Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

A Blunt Instrument
A Blunt Instrument
A Blunt Instrument
Ebook294 pages5 hours

A Blunt Instrument

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A beloved country house mystery from Georgette Heyer, perfect for readers of Agatha Christie and Dorothy L. Sayers!

Who would kill the perfect gentleman?

When Ernest Fletcher is found bludgeoned to death in his study, everyone is shocked and mystified: Ernest was well liked and respected, so who would have a motive for killing him?

Superintendent Hannasyde, with consummate skill, uncovers one dirty little secret after another, and with them, a host of people who all have reasons for wanting Fletcher dead. Then, a second murder is committed, giving a grotesque twist to a very unusual case, and Hannasyde realizes he's up against a killer on a mission…

Praise for Georgette Heyer:

"Given the chance I could happily devour a stack of her novels one after the other."—A Work In Progress

"A few things that you are guaranteed when you pick up a Georgette Heyer novel of any kind are unique characters and a fast-paced plot."—We Be Reading

LanguageEnglish
PublisherSourcebooks
Release dateMar 1, 2010
ISBN9781402246982
A Blunt Instrument
Author

Georgette Heyer

Georgette Heyer (1902-1974) was an English writer of historical romance and detective fiction. Born in London, Heyer was raised as the eldest of three children by a distinguished British Army officer and a mother who excelled as a cellist and pianist at the Royal College of Music. Encouraged to read from a young age, she began writing stories at 17 to entertain her brother Boris, who suffered from hemophilia. Impressed by her natural talent, Heyer’s father sought publication for her work, eventually helping her to release The Black Moth (1921), a detective novel. Heyer then began publishing her stories in various magazines, establishing herself as a promising young voice in English literature. Following her father’s death, Heyer became responsible for the care of her brothers and shortly thereafter married mining engineer George Ronald Rougier. In 1926, Heyer publisher her second novel, These Old Shades, a work of historical romance. Over the next several decades, she published consistently and frequently, excelling with romance and detective stories and establishing herself as a bestselling author.

Read more from Georgette Heyer

Related to A Blunt Instrument

Titles in the series (12)

View More

Related ebooks

Related articles

Reviews for A Blunt Instrument

Rating: 3.605990737327189 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

217 ratings21 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    historical-fiction, cosy-mystery, sly-humor, snarky, law-enforcement, verbal-humor, situational-humor, British-detective Didn't know that she wrote early twentieth century police mysteries, and while the mystery was fairly good, the characters are so over the top, and the humor so delightful that I giggled and snuffled and guffawed through the whole book!I love a period mystery, and this one is great fun! I requested and received a free ebook copy from SOURCEBOOKS Landmark via NetGalley!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A little bit of a cheating twist at the end I felt. After all, there are certain laws about detective stories and this did kind of break one. Not as much as Roger Ackroyd but still...
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I am recovering from a foot surgery so I got a huge pile of books to read; among them a few Georgette Heyer. I love Mrs. Heyer's Regency novels, yet I couldn't not stand this book. The dialogue was very artificial, the scenes and characters unconvincing, cardboard-like. Nothing against the Scriptures, but after the fourth quotation in the first few pages, I gave the book up!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    My interest in reading this vintage crime title arose after reading an "In the Spotlight" post by Margot Kinberg. Margot says that A BLUNT INSTRUMENT is a clear example of a Golden Age mystery, with a solid emphasis on mystery and a puzzle, focussing also in the "who" and "why".Another review that I read said it was a romance clad in a mystery, the romance being what we usually recognise Georgette Heyer for.I thought it differed in many ways from an Agatha Christie novel - it was very heavy on dialogue, reading almost like a drama script. The characters were rather peculiar and there was quite a lot of humour, particularly in the form of the interaction between Sergeant Hemingway and Constable Glass, who constantly quoted from the Bible. I thought about half way through that there could only be one answer to who the murderer was, and surprisingly was right.It is not going to send me off looking for another Heyer mystery though.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Eh. I actually liked the story - the characters are interestingly insane. Neville is a pain, but not an annoyance - Glass is an annoyance, though. Unfortunately, I remembered who the villain was, though not why - as soon as I read the first paragraph I remembered. Which meant that through all of Hannasyde's and Hemingway's puzzlement and working-out of clues and events, I was waiting impatiently for them to pick up this obvious fact and get the right guy. It made the whole thing less than interesting, as I knew they were following the wrong paths all the time. The Norths were idiots too, and Sally was a completely different sort of idiot. For a change, the viewpoints follow Hannasyde and Hemingway pretty closely - there are various conversations they didn't take part in, but that's pretty much an omniscient viewpoint. We don't get inside Neville's head, or Sally's, or anyone elses - see actions, but don't get feelings or motivations from anyone but the two. I think I would like it quite a lot if I didn't know who the murderer was, but as I seem to be unable to not know that (it's been years if not decades since I last read it...if I haven't forgotten by now I won't) the story is more than a little spoiled. Ah well. Try another.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    "A Blunt Instrument" was the fourth and last in the Superintendent Hannasyde mysteries. Georgette Heyer later formed a series based around the secondary character of Sergeant Hemingway. Although I haven't read any of the others, based on this book, it would appear that the detective character is actually a supernumerary. The police aren't bumbling but they exist to go down the list of most likely suspects, then to throw red herrings into the mix, before finally solving the case.Heyer has been likened to Agatha Christie, but there, again, unlike Christie's Poirot and Marple series, there is not much emphasis on the detective. Christie's detectives are peculiar, out-of-the-box thinkers, with a vast experiential knowledge of human nature. Hannasyde and Hemingway plod through the facts. One is not necessarily the sidekick of the other, either, so there's no awestruck innocent who hares off after the red herring in order to play off against the brilliant detective who holds things close to his or her chest. ("Ah, Hastings, all will become clear, mon ami, if you will have the patience.")Actually, that's an unfair characterization of Hemingway, who shows flashes of humor and gets in some comedic dialogue, especially playing off of PC Glass, the Bible-thumping, pompous constable who calls in the murder.This book, more than anything, is an upper class romance wrapped around a murder mystery. (Although Christie's books also had strong elements of romance, it shared equal billing with the mystery.) While the detectives plod with both their techniques and dialogue, the other characters are highly individual, sharp and wonderful embodiments of "the usual suspects."The dead body is played by Ernie Fletcher, a rich ladies' man. His household includes his sister, Lucy, a dithery, socially awkward and snobby spinster; and his nephew, Neville, who is by far the best character, by turns insouciant, irreverent, blithe, and mischievous. Debt-ridden Neville especially is a prime suspect.Good old Uncle Ernie was not just charming to the ladies but underhanded in his dealings with them as well, as it turns out. He holds IOUs for gambling debts incurred by Mrs. North, a comely neighbor, whose husband would not countenance her indebtedness. Mrs. North does not know which would be worse, that her husband is jealous of Ernie or that he isn't. They, too, are prime suspects. There are other suspects and victims, one of whom begins as one and ends up as the other. All the elements of a classic mystery are at the ready.The amount of dialogue irritated me at first. It took half the book before I stopped gritting my teeth whenever one of the suspects would start in to make a point. The point was usually obfuscated first by dithering, temporizing, and non sequiturs before being made. PC Glass with his Biblical quotes and dour looks irritated me the most. His superiors barely tolerated him, and I would have sentenced him to patrolling sheep pastures for wolves were I in charge.By the second half of the book, however, I started to enjoy it. Neville and Sally, Mrs. North's sister and a "crime novelist," bantered charmingly and tolerated Mrs. North's attempts to be her own worst enemy. A lot of the peripheral characters appeared fully, even if they only had a paragraph or two to call their own.There is certainly a charm, however dated, to this upper class play of morals, and I can see why Heyer was popular, even during England's depression and the years of war. This is just pure escapism.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A great humorous mystery with a closed cast -- will keep you guessing up to the last minute. Wonderful author.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    During the last third of the book I had a sudden conviction of who was the murderer, and I was right.I feel rather chuffed about that, pleased with myself over it. And I will spend the next few days thinking, writing and speaking in early 20th Century English. Some authors do that to one. Ernest Fletcher (and yes, the Murder She Wrote theme music was a regular feature of my reading of this) is found bludgeoned to death. Most of the people around him describe him as well-liked but this is on the surface only. When he's found dead and there doesn't appear to be a very long window of opportunity Superintendent Hannasyde has to investigate, helped and hindered by his bible thumping Constable Glass and the indolent nephew of the deceased Neville. As the layers begin to be scraped off the stories a lot of suspects begin to mount up and things get more and more complicated. Then a second body turns up... I enjoyed it, inter-war fiction is some of my favourite reads and this was a good example, yes the characters behave in strange-to-a-modern-reader manners but I just let the story flow and enjoy. While I did work out the murderer it was still interesting to see what would happen with the main characters. I found it enjoyable, there was some reflection of the horrors of World War I lurking in the story which I found interesting as well, though not as much as in Dorothy Sayers.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    after rereading in 2016 Maybe this is really only 3½ stars. I did enjoy Neville Fletcher & Sally Drew and of course Constable Glass! Unimportant but annoying is the fact that the picture on the cover of this 2006 Arrow edition not only had nothing to do with the murder but doesn't even represent the people in this book!!I recalled the solution to this one from the beginning of my reread and while this mystery does violate the "rules," I could admire how skillfully Heyer gave the reader clues pointing to the guilty person.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Some delightful characters in this exciting story, and a complex plot as Scotland Yard attempt to sift through false evidence to uncover a murderer.

    I did actually guess 'whodunit' fairly early in the book, although I was not entirely certain if I was right until the end.

    Recommended.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a chatty whodunit set in 1930's England. Ernie Fletcher is bludgeoned to death in his own home study one evening and Scotland Yard is called in to investigate. What follows is detectives doing a careful reconstruction of the timeline for the evening of the murder. At one until it seems none of the obvious suspects could have done it. Things get complicated when one of the suspects is bludgeoned to death in the identical fashion as Ernie.There's a couple of standout interesting characters amongst the cast. Ernie's campy nephew who stands to inherit the family fortune twitters away in the background throughout the entire book, only to become a serious suspect at the end. The town constable who was first on the scene of the first murder spouts evangelical sayings to all and sundry throughout the book. Meanwhile Superintendent Hannasyde and his sergeant doggedly go about their sleuthing having to contend with these two characters as well as a clueless elderly lady, a know-it-all crime fiction author, a flaky damsel-in-distress type who cannot get her story straight, and so on.The mid-1930's stye of dialogue is tedious at times, offset by the constable's evangelical bleating. These are minor annoyances in an otherwise good book.All in all, it's an entertaining story and well worth reading. I received my review copy of the book from the publisher via Netgalley. The comments are my own.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Here's the thing about most Golden Age mysteries: the puzzle is all. No matter how witty or clever or brilliant the writing is, it's almost never about the characters themselves, but about the murder mystery puzzle. Which is, of course, why I read mysteries; I love the puzzle and I love trying to solve it. But unfortunately, if the reader does solve the murder/puzzle, there's not a lot of characterisation to fall back on; solve the puzzle and the remaining story can be tedious. I solved this one on page 88-89. I don't think I did anything particularly clever, just that a certain passage hit me a certain way and it all became clear to me. The only thing I ended up getting wrong was the relation of the murderer to one of the characters and then only because I imagined the murderer to be the wrong age. I didn't dnf, or skip to the end to see if I was correct solely because, when Heyer is 'on' with her writing she is on, and this is one of her better writing efforts, even if the plotting went astray (and I've found out her mysteries were all plotted by her husband). The story behind the mystery plot is a farce and Heyer thoroughly caricatures everyone except Hannasyde. The dialog was electric and even though I was thoroughly impatient with Neville at the start, I thought him wildly entertaining by the end. I wanted to keep reading just to see what he'd say and do next. So, 2 stars for the plotting because... page 89. There was never any doubt on my part that I was wrong. But an extra star because the characters are Heyer at her wittiest and most hilarious.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    One of the better plot twists in the recent Heyer mysteries I've read, even though a good number of the characters were still fairly insufferable. Held my attention well, though.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Seemingly well-liked Ernest Fletcher is found dead in his study. But there may be quite a few people whi wanted him dead, but with all the evidence how could the murder be done in such a short time. And then there is a second murder.
    It is for Superintendent Hannasyde and Sergeant Hemingway to investigate.
    I did find that the guilty party may have been too obvious and there were some really annoying characters, like Officer Glass and the idiotic Helen North. But overall the story was enjoyable enough.
    A NetGalley Book
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I read al of the heyer regencies as a teenager and have reread them many times,but never read any of her detective stories until now and I liked this one due to the irrepressible Nigel but I prefer the 1st one I read FOOTSTEPS IN THE DARK and look forward to reading more
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    It may be that I gave this 4 stars because I am such a Heyer fan. After all, the mystery wasn't that engaging and I guessed the culprit very early in the piece. But Neville's wicked tongue made up for other weaknesses. A fun read.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I've enjoyed all the other Georgette Heyer mysteries I've read, but I have to admit I thought this one was a dud. While I enjoy the team of Hannasyde and Hemingway (especially the acerbic Hemingway), they were the only two palatable characters in the novel. I get that the upper-class twits whose relative gets murdered are supposed to be annoying and insubstantial, but the usual witty banter that Heyer uses to make such characters entertaining was missing here. In particular, I found the character of Neville to be a poor version of the kind of flighty effete that Heyer paints so well elsewhere. It seemed fairly obvious who the culprit was, and the plot drags on endlessly as the detectives struggle to fit events into a narrow timetable. If I heard one more thing about what happened at 10:02,I think I might have pitched the book across the room. I truly contemplated not finishing this one, which is very unusual for me! I'm just glad that I read most of her other mysteries before I got to this one, because it is not her best outing in the genre. (For that, read _The Unfinished Clue_!)
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Witty, humorous dialogue. Engaging characters. Fast-paced plot. Ranks high on my list of "Golden Age" mysteries.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The fourth Superintendent Hannasyde book. Earnest Fletcher is found dead in his study, with a large dent in his head from a blunt instrument. On the surface he's a well-liked and respected man, but it soon becomes apparent that his nephew and heir is not the only one with a possible motive for killing him. Unfortunately for Hannasyde, some of the people with motives are also his best witnesses, and some of them also have good reason to try to protect some of the other people with motives. He has a number of precise statements of the time of various events in the half hour leading up to the murder, most of which are not compatible and some of which are almost certainly true. It's only after a second murder that he begins to suspect the truth...I actually spotted the murderer straight off, which bothered me not at all, as part of the fun was trying to work out whether I was right. The story itself is great fun, with Heyer's usual collection of sharply drawn characters, and her usual odd couple romance in the background.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I may have read too much Agatha Christie as I discovered the identity of the murderer very early on in the book, but it did take until the end to discover the why. Strangely for a murder mystery this didn't matter because there are some absolutely hilarious encounters in this book, particularly in the scenes involving Constable Glass and Neville Fletcher, which makes this a quick fun read.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Ernest Fletcher is discovered at his desk with his head bashed in. Scotland Yard is on the case. But for every suspect, there's an alibi. Soon there's none left. So whodunnit?

Book preview

A Blunt Instrument - Georgette Heyer

Also by Georgette Heyer

Behold, Here’s Poison

Death in the Stocks

Detection Unlimited

Duplicate Death

Envious Casca

Footsteps in the Dark

No Wind of Blame

Penhallow

They Found Him Dead

The Unfinished Clue

Why Shoot a Butler?

Thank you for downloading this Sourcebooks eBook!

You are just one click away from…

• Being the first to hear about author happenings

• VIP deals and steals

• Exclusive giveaways

• Free bonus content

• Early access to interactive activities

• Sneak peeks at our newest titles

Happy reading!

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

Books. Change. Lives.

Copyright © 1938 by Georgette Rougier

Cover and internal design © 2019 by Sourcebooks, Inc.

Cover image © The Advertising Archives, McKevin/Getty Images, Bloodlinewolf/iStock

Sourcebooks, Poisoned Pen Press, and the colophon are registered trademarks of Sourcebooks, Inc.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means including information storage and retrieval systems—except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews—without permission in writing from its publisher, Sourcebooks.

The characters and events portrayed in this book are fictitious or are used fictitiously. Any similarity to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental and not intended by the author.

Published by Poisoned Pen Press, an imprint of Sourcebooks

P.O. Box 4410, Naperville, Illinois 60567-4410

(630) 961-3900

Fax: (630) 961-2168

sourcebooks.com

Originally published in Great Britain in 1938 by Hodder & Stoughton. This edition issued based on the paperback edition published in 2010 by Sourcebooks Landmark, an imprint of Sourcebooks.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Heyer, Georgette.

A blunt instrument / Georgette Heyer.

p. cm.

1. Hannasyde, Inspector (Fictitious character)--Fiction. 2. Police--England--Fiction. 3. Murder--Investigation--Fiction. 4. Country homes--England--Fiction. I. Title.

PR6015.E795B58 2010

823’.912--dc22

2009046824

Contents

Front Cover

Title Page

Copyright

One

Two

Three

Four

Five

Six

Seven

Eight

Nine

Ten

Eleven

Twelve

Thirteen

Fourteen

Fifteen

About the Author

Back Cover

One

A breeze, hardly more than a whisper of wind, stirred the curtains that hung on either side of the long window, and wafted into the room the scent of the wisteria covering the wall of the house. The policeman turned his head as the curtains faintly rustled, his rather glassy blue eyes frowning and suspicious. Straightening himself, for he had been bending over the figure of a man seated behind the carved knee-hole desk in the middle of the room, he trod over to the window and looked out into the dusky garden. His torch explored the shadows cast by two flowering shrubs without, however, revealing anything but a nondescript cat, whose eyes caught and flung back the light for an instant before the animal glided into the recesses of the shrub. There was no other sign of life in the garden, and after a moment of keen scrutiny, the policeman turned back into the room, and went to the desk. The man behind it paid no heed, for he was dead, as the policeman had already ascertained. His head lay on the open blotter, with blood congealing in his sleek, pomaded hair.

The policeman drew a long breath. He was rather pale, and the hand which he stretched out towards the telephone shook a little. Mr Ernest Fletcher’s head was not quite the right shape; there was a dent in it, under the coagulated blood.

The policeman’s hand was arrested before it had grasped the telephone receiver. He drew it back, felt for a handkerchief, and with it wiped a smear of blood from his hand, and then picked up the receiver.

As he did so, he caught the sound of footsteps approaching the room. Still holding the instrument, he turned his head towards the door.

It opened, and a middle-aged butler came in, carrying a tray with a syphon and a whisky decanter and glasses upon it. At sight of the police constable he gave a perceptible start. His gaze next alighted on the figure of his master. The tumbler on the tray shuddered against the decanter, but Simmons did not drop the tray. He stood holding it mechanically, staring at Ernest Fletcher’s back.

PC Glass spoke the number of the police station. His flat, unemotional voice brought Simmons’s eyes back to his face. ‘My God, is he dead?’ he asked in a hushed voice.

A stern glance was directed towards him. ‘Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord, thy God, in vain,’ said Glass deeply.

This admonishment was more comprehensible to Simmons, who was a member of the same sect as PC Glass, than to the official at the Telephone Exchange, who took it in bad part. By the time the misunderstanding had been cleared up, and the number of the police station repeated, Simmons had set the tray down, and stepped fearfully up to his master’s body. One look at the damaged skull was enough to drive him back a pace. He raised a sickly face, and demanded in an unsteady voice: ‘Who did it?’

‘That’ll be for others to find out,’ replied Glass. ‘I shall be obliged to you, Mr Simmons, if you will shut that door.’

‘If it’s all the same to you, Mr Glass, I’ll shut myself on the other side of it,’ said the butler. ‘This – this is a very upsetting sight, and I don’t mind telling you it turns my stomach.’

‘You’ll stay till I’ve asked you a few questions, as is my duty,’ replied Glass.

‘But I can’t tell you anything! I didn’t have anything to do with it!’

Glass paid no heed, for he was connected at that moment with the police station. Simmons gulped, and went to shut the door, remaining beside it, so that only Ernest Fletcher’s shoulders were visible to him.

PC Glass, having announced his name and whereabouts, was telling the Sergeant that he had a murder to report.

Policemen! thought Simmons, resentful of Glass’s calm. You’d think corpses with their heads bashed in were as common as daisies. He wasn’t human, Glass; he was downright callous, standing there so close to the body he could have touched it just by stretching out his hand, talking into the telephone as though he was saying his piece in the witness-box, and all the time staring at the dead man without a bit of feeling in his face, when anyone else would have turned sick at the sight.

Glass laid down the receiver, and restored his handkerchief to his pocket. ‘Lo, this is the man that made not God his strength, but trusted in his riches,’ he said.

The sombre pronouncement recalled Simmons’s thoughts. He gave a sympathetic groan. ‘That’s true, Mr Glass. Woe to the crown of pride! But how did it happen? How do you come to be here? Oh dear, oh dear, I never thought to be mixed up with a thing like this!’

‘I came up that path,’ said Glass, nodding towards the French windows. He drew a notebook from his pocket, and the stub of a pencil, and bent an official stare upon the butler. ‘Now, Mr Simmons, if you please!’

‘It’s no use asking me: I don’t know anything about it, I tell you!’

‘You know when you last saw Mr Fletcher alive,’ said Glass, unmoved by the butler’s evident agitation.

‘It would have been when I showed Mr Budd in,’ replied Simmons, after a moment’s hesitation.

‘Time?’

‘I don’t know – not for certain, that is. It was about an hour ago.’ He made an effort to collect his wits, and added: ‘About nine o’clock. I was clearing the table in the dining-room, so it couldn’t have been much later.’

Glass said, without raising his eyes from his notebook: ‘This Mr Budd: Known to you?’

‘No. I never saw him before in my life – not to my knowledge.’

‘Oh! When did he leave?’

‘I don’t know. I didn’t know he had left till I came in just now. He must have gone by the garden-way, same as you came in, Mr Glass.’

‘Was that usual?’

‘It was – and it wasn’t,’ replied Simmons, ‘if you know what I mean, Mr Glass.’

‘No,’ said Glass uncompromisingly.

‘The master had friends who used to visit him that way.’ Simmons heaved a sigh. ‘Women, Mr Glass.’

‘Thine habitation,’ said Glass, with a condemnatory glance round the comfortable room, ‘is in the midst of deceit.’

‘That’s true, Mr Glass. The times I’ve wrestled in prayer –’

The opening of the door interrupted him. Neither he nor Glass had heard footsteps approaching the study, and neither had time to prevent the entrance into the room of a willowy young man in an ill-fitting dinner-jacket suit, who paused on the threshold, blinked long-lashed eyelids at the sight of a policeman, and smiled deprecatingly.

‘Oh, sorry!’ said the newcomer. ‘Fancy finding you here!’

His voice was low-pitched, and he spoke softly and rather quickly, so that it was difficult to catch what he said. A lock of lank dark hair fell over his brow; he wore a pleated shirt, and a deplorable tie, and looked, to PC Glass, like a poet.

His murmured exclamation puzzled Glass. He said suspiciously: ‘Fancy meeting me, eh? So you know me, do you, sir?’

‘Oh no!’ said the young man. His fluttering glance went round the room and discovered the body of Ernest Fletcher. His hand left the door-knob; he walked forward to the desk, and turned rather pale. ‘I should shame my manhood if I were sick, shouldn’t I? I wonder what one does now?’ His gaze asked inspiration of Glass, of Simmons, and encountered only blank stares. It found the tray Simmons had brought into the room. ‘Yes, that’s what one does,’ he said, and went to the tray, and poured himself out a stiff, short drink of whisky-and-soda.

‘The master’s nephew – Mr Neville Fletcher,’ said Simmons, answering the question in Glass’s eye.

‘You’re staying in this house, sir?’

‘Yes, but I don’t like murders. So inartistic, don’t you think? Besides, they don’t happen.’

‘This has happened, sir,’ said Glass, a little puzzled.

‘Yes, that’s what upsets me. Murders only occur in other people’s families. Not even in one’s own circle. Ever noticed that? No, I suppose not. Nothing in one’s experience – one had thought it so wide! – has taught one how to cope with such a bizarre situation.’

He ended on an uncertain laugh; it was plain that under his flippancy he was shaken. The butler looked at him curiously, and then at Glass, who, after staring at Neville Fletcher for a moment, licked his pencil-point, and asked: ‘When did you see Mr Fletcher last, if you please, sir?’

‘At dinner. In the dining-room, I mean. No, let us be exact; not the dining-room, the hall.’

‘Make up your mind, sir,’ recommended Glass stolidly.

‘Yes, that’s all right. After dinner he came here, and I wandered off to the billiard-room. We parted in the hall.’

‘At what hour would that have been, sir?’

Neville shook his head. ‘I don’t know. After dinner. Do you know, Simmons?’

‘I couldn’t say, sir, not precisely. The master was usually out of the dining-room by ten to nine.’

‘And after that you didn’t see Mr Fletcher again?’

‘No. Not till now. Anything you’d like to know, or can I withdraw?’

‘It’ll save time, sir, if you’ll give an account of your movements between the time you and the deceased left the dining-room, and 10:05 p.m.’

‘Well, I went to the billiard-room, and knocked the balls about a bit.’

‘Alone, sir?’

‘Yes, but my aunt came to find me, so I left.’

‘Your aunt?’

‘Miss Fletcher,’ interpolated the butler. ‘The master’s sister, Mr Glass.’

‘You left the billiard-room with your aunt, sir? Did you remain with her?’

‘No. Which all goes to show that politeness always pays. I silently faded away, and now I’m sorry, because if I’d accompanied her to the drawing-room I should have had an alibi, which I haven’t got. I went upstairs to my own room, and read a book. I wonder if I can have fallen asleep over it?’ He looked doubtfully towards his uncle’s chair, and gave a faint shudder. ‘No, my God, I couldn’t dream anything like this! It’s fantastic.’

‘If you’ll excuse me, Mr Glass, I fancy that was the front-door bell,’ interrupted Simmons, moving towards the door.

A few moments later a police-sergeant, with several satellites, was ushered into the study, and in the hall outside the voice of Miss Fletcher, urgently desiring to be told the meaning of this invasion, was upraised in some agitation. Neville slid out of the study, and took his aunt by the arm. ‘I’ll tell you. Come into the drawing-room.’

‘But who are all those men?’ demanded Miss Fletcher. ‘They looked to me exactly like policemen!’

‘Well they are,’ said Neville. ‘Most of them, anyway. Look here, Aunt Lucy –’

‘We’ve been burgled!’

‘No –’ He stopped. ‘I don’t know. Yes, perhaps that was it. Sorry, Aunt, but it’s worse than that. Ernie has met with an accident.’

He stumbled a little over the words, looking anxiously at his aunt.

‘Try not to mumble so, Neville dear. What did you say?’

‘I said an accident, but I didn’t mean it. Ernie’s dead.’

‘Dead? Ernie?’ faltered Miss Fletcher. ‘Oh no! You can’t mean that! How could he be dead? Neville, you know I don’t like that sort of joke. It isn’t kind, dear, to say nothing of its being in very questionable taste.’

‘It isn’t a joke.’

She gave a gasp. ‘Not? Oh, Neville! Oh, let me go to him at once!’

‘No use. Besides, you mustn’t. Terribly sorry, but there it is. I’m a trifle knocked-up myself.’

‘Neville, you’re keeping something back!’

‘Yes. He’s been murdered.’

Her pale, rather prominent blue eyes stared at him. She opened her mouth, but no words passed her lips. Neville, acutely uncomfortable, made a vague gesture with his hands. ‘Can I do anything? I should like to, only I don’t know what. Do you feel faint? Yes, I know I’m being incompetent, but this isn’t civilised, any of it. One has lost one’s balance.’

She said: ‘Ernie murdered? I don’t believe it!’

‘Oh, don’t be silly,’ he said, betraying ragged nerves. ‘A man doesn’t bash his own skull in.’

She gave a whimper, and groped her way to the nearest chair, and sank into it. Neville lit a cigarette with a hand that trembled, and said: ‘Sorry, but you had to know sooner or later.’

She seemed to be trying to collect her wits. After a pause she exclaimed: ‘But who would want to murder dear Ernie?’

‘Search me.’

‘There has been some dreadful mistake! Oh, Ernie, Ernie!’

She burst into tears. Neville, attempting no consolation, sat down in a large armchair opposite to her, and smoked.

Meanwhile, in the study, PC Glass was making his painstaking report to his superior. The doctor had gone; the cameramen had taken their photographs; and the body of Ernest Fletcher had been removed.

‘I was on my beat, Sergeant, walking along Vale Avenue, the time being 10:02 p.m. When I came to the corner of Maple Grove, which, as you know, sir, is the lane running between Vale Avenue and the Arden Road, at the back of the house, my attention was attracted by a man coming out of the side gate of this house in what seemed to me a suspicious manner. He set off, walking very fast, towards the Arden Road.’

‘Would you know him again?’

‘No, Sergeant. It was nearly dark, and I never saw his face. He had turned the corner into Arden Road before I had time to do more than wonder what he was up to.’ He hesitated, frowning a little. ‘As near as I could make out, he was a man of average height, wearing a light-coloured soft hat. I don’t know what gave me the idea there was something wrong about his coming out of Mr Fletcher’s garden-gate, unless it was the hurry he seemed to be in. The Lord led my footsteps.’

‘Yes, never mind about that!’ said the Sergeant hastily. ‘What did you do then?’

‘I called out to him to stop, but he paid no heed, and the next instant had rounded the corner into the Arden Road. That circumstance led me to inspect these premises. I found the garden-gate standing open and, seeing the light from this window, I came up the path with the intention of discovering whether anything was wrong. I saw the deceased, like you found him, Sergeant. The time, as verified by my watch and the clock there, was 10:05 p.m. My first action was to ascertain that Mr Fletcher was dead. Having assured myself that he was past mortal help, I effected a search of the room, and made sure no one was hiding in the bushes in the garden. I then called up the station on the telephone, the time being 10:10 p.m. While I was waiting to be connected, the butler, Joseph Simmons, entered the room, bearing the tray you see upon that table. I detained him, for interrogation. He states that at about 9:00 p.m. a person of the name of Abraham Budd came to see the deceased. He ushered same into this room. He states that he does not know when Abraham Budd left the house.’

‘Description?’

‘I hadn’t got to that, sir. Mr Neville Fletcher came in at that moment. He states that he saw the deceased last at about 8:50 p.m., when they left the dining-room together.’

‘All right; we’ll see him in a minute. Anything else?’

‘Nothing that I saw,’ replied Glass, after a moment’s scrupulous thought.

‘We’ll look around. Looks like an open-and-shut case against this man you saw making off. Friend Abraham Budd, eh?’

‘Not to my way of thinking, Sergeant,’ said Glass.

The Sergeant stared. ‘Oh, it isn’t, isn’t it? Why not? The Lord been guiding you again?’

A flash of anger brought Glass’s cold eyes to life. ‘The scorner is an abomination to men!’ he said.

‘That’s enough!’ said the Sergeant. ‘You remember you’re speaking to your superior officer, if you please, my lad!’

‘A scorner,’ pursued Glass inexorably, ‘loveth not one that reproveth him: neither will he go unto the wise. The man Budd came openly to the front door, making no secret of his name.’

The Sergeant grunted. ‘It’s a point, I grant you. May not have been a premeditated murder, though. Fetch the butler in.’

‘Joseph Simmons is well known to me for a godly member,’ said Glass, on his way to the door.

‘All right, all right! Fetch him!’

The butler was discovered in the hall, still looking rather pale. When he entered the study he cast a nervous look towards the desk, and drew an audible sigh of relief when he saw the chair behind it unoccupied.

‘Your name?’ asked the Sergeant briskly.

‘Joseph Simmons, Sergeant.’

‘Occupation?’

‘I am – I was employed as Mr Fletcher’s butler.’

‘How long have you been with him?’

‘Six and a half years, Sergeant.’

‘And you state,’ pursued the Sergeant, consulting Glass’s notes, ‘That you last saw your master alive at about 9:00 p.m., when you showed a Mr Abraham Budd into this room. Is that correct?’

‘Yes, Sergeant. I have the person’s card here,’ said Simmons, holding out a piece of pasteboard.

The Sergeant took it, and read aloud: ‘Mr Abraham Budd, 333c Bishopsgate, EC. Well, we know where he’s to be found, that’s one thing. You state that he wasn’t known to you, I see.’

‘I never laid eyes on the individual before in my life, Sergeant. He was not the type of person I have been in the habit of admitting to the house,’ said Simmons haughtily.

Glass dispelled this pharisaical attitude with one devastating pronouncement. ‘Though the Lord be high, yet hath he respect unto the lowly,’ he said in minatory accents, ‘but the proud he knoweth afar off.’

‘My soul is humbled in me,’ apologised Simmons.

‘Never mind about your soul!’ said the Sergeant impatiently. ‘And don’t take any notice of Glass! You listen to me! Can you describe this Budd’s appearance?’

‘Oh yes, Sergeant! A short, stout person in a suit which I should designate as on the loud side, and a bowler hat. I fancy he is of the Jewish persuasion.’

‘Short and stout!’ said the Sergeant, disappointed. ‘Sounds to me like a tout. Did the deceased expect a visit from him?’

‘I hardly think so. Mr Budd stated that his business was urgent, and I was constrained to take his card to Mr Fletcher. My impression was that Mr Fletcher was considerably annoyed.’

‘Do you mean scared?’

‘Oh no, Sergeant! Mr Fletcher spoke of damned impertinence, but after a moment he told me to show Mr Budd in, which I did.’

‘And that was at 9:00 p.m., or thereabouts? Did you hear any sounds of altercation?’

The butler hesitated. ‘I wouldn’t say altercation, Sergeant. The master’s voice was upraised once or twice, but I didn’t hear what he said, me being in the dining-room, across the hall, until I withdrew to my pantry.’

‘You wouldn’t say that a quarrel took place between them?’

‘No, Sergeant. Mr Budd did not strike me as a quarrelsome person. In fact, the reverse. I got the impression he was afraid of the master.’

‘Afraid of him, eh? Was Mr Fletcher a bad-tempered man?’

‘Dear me, no, Sergeant! A very pleasant-spoken gentleman, usually. It was very seldom I saw him put-out.’

‘But was he put-out tonight? By Mr Budd’s call?’

The butler hesitated. ‘Before that, I fancy, Sergeant. I believe Mr Fletcher had a – a slight difference with Mr Neville, just before dinner.’

‘Mr Neville? That’s the nephew? Does he live here?’

‘No. Mr Neville arrived this afternoon to stay with his uncle for a few days, I understand.’

‘Was he expected?’

‘If he was, I was not apprised of it. I should mention, in fairness to Mr Neville, that he is – if I may say so – a somewhat eccentric young gentleman. It is by no means an unusual occurrence for him to arrive here without warning.’

‘And this difference with his uncle: Was that usual?’

‘I should not like to give a false impression, Sergeant: there wasn’t any quarrel, if you understand me. All I know is that when I took sherry and cocktails to the drawing-room before dinner it seemed to me that I had interrupted an altercation. The master looked to be distinctly annoyed, which was a rare thing, in my experience, and I did hear him say, just as I came in, that he wanted to hear no more about it, and Mr Neville could go to hell.’

‘Oh! And what about Mr Neville? Was he annoyed?’

‘I shouldn’t like to say, Sergeant. Mr Neville is a peculiar young gentleman, not given to showing what he feels, if he feels anything, which I sometimes doubt.’

‘Well I do, frequently,’ said Neville, who had come into the room in

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1