Waterloo: The History of Four Days, Three Armies and Three Battles
Written by Bernard Cornwell
Narrated by Bernard Cornwell and Dugald Bruce-Lockhart
4/5
()
Unavailable in your country
Unavailable in your country
About this audiobook
‘A fabulous story, superbly told … cannot be bettered’ Max Hastings
‘Some battles change nothing. Waterloo changed almost everything.’
On the 18th June 1815 the armies of France, Britain and Prussia descended upon a quiet valley south of Brussels. In the previous three days the French army had beaten the British at Quatre-Bras and the Prussians at Ligny. The Allies were in retreat.
The blood-soaked battle of Waterloo would become a landmark in European history, to be examined over and again, not least because until the evening of the 18th, the French army was close to prevailing on the battlefield.
Now, brought to life by the celebrated novelist Bernard Cornwell, this is the chronicle of the four days leading up to the actual battle and a thrilling hour-by-hour account of that fateful day.
In his first work of non-fiction, Cornwell combines his storytelling skills with a meticulously researched history to give a riveting account of every dramatic moment, from Napoleon’s escape from Elba to the smoke and gore of the battlefields. Through letters and diaries he also sheds new light on the private thoughts of Napoleon and the Duke of Wellington, as well as the ordinary officers and soldiers.
Published to coincide with the bicentenary in 2015, Waterloo is a tense and gripping story of heroism and tragedy – and of the final battle that determined the fate of Europe.
Bernard Cornwell
BERNARD CORNWELL is the author of over fifty novels, including the acclaimed New York Times bestselling Saxon Tales, which serve as the basis for the hit Netflix series The Last Kingdom. He lives with his wife on Cape Cod and in Charleston, South Carolina.
More audiobooks from Bernard Cornwell
Vagabond: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Agincourt: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Heretic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51356: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gallows Thief: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gallows Thief Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fools and Mortals: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fort: A Novel of the Revolutionary War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stonehenge: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Harlequin Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Pale Horseman: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fallen Angels: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Uhtred's Feast: Inside the World of The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Crowning Mercy: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to Waterloo
Related audiobooks
Agincourt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Normans: From Raiders to Kings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Admiral Collingwood: Nelson's Own Hero Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rudyard Kipling: The Man Who Would Be King Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Men-of-War: Life in Nelson’s Navy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sharpe's Fury Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hannibal's Foe: Book One in the Republic of Rome Trilogy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Charlemagne Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Panzer Ace: The Memoirs of an Iron Cross Panzer Commander from Barbarossa to Normandy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Champion (II): Blood and Gold Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In Distant Lands: A Short History of the Crusades Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In Search of a Kingdom: Francis Drake, Elizabeth I, and the Perilous Birth of the British Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hannibal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
European History For You
Project MK-Ultra: The History of the CIA’s Controversial Human Experimentation Program Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Short Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Teutonic Knights: A Military History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The War on the West Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Children of Ash and Elm: A History of the Vikings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Iron, Fire and Ice: The Real History that Inspired Game of Thrones Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ghost Map Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Invention of Murder: How the Victorians Revelled in Death and Detection and Created Modern Crime Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sir Gawain and the Green Knight: with Pearl and Sir Orfeo Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ripper: The Secret Life of Walter Sickert Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wars of the Roses: The Fall of the Plantagenets and the Rise of the Tudors Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Reformation: A History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Over My Dead Body: Unearthing the Hidden History of American Cemeteries Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Faithful Executioner: Life and Death, Honor and Shame in the Turbulent Sixteenth Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Royal Art of Poison: Filthy Palaces, Fatal Cosmetics, Deadly Medicine, and Murder Most Foul Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel: Genius, Power, and Deception on the Eve of World War I Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Brothers and Wives: Inside the Private Lives of William, Kate, Harry, and Meghan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anglo-Saxons: A History of the Beginnings of England: 400 – 1066 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Napoleon Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Memoirs of a Wartime Interpreter: From the Battle for Moscow to Hitler's Bunker Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing England: The Brutal Struggle for American Independence Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Templars: The History and the Myth: From Solomon's Temple to the Freemasons Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sovietistan: Travels in Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Whose Middle Ages?: Teachable Moments for an Ill-Used Past Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for Waterloo
143 ratings16 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bernard Cornwell branches out into non-fiction with this description of the Battle of Waterloo.He is of course well known for his series of 'Sharpe' books about the period and he now turns his attention to the facts of the matter.If you want a no-frills,well-written account of the battle,then you could do much worse than read this book.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The author’s meticulous research and the way the events of the four days are linked together creates a compelling narrative.
It is a well crafted history that has you on edge, even though you know the outcome. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5An excellent portrayal of the defining battle of the 19th century. Skillful use of existing memoirs and a careful selection of the many paintings spawned by this famous battle enable Cornwell to provide us with a compelling version of this oft told tale. He is a very skilled teller of stories and provides us with this notable book to celebrate the bicentennial of this brief but epic struggle.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This is Cornwell's first foray into actual history, and this book is every bit as readable as his Sharpe or Starbuck novels. He goes into considerable detail without being tedious, and gives the reader a real sense of the violent intensity of this well-documented battle. Well worth a read.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bernard Cornwell is the author of several historical novels featuring Richard Sharpe, an English soldier during the Napoleonic Wars. Waterloo is his first attempt at nonfiction, published just in time for the 200th anniversary in June 2015 of that climactic conflict. Cornwell has done his homework, and although he has little or nothing to add to the voluminous corpus of Waterloo information, he is an adept story teller who provides a riveting recap of the series of battles that has come down to us as “Waterloo.” The decisive battle pitted against one another the two most outstanding military leaders of their era: The (Iron) Duke of Wellington for the British and Napoleon Bonaparte for the French. Napoleon had recently escaped from his banishment on the Isle of Elba, and had resumed the power of Emperor of France. The British, Prussians, Austrians, and Russians feared he would once again dominate Europe, and so they organized a coalition to remove him from his throne. The British and Prussian armies arrived on the scene first, and invaded France from the north and east, respectively. Napoleon raised a formidable army in record time, and sought to prevent the allies from combining their armies by defeating them in sequence. In the event, the allies were able to combine their powers only on the fourth and last day of the battles, but that was enough to effect a catastrophic defeat for the French. While no one knows how many actually died at Waterloo because the French Army never had a chance to make a count, the best estimates suggest that of the 200,000 or so who fought there, some 50,000 lay dead or wounded at the battle’s end, along with 10,000 horses dead or dying. The results were even more momentous than a consideration of the casualty numbers. Waterloo brought the career of Napoleon Bonaparte to an end; no small matter. It led to a redrawing of the map of Europe, and to the Concert of Europe, a balance of power that restored peace and enabled Britain to grow to be the dominant global power of the 19th Century. Warfare tactics in Napoleonic times were much like the game of Rock, Paper, and Scissors: infantry (in cohesive formation) defeats cavalry; cavalry defeats artillery; artillery defeats infantry. Weaponry was crude by today’s lethal standards: the muskets carried by most infantry men were not rifled, and were very inaccurate. Accordingly, the alignment maintained by infantry formations was crucial to their efficacy. Cornwell explains clearly the advantages and disadvantages of arraying “in line” versus “in column.” A brigade “in line” was disposed in a wide formation only two (British) or three (French) deep. The front line fired their muskets while the back line(s) reloaded. This maximized the fire power of the formation in the direction it faced, but made it vulnerable to cavalry attacks on its flanks. Thus, it was a strong defensive position, but was suicidal to move so formed across open country when cavalry was nearby.A brigade “in column” was arrayed in a more oblong shape, sometimes like a square. Such a formation could protect itself from cavalry from any direction, but could not match the shear fire power of an equal number of men arrayed “in line.” Thus to attack an enemy who was positioned some distance away, infantry had to approach it “in column” across country, and then reform “in line” when it came near to the defenders. Being a writer of fiction, Cornwell seeks to make the battle come to life. In doing so, he frequently switches from the past tense to the present tense in his narration. That technique seemed a little odd at times. Cornwell clearly sympathizes with the British—he is, after all, English. His version of the battle has a different flavor than that written by Andrew Roberts in his recent Napoleon, A Life, a very sympathetic biography of the French hero. I recommend reading the two books in fairly close sequence. Note: The hardback edition is quite nice, and includes a number of color prints and maps.(JAB)
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This is an excellently written and lavishly illustrated account of the famous battle, which I started reading on the day of its 200th anniversary. This is Cornwell's first attempt at non-fiction. He is probably best known for his fictional Sharpe series set during the Napoleonic wars, which I have not read, though I have read most of his other novels. This book covers the lead up to the day of the battle as well as, in great depth, the events of Sunday 18 June 1815 itself. The fighting itself is described in great and bloody detail, but so are the strategy, the relations between the great leaders Wellington, Napoleon and Blucher, and the experiences of soldiers at all levels in all three armies, through numerous eye witness accounts. The noise, smoke and chaos of the battlefield come across very clearly, with huge scope for misunderstandings of the true position and therefore very different accounts of the same events. The battle was a close won thing and the sometimes fragile understanding between the British and Prussians could have led to disaster for the allies, while at the same time the French effort was hampered by misunderstandings between Napoleon and Marshal Ney, whose inactivity at key moments cost his Emperor's cause dearly. After the defeat in the gathering darkness of the summer night, the Emperor was defeated and was soon on his way to his final exile in St Helena. A great book.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Brilliant true story of the battle of Waterloo . Kept me on edge of my seat
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I have the paperback which I've read three times. Crackin account of the Campaign. Great read!
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cornwell is very good at doing the punchy narrative. This book really moves along. I'm giving it 4 stars, though, because I find Cornwell's prose a bit too purple. I prefer David Howarth's "Waterloo: A Near Run Thing".Cornwell's book is also good in the sense that it gives a thorough description of the trials and triumphs of Blucher and the Prussians. I think Howarth's book goes light on the importance of the Prussians in the battle.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I enjoyed this military history of the battle of Waterloo. This battle is not a part of our history in the States, but the word "Waterloo" in Europe seems to carry as much weight as the word "Gettysburg" carries here. Important. Bloody. A battle of attrition. Determining the future.
Those last four phrases are why I read this book. I wanted to know more of the military history of this great battle. Cornwell's take (from a British perspective) is well-researched and detailed by the letters of soldiers from all three countries involved in this fight (Prussia, Great Britain, and France). Unfortunately for me, I do not know French. I listened to the book on audiobook, but I am unable to convert the French words (about the location in Belgium) into letters.
Cornwell describes the battle as a series of formations. The outcome was merely a product of these formations fighting against one another, provided that the manpower of the troops was there. Prussia and Britain both deserve credit for the victory, even as both sides have griped throughout history about giving the other credit. Wellington, to Cornwell, still deserves the most credit for the victory and the title of "conqueror of the world's conqueror." Prussia provided significant and necessary help at the right time, but the ever-present Wellington willed British troops towards the decisive victory in the middle of the battle. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5If you've ever read or seen a "War and Peace" not Piece. :), you'll understand why I had to read this story.
This was such a great retelling of a famous battle and it shone the light not just on famous names that fought it but some infamous as well.
It was pure genius to bring us the recounting of this battle through multiple view points, using real words of the soldiers on all sides of the war, through their correspondence.
The author literally painted the carnage of this battle in so vivid of detail that it brought tears to my eyes.
I highly recommended to all that are interested to know in what it took to pull the victory over Napoleon.
Melanie for b2b
Complimentary copy provided by the publisher - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Once again Bernard Cornwell has shown his depth as an author. Waterloo is a very easy read not dry or boring as a lot of books about battles can be. It is well written and not biased in the telling of how the battle progressed from start to finish. Very good book.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Very easy to read book which covers the battle in a remarkable amount of detail given how much of a page turner it was!
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In the forward, Cornwell (one of my favorite authors of historical fiction) poses the question, "why another book on Waterloo?" It is, after all, one of the most studied and written about battles. Given that he poses that question, we would expect he has something meaningful to add to the volume of literature on the subject. Does he?Well, not really. Perhaps some of the accounts and anecdotes quoted are from sources not previously used by other authors, but there are no really profound insights. It's not a bad book on the subject -- indeed, it's a fine choice for someone with a casual interest in the battle, since Cornwell does bring his story-telling chops where others might be drier, more technical accounts. Napoleon's failure to compensate for the egregious tactical failures of Ney and Grouchy ultimately decided his fate -- his grand-strategy was spot-on and even with mistake after mistake being committed, the French had a chance to prevail at the end.Cornwell does not engage in speculation of what might have been -- and that's a shame since I'd be interested in hearing such thoughts from him. As Waterloo books go, this one is fine, just a little too indistinguishable from the rest.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I loved Waterloo: The History of Four Days, but its appeal is probably limited to those who are interested in (1) the battle at Waterloo; (2) the Napoleonic Wars; (3) war in the early 1800s; or (4) anything Cornwell writes. This is really well done - his only nonfiction book so far. It has the page-turning character of a novel.The battle took place in fields just south of Brussels in June, 1815. Around 200,000 men (and at least one disguised woman) fought each other in a five mile square area. The Duke of Wellington squared off with the genius Napoleon, and Wellington became known as the Conqueror of the Conqueror of the World. However, it was a brutal battle, or really three battles, with around 50,000 dead or wounded by the end. Three battles: there was Wellington vs. the French and slow-to-act General Ney at nearby (and crucially located) Quatres Bras, the French successfully attacking the Prussian army at Ligny the next day, and then the battle of Waterloo with Wellington's Anglo-Dutch forces eventually being joined by the Prussians against the French.Telling the story well had to take discipline and persistence. Wellington himself said: “The history of a battle is not unlike the history of a ball. Some individuals may recollect all the little events of which the great result is the battle won or lost; but no individual can recollect the order in which, or the exact moment at which, they occurred, which makes all the difference as to their value or importance.”Cornwell does a superb job of telling that story. He has honed his storytelling skills in many historical novels, including the famous Sharpe series, and this is his first venture into nonfiction. He had told the story through Sharpe's eyes in Sharpe's Waterloo, but this is much more in-depth. He has drawn on a huge archive of letters and diaries written by soldiers from all three armies at the battles. Some of the most riveting material comes from those archives. For example, the perspective of a surviving Ensign recently graduated from Eton College:"You perceived at a distance what appeared to be an overwhelming, long moving line, which, ever advancing, glittered like a stormy wave of the sea when it catches the sunlight. On came the mounted host until they got near enough, whilst the very earth seemed to vibrate beneath their thundering tramp. One might suppose that nothing could resist the shock of this terrible moving mass. They were the famous cuirassiers . . . "Part of why the Waterloo battles are so famous is that the outcome was very much in doubt throughout. Cornwell aptly points out many "what if"s - what if a Dutchman, Major-General Rebecque, hadn't recognized the strategic significance of Quartres-Bras, and disobeyed orders in order to protect it? What if French General Ney hadn't inexplicably waited so long to attack Quartres-Bras (probably due to wariness of Wellington's strategic reputation), allowing reinforcements to arrive? There are many of these moments described by Cornwell which could have turned the tide the other way. Napoleon's often brilliant strategy is explained, but it was subject to the vagaries of battle and at times erroneous execution by his staff in chaotic circumstances. We also get to see the bravery and clear-headedness of many, especially those who eventually turned the battle into the allies favor.The devastating loss of lives and the awful injuries are unstintingly portrayed, with Wellington professing his hope that he would never go to war again. This is a page-turning account of the famous battle, and a great place to start in understanding it.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Very detailed account of the Battle of Waterloo. Almost too detailed. But interesting nonetheless. Sadly, total carnage. I'm amazed anyone survived.