Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    Sherman: A Soldier's Life
    Unavailable
    Sherman: A Soldier's Life
    Unavailable
    Sherman: A Soldier's Life
    Ebook658 pages12 hours

    Sherman: A Soldier's Life

    By Lee B. Kennett

    3.5/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this ebook

    In Sherman, Lee Kennett offers a brilliant new interpretation of the general's life and career, one that probes his erratic, contradictory nature. Here we see the making of a true soldier, beginning with the frontier society and the extraordinary family from which he came, his formative years at West Point, and the critical period leading up to the Civil War. Throughout the spirited battles at Bull Run and Shiloh, the siege of Vicksburg, and ultimately, the Great March, Sherman displayed a blend of drive, determination, and mastery of detail unique in the annals of war.

    By drawing upon previously unexploited materials and maintaining a sharp, lively narrative, Lee Kennett presents a rich, authoritative portrait of Sherman -- the man and the soldier -- who emerges from this work more human and more fascinating than ever before.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherHarperCollins
    Release dateJun 23, 2009
    ISBN9780061943614
    Unavailable
    Sherman: A Soldier's Life
    Author

    Lee B. Kennett

    Lee Kennett is Professor Emeritus of History at the University of Georgia and the author of Marching Through Georgia: The Story of Soldiers and Civilians During Sherman's Campaign and G.I.: The American Soldier in World War II He lives in Pleasant Garden, North Carolina.

    Read more from Lee B. Kennett

    Related to Sherman

    Related ebooks

    United States History For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Under Lock and Key

      Jul 27, 2021

      Under Lock and Key
      1 min read

    • Article

      ‘Have We Come To This?’

      Jan 17, 2023

      ‘Have We Come To This?’
      5 min read

    • Article

      A Widow’s Campaign

      Jan 21, 2020

      A Widow’s Campaign
      11 min read

    • Article

      ‘Valiant Val’ Reexamined

      Nov 16, 2021

      ‘Valiant Val’ Reexamined
      4 min read

    • Article

      Regimental Newspaper

      Feb 14, 2023

      Regimental Newspaper
      1 min read

    • Article

      The Last Kingdom

      Jul 12, 2022

      The Last Kingdom
      6 min read

    • Article

      The Vicksburg Question

      Jul 27, 2021

      The Vicksburg Question
      14 min read

    • Article

      ‘Murderous’ Fire

      Dec 24, 2019

      ‘Murderous’ Fire
      4 min read

    • Article

      Men And Nature Ablaze

      Dec 14, 2021

      Men And Nature Ablaze
      2 min read

    • Article

      Fatal Sabbath

      Dec 24, 2019

      Fatal Sabbath
      7 min read

    • Article

      The War On The Net

      Sep 25, 2018

      altchive.org/private-voices In January 1862, a scuffle broke out in the camp of the 6th North Carolina Infantry, which was part of the Confederacy’s blockade of the Potomac River. The Carolinians had been skirmishing with Federal defenders on the Mar

      1 min read

    • Article

      Tragic Redemption

      Jul 5, 2022

      Tragic Redemption
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Bloodbath And The Bomb

      Mar 19, 2020

      The Bloodbath And The Bomb
      9 min read

    • Article

      George Henry Thomas

      Apr 16, 2020

      George Henry Thomas
      9 min read

    • Article

      Lincoln’s Plan for Peace

      Nov 1, 2020

      Lincoln’s Plan for Peace
      3 min read

    • Article

      Ancient Battle Tactics

      Feb 20, 2020

      Ancient Battle Tactics
      4 min read

    • Article

      Delayed Honor

      Jun 1, 2021

      Delayed Honor
      5 min read

    • Article

      Reefer Rant

      Apr 7, 2020

      Reefer Rant
      4 min read

    • Article

      How War Chariots Performed

      Nov 23, 2021

      How War Chariots Performed
      3 min read

    • Article

      Spotsylvania Shock Wave

      Apr 26, 2022

      Spotsylvania Shock Wave
      21 min read

    • Article

      Crossing The ‘Rubicon’

      Jul 27, 2021

      Crossing The ‘Rubicon’
      14 min read

    • Article

      Saving Sherman

      Jan 18, 2022

      Saving Sherman
      5 min read

    • Article

      Hallowed Ground Bladensburg, Maryland, 1814

      Sep 28, 2021

      The British victory at Bladensburg, Md., on Aug. 24, 1814—two years into the War of 1812—exposed the capital of the United States to invasion. In the wake of that humiliating defeat of U.S. forces vengeful Redcoats torched prominent buildings in Wash

      3 min read

    • Article

      Hunted Down After Gettysburg

      Jul 24, 2018

      Hunted Down After Gettysburg
      14 min read

    Reviews for Sherman

    3.5/5

    13 ratings2 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 3/5
      This is one of three books that I picked up to learn a little about William Tecumsah Sherman, the other two being The Soul of Battle by Victor Davis Hanson, and Grant and Sherman : the Friendship that Won the Civil War by Charles Bracelon Flood.This is easily the least flattering. Since I am after all, reading to learn, I can't say which is the most accurate. This seems impressively documented, but Kennett himself says: "Two historians can defend diametrically views of the man, each armed with quotations by the general himself." (p.346) There are times when Kennett deals beautifully with this disparate evidence, and other times when I am completely unsatisfied with his arguments.To take one example, where I can judge for myself, considered Sherman's promise Ellen Ewing: "Sherman has promised his intended that he will 'examine with an honest heart and a wish to believe, if possible,' the doctrines of the Catholic Church ... He will also look into the possibility of a civil career. Strictly speaking, neither of these promises is kept."Kennett and I must have a different definition of "strictly". In the first place, Sherman agreed only to consider each choice, not to decided one way or the other. Sherman did in fact leave the military about three years after the marriage. He only returned to it after the Civil War drove him out of his job in Louisiana. As to the former, no-one can judge whether Sherman undertook his studies with "an honest heart and a wish to believe", but he apparently did undertake a study of doctrine and he and Ellen discussed the matter in several letters. He didn't show a great enthusiasm for either project, but the reason for the promises is that he wasn't naturally inclined to do either.A small point, perhaps, but it makes me a bit more leery of accepting Kennett's other judgements. He generally portrays Sherman as inept, so I am puzzled when I read: "Hitchcock ... accords well with the judgements made by many others: "He impresses me as a man of power more than any other man I remember." (p.267). Kennett also relates the outpouring of grief at Sherman's death: huge crowds, people climbing light poles for a better view of the funeral procession, etc. So, how did such a lackluster man as Kennett portrays manage to fool most of the people (of the North, at least), most of the time? I know that others have done it, but given Sherman's lack of political skills, his feuds with the press, etc., how did he do it?In considering Sherman's (in)famous Marches, Kennett seems to consider them only from the point of view of affecting civilian morale, but which he judges them a failure. I had usually heard them discussed in terms of destroying infrastructure, which is a different matter. I am a little surprised that he says little on the issue of the freedman, especially Stanton and Sherman's faceoff on the subject. Kennett judges Sherman's real actions against an ideal of "good" war; anyone judged against the ideal is bound to come up short. One wonders how well other "good" wars actually succeeded in not injuring civilians. He does, in the end, compare Sherman to other Union generals and find him to be not far out of line, although one could argue whether that elevates Sherman or damns the other generals. (pp.352-353).Kennett does not go into great detail about battles, for which I personally am grateful. The highlights and the significance of the results is quite enough for me, especially in a biography. If I wanted all the details, I'd read military history.In all, while I did learn a lot, I found the book a bit dull. I am also skeptical of posthumous psychology: in this case, Kennett's expert describes Sherman as a narcissist. This appears to be based in part on the "self-esteem" hypothesis, i.e., grandiosity as a cover for low self-esteem, which has been recently losing ground.The notes are in a format that makes them easy to match with the citations. They are not always clear, however. I attempted and failed to find the source of a direct quote. There were numerous citations to a preceding reference, so perhaps it was mixed in with those, but I couldn't be sure. The index could have been a bit more thorough, and I always want a chronology.There are 16 pages of plates and 6 maps.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 3/5
      This is one of three books that I picked up to learn a little about William Tecumsah Sherman, the other two being The Soul of Battle by Victor Davis Hanson, and Grant and Sherman : the Friendship that Won the Civil War by Charles Bracelon Flood.This is easily the least flattering. Since I am after all, reading to learn, I can't say which is the most accurate. This seems impressively documented, but Kennett himself says: "Two historians can defend diametrically views of the man, each armed with quotations by the general himself." (p.346) There are times when Kennett deals beautifully with this disparate evidence, and other times when I am completely unsatisfied with his arguments.To take one example, where I can judge for myself, considered Sherman's promise Ellen Ewing: "Sherman has promised his intended that he will 'examine with an honest heart and a wish to believe, if possible,' the doctrines of the Catholic Church ... He will also look into the possibility of a civil career. Strictly speaking, neither of these promises is kept."Kennett and I must have a different definition of "strictly". In the first place, Sherman agreed only to consider each choice, not to decided one way or the other. Sherman did in fact leave the military about three years after the marriage. He only returned to it after the Civil War drove him out of his job in Louisiana. As to the former, no-one can judge whether Sherman undertook his studies with "an honest heart and a wish to believe", but he apparently did undertake a study of doctrine and he and Ellen discussed the matter in several letters. He didn't show a great enthusiasm for either project, but the reason for the promises is that he wasn't naturally inclined to do either.A small point, perhaps, but it makes me a bit more leery of accepting Kennett's other judgements. He generally portrays Sherman as inept, so I am puzzled when I read: "Hitchcock ... accords well with the judgements made by many others: "He impresses me as a man of power more than any other man I remember." (p.267). Kennett also relates the outpouring of grief at Sherman's death: huge crowds, people climbing light poles for a better view of the funeral procession, etc. So, how did such a lackluster man as Kennett portrays manage to fool most of the people (of the North, at least), most of the time? I know that others have done it, but given Sherman's lack of political skills, his feuds with the press, etc., how did he do it?In considering Sherman's (in)famous Marches, Kennett seems to consider them only from the point of view of affecting civilian morale, but which he judges them a failure. I had usually heard them discussed in terms of destroying infrastructure, which is a different matter. I am a little surprised that he says little on the issue of the freedman, especially Stanton and Sherman's faceoff on the subject. Kennett judges Sherman's real actions against an ideal of "good" war; anyone judged against the ideal is bound to come up short. One wonders how well other "good" wars actually succeeded in not injuring civilians. He does, in the end, compare Sherman to other Union generals and find him to be not far out of line, although one could argue whether that elevates Sherman or damns the other generals. (pp.352-353).Kennett does not go into great detail about battles, for which I personally am grateful. The highlights and the significance of the results is quite enough for me, especially in a biography. If I wanted all the details, I'd read military history.In all, while I did learn a lot, I found the book a bit dull. I am also skeptical of posthumous psychology: in this case, Kennett's expert describes Sherman as a narcissist. This appears to be based in part on the "self-esteem" hypothesis, i.e., grandiosity as a cover for low self-esteem, which has been recently losing ground.The notes are in a format that makes them easy to match with the citations. They are not always clear, however. I attempted and failed to find the source of a direct quote. There were numerous citations to a preceding reference, so perhaps it was mixed in with those, but I couldn't be sure. The index could have been a bit more thorough, and I always want a chronology.There are 16 pages of plates and 6 maps.