Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Seapower States: Maritime Culture, Continental Empires, and the Conflict That Made the Modern World
Seapower States: Maritime Culture, Continental Empires, and the Conflict That Made the Modern World
Seapower States: Maritime Culture, Continental Empires, and the Conflict That Made the Modern World
Audiobook13 hours

Seapower States: Maritime Culture, Continental Empires, and the Conflict That Made the Modern World

Written by Andrew Lambert

Narrated by Julian Elfer

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars

3/5

()

About this audiobook

Andrew Lambert, author of The Challenge-winner of the prestigious Anderson Medal-turns his attention to Athens, Carthage, Venice, the Dutch Republic, and Britain, examining how their identities as "seapowers" informed their actions and enabled them to achieve success disproportionate to their size.

Lambert demonstrates how creating maritime identities made these states more dynamic, open, and inclusive than their lumbering continental rivals. Only when they forgot this aspect of their identity did these nations begin to decline. Recognizing that the United States and China are modern naval powers-rather than seapowers-is essential to understanding current affairs, as well as the long-term trends in world history. This volume is a highly original "big think" analysis of five states whose success-and eventual failure-is a subject of enduring interest, by a scholar at the top of his game.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateNov 27, 2018
ISBN9781541446489
Author

Andrew Lambert

Andrew Lambert is Laughton Professor of Naval History in the Department of War Studies at King's College. After completing research in the Department he taught at Bristol Polytechnic,(now the University of West of England), the Royal Naval Staff College, Greenwich, and the Royal Military Academy, Sandhurst. He is a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society and also Director of the Laughton Naval Unit housed in the Department. In 2020 he was made a Fellow of Kings College London (FKC).

Related to Seapower States

Related audiobooks

Business For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Seapower States

Rating: 3.14999998 out of 5 stars
3/5

10 ratings2 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Incredibly stupid history of seafaring empires and sea culture. Lambert is close to making a convincing argument about sea culture and it’s impact on certain empires but his stretching and over protesting and finally a laughable review of British imperial history sinks the whole book. Hard to take seriously as a piece of scholarship
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    When I started this book I really didn't know what angle Lambert was going to adopt. To be honest, I mostly expected a boiler-plate examination of the sinews of naval power for the current age, with a particular eye on Beijing's maritime aspirations. I then get exposed to this somewhat labored dichotomy between nations with a "seapower" culture, versus countries that simply have navies capable of offensive naval action; my reaction being okay, let's see what the author does with this.One then goes through this looping examination of those disparate polities that Lambert holds had a "seapower" culture: Athens, Carthage, Venice, the Netherlands, and Britain. The argument being that only such states were the true creators of open societies, upon which we eventually wind up arriving at author's true concern; Great Britain's absorption into a European Union that to him is just a new form of German hegemony. Yes, this is mostly a pro-Brexit polemic. Keep in mind that I'm not convinced that the EU as it's been run has been all it's cracked up to be, and that since this book was probably finished about 2017, you could argue that I should give Lambert more benefit of the doubt. However, since it turns out that the Brexit skeptics were dead right about this being a disastrous move, mostly implemented on dishonest arguments, that result makes this book look like wishful thinking. Professional historians might have reason to read this book as a case study of when a smart person fails to rise above their own prejudices, but the general reader should give this work a wide berth.