Heard

      Feb 27, 2024

      Family Historians Must Be Heard
      1 min read

    • Article

      ‘I Have Three Hero Brothers On My Tree’

      May 30, 2023

      She sails like a lost soul on the Arctic Seas – the ghost ship they call the Baychimo. She floats wraith-like among the icebergs and flees, creaking in the teeth of turbulent gales. She always survives, to become once again the fleeting entry in the

      5 min read

    • Article

      To Canada With Love

      Jun 1, 2021

      To Canada With Love
      4 min read

    Reviews for True North

    4/5

    25 ratings3 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      I learned that Peary had discovered the North Pole. Turns out that may not be true. Bruce Hendeson tells the story of Cook and Peary both trying to be the first to reach the North Pole. Both men had worked together on an earlier norther expedition. Cook had parted ways and explored Alaska. Then took a shot at reaching the North Pole. At the same time Peary was organizing another attempt at the unexplored top of the world.
    • 4/5
      It took a little bit to get into this book, but once I did, I listened to it everyday on my way home from work as a way to let go of the thoughts of work. As the polar race progressed, the author's bias did show, but after listening to the whole book, I think some bias towards Cook was really deserved.
      What I learned from this book: Peary was a rat bas*&^d. I shouted this at the CD player more than a few times. He was a rat bas*(&& to his wife, to his obligations with the Navy, to the Eskimo peoples, to anyone else who got in his way of fame in the Arctic, and especially to Cook and anyone associated with Cook. RAT B(*&*&^.
      Cook most likely found the North Pole first, but his proofs could not be found. Peary most likely missed the Pole.
      Polar exploration works much better if you go as a small expedition and work closely with the native peoples, who live there all the time.
      Eventually the truth will out, although it may take a long, long time.
    • 4/5
      True North: Peary, Cook, and the Race to the Pole by Bruce Henderson places itself within the longstanding debate of who reached the North Pole first: Dr. Frederick A. Cook or Navy Officer Robert E. Peary. Both claimed to have reached it within one year of each other, Cook in April of 1908 and Peary in April of 1909. Historically, credit for the North Pole discovery has gone to Peary, and much criticism has been aimed at Cook for fabricating his story. Henderson addresses the possibility that Cook may have reached the Pole first and has thus been cheated of his acclamation. A reexamination of evidence, Henderson hopes, will shed more light on the controversy because recent history has charged that Peary lied about the distances he travelled while Cook has gained merit due to his accurate descriptions of the northern regions verified by later explorers. Henderson begins True North when the two are just children, setting up a foundation to help readers understand the two men and what may have motivated their drive to reach the pole. It is not until the middle of the book, in fact, that the race to the North Pole becomes the focus.Cook and Peary initially worked together to cross and map the Greenland ice cap. Due to conflict during the expedition, Cook decided not to work with Peary again when called upon to do so, instead choosing to lead Greenland expeditions of his own. Peary returned to Greenland to collect iron meteorites sacred to the native people while Cook returned to take up tourist groups of hunters and explorers. Beginning in 1898, Peary made a few failed attempts to reach the North Pole and Cook ventured to the South Pole (1897-1899) and to the summit of Mt. McKinley (1906). During the years in Greenland he spent to achieve his goal, Henderson describes in detail how Peary abused the native people of Greenland, cheated on his wife, and grew increasingly obsessed with fame. Contrasted against this was Cooks modest desire to explore and record. It was not until 1907 that Cook secretly decided to try to reach the North Pole, setting out with two natives and one white man in early 1908, covering the 500 miles in just two months. During the return trip, the Cook explorers got trapped over winter and did not return until 1909. Over the course of this delay, Peary reached the North Pole and claimed the discovery for himself, though he had yet to announce it by the time Cook returned from his expedition. Before Peary was even back from his mission, Cook sent off his own story to a newspaper and proclaimed to the world that he had discovered the North Pole. After Peary declared that he had discovered the North Pole first, it had to be decided who had really done it first, if at all.Back at home, the controversy began when Cook, challenged to produce his data, could not because Peary refused to bring it home on his ship. Embroiled in a smear campaign against his honor, Cook was soon denied notoriety and credit for the discovery of the North Pole, which was given to Peary despite his own questionable data. Though Henderson never explicitly states who he believes discovered the pole and does not take sides throughout the book, it is clear that he believes the honor of the discovery should go to Cook, since it appears from record that he got the closest to the pole. Evident in his depictions of Cook versus Peary, Henderson’s motive is to prove that Cook was indeed cheated out of a victory that was rightfully his. Through Henderson’s descriptions, Peary is shown to be an egotistical and hard-handed man concerned only with fame, with a boisterous attitude and little respect for other people. In opposition, Cook is portrayed as being very humble and quiet, an inventive man who is content to share victory. When the events of the contested pole discovery come about, Henderson details how Cook was thwarted his due by Peary’s sabotage, and raises suspicion for Peary’s claim by pointing out that Peary would not hand over his own notes for inspection before Cook released a statement, insinuating that Peary was getting information from Cook to use in his own dubious notes. As told by Henderson, Cook’s evidence, though he produced no notes as proof and with only a diary and the statements of him and his Eskimo companions to back him up, is still more credible than Peary and the incomplete notes he supplies. It is even insinuated that Peary was responsible for Cook later going to prison for mail fraud because the judge trying the case was a friend of the family. Henderson finishes up his assessment by listing all of the ways in which Cook was right or credible in both his pole and Mt McKinley claims. So, despite Henderson never explicitly stating to support Cook, it comes through in his presentation of facts and their evident bias. Whether or not the facts are true as stated, Henderson clearly wants us to see things a certain way.Henderson’s source usage raises concerns over his presentation of facts and how they support his central purpose. True North is rich in detail and follows the separate and intertwining paths of Cook and Peary closely, even to minute detail. Yet the background provided, including an array of personal stories and emotions too intimate to be part of common knowledge, is given no footnoted documentation, which calls into question the validity of the information, its truthfulness, and whether or not Henderson is being true to the facts and portraying them accurately. A reader would have a difficult time verifying many of the things said and claimed to have happened by Henderson. Henderson does provide a selection of source notes at the end of the book, which serve the purpose of explaining where some of the specific personal statements come from. These are actually very informative and valuable to the credibility of the story because they are all primary sources, sources that come direct from people involved or in the time- they are the words of Cook, of Peary, of people witness to the events in question. There is included a bibliography at the back, but without the aid of footnotes, one cannot tell if the books listed at the end are indeed used and where.True North is a very well written and engaging book, not at all difficult to read and follow. Bruce Henderson is a writer by career with over 20 nonfiction books in his catalog, and he instructs writing classes at Stanford University. Though very skilled at writing, capable of writing a book that is as informative as it is entertaining, it is important to keep in mind that Henderson is not a trained historian and therefore may have approached his subjects with an eye for writing a good story rather than telling balanced fact based history, which would explain his treatment of sources and clear bias. Even with Henderson’s notable favoritism, however, the book does present a complete story and sequence of events for both camps. Additionally, the book is full of information about ice travel, geography, and Eskimo culture. For anyone interested in the lives of Cook and Peary, in Arctic travel, or in exploration in general, True North would be well worth the read.