Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    On Dialogue: 2nd Edition
    On Dialogue: 2nd Edition
    On Dialogue: 2nd Edition
    Audiobook3 hours

    On Dialogue: 2nd Edition

    Written by David Bohm

    Narrated by Don Hagen

    4/5

    ()

    About this audiobook

    Never before has there been a greater need for deeper listening and more open communication to cope with the complex problems facing our organizations, businesses and societies. Renowned scientist David Bohm believed there was a better way for humanity to discover meaning and to achieve harmony. He identified creative dialogue, a sharing of assumptions and understanding, as a means by which the individual, and society as a whole, can learn more about themselves and others, and achieve a renewed sense of purpose.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherAscent Audio
    Release dateSep 10, 2017
    ISBN9781469007618
    On Dialogue: 2nd Edition

    Related to On Dialogue

    Related audiobooks

    Self-Improvement For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      The Blue Mind

      Sep 10, 2018

      The Blue Mind
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Hour Between Dog and Wolf

      Dec 12, 2018

      The Hour Between Dog and Wolf
      9 min read

    • Article

      Entrenched Perceptions

      Nov 7, 2020

      Entrenched Perceptions
      14 min read

    • Article

      AGREEING to DISAGREE

      May 2, 2021

      Have we become more disagreeable in the 21st century? Has social media made it harder to change people’s minds? We have been getting more “disagreeable” for centuries as our societies have become steadily more egalitarian, diverse and disputatious. B

      5 min read

    • Article

      Q&A

      May 1, 2017

      You believe that the ability to ‘read other people’ is the human brain’s greatest asset. Please explain. This ability — which I also call our social sense or sixth sense — enables us to achieve life’s most important goal: connecting with other human

      6 min read

    • Article

      TREASURE Every Moment

      Mar 26, 2020

      TREASURE Every Moment
      4 min read

    • Article

      ‘The Power Of Strangers’: What We Gain From Listening To Others

      Aug 17, 2021

      Joe Keohane, author of “The Power of Strangers,” says we gain from talking with – and especially listening to – people we don’t know.

      5 min read

    • Article

      Language Both Enraptures and Deceives Us

      Sep 12, 2019

      The purpose of language is to reveal the contents of our minds, says Julie Sedivy. It’s a simple and profound insight. We are social animals and language is what springs us from our isolated selves and connects us with others. Sedivy has taught lingu

      13 min read

    • Article

      Speak Your Mind

      Aug 25, 2023

      Speak Your Mind
      5 min read

    • Article

      Q&A

      Sep 1, 2023

      We’ve heard a lot about difficult conversations, but you believe all conversations are difficult. Please explain. In recent years we have heard a lot about so-called difficult conversations from the realm of academic research and in the public discou

      7 min read

    • Article

      Mind What You Say

      Apr 1, 2020

      Many years ago, the five-year-old son of a friend of mine came rushing into his father’s workshop talking rapidly in a rush of insight and pointing to a tool on the bench: “Daddy, this isn’t a screwdriver; that’s just what we call it, and a rock isn’

      2 min read

    • Article

      Remaking Morality

      Aug 31, 2021

      Remaking Morality
      5 min read

    • Article

      Me, You, And Intimacy Too

      Feb 16, 2022

      Me, You, And Intimacy Too
      8 min read

    • Article

      Changing Minds

      Oct 28, 2019

      Changing Minds
      5 min read

    • Article

      Life-changing Conversations

      Nov 30, 2021

      Life-changing Conversations
      7 min read

    • Article

      Dear Ali ...

      May 27, 2022

      Dear Ali ...
      2 min read

    • Article

      The Power Of Flow

      Mar 1, 2023

      The Power Of Flow
      16 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for On Dialogue

    4/5

    45 ratings2 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 2/5
      David Bohm, the author of “On Dialogue,” was apparently recognized as one of the greatest theoretical physicists of the twentieth century. Despite my background in physics, I’d never heard of his contributions to the field, and I’d certainly never heard of his contributions to other fields, including … well, whatever you could call this book. Is it philosophy? Communications? I know it’s not an attempt at literary theory, but some of it seems to resemble it. It fancies itself a visionary way of reimagining and reawakening the power of human communication, but much of it sounds like New Age occultism – spooky and obscurantist, weird and much of it frankly unfounded. Bohm thinks that following his recommendations will result in a kind of enhanced, unbiased conversation (which he insists on calling “dialogue”) between people that will help foster a common sense of humanity, and that our dialogue with one another has been irrevocably tainted by personal ambition and unexamined prejudices. Because we have these presuppositions, we can only engage in “conversations” (which is somehow very different from dialogue, which is the idealized type of human interaction). How conversation is different from dialogue is never really discussed. The way we can reestablish this most meaningful type of human connection is by letting go of these ambitions and prejudices.He says that dialogue should ideally begin with no set purpose, no leader, and no hidden assumptions or opinions which will only serve to make you defensive during the course of the dialogue. Now, gentle reader, there is a difference between suspending opinions which might be culturally or religiously biased, which is something I would completely understand doing to open a dialogue fully up, and what Bohm is asking us to do in this book. He seems to want us to sit and listen to absolutely anyone say anything they sincerely believe. But the problem with sincerity is this: it and four dollars will buy you a cup of coffee at Starbucks. Considering that Bohm is a scientist and is ostensibly on the hunt for something resembling truth about the physical world, this is somewhat disheartening to read. Do I need to suspend my judgments about the absurdity of Holocaust denial when I speak to someone who actually denies historical reality? Or fail to adduce the evidence that the Earth is roughly spherical to a flat Earther while engaged in a conversation with one? For someone who thinks that the scientific endeavor is something other than an utterly futile one, how can someone genuinely think these things? To request that we listen to varying opinions, measure their respective amounts of evidence, and adopt the one that has the most explanatory power all the while maintaining a cool head about those who have very different ideas from our own is a very good idea. Actually engaging people with ridiculous, patently false ideas is another. Not only is it silly, but it’s dangerous. There are some people who should be disabused of their false ideas. In fact, if that’s not the main point of dialogue, it should be one of its major reasons for existing. To say that dialogue shouldn’t be used for the purpose of convincing people of things we know to be true is detrimental to the idea of any kind of human interaction, especially if you believe that some things are true and some things aren’t.This is mostly a collection of ad hoc work, with only a couple of pieces having been previously published elsewhere. Most of what I spoke about above is found in the first piece, “On Dialogue.” The subsequent pieces serve to expound upon the first in minor, tangential ways, and none of them seemed as egregious as what was set forward in the first piece. If this is the kind of uncritical work that Bohm is known for, I think I can safely bypass his other stuff and regard him for what he is: a physicist who should stick to doing what he knows best.
    • 3/5
      I initially liked the book, because it made me reflect on the way how I communicate and behave. Further on, I was bored by the somewhat uninteresting outline of how dialogues function. Too explicit and hypothetical.