Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Before the First Shots Are Fired: How America Can Win or Lose Off the Battlefield
    Before the First Shots Are Fired: How America Can Win or Lose Off the Battlefield
    Before the First Shots Are Fired: How America Can Win or Lose Off the Battlefield
    Audiobook8 hours

    Before the First Shots Are Fired: How America Can Win or Lose Off the Battlefield

    Written by Tony Zinni and Tony Koltz

    Narrated by Johnny Heller

    4/5

    ()

    Switch to ebook

    About this audiobook

    For the better part of the last half century, the United States has been the world's police, claiming to defend ideologies, allies, and our national security through brute force. But is military action always the most appropriate response? Drawing on his vast experience, retired four-star general Tony Zinni argues that we have a lot of work to do to make the process of going to war-or not-more clear-eyed and ultimately successful. He examines the relationship between the executive and the military; the challenges of working with the UN, coalition forces, and NATO; and the difficult choices that need to be made to create tomorrow's military. Among his provocative points:
    Virtually every recent American military operation follows a disconnected series of actions that lead to outcomes we never foresaw or intended.
    We need to assign accountability for the political decisions that can make or break a mission.
    Words and ideas are as important to victory in today's conflicts as bullets.
    From the Oval Office to the battlefield, Before the First Shots Are Fired is a hard-hitting analysis of the history of America's use of military action and a spirited call for change.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherTantor Media, Inc
    Release dateOct 13, 2014
    ISBN9781494577292
    Author

    Tony Zinni

    General Tony Zinni (Ret.) was Commander in Chief of CENTCOM and special envoy to the Middle East. He has appeared on 60 Minutes, Nightline and Charlie Rose, among others.

    Related to Before the First Shots Are Fired

    Related audiobooks

    History For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    Related categories

    Reviews for Before the First Shots Are Fired

    4/5

    30 ratings13 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      You have just been sitting through a PowerPoint presentation and almost everyone is leaving the room. You notice that the one attendee with the large stack of folders is still organizing and placing the folders in his briefcase. You offer to help and an informal conversation starts. You recognize that you are about to hear an open and frank analysis of what really just took place.If you have ever had this experience, you can imagine if the conversation was with one of the most honored and knowledgeable experts in strategic military and geo-political affairs. "Before the First Shots are Fired" is a kind of record of a memorable conversation like that. With this book, you are privy to a real insider analysis of United States military actions up to the present time. Retired General Tony Zinni with the help of Tony Koltz, shares a series of thoughts about our broad military strategy and the well recognized names of the military and civilian leadership at the highest levels.Frustrations with civilian leadership limiting the early input from military expertise is one of the themes through the book. Military emphasis on highly detailed technical and logistical planning is not partnered with the same level of planning from the civilian leadership. Interestingly, the book recognizes the cultural factors from the military perspective that are not emphasized sufficiently from the civilian leaders. The book is indeed written in a conversational manner even when looking deeply into strategic areas. Contemporary challenges are smoothly put into historical perspective.If you are tired of the five minute cable news "analysis" and instead prefer a deeper but understandable look behind the scenes of our military role and strategic planning, this book makes a great read.
    • 4/5
      This book is written by a general who has experienced most of the conflicts since Vietnam. Our politicians should be listening to him. He stresses the need for diplomatic solutions and planning for what happens after the military battle is won.
    • 3/5
      I enjoyed this book. General Zinni writes in a way that causes you to step back and think. Personally I think that there are rarely easy answers to military questions. However, I think this book helps frame some of the big questions around military action. Whether you agree or disagree with American military policy as it stands or with General Zinni's perspective, this book will have you pondering the big questions. That is part of what I like about this book, I have to engage with it. There is a bit of redundancy which can be off-putting, however, perhaps that is needed to drive a point home. This is readable in sections which also makes it easy to travel with and enjoy.
    • 4/5
      A delicate takedown of the mismanagement of the military, published years after it would have been useful. I understand why it would have been difficult for Zinni to come forward about his misgivings before the invasion of Iraq, and appreciate that he is evenhanded in this book without pussyfooting around the fact that the Bush administration willfully ignored intelligence when it made the case for invasion, but at this point those of us who suspected the war would be a disaster have been vindicated by the facts, and those who still think the invasion was a good idea are not going to be convinced otherwise by a book like this.While Zinni's overall points are excellent, and his ability to support them with his long experience in the military is a boon, I did not feel like I learned anything particularly new when reading. That said, the book is a strong case for reform on the civilian end of the US's wars, and a collection of insights that I can only hope will be heeded by our leaders in the future.
    • 3/5
      While this book is not on WWII or focused on any other particular past war. I was interested in reading this book. I wanted to know how we as America could win or lose off the battlefield. Plus the author sounded like he had past experience and great knowledge about this subject matter. Which the author did have a lot of insight. This book is divided into sections. Each one focusing on a different part of war. Like...intelligence, political pressures, goals and visions, outsourcing war, and the operational art to name a few. While I did like reading this book. I did also feel at the same time that the details sometimes grew old quick. I would fine myself skimming parts. Luckily you can get away with doing this with this book and still get the high points of the book that the author is trying to get across. One thing that I did really like about this book is that if you are a history buff or just interested in reading about history or military themed books you can read this one with ease. You don't have to have lots of knowledge because even with the author's knowledge he breaks it down into a easy, understandable way that the layperson can get.
    • 4/5
      I have to say this book really makes you think about the wars that have happened and the wars to come. It opens the layperson's eyes to what needs to be done and who should be doing it. I am not usually interested in military reads but I am trying to read different things and I am really glad I read this one. "Before the First Shots are Fired" is a great read and one that really gets you asking questions. General Zinni is a man with decades of experience and it shows. You can relate to him even though he is political and military. I will definitely suggest this book for anyone to read.
    • 3/5
      This is a Goodreads First Reads books.

      Before the First Shots Are Fired: How America Can Win or Lose Off the Battlefield by Tony Zinni and Tony Koltz is a thought provoking critique of the American political and military systems. Leadership (or the lack thereof) plays a central role in their analysis of the military and the political leaders who direct it.

      Before the First Shots Are Fired should be viewed as a wake-up call to the political and military leaders and is a good read for anyone interested in the military or political systems.
    • 3/5
      You know that saying that, to a child with a hammer, all the world looks like a nail? General Tony Zinni, USArmy (Ret.) has convinced me that, to a man who’s spent his whole adult life in the military, all the world looks like a war — or something best solved by war. That’s a great disappointment. I requested the book because the subtitle, “How America Can Win or Lose Off the Battlefield,” and the synopsis from the publisher led me to believe that General Zinni might have a vision to offer of solving the problems of the world without resort to arms. What the book offers instead of that vision is a detailed memoir and justification of Gen. Zinni’s role — always able to see what should have been done but never in a position or given the resources to do it — in USAmerica’s military ventures from Vietnam through Afghanistan. He is most directly critical of George W. Bush’s administration and quite baldly accuses Vice President Cheney of lying to the American people about the reasons for invading Iraq. Zinni is also highly critical of President Obama’s policies and performance, though he seems to know no more than I do about how decisions have actually been made in the Obama White House. He settles for reading the most damaging conclusions possible into the photos we’ve all seen of the gathering in the Situation Room as Osama bin Laden was hunted down, and criticizes the President for robbing John Kerry of his rightful role in settling the initial crisis of Russia’s annexation of Crimea. Perhaps he's sympathetic to Kerry because of Kerry's military background. Gen. Zinni names many other military figures, usually with a summary of their backgrounds and almost always with information about when Zinni worked with him and what he thought of him. He blatantly idolizes Gen. George Marshall. I can’t think of any women mentioned in any kind of leadership context, though he does speak at least once of the extra burden placed on commanders to integrate women and out gays into their units.I guess that's my other great disappointment in the book: It's all about the brass, and almost not at all about the troops who do the fighting. They seem to be just another weapon to be used more or less effectively by the officers. He complains about 'taking America to the battlefield' for the comfort of the troops "at ease," and seems to blame the speed with which they jet home from combat for the epidemic of post-traumatic stress disorders. He says Presidents who've never been shot at lack a visceral understanding of what they ask of the troops, or maybe what they ask of the generals. He demonstrates no identification himself with the experience of being shot at. His comments on the most recent uses of National Guard and Reserve troops are hardly more sympathetic. There is a brief moment in chapter two, in the context of the invasion of Iraq, when Zinni toys with questioning why it’s so easy to respond with military force, why we didn’t deal with al Qaeda and Afghanistan more directly and first, why we didn’t look to other injustices and threats in the world. He criticizes politicians — and generals — who never met an intervention they didn’t like. But he acknowledges that having the most powerful military in the world is its own temptation to use it. I guess I'm glad to have had a reason to read a book by a General, though I never would have bought it or sought it out for any other reason. I am a pacifist, and it's always good to see things from another perspective. But General Zinni seems to accept that there will always come a crisis, and a time in each crisis, when resolution will depend on shots being fired, and fired by USAmerica’s military. And because of that certainty, we will be required to maintain the largest, most powerful military force on the planet. And we will want to use it. General Zinni spent his finest years as a “combat commander,” whether or not there was active combat in his area. And he is quite clear that he knows how to fight future wars, and construct future pauses in war and geographical shifts in where the war is, more efficiently and effectively than we’ve done at least since “the good war” of the 1940s. I was really hoping he might have seen an entirely different way for the world to run.
    • 3/5
      The authors bring the seemingly most obvious and logical positions and actions that should be held during war (and peace) time to the forefront. While it seems the "fixes" to the problems discussed in the book are well within an experienced, senior military board, I was left with a feeling that smart warring is something that will not happen any time in the near future. A recommended read for those in politics and military, as those are the groups that are most capable of making the immediate needed changes. A good read for civilians in helping to understand what happens when a failure is perceived and how to better support military decisions and elect public officials.
    • 4/5
      The good: This is an analysis of how the modern American political/military system is failing to do a good job , making us end up in quagmires like Iraq and Afghanistan, and what could be done differently to make things safer and more effective, worldwide. The author has vast experience, and shares much of it with us in this book.Problems: Well, it's not tightly written, and I would have expected the secondary author to have corrected this. It rambles. It rambles a LOT. The anecdotes are fascinating and clear, but they do not seem chosen to support the immediate point that the authors are trying to make.This means that the main points of the book are scattered throughout, and somewhat obscured by all the rest of the stories, except for the last chapter which is a very tight summary.I'd recommend the lat chapter widely. The rest? probably mostly of interest to military historian buffs, especially ones focusing on the last 50 or so years.I got this book as an ARC via LibraryThing.
    • 5/5
      General Zinni brings decades of military experience to show how our political and militarily must learn from lessons from past wars in order to show what would be the preconditions for successful military intervention. No matter how we are provoked we must respond first with a sound analysis of the situation. Intelligence experts must gather all the information and define what is the problem, but also show how we must make solid decisions. Those responsible must look at all the options, what policies will be impacted and the consequences. The president must find a way to fully understand the implications of any decision to use force. We must design and put into place a strategy that meshes efforts of our political leadership, policy developers and militarily field commanders. Zinni touches on a variety of topics: the role played by any secretary of defense, the need for legal, and moral grounds arguing for war; a military force adaptable to any mission; the proper role of non military contractors, the National Guard and Reserves; the selection of combat leaders; the need for overhauling United States security structures, some of which date back to WWII.When were in a conflict and ask ourselves “How the hell did we get here?”it is likely due to the fact that we have ignored too many of the issues Zinni raises.
    • 4/5
      An enjoyable book that greatly reminded me of "The March of Folly" by Barbara Tuchman. While her book was written in 1984, General Zinni's book shows that we still do not learn from our past. It was interesting to see a perspective of current affairs from an "insider"; however, since everyone has a bias, what was General Zinni's when he wrote this book. I would recommend this to others.
    • 4/5
      World wars are very different from regional conflicts. General Zinni's worldview is shaped by his experience in Vietnam and he traces the US military transition from a big war mentality to the current fighting in the mIddle east. His book provides a perspective on the relationship between Commanders in Chief, the Congress, and top military leadership. The General gives Clinton good marks for the detail he seeks when considering military actions, Bush-Cheney lower marks (or grudging respect) for outmaneuvering Congress on debate prior to the Iraq war declaration, and dismisses Obama politely for his approach to drawing red lines in Syria. Before the First Shots concisely states the problem but doesn't offer much in the way of answers. Still, it is a good read from one of the major players in this key area of the world.