Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    Why I Am Not a Christian: And Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects
    Unavailable
    Why I Am Not a Christian: And Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects
    Unavailable
    Why I Am Not a Christian: And Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects
    Audiobook8 hours

    Why I Am Not a Christian: And Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects

    Written by Bertrand Russell

    Narrated by Qarie Marshall

    4.5/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this audiobook

    Dedicated as few men have been to the life of reason, Bertrand Russell has always been concerned with the basic questions to which religion also addresses itself — questions about man’s place in the universe and the nature of the good life, questions that involve life after death, morality, freedom, education, and sexual ethics. He brings to his treatment of these questions the same courage, scrupulous logic, and lofty wisdom for which his other work as philosopher, writer, and teacher has been famous. These qualities make the essays included in this collection perhaps the most graceful and moving presentation of the freethinker's position since the days of Hume and Voltaire.

    Whether listeners share or reject Bertrand Russell’s views, they will find this book an invigorating challenge to set notions, a masterly statement of a philosophical position, and a pure joy to listen to. This collection was edited, with Lord Russell’s full approval and cooperation, by Professor Paul Edwards of the Philosophy Department of New York University.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherDreamscape Media Audio
    Release dateApr 2, 2019
    ISBN9781974948154
    Unavailable
    Why I Am Not a Christian: And Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects
    Author

    Bertrand Russell

    Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) was born in Wales and educated at Trinity College, Cambridge. His long career established him as one of the most influential philosophers, mathematicians, and social reformers of the twentieth century.

    More audiobooks from Bertrand Russell

    Related to Why I Am Not a Christian

    Related audiobooks

    Philosophy For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Herbert Spencer’s Principle of Equal Freedom: Is It Well Grounded?

      Sep 1, 2020

      During the mid-to late nineteenth century, Herbert Spencer was the most widely read philosopher in the world. A large part of his appeal was owing to his ambition of providing a complete and comprehensive account of human reality based on scientific

      38 min read

    • Article

      Philosophy’s Big Oversight

      Apr 17, 2023

      Philosophy’s Big Oversight
      5 min read

    • Article

      A Clarion Call for Buddhism

      Feb 5, 2019

      A Clarion Call for Buddhism
      7 min read

    • Article

      Short Cuts

      Aug 7, 2022

      TWO HEADS (Bloomsbury) boasts cover blurbs from Steven Pinker and Brian Cox, but then it is a graphic novel about neuroscience. Two British neuroscience professors, husband and wife team Uta and Chris Frith, who have researched autism, dyslexia and s

      1 min read

    • Article

      The Science of Writing

      Jan 30, 2019

      “You’re an oceanographer?” The librarian shakes his head, incredulous, his spectacles tossing a circle of sunlight on the floor between us. “I always knew I wanted to be a novelist,” I reply. “So, naturally, I spent the first two decades of my adult

      2 min read

    • Article

      Lessons Of The Gandharan Manuscripts

      Feb 5, 2019

      Lessons Of The Gandharan Manuscripts
      10 min read

    • Article

      The Guru of Athens

      Dec 3, 2018

      The Guru of Athens
      3 min read

    • Article

      This Essentially Meaningless Conflict

      Sep 22, 2017

      MARILYNNE ROBINSON’S accomplishments are impressive by any standard: she has won the National Book Critics Circle Award for Fiction, the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, and the National Humanities Medal, among other honors. But perhaps a better measure o

      8 min read

    • Article

      Up-to-date Dharma

      Jul 19, 2022

      Up-to-date Dharma
      4 min read

    • Article

      Thinking Makes It So: Ward Farnsworth Reframes the Stoics with Wit and Insight

      Aug 30, 2018

      Seneca’s suicide, at the order of the emperor Nero, presents a macabre scene. Previously adviser to the fickle, impetuous, paranoid, thin-skinned emperor, Seneca was erroneously implicated in an assassination plot and was ordered to take his own life

      9 min read

    • Article

      Know Your Philosophers

      Aug 2, 2020

      Know Your Philosophers
      4 min read

    • Article

      The How Of Happiness

      Nov 22, 2022

      The How Of Happiness
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Socrates Of Second Grade: Adventures In Philosophy With Children

      May 12, 2022

      If you’re the parent of a young child, Scott Hershovitz says you’re raising a philosopher “whether you know it or not.” In the delightful “Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Adventures in Philosophy With My Kids,” Hershovitz, a law and philosophy professor a

      2 min read

    • Article

      Sexism Killed My Love for Philosophy Then Mary Astell Brought It Back

      Aug 31, 2017

      In 2004, I spent many hours walking the dirt paths of the Driftless Area, an undulating region in the Midwest left untouched by glaciers from Earth’s ice ages. In some parts the cracked earth exhales a cool air generated by underground ice. It’s a re

      14 min read

    • Article

      Was There a Fifth Noble Truth?

      Jan 22, 2019

      MORE THAN TWENTY YEARS have passed since twenty-eight fragile birch bark scrolls, now known to be the oldest surviving Buddhist manuscripts in the world, came to light. Dating back to as early as the first century BCE, the scrolls—originating in the

      2 min read

    • Article

      A Brilliant Biography Of An Elusive Genius

      Jul 27, 2023

      IN MEDIEVAL SCHOLASTICISM, ARISTOTLE’S reputation was such that he was usually referred to simply as “the Philosopher”. Among the moderns, this book makes the case for treating Baruch Spinoza (1632–77) similarly. And if there is no philosopher but Sp

      6 min read

    • Article

      Do Great Books Still Matter? For Roosevelt Montás, They Are Essential.

      Dec 15, 2021

      The study of the Great Books – a fluctuating list of predominantly Western texts hailed by academics – has long been criticized as elitist, sexist, and Eurocentric. But Roosevelt Montás is coming to the books’ defense. The Columbia University alumnus

      3 min read

    • Article

      Book Briefs

      Mar 8, 2022

      BUDDHADASA BHIKKHU (1906–1993), one of Thailand’s most revered monks of the twentieth century, wants us all to be problem solvers. In an edited series of his lectures recently published as Seeing with the Eye of Dhamma: The Comprehensive Teaching of

      4 min read

    • Article

      Two Writers on the Woman Philosopher Who Changed Their Lives

      Jan 26, 2024

      "Cavendish always thought she was writing for a time which was not her own; a century which might appreciate her more, and understand her." The post Two Writers on the Woman Philosopher Who Changed Their Lives appeared first on The Millions.

      9 min read

    • Article

      Howard University's Decision To Cut Classics Department Prompts An Outcry

      May 10, 2021

      Howard is the nation's only historically Black university with a classics department, but it is now moving to dissolve the program after a three-year review of the school's curriculum.

      3 min read

    • Article

      The Interdisciplinarian

      Sep 1, 2023

      The Interdisciplinarian
      5 min read

    • Article

      The Best Panaceas for Heartaches

      Sep 22, 2017

      The Best Panaceas for Heartaches
      17 min read

    Reviews for Why I Am Not a Christian

    4.5/5

    29 ratings15 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 5/5
      The question of whether there is a god, and if so, what our relations with them should be, is a timeless one. I decided to read this book as a counterpoint to a book arguing for the existence and relevance of god a month or two ago. In contrast, Russell's point of view, expressed eloquently and forcefully, is that he believes there not to be a god, and that religion has by and large been a force for tyranny, anti-intellectualism, and negativity in the world through history. He attempts to refute the reasonable arguments for the existence of god, as well as rejecting the moral ones, and finally deploring the policies of religion that have listed until this day, in many cases, such as being anti-contraception.Russell's prose is very well-written and persuasive, and the longest essay of the book, What I Believe, lays out a very interesting way of life for people to follow, as well. Other essays, concerning other atheists and their fate (on Thomas Paine), dealing with children, the ethics of sexuality, and other topics, are also very well done. Since it's a list of essays on similar topics, there is certainly overlap, but it's not too great, and that they were written at different times allows one to see the growth and changes in his thought over time. I really enjoyed this book, and found it both thought-provoking and something that I will carry with me over time. The final essay, regarding how Russell was refused employment at the City College of New York by local government due to his atheism in 1940, shows that the influence of religion on politics and authority were already apparent, and the effects of atheism overblown, even then. It may have gotten worse since, but it's still visible in our past.This one's definitely worth reading, if you have an open mind about the question of religion.
    • 4/5
      I read this book many years ago when I was an agnostic who was still trying to figure out the great mysteries of Christianity. Even now, I question all of the things that I was taught as a child, but that is another story entirely. I certainly understand Russell's thoughts and opinions, though I may be inclined to disagree with a few of them. Nevertheless, he works desperately to prove his point, and that part cannot be ignored. I think he was a man who long sought to find the truth, and this book takes us down that search right along with him.
    • 5/5
      Classic treatise on atheism from a deep thinker. Some essays are better than others (a bit outmoded language) - but a very worthwhile read.
    • 5/5
      these ratinjgs here are as pernicious and prejorative as the indiv idual's mind who rates the book. having said that, i am joyful with Russell's sardonic style. I do wonder if tghe Lord Bertrand read much of Mark Twain as they both have this acerbic knife they uswe on their enemies (or those who do not agree with them). he essays were read by thiks writer during his early college days (mid 1960s), and I remmeber being enthralled at the man's erudition, yet being "common enough" to be understood by the layman. The piece at the end explaining the process of Lord Russell's being blackballed by the New York city political system was eye-opening. Next time anyone calls a New Yorker a "liberal," I'm going to jump in whatever fray they are in and they WILL take note of what I say. YOU WANT A LIBERAL? read this book.
    • 5/5
      One of the first books I read on freethought and agnosticism, this still holds a fond spot for me. Although the arguments presented here would not be new to me at this time, this was the first time I had heard many of them presented. Unlike many of today's philosophers, Russell writes lucid prose with clarity rather than obfuscation. From what I've read, and what I've observed from the philsophy departments I've been associated with, I believe Russell was truly one of the last original thinkers in the field. This book made a big impression on me, and I need to reread it soon.
    • 4/5
      Russell first defines what he means by a Christian: someone who believes in God, the immortality of the soul, and Jesus Christ. Then he explains why he does not believe. Step-by-step he dismisses as fallacious the arguments for the existence of God: the first cause argument, the argument from design, etc. Then he discusses whether we survive death. Then the character of Jesus, as presented in the Gospels. He agrees that Jesus was an admirable man, but not divine and not the best or wisest of men. He gives examples from the Gospels. He believes that all religions are false and harmful. He even calls religion "a disease born of fear" and "a source of untold misery to the human race." Fear leads to cruelty, he says. "A habit of basing convictions upon evidence, and of giving them only that degree of certainty which the evidence warrants, would, if it became general, cure most of the ills from which the world is suffering." He explains his agnostic views with his usual lucidity. Russell was not an atheist; he was just not convinced by the arguments for God. He was always wary of certainties. So this book does not resolve anything, but it will give you plenty to think about. It is not a difficult read.
    • 4/5
      This is neither Russell's best nor his most cohesive work (there is a good deal of repetition between the essays, and they were written for a number of different venues); however, this is Bertrand Russell we're talking about ... so for this reviewer, anyway, the temptation to mark particularly good passages was strong. For the most part these essays sparkle with the usual fire.I will say that the long Appendix (not written by Russell) detailing how Russell was prevented from teaching at the City College of New York leaves me breathless with revulsion.Certainly in these frighteningly Bible-thumping times in the U.S., this material is highly relevant.
    • 3/5
      Suffers from being outdated in some places ... and discussion of what makes up "the good life" wanders into some soft territory.
    • 5/5
      A classic, and just as powerful today as when it was written.
    • 4/5
      A call to reason from a great thinker.
    • 3/5
      Good, clear writing; ideas that sound very current (for better or worse, the discussion has not changed much in 60 - 80 years); a lot to recommend this fairly short read.

      Purely for historical reasons, it was interesting to read the last portion of the book concerning the furor over Russell's appointment to a professorship in New York, and the social, political and (extra-) legal wranglings to keep him from "corrupting the youth." It serves as a reminder how much things have changed, and how quickly; and how much is at risk today in parts, geographically and otherwise, of the country that seem so ready to rush into a reversal of liberal ideals.
    • 4/5
      Honestly this book didn't seem all that focused on religion or Christianity, especially considering Russell seems to always find a way to tie a complaint or two about religion into his books. (At least he has in every one I've read so far, I imagine it would be harder in his math books.) The essay the book takes it's title from doesn't put any significant consideration into why Russell was an atheist, just why he disapproved of the Christian church, which seems like a pretty big piece to leave out of a book by an atheist that's theoretically about religion.There are several essays that directly relate to religion, I really liked "Can Religion Cure Our Troubles" and there are a few that you might be able to kinda sorta relate back to religion, but you'd be making the connection there, not Bertrand. An example of that would be the essay on Thomas Paine. I know Thomas Paine was very outspoken about religion, but the extent to which it comes up in the essay is that he pissed off Jefferson and Washington for running his mouth off about his non traditional beliefs (he was Deist). They shared those beliefs they just weren't about to admit it and didn't like Paine's uncompromising literature. That probably accounts for about two sentences of the essay.Another of my favorites, "Nice People", could certainly point the finger at hypocritical behavior of some Christians...or any other person that projects a mantle of moral superiority while acting without disregard for the well-being of other people. It certainly never singles Christians out, or any other group for that matter. The essay does just fine coyly listing examples of the sorts nice behavior practiced by "nice people". For example:"Above all they keep alive the pleasures of the hunt. In a homogeneous country population, such as that of the English shire, people are condemned to hunt foxes; this is expensive and sometimes even dangerous. Moreover, the fox cannot explain very clearly how much he dislikes being hunted. In all these respects the hunting of the human being is better sport, but if it were not for the nice people, it would be difficult to hunt human beings with a good conscience. Those whom the nice people condemn are fair game; at their call of "Tallyho" the hunt assembles, and the victim is pursued to prison or death. It is especially good sport when the victim is a woman, since this gratifies the jealousy of the women and the sadism of the men."All and all the book is a bit of a mixed bag. Some of the essays are great. But a fair chunk are just so-so and two of them didn't read like Bertrand at all. This is the consequence of the essays being drawn from the first fifty years of Bertrand's writing. Two essays written in the 'ots lack all of the confidence, wit and simplicity that make Bertrand so enjoyable to me. They sounded an awful lot like a unsure, but overachieving college student that tries too hard to write seriously by using cold, formal and overly decorated language.The book ends with a reasonably detailed account of Bertrand's dismissal from New York City College before he actually got a chance to start. It's a pretty outrageous case of ideological bigotry. Though he had widespread support of the college's board, students and their parents Russell was ousted by what amounted to an angry mob and a shady judge that decided that Bertrand's astonishingly modern, but shamelessly misrepresented views on sex, marriage and (egads) masturbation would corrupt students and encourage them to violate New York's penal laws. These were laws that among other things made extramarital sex and cohabitation a felony, especially if it was with "an unmarried female of any age of a previously chaste character".
    • 5/5
      The question of whether there is a god, and if so, what our relations with them should be, is a timeless one. I decided to read this book as a counterpoint to a book arguing for the existence and relevance of god a month or two ago. In contrast, Russell's point of view, expressed eloquently and forcefully, is that he believes there not to be a god, and that religion has by and large been a force for tyranny, anti-intellectualism, and negativity in the world through history. He attempts to refute the reasonable arguments for the existence of god, as well as rejecting the moral ones, and finally deploring the policies of religion that have listed until this day, in many cases, such as being anti-contraception.Russell's prose is very well-written and persuasive, and the longest essay of the book, What I Believe, lays out a very interesting way of life for people to follow, as well. Other essays, concerning other atheists and their fate (on Thomas Paine), dealing with children, the ethics of sexuality, and other topics, are also very well done. Since it's a list of essays on similar topics, there is certainly overlap, but it's not too great, and that they were written at different times allows one to see the growth and changes in his thought over time. I really enjoyed this book, and found it both thought-provoking and something that I will carry with me over time. The final essay, regarding how Russell was refused employment at the City College of New York by local government due to his atheism in 1940, shows that the influence of religion on politics and authority were already apparent, and the effects of atheism overblown, even then. It may have gotten worse since, but it's still visible in our past.This one's definitely worth reading, if you have an open mind about the question of religion.
    • 5/5
      Collection of Russell`s short critical essays about Christianity. Interesting to see how valid and thought provoking his arguments are 80-100 years later.
    • 5/5
      I found the the first two chapters a fantastic clear summary of why, Christianity is not where ethics needs/should be derived. The following chapters were to me an answer to a discussion not too relevant to, as far as I'm able to understand our current times. The last third of the book was again to me very exciting starting from the life of Thomas Paine. Other highlights were the radio debate on the existence of God and appendix of Russels denial to teach in state of New York due to allegedly immoral viewpoints. The latter is to me relevant in a discussion on cancel culture vs democratic pluralism. Essay on "Nice people" is also very strong.