Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Flat Earth News: AN AWARD WINNING REPORTER EX
Flat Earth News: AN AWARD WINNING REPORTER EX
Flat Earth News: AN AWARD WINNING REPORTER EX
Audiobook17 hours

Flat Earth News: AN AWARD WINNING REPORTER EX

Written by Nick Davies

Narrated by Steven Crossley

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

About this audiobook

Finally I was forced to admit that I work in a corrupted profession." When award-winning journalist Nick Davies decided to break Fleet Street's unwritten rule by investigating his own colleagues, he found that the business of reporting the truth had been slowly subverted by the mass production of ignorance. Working with a network of off-the-record sources, Davies uncovered the story of the prestigious "Sunday" newspaper which allowed the CIA and MI6 to plant fiction in its columns; the newsroom which routinely rejects stories about black people; the respected paper that hired a professional fraudster to set up a front company to entrap senior political figures; the newspapers which support law and order while paying cash bribes to bent detectives. Davies names names and exposes the national stories which turn out to be pseudo events manufactured by the PR industry, and the global news stories which prove to be fiction generated by a new machinery of international propaganda. He shows the effect of this on a world where consumers believe a mass of stories which, in truth, are as false as the idea that the Earth is flat - from the millennium bug to the WMD in Iraq - tainting government policy, perverting popular belief. With the help of researchers from Cardiff University, who ran a ground-breaking analysis of our daily news, Davies found most reporters, most of the time, are not allowed to dig up stories or check their facts - a profession corrupted at the core.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJun 1, 2009
ISBN9781407440385
Flat Earth News: AN AWARD WINNING REPORTER EX

Related to Flat Earth News

Related audiobooks

Business For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Flat Earth News

Rating: 4.2317077073170735 out of 5 stars
4/5

123 ratings10 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Eye-opener voor al wie in de sector zit. Schokkend in zijn beschrijving van de praktijken in de pers: de bewuste vuile truuks en de band pers-beleid, maar was al grotendeels bekend. Nieuw: het mechanisme van churnalism. Knappe analyse, goed onderbouwd, occasioneel dubieus in sommige voorbeelden, cfr heroïne
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Regretfully eye opening. A deeper insight to what I feel we already know is happening.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Sadly the Internet did not save journalism, it just struck the killing blow to the diseased monster it has become. This book will disabuse you of the mistaken memory that journalism was good before twitter took over.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The 'sister' volume to Davies' recent "Hack Attack", this is well-researched polemic maps the slippery slope of decline in British newspapers - from journalism to churnalism. Davies is thorough on the impact of PR, government spin and corporate ownership, and while his glasses may be a little rose tinted for the pre-Murdoch era, there's plenty of stories here to support his point. A little slow at times (it lacks the narrative drive of the more recent book) it's still well worth a read, especially if you want to know why so many respected commentators fell for the Iraq WMD story.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This book really opened my eyes to the world of 'churnalism' and the lengths that some newspapers and journalists will go to, to get that scoop. It was particularly timely during the investigations into phone hacking which are currently going on too. Davies cites example after example of not just bad practice but practice which ruins people's reputations and lives and reinforces negative opinions of individuals and racial stereotypes. The fact that many of us believe everything we read makes me quite fearful for the repercussions on society, especially with the case studies which highlighted that techniques such as misquoting, lying or entrapment were being used not by the red tops but by the 'quality' papers too. It will certainly make me question the reliability of media stories to a greater extent than before.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Eye-opener voor al wie in de sector zit. Schokkend in zijn beschrijving van de praktijken in de pers: de bewuste vuile truuks en de band pers-beleid, maar was al grotendeels bekend. Nieuw: het mechanisme van churnalism. Knappe analyse, goed onderbouwd, occasioneel dubieus in sommige voorbeelden, cfr heroïne
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Continuing in the pattern of “lemme tell you what I think about this”, here’s the book that was finished earlier this week. Once you’ve read it, you probably will read newspapers more carefully; no matter how carefully you thought you read them before.First, however, let’s have one thing clear from the outset: this is not about how some minority group or secret committee is controlling the world and/or the media. While there may be decisions made about things by groups we know nothing about (that’s why they’re ‘secret groups’ after all), it’s all too easy to shuffle off one’s responsibility for not doing anything to change things by blaming an anonymous ‘powerful individuals’. Here’s an H.L. Menken quote included in the book (p. 395) which goes some way to explain how this sort of thinking can be rubbish: "…the central belief of every moron is that he is the victim of a mysterious conspiracy against his rights and true deserts … [He] ascribes all his failures to get on in the world, all of his congenital incapacity damfoolishness, to the machinations of werewolves assembled in Wall Street or some other such den of infamy."This book is specifically about how there are few, if any, people in control of the media. While many reporters and editors find all too frequently that they aren’t able to do the fact‐checking they wish to – and are frustrated at the situation’s stasis – they aren’t the cause of it through lack of initiative; they simply haven’t the time. According to the staggeringly persuasive argument of author Nick Davies, the newspapers of the UK are essentially now all owned by people who have little interest in publishing newspapers containing journalism. What these individuals are principally concerned with is simply ‘selling copies of the paper each and every day, and the more the better.’ This ‘quantity over quality’ approach is why they are termed “the Grocers” by Mr. Davies.Certainly, any business must be operated with an eye to profit v. loss. However, there is so much an avoidance of idealism towards the media’s content, that the readers are being under‐served to the point of unconscionable delivery of falsity on the part of the various persons responsible for the media outlets’ content.While the book focusses much of its time upon the newspapers of London – including entire chapters each devoted to the Sunday Times, the Observer, and both the Daily and Sunday Mail newspapers – the problems and trends can all be recognised as being world‐wide in scope. The newspapers of North America are, thankfully, prevented from out‐right lying about individuals in print, owing to a reversal of the onus of proof in legal arguments here, when compared to the UK. That said, the habit of reporting quickly and loudly, then correcting slowly and quietly, is one which no legal or regulatory procedure can effectively prevent.The other worrisome trend is the one first identified in the book: things being simply repeated from the texts of Media Releases without any effort to confirm that there is any validity within them, or even if they contain amplified – or ‘sexed up’, to use the UK Government’s term about the Iraqi WMD reports – versions of the truth which is then responsible for a snowball effect of panic about the subject in question; which then is fed‐back into (EG: Iranian Elections get dropped to cover Michael Jackson’s death) or someone is able to stop the thing by explaining that it’s simply not true in the slightest and we can all relax now (EG: the nullification of the principle of habeas corpus in the USA is only applied to the cases of those naughty terrorists).The fact that this book doesn’t cover is the recent development of newspapers closing due to financial decisions by their owners, despite any budget restraints they may have imposed prior to the shut‐down. It would be fascinating to know what Mr. Davies’s views of the ‘new media platform’ might do to return journalists to the forefront of the delivery of facts. He suggests late in the book that an over‐haul of newspapers is required, with the probable method of delivery being some sort of display screen.Read this book, not to begin seeing some Secret Star‐Chamber Cabal controlling the World’s fate, but in order to see that there is an ordinary group of men frantically pulling levers behind the curtain so as to continue making the Great Oz of the Media just as impressive and seemingly required as ever before.Flat Earth News: An Award‐Winning Reporter Exposes Falsehood, Distortion and Propaganda in the Global Media by Nick Davies; PP 420 (including index), ISBN: 9780099512684; 2nd Edition published in 2009 by Vintage, an imprint of Random House, London, SW1V
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Nick Davies convincingly illustrates and explains the decline in newspaper news quality over the last 30 years.It isn't a conspiracy, it's just an overwhelming commercial priority forcing less journalists to produce more stories. How can they do it? They copy them from the pre packaged Associated Press news feed, PR releases or from other newspapers and check nothing. Does it matter? Yes, because special interests can feed the press packaged stories much more effectively than they could in the past when newspapers still had an investigative function. The classic example is the WMD story pushed by the US and GB governments to justify the invasion of Iraq. Arguably these lies cost Tony Blair his job (which Davies doesn't say) so the truth still seems to come out, but in a much less timely and reliable way.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I'd suspected, of course, that most of what sadly passes for "headline news" right now is, in fact, a load of b*ll*cks. What I didn't know was why. Read this passionate, vital and implacably well-argued book, and you'll never trust a headline again.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A coruscating crucifixion of modern British journalism. The chapter on the Daily Mail is chilling. The highest commendation of this work are the subsequent reviews - high praise through gritted teeth. Interesting that no-one able to land a killer blow on Davies' core thesis.