Judges and Courts: A Look at the Judicial Branch
Written by Kathiann M. Kowalski
Narrated by Intuitive
3/5
()
About this audiobook
What is the judicial branch? It's the part of government that's in charge of our courts. But just what do the courts do? And how do they affect your daily life? Read this book to find out.
Kathiann M. Kowalski
Kathiann M. Kowalski has spent fifteen years practicing law. She holds a bachelor's degree in political science from Hofstra University. She received her law degree from Harvard Law School, where she was a member of the Harvard Law Review.
Related to Judges and Courts
Related audiobooks
The Supremes' Greatest Hits, 2nd Revised & Updated Edition: The 44 Supreme Court Cases That Most Directly Affect Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The American Judicial System: A Very Short Introduction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The American Legal Experience Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Supreme Court: An Up-To-The-Minute Presentation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWho Decides?: States as Laboratories of Constitutional Experimentation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerican Epic: Reading the U.S. Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Checks and Balances: A Look at the Powers of Government Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Read the Constitution--and Why Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge's View Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Law in America: A Short History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When the Government Breaks Its Own Laws Audiobook
Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When the Government Breaks Its Own Laws
byAndrew P. NapolitanoRating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5National Ballot Measures 2024: Living Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings51 Imperfect Solutions: States and the Making of American Constitutional Law Audiobook
51 Imperfect Solutions: States and the Making of American Constitutional Law
byJeffrey S. SuttonRating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Justices Behind Roe V. Wade: The Inside Story, Adapted from The Brethren Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Nation of Sheep Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dred Scott's Revenge: A Legal History of Race and Freedom in America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Conviction Machine: Standing Up to Federal Prosecutorial Abuse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A User's Guide to Democracy: How America Works Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsU.S. Constitution for Dummies: 2nd Edition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Congress: A Look at the Legislative Branch Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat We Know: Solutions from Our Experiences in the Justice System Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUsual Cruelty: The Complicity of Lawyers in the Criminal Justice System Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Landmark Supreme Court Decisions and How They Impact Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Legal Proceedings: Being a Witness, Deponent, Plaintiff or Defendant Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Children's For You
Learn Spanish with Paul Noble for Beginners – Complete Course: Spanish Made Easy with Your 1 million-best-selling Personal Language Coach Audiobook
Learn Spanish with Paul Noble for Beginners – Complete Course: Spanish Made Easy with Your 1 million-best-selling Personal Language Coach
byPaul NobleRating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Welcome to Dead House (Classic Goosebumps #13) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5New Kid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hold a Cockroach: A book for those who are free and don't know it Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Lost Heir (Wings of Fire #2) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Writing: Four Principles for Great Writing that Everyone Needs to Know Audiobook
The Art of Writing: Four Principles for Great Writing that Everyone Needs to Know
byPeter YangRating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anne of Green Gables Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Learn Spanish with Paul Noble for Beginners – Part 1: Spanish Made Easy with Your 1 million-best-selling Personal Language Coach Audiobook
Learn Spanish with Paul Noble for Beginners – Part 1: Spanish Made Easy with Your 1 million-best-selling Personal Language Coach
byPaul NobleRating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Hunger Games Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Spanish Short Stories: 20 Captivating Spanish Short Stories for Beginners While Improving Your Listening, Growing Your Vocabulary and Have Fun Audiobook
Spanish Short Stories: 20 Captivating Spanish Short Stories for Beginners While Improving Your Listening, Growing Your Vocabulary and Have Fun
bySergio RodriguezRating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Catching Fire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mockingjay Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Bear Called Paddington Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5City of Ghosts (City of Ghosts #1) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Amari and the Night Brothers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mouse and the Motorcycle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Out of My Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Series of Unfortunate Events #1 Multi-Voice, A: The Bad Beginning Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Cuentista Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pax Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ground Zero Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary: Thinking, Fast and Slow: by Daniel Kahneman: Key Takeaways, Summary & Analysis Included Audiobook
Summary: Thinking, Fast and Slow: by Daniel Kahneman: Key Takeaways, Summary & Analysis Included
byBrooks BryantRating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Projekt 1065: A Novel of World War II Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bridge to Terabithia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Refugee Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Two Degrees Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Island of the Blue Dolphins Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary and Analysis of The Psychology of Money: Timeless Lessons on Wealth, Greed, and Happiness by Morgan Housel Audiobook
Summary and Analysis of The Psychology of Money: Timeless Lessons on Wealth, Greed, and Happiness by Morgan Housel
byBOOK TIGERSRating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related podcast episodes
HS 345 - FBF – The Proper Constitutional Role of a Juror with Roger Roots Podcast episode
HS 345 - FBF – The Proper Constitutional Role of a Juror with Roger Roots
byHolistic Survival Show - Economic Crisis0 ratings0% found this document usefulIt’s either the courts or our civilization Ep. 218: In this episode, we unload on the judicial crisis unfolding before our eyes, as the courts issue one civilization-killing opinion after another every few hours. We go through the history of judicial review and distinguish it from judicial supremacy. We explore some solutions for judicial reform, such as mandatory appeals of any lower court ruling on political issues. Today was also oral argument day for the immigration pause executive order at the Supreme Court. We explain why a 5-4 “victory” won’t be much of a victory in the long-run and how unless the courts are kicked out of immigration, the lower courts will continue doing their thing. There are many reasons why the courts are a sure thing for the Left and why merely “selecting better judges” never changes the arc of the jurisprudential velocity. Finally, we end with a discussion of Alfie Evans and how, unless we change the power of the courts and the power of government ove Podcast episode
It’s either the courts or our civilization Ep. 218: In this episode, we unload on the judicial crisis unfolding before our eyes, as the courts issue one civilization-killing opinion after another every few hours. We go through the history of judicial review and distinguish it from judicial supremacy. We explore some solutions for judicial reform, such as mandatory appeals of any lower court ruling on political issues. Today was also oral argument day for the immigration pause executive order at the Supreme Court. We explain why a 5-4 “victory” won’t be much of a victory in the long-run and how unless the courts are kicked out of immigration, the lower courts will continue doing their thing. There are many reasons why the courts are a sure thing for the Left and why merely “selecting better judges” never changes the arc of the jurisprudential velocity. Finally, we end with a discussion of Alfie Evans and how, unless we change the power of the courts and the power of government ove
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulThe Massacre in the Federal Courts and the Lack of a Breaking Point | 3/19/24 Podcast episode
The Massacre in the Federal Courts and the Lack of a Breaking Point | 3/19/24
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulThe Courts are Destroying this Country and We are Letting it Happen. Ep117: Between the courts setting immigration policy, national security policy, election law, social policy, redistricting, and criminal justice policy, we no longer live in a republic. The lower courts, not just the Supreme Court, stand above the other branches of government and the 50 states. But how did this happen? How can the other branches, which have more robust powers, get rolled by courts created by Congress? In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, we explore the recent immigration rulings and some other cases to demonstrate how the judicial crisis stems from a political crisis whereby the other branches of government are needlessly giving in to the courts. In fact, as it relates to the Fourth Circuit opinion on Trump’s executive order, the administration is giving the courts even more than they ask for. At some point, could we really blame the courts for grabbing power that is handed to th Podcast episode
The Courts are Destroying this Country and We are Letting it Happen. Ep117: Between the courts setting immigration policy, national security policy, election law, social policy, redistricting, and criminal justice policy, we no longer live in a republic. The lower courts, not just the Supreme Court, stand above the other branches of government and the 50 states. But how did this happen? How can the other branches, which have more robust powers, get rolled by courts created by Congress? In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, we explore the recent immigration rulings and some other cases to demonstrate how the judicial crisis stems from a political crisis whereby the other branches of government are needlessly giving in to the courts. In fact, as it relates to the Fourth Circuit opinion on Trump’s executive order, the administration is giving the courts even more than they ask for. At some point, could we really blame the courts for grabbing power that is handed to th
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulJeffrey S. Sutton, "Who Decides?: States As Laboratories of Constitutional Experimentation" (Oxford UP, 2021): An interview with Jeffrey S. Sutton Podcast episode
Jeffrey S. Sutton, "Who Decides?: States As Laboratories of Constitutional Experimentation" (Oxford UP, 2021): An interview with Jeffrey S. Sutton
byNew Books in Law0 ratings0% found this document usefulPractical Equality: Robert L. Tsai: “It’s important to be practical and hard-nosed about equality and justice.” Podcast episode
Practical Equality: Robert L. Tsai: “It’s important to be practical and hard-nosed about equality and justice.”
byFuture Hindsight0 ratings0% found this document usefulJeffrey S. Sutton, "Who Decides?: States As Laboratories of Constitutional Experimentation" (Oxford UP, 2021): An interview with Jeffrey S. Sutton Podcast episode
Jeffrey S. Sutton, "Who Decides?: States As Laboratories of Constitutional Experimentation" (Oxford UP, 2021): An interview with Jeffrey S. Sutton
byNew Books in Public Policy0 ratings0% found this document usefulHow Pro-Abortion District Attorneys Aim to Derail Pro-Life Laws Podcast episode
How Pro-Abortion District Attorneys Aim to Derail Pro-Life Laws
byThe Daily Signal Podcast0 ratings0% found this document usefulJeffrey S. Sutton, "Who Decides?: States As Laboratories of Constitutional Experimentation" (Oxford UP, 2021): An interview with Jeffrey S. Sutton Podcast episode
Jeffrey S. Sutton, "Who Decides?: States As Laboratories of Constitutional Experimentation" (Oxford UP, 2021): An interview with Jeffrey S. Sutton
byNew Books in Political Science0 ratings0% found this document usefulWhy Do We Have An Unelected Super Legislature? The Runaway Federal Courts: Nowhere in the Constitution does it describe an unelected super legislature who is tasked with determining what is and isn't Constitutional but that is exactly what we have with the federal courts and especially the Supreme Court. The concept of judicial review started as a controversial function that would sometimes be used by the Supreme Court, but today it seems all societal and legislative questions find their answer through the courts. Daniel and Joe discuss the courts and the impact they have on America, our laws, and the future of the Republic. Podcast episode
Why Do We Have An Unelected Super Legislature? The Runaway Federal Courts: Nowhere in the Constitution does it describe an unelected super legislature who is tasked with determining what is and isn't Constitutional but that is exactly what we have with the federal courts and especially the Supreme Court. The concept of judicial review started as a controversial function that would sometimes be used by the Supreme Court, but today it seems all societal and legislative questions find their answer through the courts. Daniel and Joe discuss the courts and the impact they have on America, our laws, and the future of the Republic.
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulSun 14 Jan, 2024: Busy Times - Insurrection Act - Overreach - Amendment IX - Ballot Battles - Fake Riot - Being Heard: With so many psyops in play, we are still being heard very loudly. Relevant and important details are now seen by the people. Waiting and watching what happens in Colorado. The Google suit is progressing, among others. How can a judicial system fall... Podcast episode
Sun 14 Jan, 2024: Busy Times - Insurrection Act - Overreach - Amendment IX - Ballot Battles - Fake Riot - Being Heard: With so many psyops in play, we are still being heard very loudly. Relevant and important details are now seen by the people. Waiting and watching what happens in Colorado. The Google suit is progressing, among others. How can a judicial system fall...
byThe Tore Says Show0 ratings0% found this document usefulHow Trump’s Justice Department Can Stand up to the Crazy Courts Ep 79: Starting things off on this episode of the Conservative Conscience, Daniel gives a rundown of examples showing the establishing winning more control in the nascent Trump administration. What was once a promise to drain the swamp is looking more and more like an exercise in making the worst elements of the swamp great again. While it’s important to fight for a few key conservative victories that are within reach, we must also voice our concerns early and often about harmful policies and personnel. We can’t afford to wait six years to pushback against “our own party” like we did during the Bush years. Next, we move onto our latest update on judicial tyranny. There is no way to sugar-coat this. The federal courts pose an imminent threat to our republic. It’s worse than ever. The courts are destroying our culture, inclinable rights, Constitution, and system of government. They have already redefined marriage and Podcast episode
How Trump’s Justice Department Can Stand up to the Crazy Courts Ep 79: Starting things off on this episode of the Conservative Conscience, Daniel gives a rundown of examples showing the establishing winning more control in the nascent Trump administration. What was once a promise to drain the swamp is looking more and more like an exercise in making the worst elements of the swamp great again. While it’s important to fight for a few key conservative victories that are within reach, we must also voice our concerns early and often about harmful policies and personnel. We can’t afford to wait six years to pushback against “our own party” like we did during the Bush years. Next, we move onto our latest update on judicial tyranny. There is no way to sugar-coat this. The federal courts pose an imminent threat to our republic. It’s worse than ever. The courts are destroying our culture, inclinable rights, Constitution, and system of government. They have already redefined marriage and
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulThe Judicial Emergency Consuming our Sovereignty and Security Ep 91: In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, Daniel rounds up all of this week’s CR content on how the courts are destroying America. Despite the fact that judges have demonstrated they will stop at nothing to enact their social justice agenda through the Constitution, many conservative legal establishment figures are still in love with the courts. They believe they can still win in the courts and make them better simply by appointing better judges. The reality is that we’ve crossed the point of no return with the courts a long time ago. Anything short of wholesale judicial reform will only raise the prominence of the courts and stifle our ability to save American democracy. Key quote: “[T]o the objection that a rejection of a court’s authority would be civil disobedience, the answer is that a court that issues orders without authority engages in an equally dangerous form of civil disobedience.” ~ Rober Podcast episode
The Judicial Emergency Consuming our Sovereignty and Security Ep 91: In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, Daniel rounds up all of this week’s CR content on how the courts are destroying America. Despite the fact that judges have demonstrated they will stop at nothing to enact their social justice agenda through the Constitution, many conservative legal establishment figures are still in love with the courts. They believe they can still win in the courts and make them better simply by appointing better judges. The reality is that we’ve crossed the point of no return with the courts a long time ago. Anything short of wholesale judicial reform will only raise the prominence of the courts and stifle our ability to save American democracy. Key quote: “[T]o the objection that a rejection of a court’s authority would be civil disobedience, the answer is that a court that issues orders without authority engages in an equally dangerous form of civil disobedience.” ~ Rober
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulIs this what they mean by “Democracy is under attack” ?: Today’s missive looks a bit different from our normal Friday roundup. - As you probably know, a few big rulings came down from the United States Supreme Court over the past 24 hours-- one on gun control, the other on abortion. - Predictably, Podcast episode
Is this what they mean by “Democracy is under attack” ?: Today’s missive looks a bit different from our normal Friday roundup. - As you probably know, a few big rulings came down from the United States Supreme Court over the past 24 hours-- one on gun control, the other on abortion. - Predictably,
bySchiff Sovereign Podcast0 ratings0% found this document usefulWhen states sue the federal government: It seems like every few weeks, we see headlines about states banding together to block actions taken by the federal government. You might even remember former Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott quipping that he goes to the office, sues the federal government, then goes home. How do those lawsuits take shape? How does a state … Continue reading When states sue the federal government → Podcast episode
When states sue the federal government: It seems like every few weeks, we see headlines about states banding together to block actions taken by the federal government. You might even remember former Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott quipping that he goes to the office, sues the federal government, then goes home. How do those lawsuits take shape? How does a state … Continue reading When states sue the federal government →
byDemocracy Works0 ratings0% found this document usefulTrump v. Anderson (Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson Concurrence) Podcast episode
Trump v. Anderson (Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson Concurrence)
bySupreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)0 ratings0% found this document usefulThe Single Best Guide I’ve Heard to the Supreme Court’s Rightward Shift: In the past few weeks alone, the Supreme Court has delivered a firestorm of conservative legal victories. States now have far less leeway to restrict gun permits. The right to abortion is no longer constitutionally protected. The Environmental Protection Agency has been kneecapped in its ability to regulate carbon emissions, and by extension, all executive branch agencies will see their power significantly diminished. But to focus only on this particular Supreme Court term is to miss the bigger picture: In the past few decades, conservative court majorities have dragged this country’s laws to the right on almost every issue imaginable. Shelby County v. Holder gutted the Voting Rights Act and opened the door for states to pass restrictive voting laws. Rucho v. Common Cause limited the court’s ability to curb partisan gerrymandering. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission unleashed a torrent of campaign spe Podcast episode
The Single Best Guide I’ve Heard to the Supreme Court’s Rightward Shift: In the past few weeks alone, the Supreme Court has delivered a firestorm of conservative legal victories. States now have far less leeway to restrict gun permits. The right to abortion is no longer constitutionally protected. The Environmental Protection Agency has been kneecapped in its ability to regulate carbon emissions, and by extension, all executive branch agencies will see their power significantly diminished. But to focus only on this particular Supreme Court term is to miss the bigger picture: In the past few decades, conservative court majorities have dragged this country’s laws to the right on almost every issue imaginable. Shelby County v. Holder gutted the Voting Rights Act and opened the door for states to pass restrictive voting laws. Rucho v. Common Cause limited the court’s ability to curb partisan gerrymandering. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission unleashed a torrent of campaign spe
byThe Ezra Klein Show0 ratings0% found this document usefulA Week of Unimaginable Judicial Hell Destroying What’s Left of America Ep. 158: In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, we speak the truth about the severity of the judicial crisis, how it happened, what is happening now that makes this issue an emergency, why it won’t be fixed with traditional methods, how conservative legal elites have screwed us, and what we can do about it. We begin by addressing almost a dozen mind-boggling decisions by the courts recently and how they are shutting down our country and nobody is talking about it. Next, we address the stratagem and philosophy behind what they are doing and how it will succeed no matter how many new judges Trump appoints. Finally, we conclude with a lesson on the difference between judicial review and judicial supremacy, how “conservative” legal activists are part of the problem and misunderstand this lesson, and what we can do to educate people and change course. Key quotes: “If god gave me one political wish, it Podcast episode
A Week of Unimaginable Judicial Hell Destroying What’s Left of America Ep. 158: In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, we speak the truth about the severity of the judicial crisis, how it happened, what is happening now that makes this issue an emergency, why it won’t be fixed with traditional methods, how conservative legal elites have screwed us, and what we can do about it. We begin by addressing almost a dozen mind-boggling decisions by the courts recently and how they are shutting down our country and nobody is talking about it. Next, we address the stratagem and philosophy behind what they are doing and how it will succeed no matter how many new judges Trump appoints. Finally, we conclude with a lesson on the difference between judicial review and judicial supremacy, how “conservative” legal activists are part of the problem and misunderstand this lesson, and what we can do to educate people and change course. Key quotes: “If god gave me one political wish, it
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulEpisode 5: John Mulaney 0 ratings0% found this document useful5 Things You Need to Know About Criminal Justice Reform: We share the essentials of what you need to know about criminal justice reform. Podcast episode
5 Things You Need to Know About Criminal Justice Reform: We share the essentials of what you need to know about criminal justice reform.
byPantsuit Politics0 ratings0% found this document usefulThe real legislature that runs our country doesn’t take off for the summer Ep. 258: Congress might be on vacation until after Labor Day, but the lower courts are working overtime to destroy this republic. You will come away from this episode understanding, once and for all, why the judiciary is irremediably broken, why simply appointing “better judges” alone won’t help, and why nothing matters in terms of elections and Congress until this issue is dealt with. We go through a list of about 10 insane court decisions dealing with cultural, fiscal, and immigration issues just from last week. These cases alone have the ability to alter our country in a way that even Democrat control of Congress would never do. Fundamental rights have been so bastardized by the courts that what is a true right, such as property, religious liberty, and self-defense, can be regulated into oblivion, while the “right” to self-immolate for the sexual identity movement and to kill one’s baby cannot be touched Podcast episode
The real legislature that runs our country doesn’t take off for the summer Ep. 258: Congress might be on vacation until after Labor Day, but the lower courts are working overtime to destroy this republic. You will come away from this episode understanding, once and for all, why the judiciary is irremediably broken, why simply appointing “better judges” alone won’t help, and why nothing matters in terms of elections and Congress until this issue is dealt with. We go through a list of about 10 insane court decisions dealing with cultural, fiscal, and immigration issues just from last week. These cases alone have the ability to alter our country in a way that even Democrat control of Congress would never do. Fundamental rights have been so bastardized by the courts that what is a true right, such as property, religious liberty, and self-defense, can be regulated into oblivion, while the “right” to self-immolate for the sexual identity movement and to kill one’s baby cannot be touched
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulThe crisis with the courts; conservatives hooked on political morphine Ep. 196: Conservatives are so focused on substance-less and short-sighted victories that they don’t realize how the Left is winning 50-year battles overnight, even as conservatives think they are in power. Nowhere is this more evident than with the courts. In this episode, we delve into some recent happenings in the courts that demonstrate how the Supreme Court is purposely allowing lower courts to enact a tyrannical agenda against the law of the land. Nobody is willing to do anything about it. There are no words in the English language to describe the degree of insanity of district judges forcing an entire country to issue Social Security cards to illegal foreign nationals, but we try to best capture the consequences in this show. After this show, you will come away with an understanding of why simply “appointing better judges” is not working. Then we outline some ways out of this morass. But that will require Podcast episode
The crisis with the courts; conservatives hooked on political morphine Ep. 196: Conservatives are so focused on substance-less and short-sighted victories that they don’t realize how the Left is winning 50-year battles overnight, even as conservatives think they are in power. Nowhere is this more evident than with the courts. In this episode, we delve into some recent happenings in the courts that demonstrate how the Supreme Court is purposely allowing lower courts to enact a tyrannical agenda against the law of the land. Nobody is willing to do anything about it. There are no words in the English language to describe the degree of insanity of district judges forcing an entire country to issue Social Security cards to illegal foreign nationals, but we try to best capture the consequences in this show. After this show, you will come away with an understanding of why simply “appointing better judges” is not working. Then we outline some ways out of this morass. But that will require
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulAmerica Is Unhappy Because of the Epic Failures of Liberalism: Jun 17, 2020 Podcast episode
America Is Unhappy Because of the Epic Failures of Liberalism: Jun 17, 2020
byRush Limbaugh - Timeless Wisdom0 ratings0% found this document usefulEp 378 | The Courts Are a One-Way Street with a Dead End for Conservatives: When is it appropriate to sue a law or a policy in court, what is the role of the court in taking these cases, and where do the other branches of government fit in to the scheme of things? In this foundational show, I use recent cases on guns, free speech, immigration, and Obamacare to give a vision of what the conservative view is about the role of the courts on rules of standing, the outcome of their rulings, and constitutional interpretation of fundamental rights. I also show how the courts are hypocritical in all ways and will flip fundamental rights, rules of standing, and state and federal powers upside-down. Show links Episode 322 on how we should view the role of the courts with Obamacare The inferior courts have crowned Obama president forever. What will we do about it? Kate Steinle’s parents denied right to sue San Francisco Copyright Blaze Media All Rights Reserved. Podcast episode
Ep 378 | The Courts Are a One-Way Street with a Dead End for Conservatives: When is it appropriate to sue a law or a policy in court, what is the role of the court in taking these cases, and where do the other branches of government fit in to the scheme of things? In this foundational show, I use recent cases on guns, free speech, immigration, and Obamacare to give a vision of what the conservative view is about the role of the courts on rules of standing, the outcome of their rulings, and constitutional interpretation of fundamental rights. I also show how the courts are hypocritical in all ways and will flip fundamental rights, rules of standing, and state and federal powers upside-down. Show links Episode 322 on how we should view the role of the courts with Obamacare The inferior courts have crowned Obama president forever. What will we do about it? Kate Steinle’s parents denied right to sue San Francisco Copyright Blaze Media All Rights Reserved.
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulDaily News Brief for Friday, December 22nd, 2023 0 ratings0% found this document usefulThe case for open primaries: In about a dozen U.S. states, the only people who can vote in primary elections are those who are registered with a party. Republicans vote in the Republican primary and Democrats vote in the Democratic primary. This leaves out independents, who make up a growing share of the electorate. This week’s guest argues that’s problem […] Podcast episode
The case for open primaries: In about a dozen U.S. states, the only people who can vote in primary elections are those who are registered with a party. Republicans vote in the Republican primary and Democrats vote in the Democratic primary. This leaves out independents, who make up a growing share of the electorate. This week’s guest argues that’s problem […]
byDemocracy Works0 ratings0% found this document usefulEp. 241 IT’S HAPPENING! Trump’s LEGAL TEAM Is Beginning to CLOSE IN on the DEMOCRATS!!!: IT’S HAPPENING! Trump’s LEGAL TEAM Is Beginning to CLOSE IN on the DEMOCRATS! In this episode, we’re going to take a look at how things are really beginning to heat up in the courts, how the Supreme Court is poised to come in and render a decisive v Podcast episode
Ep. 241 IT’S HAPPENING! Trump’s LEGAL TEAM Is Beginning to CLOSE IN on the DEMOCRATS!!!: IT’S HAPPENING! Trump’s LEGAL TEAM Is Beginning to CLOSE IN on the DEMOCRATS! In this episode, we’re going to take a look at how things are really beginning to heat up in the courts, how the Supreme Court is poised to come in and render a decisive v
byTurley Talks0 ratings0% found this document usefulEpisode 1: Eduardo Tagle and the Mexican Supreme Court 0 ratings0% found this document usefulMy Thoughts on Gorsuch and Scotus: A Time to Remain Vigilant Ep 88: In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, Daniel spills his heart out on the state of the courts, what conservatives are looking for, and why Gorsuch, although a solid nominee, still doesn’t inspire full confidence that he is the best we could have done, given GOP control of the Senate. Then again, with a Senate full of RINOs, who could have scuttled the nomination of someone in the mold of Clarence Thomas, could you really blame Trump? Moreover, the entire process demonstrate why we will never really fix the courts simply by “picking better judges.” “The capacity of a good judge to do good is nowhere near the capacity of a bad judge to harm our constitution, society, sovereignty, and security. Even if we had a Clarence Thomas for every Republican SCOTUS pick and for every lower court pick, an impossibility (they don’t exist), we could never combat the malfeasance of the left. The equivalent on the right o Podcast episode
My Thoughts on Gorsuch and Scotus: A Time to Remain Vigilant Ep 88: In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, Daniel spills his heart out on the state of the courts, what conservatives are looking for, and why Gorsuch, although a solid nominee, still doesn’t inspire full confidence that he is the best we could have done, given GOP control of the Senate. Then again, with a Senate full of RINOs, who could have scuttled the nomination of someone in the mold of Clarence Thomas, could you really blame Trump? Moreover, the entire process demonstrate why we will never really fix the courts simply by “picking better judges.” “The capacity of a good judge to do good is nowhere near the capacity of a bad judge to harm our constitution, society, sovereignty, and security. Even if we had a Clarence Thomas for every Republican SCOTUS pick and for every lower court pick, an impossibility (they don’t exist), we could never combat the malfeasance of the left. The equivalent on the right o
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulWhen states sue the federal government [rebroadcast]: Our holiday break continues this week as we bring you an episode with with Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro that originally aired in October. Happy New Year! It seems like every few weeks, we see headlines about states banding together to block actions taken by the federal government. You might even remember former Texas Attorney … Continue reading When states sue the federal government [rebroadcast] → Podcast episode
When states sue the federal government [rebroadcast]: Our holiday break continues this week as we bring you an episode with with Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro that originally aired in October. Happy New Year! It seems like every few weeks, we see headlines about states banding together to block actions taken by the federal government. You might even remember former Texas Attorney … Continue reading When states sue the federal government [rebroadcast] →
byDemocracy Works0 ratings0% found this document useful
Related articles
Contempt for Court The AtlanticArticle
Contempt for Court
Feb 12, 2018
5 min readThe Constitutional Right We Have Bargained Away The AtlanticArticle
The Constitutional Right We Have Bargained Away
Dec 24, 2021
5 min readA Single Judge Shouldn’t Have This Kind of National Power The AtlanticArticle
A Single Judge Shouldn’t Have This Kind of National Power
Apr 14, 2023
6 min readNo Wonder the Impeachment Trial Is Such a Mess The AtlanticArticle
No Wonder the Impeachment Trial Is Such a Mess
Jan 25, 2020
10 min readCommentary: Attempting FDR’s Court-packing Ploy Again Would Be Ruinous Chicago TribuneArticle
Commentary: Attempting FDR’s Court-packing Ploy Again Would Be Ruinous
Jul 15, 2022
3 min readHere's Why Jeff Sessions' Parting Shot Is Worse Than You Thought The Marshall ProjectArticle
Here's Why Jeff Sessions' Parting Shot Is Worse Than You Thought
Nov 20, 2018
Former attorney general’s directives make it easy to render federal action against abusive police departments ineffective.
4 min readCommentary: Trump Administration Turns Judges Into Prosecutors In A Judge's Robe Los Angeles TimesArticle
Commentary: Trump Administration Turns Judges Into Prosecutors In A Judge's Robe
Aug 31, 2018
In the immigration courts that Americans saw in news stories this summer, children were appearing alone at bewildering legal proceedings. But the nation's immigration courts - about 350 judges with monumental caseloads - handle all manner of immigrat
7 min readCommentary: Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Election Should Never Have Happened Chicago TribuneArticle
Commentary: Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Election Should Never Have Happened
Apr 8, 2023
3 min readFederal Officials Should Be Accountable for Their Wrongdoing The AtlanticArticle
Federal Officials Should Be Accountable for Their Wrongdoing
Sep 25, 2019
5 min readWhen Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissented in Bush v. Gore Literary HubArticle
When Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissented in Bush v. Gore
Oct 1, 2020
7 min readOne Change That Could Make American Criminal Justice Fairer The AtlanticArticle
One Change That Could Make American Criminal Justice Fairer
Mar 16, 2020
6 min readA Day of Sorrow for American Democracy The AtlanticArticle
A Day of Sorrow for American Democracy
Jul 3, 2019
5 min readSupreme Court To Hear Controversial Election-law Case NPRArticle
Supreme Court To Hear Controversial Election-law Case
Dec 7, 2022
4 min readThe Texans Challenging Obamacare Have No Standing The AtlanticArticle
The Texans Challenging Obamacare Have No Standing
Dec 18, 2018
4 min readThe Supreme Court Has a Perfectly Good Option in Its Most Divisive Case The AtlanticArticle
The Supreme Court Has a Perfectly Good Option in Its Most Divisive Case
Oct 11, 2022
5 min readCommentary: US Supreme Court Vs. States’ Highest Courts: We Are Giving Kids The Wrong Message Chicago TribuneArticle
Commentary: US Supreme Court Vs. States’ Highest Courts: We Are Giving Kids The Wrong Message
Sep 27, 2022
3 min readCommentary: Judges Will Not Save Us. Pushing For Truly Democratic Solutions Will Chicago TribuneArticle
Commentary: Judges Will Not Save Us. Pushing For Truly Democratic Solutions Will
Aug 25, 2022
3 min readWhen Your Judge Isn't A Lawyer The AtlanticArticle
When Your Judge Isn't A Lawyer
Feb 5, 2017
5 min readWhat Comes After Roe? The AtlanticArticle
What Comes After Roe?
Jul 1, 2022
15 min readSens. Warren And Gardner On Why Marijuana Policy Should Be Left To States NPRArticle
Sens. Warren And Gardner On Why Marijuana Policy Should Be Left To States
Jun 14, 2018
4 min readCommentary: The Supreme Court Is Not Accountable To The People. So What Can Check Its Power? Los Angeles TimesArticle
Commentary: The Supreme Court Is Not Accountable To The People. So What Can Check Its Power?
Jun 29, 2022
3 min readCommentary: Abolish The Courts’ Wanton Use Of Nationwide Injunctions Los Angeles TimesArticle
Commentary: Abolish The Courts’ Wanton Use Of Nationwide Injunctions
Apr 29, 2022
3 min readSupreme Court Is US ‘Decider.’ Here’s How Other Nations Check Judiciary. The Christian Science MonitorArticle
Supreme Court Is US ‘Decider.’ Here’s How Other Nations Check Judiciary.
Aug 4, 2022
In its infancy, the U.S. Supreme Court was the runt of the litter of America’s new institutions. The court had little power compared to Congress or the presidency. Justices traveled the country hearing cases in grueling, unglamorous “circuits.” When
6 min readThe Gerrymandering Ruling Was Bad, but the Alternatives Were Worse The AtlanticArticle
The Gerrymandering Ruling Was Bad, but the Alternatives Were Worse
Jun 28, 2019
5 min readA Case That Should Have Been Laughed Out of Court May Kill Obamacare The AtlanticArticle
A Case That Should Have Been Laughed Out of Court May Kill Obamacare
Dec 19, 2019
5 min readThe Divergent Classmates The AtlanticArticle
The Divergent Classmates
Feb 3, 2017
5 min readThe Clemency Process Is Broken. Trump Can Fix It. The AtlanticArticle
The Clemency Process Is Broken. Trump Can Fix It.
Jan 15, 2019
3 min readThe Case That Could Blow Up American Election Law The AtlanticArticle
The Case That Could Blow Up American Election Law
Jul 11, 2022
6 min readCommentary: Those Who Want ‘Criminal Justice Reform’ Should Look At Lawmakers, Not Judges Chicago TribuneArticle
Commentary: Those Who Want ‘Criminal Justice Reform’ Should Look At Lawmakers, Not Judges
Feb 1, 2022
3 min readCommentary: The Ominous Way The Supreme Court Could Change Our Elections Los Angeles TimesArticle
Commentary: The Ominous Way The Supreme Court Could Change Our Elections
Dec 10, 2022
4 min read
Reviews for Judges and Courts
1 rating0 reviews