Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Lord of Misrule
    Lord of Misrule
    Lord of Misrule
    Audiobook10 hours

    Lord of Misrule

    Written by Jaimy Gordon

    Narrated by Myra Lucretia Taylor

    3.5/5

    ()

    About this audiobook

    Jaimy Gordon's engrossing Lord of Misrule is a National Book Award winner. In the early 1970s, horse trainer Tommy Hansel cooks up a crafty get-rich-quick scheme. But his plans go awry when everyone at the Indian Mound Downs track seems to be on to his shenanigans. Complicating matters further is Tommy's tragic love, Maggie. She adores the horses in all their rundown glory and becomes fascinated by the misfits who populate the backwater West Virginia track-including some local gangsters looking for a big score of their own. "Exceptional writing and idiosyncratic characters make this an engaging read."-Kirkus Reviews
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherRecorded Books, Inc.
    Release dateFeb 18, 2010
    ISBN9781456136604
    Lord of Misrule

    Related to Lord of Misrule

    Related audiobooks

    Literary Fiction For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      A Year in Reading: Max Porter

      Dec 6, 2019

      I would have been lost this year (as any other) without poetry to cling to and travel with. The post A Year in Reading: Max Porter appeared first on The Millions.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Cooking with Ursula K. Le Guin

      Feb 16, 2018

      Cooking with Ursula K. Le Guin
      8 min read

    • Article

      Cj Carey

      May 19, 2021

      OCCASIONALLY, A WRITER CAN TELL YOU exactly how a book began life. In the case of CJ Carey (a pseudonym), she’d gone out for lunch with a friend, who had offered condolences over the 2018 death of her husband, the novelist Philip Kerr. But there was

      3 min read

    • Article

      The Great Divide

      Apr 22, 2022

      It’s easy to imagine a conversation about Louise Kennedy’s debut novel, Trespasses, that goes something like this: “What’s it about?” “Well, it’s about a young Catholic woman in Belfast in the 70s, at the height of the Troubles.” “Punishment beatings

      2 min read

    • Article

      Back Draft: Sterling HolyWhiteMountain

      Jul 23, 2021

      The fiction writer discusses Native art, breakup phone calls, and the line between politics and propaganda.

      10 min read

    • Article

      Two Poems

      Jul 1, 2022

      Golden Gate Park As any poet will tell you, the weight of the lineis essential, but here these practitioners havemore on their minds than poems. The weight of their lines is uniformly light, the line selectedto land and then rest gently on the surfac

      2 min read

    • Article

      The Element of Silence: The Millions Interviews N. Scott Momaday

      Jul 20, 2022

      "Too many people just write down things in haste that look like poetry, but they’re not." The post The Element of Silence: The Millions Interviews N. Scott Momaday appeared first on The Millions.

      9 min read

    • Article

      Enter the Ambition Fatigue

      Apr 8, 2017

      Enter the Ambition Fatigue
      6 min read

    • Article

      'A View Of The Empire At Sunset' Uses Author Jean Rhys To Explore 'Otherness'

      Jun 13, 2018

      Novelist Caryl Phillips uses the life of author Jean Rhys to return to once again explore themes of racism and colonialism.

      3 min read

    • Article

      José Donoso Saw the Future of Latin American Literature

      Nov 21, 2023

      American readers have largely forgotten the single greatest writer to come from the Latin American Boom: Chilean novelist José Donoso. The post José Donoso Saw the Future of Latin American Literature appeared first on The Millions.

      5 min read

    • Article

      The Art of Nonfiction No. 11

      Dec 7, 2021

      The Art of Nonfiction No. 11
      26 min read

    • Article

      Clarence Page: The Age-old Trick Of ‘Passing’: Fiction Writer The Latest To Be Disgraced By Lies About Heritage

      Mar 20, 2023

      I have never known a man who faked his own death, but I have known a man who faked his own life, then sadly failed to live long enough for us to talk about it. I’m talking about the late Hache Carrillo, a rising, award-winning literary talent whose r

      3 min read

    • Article

      Books

      Sep 5, 2022

      Books
      6 min read

    • Article

      Birds Of Paradise

      Apr 19, 2022

      Birds Of Paradise
      5 min read

    • Article

      Announcing Our Spring Issue

      Mar 1, 2018

      Announcing Our Spring Issue
      1 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Lord of Misrule

    3.5/5

    194 ratings31 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 2/5
      I could not get into this book. I finished it because it had two things going for it; the audio book reader was excellent, and the writing was decent.

      I did not develop any kind of relationship with any of the characters or horses, and felt lost in the storyline most of the time. Was there a point to this story, or was it just a slice of life story that wanted to be more? Basic storyline is about a bunch of two-bit, washed up horse trainers, jockeys, owners, groomsmen and horses at a small time race track in West Virginia in the 1970’s. It has all of the makings for a story I would like, but there were too many characters and none of them seemed real enough to care about. I finished the book thinking, “I just don’t get it.”

      I doubt I will remember anything about this book next week.
    • 4/5
      While I recognize that there are things to admire about this book (the writing shines in a few places, and the characters are well-crafted), I can't say that I enjoyed it. Or even particularly liked it. Because there are also things here that I demonstrably didn't enjoy: the sex scenes were icky (thankfully there were only a couple), and the racetrack details were beyond my ken. I admit that this last fault is my own, since I know very close to nothing about horse racing, although I suppose a case could be made that the book should be readable to those outside track life. Despite all this, though, the basic storyline - which took me a good 3/4 of the book to suss out - pulled me in on the home stretch (and do apologize for the word choice there). So, a mixed bag this one, for me, at least.
    • 4/5
      This book is a National Book Award Winner(2010). Gordon was an author from a small press and her win that year was a surprise. For the most part I find National Book Award nominees and winners great reading lists. This book has great language. It deals with the low end of horse racing in West Virginia in the early 70's. Gordon really evokes a feel for the setting with her language. This is not an easy read. She mixes her descriptions of the characters including the horses in a way that can be hard to follow. Her prose style does not distinguish dialogue so it can be confusing as to what character is speaking. However, once you figure out the flow, it was an excellent read. A good author says things in a creative way and Gordon does a great job on this. A worthwhile read and I will check out her other books.
    • 5/5
      This was a compelling read---fraught with tension. The complex characters( human and animal ) played their fated roles in a world where good and evil were inextricably bound.
      I read this book voraciously---lapped up the rich, dense, evocative language. Jaimy Gordon has elevated the sordid little world of claiming races to the level of classic Greek tragedy.
    • 1/5
      I read about 100 pages of this book and just couldn't get into it. Just another award winning book that didn't win me over.
    • 4/5
      Despite floundering through the first 50 or so pages (maybe more?), I loved reading this book. Her physical descriptions of people and animals are intensely good, Margaret's is one of the best female characters I've ever met in fiction, and I appreciated that Gordon allowed me to love Toe-Tie and Elizabeth. And Pelter.
    • 3/5
      I feel like such a philistine, but the patois just did not work for me. In some ways I felt that Gordon leaned on it like a crutch instead of developing her characters and narrative more fully. And if you've read the book you know that if you're not sold on the language, this book is just not going to work for you.
    • 2/5
      This book started off fantastic -- the imagery was striking, the characters were interesting, and the occasional use of dialect wasn't too intrusive.

      About halfway through the book, though, I started losing my handle on the book. I found myself having trouble remembering which horse was which, and what connected the various characters to which horses. For obvious reasons, that made the book much less enjoyable. By the end, I was even a little unsure that I understood why people were doing what they were doing anymore.

      It's a shame -- I really wanted to like this book, but all my appreciation for the setting and the horse-racing expertise had ebbed away by the end of the book.

      One other note: there are a handful of sex scenes scattered throughout the book, somewhat graphic, but mostly just disturbingly different in tone from the rest of the book. They're dark and overly poetic, almost mystical, and I seem to recall them being written in the second person, which might be partly responsible for their disturbing nature.
    • 4/5
      The characters at first came across as racetrack stereotypes -- the naive girl; the wise, superstitious black groom -- and I had trouble keeping the different horses straight. Later in the book, though, the story started to come together, and the plot took on urgency. The character of Two-Tie holds together the book; his scenes are the most powerful. Gordon's language is incredible, and it makes Lord of Misrule worth reading: "The sun beat down and by three the red dirt glowed back around each barn and strip of grass like the works of a toaster. The heat was a bullying heat that muffled sound, so that a person saw a brush or bucket fall or a tiechain drop and heard nothing, just a kind of clap of air, a flat toneless echo. Every now and then a sparrow flopped down in the dirt and scratched around."At times, I felt uncomfortable with how close Gordon came to the dark hearts of her characters. In particular, the sexual descriptions of Margaret from Tommy Hansel's point of view made me want to stop reading. It's not an author's job to make life pretty, of course, and later I gained sympathy for Hansel. But I think there can be too close of an identification with some characters. It's problematic, I think, to put some voices into the world without modulation, without a bit of distance.
    • 4/5
      This is an extraordinary book and I am so glad it surprised everyone and won the National Book Award. It deserved it. Ms. Gordon put a life time of her writing life into this and across the board whether it's dialogue or description the work is beautiful, fresh and surprising. The story follows the corrupt behavior on a small W virginia race track and features a cast of characters from the walkers to the trainers to the owners and the local mob. It's got a crime story but that is beside the point. Ms. Gordon knows the vernacular and uses it beautifully to give us all this dirty realism. It can be hard to follow since she minimalizes summary and instead throws us into conversations where the characters are speaking a kind of patois of the race track. None of this does justice, the whole thing is so beautifully wrought. The issue, if there is one, is the ending where the madness of one of the characters hasn't been established enough to warrant what happens. But all is forgiven. Much more than American Rust and other books that feature gritty realism this one is poetry, so lush and rich that again it deserved its recognition.
    • 4/5
      What an unusual novel!

      I found Lord of Misrule a difficult read. It is not a "page turner that you can not wait to get back to". Ms. Gordon uses a staccato cadence and pacing which never settles into a comfortable flow. There are several deep dialects that never become familiar. You are not always sure who is speaking to whom, even occasionally whether human is speaking to human or to an animal.

      This is not a book about horse racing. It is a book about hardscrabble people in a hardscrabble place trying to get from one day to the next. Yes, the race track is the setting and framework, but the story is one of survival, hope and despair. Luck is always around the next corner, but never really at hand.

      I never felt that the characters were vivid, they were always a bit hazy and distant. I felt that I was looking into a shadow or a through a layer of film. The narrative is also sketchy and jumpy throughout, almost more lyrical poetry than prose at times.

      This is all certainly intentional and not necessarily a bad thing, just disconcerting at times. Lord of Misrule simply requires a good deal from the reader and will not resonate with everyone.

      Finally, there are several passages where the imagery suddenly devolves into vulgarity which many readers may find extreme.
    • 1/5
      There's a reason for using certain styles, like dialog with quotes, he said & she said. This is all mixed up with some sentences being thoughts while others are apparently supposed to be dialog. Seems like the author knows what he/she is talking about, but it's just too much work trying to read this.
    • 2/5
      Rather hard to read with its over-artful style.
    • 4/5
      From the opening metaphor of the hot-walking machine at Indian Mound Downs to its final pages, this novel is filled with characters, human and animal, whose lives intersect in dramatic encounters. The setting is the world of horse racing. Like the plays of Shakespeare or the novels of Dickens when they portrayed the lower classes, the story is set in the small time backwater of the claims stakes with bit players, the subculture of grifters and ne’er-do-wells whose lives center on a venue that obviously has never and will never bring them success. They include the handlers, owners, and wannabes along with gamblers, backers, and assorted hanger-ons. They have names like Two-Tie, Medicine Ed, Kidstuff and Deucey, and they’re capable of speaking a kind of racetrack patois occasionally reminiscent of Damon Runyon characters: “So I want you should write me a race, well, not me personally, fellow from Nebraska, kid I used to know back when—actually I used to know his mother…She was very good to me. Alas, I fear I did not return the favor like I should have.” At the center of the novel is Tommy Hansel, a horse trainer with a get-rich-quick scheme that he feels cannot fail. He plans to enter “sure-fire” winners in claiming races, benefit from the long odds, then get out of town quickly. "I tell you a secret, horse racing is not no science."(p 83) 'Nothing, of course, goes according to plan, especially since everyone seems on to his scheme, and the horses aren’t as cooperative as Tommy would like them to be. Complicating the issue is the quirky, intelligent Maggie Koderer, new to the horse-race business but nonetheless Tommy’s love. Maggie is college-educated but is drawn to the seamy underbelly of the track and the broken-down beauty of the horses.The best aspect of Jaimy Gordon's fine novel is the portrayal of the racing milieu. The atmosphere is a presence that is strong enough to smell. The characters are developed through small vignettes through which their personalities gradually emerge. Gordon structures the narrative around the four horses and she seamlessly moves the reader from one narrative consciousness to another without being manipulative or intrusive. The races themselves are described with a tour de force of energy and spirit. The exceptional writing and idiosyncratic characters give the reader entry into another world and make this a delightful, engaging, and even award-winning read.
    • 3/5
      A Damon Runyonesque story about horse racing - some of those horses are treated well, many are not. This book was long listed for the Orange Prize but I didn't find it profound. I did finish because it kept me interested enough to know what happened, but one could lead a long and happy life without it. Female masochism is never appealing to me.
    • 4/5
      It's always a great bonus when a good work of fiction can also teach readers about something new. Lord of Misrule did this, introducing me to a world of horseracing that I never knew existed. Set in the 1970's and taking place at a run-down, small-stakes track and stable operation in the boonies of West Virginia, Misrule tells the story of a group of downtrodden, but loyal track employees, the unethical, money-obsessed men who call the shots, and the ill-fated horses who (literally) race through their world. While the dialects, lack of quotation marks or spacing of dialogue, and Gordon's changing points of view require a bit of acclimation and close attention, soon enough you will be enveloped by the narrative; read a few words into the sentence and the identities of the speakers becomes obvious.Gordon's knowledge of small-time horse racing and attention to detail is impressive. I can only imagine the amount of research a work like this required. And, even though the story includes realistic portrayals of the abuses and suffering of both horses and people, the book remains as objective in its stance as it can. Yes, one can tell the "good" characters from the "bad" ones, even if flaws and worthy traits appear in both, but Gordon avoids easy resolutions. This is the story about lives lived, not fortunes made; but the poignant emotions evoked by the tale and its memorable characters are what make this novel worthwhile.
    • 2/5
      Lord of Misrule is the story of the trainers, grooms, jockeys and assorted hangers on at a seedy racetrack in West Virginia. I love horse racing and so I eagerly anticipated the novel, especially after learning that it had won the National Book Award. Unfortunately, little about the story rang true. The story is told from the point of view of several characters, a technique that is quickly becoming hackneyed. One of the characters is Medicine Ed, the African American groom. Ed's narration is such a caricature that it borders on offensive. I'm not sure Gordon has ever talked to a black person in her life. Ed's character appears to have been constructed from reading Uncle Remus and watching episodes of Amos n Andy. Nearly every character is given a colorful nickname, of course, and the main character, Maggie, goes in for a little bondage just for the heck of it. This is the kind of book that reeks of creative writing program, with full of artifice, lacking in humor and completely divorced from any actual life experience the author may have had. From now on, I think I am going to have to read author biographies more carefully and pass on book written by anyone contaminated by an MFA.
    • 5/5
      Well written and interesting tale of lifes hard choices and the gritty underbelly of a slowly dying sport.
    • 4/5
      Indian Mounds Down, is a rundown amateur racetrack, in West Virginia, circa 1970.Everything in this ramshackle place is broken or about to be, populated with hot-walkers, grooms, jockeys, trainers and third-rate gangsters, all christened with names like Deucey, Medicine Ed, Two-Tie and Kidstuff. The line between these misfits and the brokedown horses they live for, blur again and again. The author presents this world in a unique language, full of slang and verbal shortcuts, doing away with quotations and some punctuation, so it flows like poetic grunge. This makes for some difficult reading, but there is beauty to the prose and at times you can smell the dust and horse sweat, emanating from the page.“An hour before Little Spinoza’s first race they sat around in a funeral mood-all except Little Spinoza who stood in his bucket of ice as cool as a Tiffany cocktail stirrer, dreaming in black jewelry eyes of emerald alfalfa and clover of Burmese jade. He had miraculously regained his innocence as they had all lost theirs.”I can see why this National Book Award winner, has divided readers. It’s not an easy read but I find my problems with the narrative, a deficiency in me and not in the writing. If you are up for the challenge, I think the rewards will be yours.
    • 5/5
      There is a reason Lord of Misrule won the National Book Award. Gordon expertly uses four separate third-person narrators (well one is actually second-person) throughout the entire book. Each chapter dives into a different characters head and never once does the reader feel at a loss for who is the focus.Every character in this book is trying to stack the odds in their favor to either simply survive in or walk away very rich from the horse racing world. The truth is that they are all susceptible to what feels like a perpetual cycle of many losses with an occasional win so long as they remain within the confines of the racing world—which can be seen as a metaphor for human existence in the world at large. Gordon’s characters know or learn the ins and outs of the racing world, for better or worse, and they do their best to continue to put a roof of their own over their heads (Medicine Ed), keep a horse in their stall (Duecey), protect their family (Two-Tie), discover who they are (Maggie).This book is also about the fallacy of the Cinderella story. Each person who makes any kind of gain, legitimate or otherwise, does so through hard work or very dirty dealings, which often lead to unpleasant consequences. There is nothing pretty about the workings of this horse race world, even some of the horses themselves have been run ragged. Yet, everyone loves a Cinderella story, even if they have to ignore a few shady details to believe it.In the end, Maggie discovers that she is stronger and more capable of handling life than she ever knew herself to be before coming to Indian Mound Downs. She no longer feels she is there simply to take care of Tommy Hansel and his horses; she was there for herself as much as for any man or any animal.The language in this book is divine. Even in the early stages of the book when I was trying to orient myself and when the action was slow, the language kept me reading. The first two chapters are great, but it was as if Gordon was purposefully keeping us in the gate while all we wanted to do was burst out and get on with the race.I’m glad she finally opened the gate because the story really picks up. While the whole book is superb, Chapter 27 is some of the best reading I have ever had the privilege of experiencing. I went over it at least twice and plan on reading it again. In that chapter, specifically, Gordon carries the reader on her back as if she were a seasoned thoroughbred; the reader is never distracted or thrown off by a single word. The entire book is drenched in images and phrases that had me breaking out the highlighter and rereading pages for pure enjoyment’s sake. For me as a writer, the greatest strength of all, regarding Lord of Misrule, is that every time I put it down, I wanted to write.
    • 2/5
      I found this book difficult to read. The dialogue was hard to follow, there were no quotation marks even though there was a lot of dialogue, and it was hard to tell the characters apart. There were a few sections which were quite good, but most of the book was difficult to follow.
    • 4/5
      I’m no horse racing enthusiast and this book did not turn me into one, although I doubt that was the author’s intent. She wrote a book about some down and out characters, seedy has-beens much like the horses that populate the second-rate racetrack in West Virginia where the story is set. It follows the lives of five of these characters and four races that take place over the course of a year in the early 1970s. The story is told through these four races.Tommy Hansel is a newcomer to Indian Mound Downs Racetrack and he has a plan: he’ll bring in four horses that are better than they look, win big and quickly get out. Things don’t go exactly as planned. It’s the story of these characters, their gritty lives and commitment to these mediocre steeds that might provide them with the wherewithal to buy that used trailer if only they can win Saturday’s $1,500 race. They live from race to race as others live from week to week. Gordon paints a grim picture of life at the track and its genuineness is unsparing.The narrative depicting the race scenes is absolutely riveting.“Gates clang open and Mr Boll Weevil, he is looking for a home all right. He’s still looking around that gate like he’s thinking about putting up wallpaper in it, making a down payment on a living room suit, moving in for life. Finally he drops his big head and it soaks in that all them other horses have done already gone and left him behind. He takes off running, passing horses right and left, and you can see he ain’t half trying yet. He just eats holes for hisself between them other animals in his weevilly way.” (Page 52)And yet something about the story feels disjointed. Besides the gritty dialect, that takes some getting used to, the characters, for whatever reason, go by more than one name, making it difficult to know who’s talking or being referred to. There were many times when I just didn’t know what was going on. By the time I got to the last hundred pages, I knew what was going on (sort of) but I felt the urge to reread the book, not because I so loved it but so I could finally understand it.
    • 3/5
      I almost gave up on this book, it was hard getting into her writing style. But I eventually went back to it & became interested. Finally actually liked the story & gritty, crude characters.
    • 5/5
      This was truly an American grown up version of National Velvet and just as well written and exciting. Girl has no horses, girl gets horses, girl's life changes forever.Anyone who loves horse racing should love it. Every character is singularly drawn (and quartered).Highest recommendation.
    • 5/5
      Finally, a book that deserves the recognition it's getting, the prestigious National Book Award, in this case. I mean this is simply one hell of a good read! The last time I was this riveted by a book about horse racing was probably when I was reading all those Black Stallion books by Walter Farley, and before that Marguerite Henry's classic kid's book, King of the Wind. And they were a loooong time ago. Oddly, the horses in Jaimy Gordon's novel don't really play such major roles as they did in those children's books. Nope, this is is a book that concentrates on the people - the grotesques and misfits of the two-bit life of the dregs of the racing world. The grooms, trainers, jockeys and gofers and hangers-on at the low-level end of thoroughbred racing take center stage in LORD OF MISRULE, and they all come grittily alive as Gordon skilfully employs multiple points of view to tell the story. There's Medicine Ed, the gimpy black groom whose family history with horses goes back a couple generations and who mixes spells and 'goofer' powders in hopes of gaining an edge for the horses he bets on. There's buzz-cut lesbian Deucey who loves her old horses, Suitcase Vernon Smithers, and Two-Tie, the loan shark, who has been banned from the track at Indian Mound Downs, but who has his own kind of personal code of honor. There are various villains and many multifarious misfits represented here, but heroes would be hard to find. Perhaps the racetrack neophyte Maggie is a heroine, but seems more of a misfit. Her relationship with Tommy Hansel, a near-crazy dandy and womanizer, is dark, mysterious and bordering on sleazy, as the somewhat sado-masochistic nature of their ties become quickly evident.Because Gordon approaches her characters from nearly every angle, and makes masterful use of dialogue and interior monologue, they all become creepily real and the sensuous and dangerous relationships evolve expertly, luring the reader surely into this seedy world of used-up horses and fixed races. I didn't know a whole lot about horseracing before reading this. Now I feel like I know something. The vernacular, the smell, the feel of it - this writer delivers it all. I've noticed some readers have whined that Gordon failed to use quotation marks for her dialogue, that it made the story hard to follow. I disagree. This 'style' worked fine for her. And she is not the first writer to dispense with such niceties of grammar or punctuation. I only recently saw the same stylistic device in a couple novels by South Dakota writer Kent Meyers, whose books have won a raft of awards. Complaining about something like this is nothing more than nit-picking, particularly in the face of a literary achievement like Gordon's. Every character here, misfit and villain alike, is perfectly realized. A particular favorite of mine was Two-Tie (Maggie's erstwhile 'Uncle Rudy'), with his fastidious and fussy ways of an old bachelor, whose only love is his dog, Elizabeth, an aging and arthritic German Shepherd. The description of the dog's descent of stairs ("reared back a little and let down the two in front, bump, then came the two behind, da-bump") and of her being "more of a thinker, not a athlete, nutting like one of those idiot fox-running dogs, all yap and slobber ..." will immediately grab dog folks. For me it brought to mind the dog/man relationship expressed so perfectly in J.R. Ackerley's wonderful memoir, MY DOG TULIP. Most of all, this is a feat - and a feast - of story-telling. Jaimy Gordon had me from page one, and she didn't let go until the very last page. These are compelling characters, every strange one of them. Put aside some time when you read this book, because once you start it you won't want to put it down. I didn't want it to end, but she even managed to end it in a way that left me feeling satisfied, thinking, 'yeah, that's exactly what would happen.'
    • 5/5
      Excellent book. Gordon is at the top of her game. The shifting point of view showed how completely she'd captured each character. She took risks with portraying exactly the way each character spoke, thought and acted and the risks paid off tremendously (unlike the risks the characters themselves took over the course of the novel). This one deserved the National Book Award.
    • 5/5
      The language of the down-at-the-heels race track where worn-out horses and worn-out (or soon-to-be-worn-out) groomers, trainers, loan sharks all congregate is amazing with many, many coined words that simply fit the situation. I seldom have to look up a word but the words "hierodule" and "miscible" were ones I suspected were not made up, and I was right--but I didn't know them. The language shifts with the point-of-view, but one quickly gets a sense of who is talking or thinking. The sense of the track, the races, the stables, the betting, the bute and other drugs, the corruption, the gambling, as well as the general seediness is developed beautifully. The plot concerns four horses, two of whom one comes to respect and love and one of whom one fears and despises. The last one is the meant-to-be-winner in a fixed race that was set so that all the bookies and jockies and other stable hands could make some money as well as the big gangster who tries to manipulate everyone and everything. Was it the potions and charms of Medicine Ed, the old black groom, or simply random chance that led to the climax of this book? The human plot concerns a young girl who is working as a groom, girlfriend of a guy who thinks he can beat the system but is badly beaten by it. The girl is befriended by most and lusted after by the rest. Whether she can survive the corruption and life on this track in Indian Mound, West Virginia, is part of the plot. This book has gotten very little press but it won the National Book award. I'm glad it did for, otherwise, I might not have read it and I would have missed a wonderful read.
    • 3/5
      Tommy and Maggie dream of making their fortune at a backwoods, last-stop horse track in West Virginia. Their seedy schemes are no match for the rules of the track and the shady gangsters who finance it. The rules of the track? Don’t ask me to explain. I knew next to nothing about horse racing going in (shame on me a Kentucky girl!) and am still utterly confused going out. The author’s style required very intense concentration from me. She uses a difficult, sometimes unintelligible, jargon in her dialogue and no quotation marks whatsoever. Also, for the first time ever in my reading experience, the author occasionally switched to some form of narrative where the omniscient narrator addressed one of the characters with “you”. (??) As you can tell, I found the whole novel too difficult to enjoy. The writing here is often extraordinary, but for my taste it is too showy. What a shame for me because I cared about and rooted for the character of Maggie and really, really wanted to love this award winner.
    • 1/5
      Since this won this year's National Book Award for fiction, I read it, finishing it on Dec 23, 2010. It never caught my interest. It has no quotation marks even though there is much dialogue. I have read such books before, and became accustomed to the screwy system. But this book was so dull that it annoyed me all the way through. The book tells the story of four horse races and of the folk interested in them. I cannot say anything good about this book
    • 5/5
      This is simply the best book I have read in years. It was a late submission to the National Book Award Committee, so when they named it best fiction book of the year 2010 it caught most people by surprise. The NY Times, San Francisco Chronicle, etc., haven't had a chance to review the book yet, but I will be quite surprised if they don't give it rave reviews. One way I have described the book to friends is: William Faulkner goes to the Racetrack, sleeps on the hay in horses' stalls for a few months, wanders around and writes down what he finds. After reading the first four chapters I put the book down for a moment just to savour what I had read. Refreshed, I picked up the book again and read Chapter 5. It was only a little over one page long but it was so beautifully written and conceived that I had to put the book down again and savour the writing some more. The book gets a bit more hard-nosed after that for a while but I read on compulsively. I had to go to sleep eventually, but the following day I finished reading the book. Had the world gone through an economic collapse? Had the government passed laws against putting salt on eggs? I was beyond caring. I was still living the book.My comment about Faulkner comes from the fact that early on in my reading of Lord of Misrule the voice of my conscience (or whatever) was telling me I have to go back and read Faulkner again. I have not done so in a long time...maybe 40 years. There is something in Jaimy Gordon's style that reminded me of the little boy in one of Faulkner's stories sitting on a keg of nails in a dry goods store which is being used by the local judge to try a case of arson. The boy's father's barn had been burned down by a neighbor. I don't remember much else about the story but I feel I have to find it again and read it. There was something in Ms. Gordon's writing that gave me that same sense of high drama taking place in a backwater local setting.The National Book Award Committee made a wonderful selection. I highly recommend this book to anyone who has ever put two dollars on a horse or may have had the inclination to do so....and of course, to everyone who enjoys fine literature.