Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Unavailable
Gun Guys: A Road Trip
Unavailable
Gun Guys: A Road Trip
Unavailable
Gun Guys: A Road Trip
Audiobook14 hours

Gun Guys: A Road Trip

Written by Dan Baum

Narrated by Richard Kind

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

4.5/5

()

Currently unavailable

Currently unavailable

About this audiobook

Here is armed America-a land of machine-gun gatherings in the desert, lederhosened German shooting societies, feral-hog hunts in Texas, and Hollywood gun armories. Whether they're collecting antique weapons, practicing concealed carry, or firing an AR-15 or a Glock at their local range, many Americans love guns-which horrifies and fascinates many other Americans, and much of the rest of the world. This lively, sometimes raucous book explores from the inside the American love affair with firearms.

Dan Baum is both a lifelong gun guy and a Jewish Democrat who grew up in suburban New Jersey feeling like a "child of a bitter divorce with allegiance to both parents." In Gun Guys he grabs his licensed concealed handgun and hits the road to meet some of the 40 percent of Americans who own guns. We meet Rick Ector, a black Detroit autoworker who buys a Smith & Wesson after suffering an armed robbery-then quits his job to preach the gospel of armed self-defense, especially to the resistant black community; Jeremy and Marcey Parker, a young, successful Kentucky couple whose idea of a romantic getaway is the Blue Ridge Mountain 3-Gun Championship in Bowling Green; and Aaron Zelman, head of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership. Baum also travels to New Orleans, where he enters the world of a man disabled by a bullet, and to Chicago to interview a killer. Along the way, he takes us to gun shows, gun stores, and shooting ranges trying to figure out why so many of us love these things and why they inspire such passions.

In the tradition of Confederates in the Attic and Among the Thugs, Baum brings an entire world to life. Written equally for avid shooters and those who would never touch a firearm, Gun Guys is more than a travelogue. It gives a fresh assessment of the heated politics surrounding guns, one that will challenge and inform people on all sides of the issue.  This may be the first book that goes beyond gun politics to illuminate the visceral appeal of guns-an original, perceptive, and surprisingly funny journey through American gun culture.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateMar 5, 2013
ISBN9780385363105
Unavailable
Gun Guys: A Road Trip

Related to Gun Guys

Related audiobooks

Shooting & Hunting For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Gun Guys

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5/5

6 ratings4 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    For starters, I have little to no interest in guns and have generally gravitated to the anti-gun side of the argument, but this book was a paradigm shifter for me; an introduction to all aspects of gun culture presented in a reasoned, sane, humorous, and intelligent fashion. I have a much better understanding of guns, gun people, guns in the media, and the politics behind it all. Each chapter unfolded to reveal a new aspect and another view that I had never considered. If all polarized political issues were presented in such an engaging fashion, we would be living in a more harmonious world. I hope that a lot of people read this one. SRH
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    For starters, I have little to no interest in guns and have generally gravitated to the anti-gun side of the argument, but this book was a paradigm shifter for me; an introduction to all aspects of gun culture presented in a reasoned, sane, humorous, and intelligent fashion. I have a much better understanding of guns, gun people, guns in the media, and the politics behind it all. Each chapter unfolded to reveal a new aspect and another view that I had never considered. If all polarized political issues were presented in such an engaging fashion, we would be living in a more harmonious world. I hope that a lot of people read this one.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Dan Baum has spent a lot of time trying to reconcile his two halves and, in a sense, two halves of America. There's liberal Jewish Democrat Baum and there's Baum who's had a love of guns and shooting since he was five years old. He thinks the rift in his soul is a rift in America, that, if he can explain why guns are important to so many of us, maybe he can get his friends, family, and political allies to understand and accept - as in not trying to ban and control - guns. And, maybe, those of us who like guns will become less suspicious of his politics. We'll all unite in attacking the future in a Progressive way.Gun lovers and conservatives really aren't the target here for this book. Stereotypical liberals are.This is not a book retreading criminological statistics (a brief chapter of footnotes covers that). Baum talks to people, except for members of the military or police, to whom guns are important.I'm not a hardcore gun enthusiast, but I am a lifetime NRA member and have hung out at shooting ranges in three states. Many of the encounters Baum describes remind me of people I've meant then: hunters, competitive shooters, those interested in the technology of guns, preppers and survivalists, doctors - perhaps learning another way to "manage death" as one puts it, and guys who let complete strangers fire their new $9,000 gun. He also talks to four types of gun guys you would not readily think of: a weapons master for Hollywood productions, an engineer who became an evangelizer of gun ownership to his fellow blacks after he was robbed at gunpoint, a former Chicago gang member once jailed for shooting a man (and the only interview subject who has actually been shot), and a Jew who published academic works showing the direct inspiration of Nazi gun control laws on American gun control legislation and the role of gun control in fostering genocide in several countries -works pretty much ignored by every side of the gun debate. This is an honest, thorough, fun book.These aren't dry interviews. Baum is funny and knows how to tell a story. Maybe, since he already related his own hunting stories, the "Hogzilla" chapter about hunting wild pigs in Texas wasn't strictly necessary, but it's the funniest of the book. He careens across the country starting out enthusiastically (and legally) packing a pistol in the Whole Foods Market in Boulder - and disappointingly noting no reaction - and ending up at NRA headquarters.The matter of the NRA brings up one problem of the book. Baum constantly harps on people wanting to arm themselves out of fear of crime - even while crime rates are going down. He sees the NRA as exaggerating crime for political ends instead of concentrating on useful gun safety programs. The importance of maintaining a legal right and ability of armed self-defense no matter what the level of present personal danger is doesn't seem to occur to him.Baum also spends a lot of time pointing out that Democrats and the Obama administration have given up on gun control. Indeed, he points out the Obama administration's only action on guns was to make it easier to carry concealed weapons in national parks. While he does acknowledge the futility and ignorance behind the Feinstein "assault weapons" ban, he says that's in the past. Obama and his political allies don't want to confiscate guns and restrict Second Amendment rights. That's just NRA fear mongering to get donations.Of course, history has invalidated that viewpoint post-Sandy Hook. The NRA's fears turned out to be entirely justified. Gun-grabbing is in the DNA of many Democrats though, in fairness to Baum, I have met other Democrat and Obama supporters who like guns. I would dearly like to know how Baum would revise his book in light of recent history. His Democrat party has made gun control a priority again. His native state of Colorado has passed significant gun control legislation.To his credit, Baum, at the end, begins to maybe see that many people in America are feeling "overmanaged and under-respected" in many areas, that their exasperated rhetoric often sounds like gun owners. Will he have a change of heart? I'm afraid that, like one of his interviewees, I think most political opinions are almost genetic, emotion based, rationalized with a patina of reason and very refractory. That goes for opinions on guns.To be honest, while I'd like to hope Baum will change the minds of his fellow liberals, I don't think he will. I think gun guys will be the ones that most enjoy this book.There is one theme running through this book which is interesting no matter which side of the debate you are on. Baum says that the experience of frequently carrying a weapon calmed him, made him more observant, and even more eager to avoid a confrontation. It seems that there might be something to be said for managing death, truly and practically considering the consequences of that power. One of his subjects thinks this is what links the place of the gun in American culture to the respect and mythic place the samurai has in Japan or the medieval knight in Europe.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Baum is a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, except that he loves guns. And he agrees with gun guys that liberal distaste for guns is a matter of taste, since he argues that the effect of guns on crime can’t really be proven. (He has less to say about the effect of guns on suicide and accidental death, where he agrees that gun guys have fallen down in promoting responsibility as a gun owner’s social duty; he argues that social pressure should make poor gun storage socially unacceptable, like smoking at someone else’s house. He doesn’t mention “like driving drunk,” because of course that was both a social and a legal change, though he does suggest that rational gun owners ought to support the criminalization of reckless failure to secure guns.) I feel some sympathy for his ‘don’t target responsible gun owners’ (but for what? What exactly are they being targeted for?) position and for his argument that supporting gun restrictions has put a barrier between many lower-middle-class (white) voters and the Democratic party they should naturally support. But I feel like I’m being asked to make yet another deal with the devil (since the Democrats’ pact with Wall Street has gone so well), and I wondered why in his road trip to talk to gun owners and figure out what was up with them, he never did seek out the irresponsible ones whose kids shoot themselves or other kids. He did randomly encounter a guy who was put in a wheelchair by his own gun (his girlfriend shot him with a gun that he thought didn’t have a bullet chambered), and he sought out a former gang member who’d been shot, but he never manages to integrate these people or the “irresponsible” gun owners he generally condemns (including the drunken shooters who ricochet bullets down on him and his wife during a rafting trip as they shoot bullets at a rock face) with his insistence that carrying a gun makes him a more responsible, careful individual, always aware of his surroundings. I accept that this is true for him (though not for the security guards who leave their guns in restrooms, or the firearms instructor Baum encounters who forgets that her gun is loaded, or for that matter my brother-in-law whose friend accidentally discharged his gun in my brother-in-law’s apartment).But that very fact—that carrying a gun changes a person—is another way of saying that a person with a gun is a different socio/cultural/technical entity than a person without a gun, and not always for the better; because of this, regulating the gun can change how the person behaves and even how the person sees him or herself. He imagines how guns can fend off crimes—for example inducing carriers to deescalate and avoid confrontation because any confrontation could become deadly—but never how they could make crimes worse. Baum ultimately argues that we need warriors—sheepdogs, is his other term—in our culture. But why do they need so many guns? If the argument is that Americans, unlike, say, Japanese or Australians, need lots of civilian guns to make each other behave, then shouldn’t we be taking a harder look at what we might be doing differently so that this need would diminish?