Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    We Were Feminists Once: From Riot Grrrl to CoverGirl, the Buying and Selling of a Political Movement
    We Were Feminists Once: From Riot Grrrl to CoverGirl, the Buying and Selling of a Political Movement
    We Were Feminists Once: From Riot Grrrl to CoverGirl, the Buying and Selling of a Political Movement
    Audiobook10 hours

    We Were Feminists Once: From Riot Grrrl to CoverGirl, the Buying and Selling of a Political Movement

    Written by Andi Zeisler

    Narrated by Joell A. Jacob

    4/5

    ()

    About this audiobook



    Today, feminism is no longer a dirty word, and women purporting to stand up for women's equality now include high-powered names like Beyonce, Taylor Swift, and Emma Watson. Hip underwear lines sell granny pants with "feminist" emblazoned on the back. In every bookstore, there are scores of seductive feminist how-to business guides telling women how to achieve "it all." Meanwhile, access to abortion clinics is growing ever more difficult for many women across the country, and Arizona has passed a law requiring doctors to tell women undergoing an abortive procedure about a junk science method of "reversing" abortion espoused by the Tea Party right. Feminism has gone mainstream, but true equality is never an easy sell.

    Here Andi Zeisler exposes how feminism has transformed into something barely warranting the name, ignoring the many for the one, shamelessly colluding with market forces and popular culture. Witty and fearless, We Were Feminists Once is the story of how we could have let this happen, and where we go from here.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherTantor Media, Inc
    Release dateMay 3, 2016
    ISBN9781515974529
    We Were Feminists Once: From Riot Grrrl to CoverGirl, the Buying and Selling of a Political Movement

    Related to We Were Feminists Once

    Related audiobooks

    Social Science For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Andrea Long Chu: Females: A Concern

      Dec 15, 2019

      Verso, 2019 Based in New York City, Andrea Long Chu is an essayist and critic whose writings have been credited with launching a “second wave” in trans studies. Females: A Concern is her first book-length work, which provides readings of contemporary

      5 min read

    • Article

      Puncturing The Postfeminist Fantasy

      Mar 5, 2021

      Puncturing The Postfeminist Fantasy
      5 min read

    • Article

      Feminism’s Purity Wars

      Feb 27, 2020

      Feminism’s Purity Wars
      10 min read

    • Article

      The Nasty Noughties: Russell Brand And The Era Of Sadistic Tabloid Misogyny

      Sep 18, 2023

      The allegations against Russell Brand that surfaced at the weekend and which he has denied – that he is a rapist, a groomer, possessed of a nihilistic sense of impunity – appear concrete and specific, and could terminate in criminal proceedings. In t

      7 min read

    • Article

      Sisters Doing It For Themselves

      Feb 4, 2021

      Mad Men’s Betty Draper exemplifies the problems facing women as the 60s began. Bored and lonely in her Formica prison, Betty is so unhappy her hands shake. Another Betty – Betty Friedan – explained the issue in her 1963 book, The Feminine Mystique, t

      4 min read

    • Article

      Toxic Truth

      Apr 14, 2021

      Toxic Truth
      6 min read

    • Article

      ‘It Was Utterly Wild’: The Story Of A 1970s Erotic Magazine For Women

      Apr 3, 2023

      Back in the mid-aughts, right before the internet made Play-Doh spaghetti of the magazine industry, Jennifer Romolini was an editor at Lucky, a Conde Nast property dedicated to all things shopping. It was while researching her column on eBay and Etsy

      3 min read

    • Article

      The Week in Pop-Culture Writing: Sugar Daddies and Do-Gooders

      Aug 29, 2015

      Editor’s Note: This article previously appeared in a different format as part of The Atlantic’s Notes section, retired in 2021. Soon Saturdays will be for @GreenWaveFBall! What happened when camp began this week: http://t.co/klTy4hYW0E #rollwave pic

      2 min read

    • Article

      Nostalgia, Remorse, And Terrible Tabloids: Why We’re All Suddenly Talking About The Noughties

      Mar 12, 2021

      We are in the midst of a historical throwback. Until recently, the period following the turn of the millennium was frequently dismissed as a pop-culture graveyard strewn with low rise jeans, rhinestones, peek-a-boo thongs and poorly blended hair exte

      7 min read

    • Article

      When Political Satire — Whoops! — Reinforces Ideas It Means to Skewer

      Aug 25, 2017

      What are the perils when political satire leaves too much open to interpretation? That was running through my mind after Tina Fey's recent appearance on "Weekend Update: Summer Edition," which is "Saturday Night Live's" bid to stay relevant amid a su

      6 min read

    • Article

      What Madonna Knows

      Oct 10, 2023

      What Madonna Knows
      12 min read

    • Article

      Return Of The 60s Neurosis

      Jun 30, 2022

      BY THE TIME THE VETERAN journalist Christopher Booker died in 2019, he had witnessed enough of the twenty-first century to notice how much his book on the 1960s (The Neophil iacs, published in 1969) resonated with it. Two years into this decade, it’s

      8 min read

    • Article

      The Silence Breakers

      Dec 18, 2017

      The Silence Breakers
      32 min read

    • Article

      Sex

      Jun 30, 2021

      MICHEL FOUCAULT Modern Classics, 416pp, £25 For most of the last four decades or so, the obscure philosopher Michel Foucault has been a name seldom mentioned outside academic social studies departments. Now, though, he’s all the rage – blamed by cult

      3 min read

    • Article

      He Doth Brotest Too Much

      Nov 13, 2017

      He Doth Brotest Too Much
      7 min read

    • Article

      Letters

      Sep 4, 2018

      Setting aside much of Sandra M. Gilbert’s problematic cover article in the summer issue, “In the Labyrinth of #MeToo”), I would like to focus on three paragraphs. In the middle of her piece, soon after describing the rape of an unconscious woman behi

      6 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for We Were Feminists Once

    4/5

    58 ratings4 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 5/5
      Zeisler puts into words all of my discomforts around marketplace feminism and empowertising. She critiques many industries, celebrities, and campaigns without sounding "holier than thou" and still leaves space to appreciate the positive effects many do have. I love Bitch Media's feminist critiques of pop culture and Andi Zeisler did not let me down!
    • 4/5
      Is pop culture a better lens than political action to view the state of feminism? Andi Zeisler’s We Were Feminists Once posits that feminism has been taken over by Madison Avenue and capitalism, so that’s where we must look. She calls it marketplace feminism, the main takeaway of this book. In a blistering summary of songs, commercials, bands, tv shows, films, novelists, fashion and especially actresses, the book is clear evidence of way too much television intake.Capitalism and Madison Avenue have been lurking about feminism right from the beginning. Marketplace feminism long ago overcame the stigma of hardcore feminism and has never looked back. Zeisler points out there are all kinds of so-called feminist products that have little or nothing to do with feminism, but they are feminist because the purveyors say so. Right in the commercials and on the packaging. So it must be true.The basic point is sadly obvious and valid: feminism has been diluted by capitalism. The word empowered is so ubiquitous and overworked “We may have empowered ourselves into a corner”. There’s a whole chapter on the word, and it’s the best chapter in the book.There appear to be no two people who have the same appreciation of feminism. And everyone seems to criticize everyone else’s definitions, as well as their lifestyles and life choices. The entire book is anecdotes along these lines, and the message from them seems to be Abandon Hope All Ye Who Enter Here. Everything counts, from t shirt slogans to song lyrics to tv interviews. And everyone is an expert. And nothing is forgotten - or forgiven.Zeisler’s style is delightful. Every time I thought I’d had enough, she swung through with pointed, perceptive sarcasm, self deprecation or a caustic observation that kept me reading. She is knowledgeable, thorough, clever and smooth. The book though, doesn’t build. Every chapter is more of the same. And then, after all the enduring criticism of marketplace feminism, Zeisler concludes: “Marketplace feminism has made equality look attractive, sexy and cool.” And she hopes for more. So I don’t know.David Wineberg
    • 3/5
      Zeisler's analysis of "marketplace feminism" is very interesting but so contemporary that I wonder if I would understand it as well if I hadn't lived through the same pop culture moments as she has. I also will never look at the word "empower" in the same way again.
    • 4/5
      Strictly speaking, much of this book shouldn't be surprising if a reader was not willfully ignorant of current marketing and consumer trends. However, the pervasive misogyny in US culture (which reveals itself in everything from the reaction to the horrifying prospect of a womman president, to the pathological Gamergate dudes) and the numbers of people (especially young women) who inhabit the happy "post-feminist" fantasy world means that this book contains several much needed kicks up the bum. And they are delivered with relish by Zeisler; I anticipate this book by itself should supply me with a year's worth of smack-down quotes for the clueless and callous.The chief virtue of this book is that Zeisler uses her extensive experience following and critiquing a variety of media trends to connect a lot of dots. She provide a useful and very accessibly overview of how Capitalism marketed products to women, and specifically the different stages in its use of the women's movement to sell stuff.The focus of her analysis is what she refers to as "marketplace feminism." If you haven't come across the term before, you will recognize the phenomenon instantly when she begins to describe it. If you have ever heard anyone wittering on about "choice" and "empowerment" when trying to sell you a "product for women" (one of the elements of her analysis is the way in which, in contrast to the late 70s and 80s, our kids are actually growing up in a product world that is more highly gendered today) then you have encountered marketplace feminism. There are some undoubted benefits to greater exposure to the concept of feminism, especially after so many years of pretending (in the US at least) that it didn't exist, and Zeisler doesn't hesitate to point to these benefits.However, the main reason she is pissed about marketplace feminism, and she is right to be pissed, is that what it does is take a movement that since its inception was predicated upon collective action for the collective good, and make it all about individual gratification. In the process, the possibility of making value judgments is all but eliminated. If you are a woman and you are exercising your "choice" then that is awesome and therefore feminist and therefore awesome all over again! The possibility that your choice might be a lousy one that damages others is irrelevant. Likewise, if your purchase makes you feel "empowered" then that is an automatic good; the fact that your powerful pink "This is what a feminist looks like" iPhone cover was probably made by women earning starvation wages in dangerous factory conditions (ditto your phone) is irrelevant. Zeisler argues strongly for moving away from the focus on feminism as something one is, in and for oneself, and putting the emphasis back on feminism as something you do for others.My only criticism is that I wish Zeisler had spent more time connecting the trends she identifies with larger political and cultural forces. A perhaps inadvertent side-effect of the numerous (often discouraging) examples focused on feminist controversies and marketing, is that it can sometime make it seem as if these elements were created only to try and co-opt and contain feminism. Some of them of course have been applied in exactly that way. But what she is talking about here is a larger shift in modern capitalism. We are way beyond Marx's concept of alienated labor now. What we have instead is what we might call "alienation of affection" in which capitalism takes many of our own best impulses, strips them from us, and sells them back to us. Choice and empowerment should, after all, be unproblematically good things. In a capitalist world they become key mechanisms for moving units of product. And the fact that these are larger trends will be recognizable to anyone who has ever encountered the bright and shiny face of a twenty-something who has just discovered Ayn Rand and is reveling in the fact that at last (At Last!) someone is justifying their own self-absorption.For these marketing trends to work PR firms need to elicit the power of the mass media, and Zeisler uses her familiarity with the media world to point out the many ways in which feminist concerns are either routinely mis-handled by the mainstream press, or (more disturbingly) artfully manipulated by new media outlets whose only goal is to stir up the kind of controversy that will generate page clicks. This also probably shouldn't be news to anyone, but given the number of my highly educated friends and colleagues who seem powerless to recognize or resist reposting clickbait or falling into the cycnical cycle of the outrage machine, I suspect that Zeisler's examples here will prove shaming. They probably won't change people's practice, however, and here as elsewhere I found myself wishing for embedding the specific feminist project here in a more thoroughgoing criticism of the practices of the larger media sphere and their links with capitalism consumerism.And yet I still found myself hopeful after reading the book, because the book's subtext is that we were feminists once, but we could be so once again.