Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The People of the Abyss
The People of the Abyss
The People of the Abyss
Ebook263 pages3 hours

The People of the Abyss

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJan 1, 1970
Author

Jack London

Jack London (1876-1916) was an American writer who produced two hundred short stories, more than four hundred nonfiction pieces, twenty novels, and three full-length plays in less than two decades. His best-known works include The Call of the Wild, The Sea Wolf, and White Fang.

Read more from Jack London

Related to The People of the Abyss

Related ebooks

Related articles

Reviews for The People of the Abyss

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
4/5

13 ratings13 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This is a non fiction book where Jack London Lives with the homeless people of London. And some life to the old saying about "walking a mile in another man's shoes."
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Jack London remains one of the most prescient observers of human society. This work of journalism is the product of his own immersion into the slums of London after witnessing the coronation of Edward VII in the capital of the British Empire in 1902. Hindsight reveals that the British Empire was at its height. The eponymous London was also at the height of his powers, and published his most famous work, "The Call of the Wild" in the following year back in California, which remained his home.This work is the first manacle of reportage by London which indicts the hands of the wealthy criminal class where "The Iron Heel" published in 1907 caught their feet. London had the insight and courage to expose as ineluctable fact that criminals in the name of capitalism would use every device of fraud and violence to seize the wealth and labor of the poor. These twin volumes prophecied the utterly pointless destruction of WWI and the rise of fascism which culminated in WWII.This edition is brilliantly prefaced by Jack Lindsay who provides historical background on London without indulging in any clap-trap ideological bias. The background touches upon London's reactionary streaks--his own racism, and views on women, affected by readings on Hegel and Nietzsche [4]--and whatever internal inconsistencies lie in the heart of a man who built up a fortune while advocating socialism. The Preface notes that it "was nothing new for a writer to make a journey into slumland and return to recount its horrors." Lindsay compares London to the Victorians who preceded him: William Booth, the founder of the Salvation Army, whose kitchens and beds for the poor were visited by London, wrote "In Darkest England" in 1890. He documented the horrific conditions "within a stone's throw of our cathedrals and palaces".George R. Sims, another colorful and highly productive journalist, repeatedly documented the perils of lives in the London slums. For example in his "How the Poor Live" and "Horrible London" in 1889.Charles Booth, the Unitarian philanthropist famous for providing a map of povertry in London, in "Life and Labour of the People in London" (1889). William T. Stead, the English journalist and editor who pioneered "new journalism" and investigative reporting, published numerous articles on urban poverty, especially in England, but including one series after living six months sub rosa in Chicago. In placing London in this historical setting, Lindsay notes that both Booths, and Sims, Mayhew and James Greenwood, among others, gave striking accounts of the terrible conditions for the poor in England. He notes that the life of the poor had been academically studied by W. Wyckoff, luridly depicted by William Stead, and scientifically analyzed by Charles Booth. But Lindsay offers the argument made by a reviewer at the time (in The Independent) that London offered a unique addition: London brought these conditions to life--making it "real and present to us". [7] London depicts the inhabitants as our brothers and sisters, unblurred by sentimentality.The authenticity of London's documentation is vouch-safed by the American's use of street cant. He also recites numerous "stories" told by the denizens of the crowded streets, "gardens" (patches of grass), doss-houses, and workhouses -- the Mile End Waste, the Spike, Whitechapel, Hoxton, Spitalfields, and Wapping. He found the women in Leman Street, Waterloo Road, Piccadilly, the Strand [100]. He could compare the places serving "skilly", a fluid concoction of oatmeal and hot water provided as breakfast and supper. [38] Includes his observations of the Coronation. He documents the rise of a "new race of street people". [94] London spells out how these brutalized degraded and dull "Ghetto folk" have been incapacitated and cannot, cannot, perform service to England, either as workers or as soldiers, because of their weakness and desperation. [94] He compares jails in America with the fare of an English workingman, and finds the latter severely lacking. The work also recites the latest statistical and economic data on pauperism in London. [101] Of particular import was his grasp of how many English were killed and maimed by their participation in the forms of "work" available to them--West End factories, carding and chemical concerns, slayed even the most splendid men and women. [104] London lines up the suicide cases. He presents the gestures--ghastly simulacrae--toward a "family life" made impossible for the desparate wailing for lasting employment to enable workers to earn food and shelter. Where the labor is so productive that a single workman can produce cloth for 250 people, and five men can produce bread for a thousand, yet millions starve. It comes down to "criminal management". [120]In a chapter on "drink, temperance and thrift", London addresses the fecklessness of most of the do-gooders and charities. He holds up the remedial exception in the work of Dr Barnardo Homes, the "child snatcher". The doctor took waifs not yet hardened to a vicious society, and sent them to Canada, where they had a chance to thrive. [124]In the final Chapter, London examines the "management". He compares the English "Civilization" with the Inuit living along the banks of the Yukan, in Alaska. [124]The Inuit have good and bad times, in which they all share, but chronic debt and starvation is unknown. London is one of the first to fix the label of "criminal mismanagement" to the political powers of the Kingdom, by documenting the numbers, the conditions, the markets, and the deliberate misappropriations of the wealthy who live off the poor.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Jack London's The People of the Abyss is a great book. Somehow London always manages to make compelling topics I would not generally find interesting. His writing is always powerful. I can see the scenes he depicts in front of me; in fact, I feel I am in them. I find myself sympathetic to the characters. The world is a better place for having revealed itself to London and to have reflected back his interpretation of it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In 1902, Jack London went to the city of London and spent a few months posing as an unemployed American sailor in the East End slums. He lived with them, on the streets and in workhouses, and in The People of the Abyss he reports back on the living conditions he found there. They are horrific. Starvation, filth, disease... people standing hours in line trying to get a spot to sleep for the night, unable to find or keep jobs. Many of the people London met were merely unlucky - an illness, a death in the family, an injury that cost them a job, the "thing that happened" - and the next thing they knew they were homeless, no longer able to make ends meet (sounds familiar, no? The more things change, the more they stay the same). It is difficult reading, and London only hints at some of the worst of the problems. As other reviewers have said, this is by no means an unbiased, just-the-facts-ma'am book. London was outraged by what he saw. In the book, he lays blame at the feet of the government, society, the lack of jobs, and even do-gooders, stopping just short of calling for class revolution. For what it is worth, an outraged Jack London is a compulsively readable Jack London, for this reviewer. So, so difficult to put down.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    The People of the Abyss - Jack London - published by Hesperus Press Limited."Where home is a hovel, and dull we grovel,Forgetting the World is fair." William Morris, The Voice of Toil.A quotation to the start of the Chapter on Children in this striking work by Jack London, written in 1903.If this reflection by William Morris was true in Jack London's eyes in 1903, sadly and with great shame it has to be said that nothing has changed for the many, today.Accepting that Jack London was looking for the worst situations he could find and his personal background and experiences, the comments and opinions he offers are nevertheless sound. Reading this book I found all too often quite painful. All the more so because my own father was an infant of seven when this was written, living in the suburbs of London, born into a family of fourteen living in a three bedroomed terraced house. Of the fourteen children born ten survived to adult hood. By the evidence recounted by Jack London, that so many survived was exceptional.It is impossible reading the many examples he gives, not to feel that there has been little if any improvement in the lives of those today who are existing in conditions not better than he describes. The gap between those who have plenty and those who have nothing then was great and today I fear it remains so, to an even greater extent.Any serious student of social history will easily find that his research has a bias that tends to over dramatise some situations but accepting that, the stories he tells make compelling reading and do provide a very real picture of the conditions existing at that time. It would be wrong to ignore the humanity that comes from his views. He was, as would any civilised person, deeply disturbed by his experiences.This is a well produced book and Hesperus Press have provided a clear and easily read edition that reflects well the nature of the original story. I have not seen the original edition although I have seen later editions produced in 1913. This new one is faithful in all ways to the original and makes a good addition to any library.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    When somebody says “muckraker,” I recall names such as Lincoln Steffens, Ray Stannard Baker, Upton Sinclair, Ida Tarbell, Izzy Stone and a few others. I never thought of Jack London in that context because books I associated with his name (White Fang, et al.) were works of adventure fiction. I was aware of London’s socialist-labor sympathies having read a few of his short stories: tales such as South of the Slot come to mind. But I never knew Jack London for a muckraker.Now I’ve read The People of the Abyss (London: Hesperus Press Limited; 2009), I’m willing to allow that Jack London was a muckraker. Still, I note that London’s approach to muckraking was different than some. Where Ida Tarbell (for example) did years of research, gathered mountains of documented evidence and used something like 800 pages to expose the foetid monstrosity of John D. Rockefeller, Jack London did only a few weeks of leg work, composed just one airtight analogy and used only 232 pages to expose the foetid monstrosity of the British Empire and of civilization as we know it.The People of the Abyss is Jack London’s eyewitness account of what he saw when, in the summer of 1902, he went to England disguised as a merchant seaman on the skids. Arriving in England, the author dived headlong into the reeking labor ghetto at the notorious East End of London.Walking the same mean streets that Jack the Ripper had stalked just 12 years earlier, the American novelist spent several months living the life of London’s poor. He wore the clothes. He ate the swill. He slept out in the weather. He visited housing in which families of six, eight, or more dwelt in single, 7-by-8-foot rooms with no heat or water. He stayed in Dickensian workhouses. He visited hospitals that made people sick and asylums that drove people crazy. He worked for pennies a day while he watched multitudes of people slog through filth, disease and starvation to achieve misery, despair and death.In this writer’s ken, Jack London never wrote a book that didn’t contain a purple passage or two. No surprise, then: The People of the Abyss contains a few. But if London was a passionate writer, he was also a damned good one. He understood that rhetoric won’t stand without facts to support it. He also understood that a long recitation of bald facts will alienate most readers. Accordingly, London’s Abyss uses few statistics and those few statistics are shrewdly chosen. The following paragraph (p. 178) is about as thick as the narrative gets:"The figures are appalling: 1.8 million people in London live on the poverty line and below it, and one million live with one week’s wages between them and pauperism. In all England and Wales, eighteen percent of the whole population are driven to the parish for relief, and in London, according to the statistics of the London County Council, twenty-one percent of the whole population are driven to the parish for relief. Between being driven to the parish for relief and being an out-and-out pauper there is a great difference, yet London supports 123,000 paupers, quite a city of folk in themselves. One in every four in London dies on public charity, while 939 out of every 1,000 in the united Kingdom die in poverty; 8 million simply struggle on the ragged edge of starvation, and 20 million more are not comfortable in the simple and clean sense of the word."The bulk of London’s narration describes with horrid clarity what it meant to be “driven to the parish for relief” and to be “not comfortable in the simple and clean sense of the word.” Here it should be sufficient to say that in America today, cattle and hogs are often more “comfortable” than poor Britons of 1902.For all it tells a depressing story, The People of the Abyss is an almighty good book that offers today’s American reader plenty to think about. Tales of parents who killed themselves after murdering children for whom they could not provide ring all too familiar. Even more chilling is the idea that we today are afflicted with militantly moronic leaders who want to do away with “entitlements” such as Social Security and Medicare and Food Stamps so we can enjoy the good old days that supposedly prevailed before such programs existed.Jack London was a great writer who was never better than he appears in this muckraking reprint from Hesperus Press. The People of the Abyss will curl your hair, stiffen your spine, and stand you right up on your hind legs. Read it. Get mad. Raise Hell!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "It is rather hard to tell a tithe of what I saw. Much of it is untellable. But in a general way I may say that I saw a nightmare, a fearful slime that quickened the pavement with life, a mess of unmentionable obscenity that put into eclipse the 'nightly horror' of Picadilly and the Strand. It was a menagerie of garmented bipeds that looked something like humans and more like beasts, and to complete the picture, brass-buttoned keepers kept order among them when they snarled too fiercely."That was what Jack London saw on his first visit to the London docks and, despite his claim that it is 'rather hard to tell', this marvellous book does a better job of telling it than many another work, either of fiction or of history, that attempts to bring to life the squalor of 19th century London.It was in 1902 that London (the author) visited London (the city) and lived as an out-of-work man on its streets while investigating the lives of the thousands of men and women for whom that was an everyday reality. The stories that feature here are some of the most heartbreaking you will find anywhere. The vicious circle of near-endless searching for a place to sleep or a crust to eat - a search that left little time for the most important job of all, looking for work, demonstrates the unfairness of a system in which a person, once caught up in it, can only spiral further and further down to the depths (the 'abyss') that can only end in death - from starvation, disease or suicide.It is not so much the appalling conditions in which life had to be lived as the sheer inability for anyone, once caught up in this spiral, ever to emerge from it that so raises the hackles of both reader and writer and it is to London's credit that the majority of the book is written in a white hot fury. He apportions blame wherever it is due - with the government, the rich, even the charities and social workers who do their best to relieve the conditions but from a position of very little understanding.Just how much social change was brought about by this book at the time of publication I do not know. Sadly, no book can ever do quite enough and the number of people still (over 100 years later) sleeping on the streets in the capital are evidence of that but perhaps this reissue will do something, if not to change that situation, then at least to help the rest of us understand a plight we can only be grateful we do not have to experience ourselves.A superb book - not just angry, righteous and worthy but a damn good read too.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The premise is simple in 1902 Jack London, posing as an out of work American sailor, went undercover in the poverty stricken east of London.There are much more interesting, richer and more detailed accounts of poverty out there (Henry Meyhew springs to mind) although this still an interesting read, even whilst being a dated and extremely flawed book. It's interesting because in spite of his many flaws Jack London is an engaging writer, his passion and horror at the poverty keeps the account painfully alive whilst his socialist views and lack Victorian prudishness is, for the period, deeply refreshing.However it contains far far too much of Jack London and his giant ego. The tome veers wildly from boys own adventure (look how brave he is!) to heart wrenching accounts, to repetitive lengthy facts and figures. It can be funny but for all the wrong reasons, he seems to carefully select his interviewees and he has a bizarre superiority going on; our poor are better than your poor kind of thing.To be honest the whole thing makes me wonder what he would thought he would achieve. He may be right but alienating people who can change things never helps. I mean he even criticises the King! Yes yes I know, how cruel ;)A different and interesting account of poverty but one I would only recommend to Jack London fans.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    What Jacob Riis did for New York City with his photos of tenements, Jack London did for London with his book, The People of the Abyss. The abyss that he referred to was the squalid East End of London, where the poorest of the poor lived and died.All of the horrors are there, described not by a dispassionate historian keeping a professional distance in his reporting, but in eyewitness accounts of and interviews with people living in appalling conditions. What I found most horrifying about this book is that so many things haven’t changed since it was written at the turn of the last century. His descriptions of homeless people forced by the police to literally walk all night due to a law which forbade sleeping in public places brought to mind the sweeps done in our own cities, forcing the homeless off the streets and out of our sight. Healthcare was an issue then just as it is now. Families were forced into poverty and sometimes starvation when the husband, the main breadwinner, was injured, became ill or died. The majority of bankruptcies in our own time are caused by overwhelming medical bills. More than a century ago when this book was written, when a man was out of work due to illness or injury, his wife was unable to adequately support the family because the only jobs open to her paid too little. Sadly, in our own time, women are still not able to adequately provide for their families on their own because they are paid, on average, 70 cents for every dollar a man earns doing the same job. A statistic that should outrage everyone (but strangely doesn’t) is that post-divorce, children slide down the economic scale, sometimes into poverty thanks to their mothers’ inability to earn a living comparable to their fathers who actually ascend the economic ladder post-divorce due their higher earning power.The cost of housing, rents equal to half their income, brings to mind the mortgage crisis we are suffering today. As the cost of housing during the last real estate bubble, reached stratospheric levels, families were forced to pay more and more of their income for housing, leaving little to actually live on. All it takes is a job loss or catastrophic illness for them to find themselves on the street as the banks foreclose on their homes. Their counterparts a century ago faced a similar fate for the same reasons. Job loss or illness resulted in the loss of the tiny rooms that they rented.Yet for all the similarities, there are important differences. We have laws governing the workplace and a social safety net that prevents the worst of the gruesome results of illness and unemployment described in this book. Laws about workplace safety and working hours prevent employers from exploiting their workers. Unemployment insurance replaces a portion of lost wages. Food stamps and free or reduced cost meals in schools stave off starvation. We have come a long way since 1902. After reading this book, I realized that we still have a long way to go.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a very interesting book set in London in the first decade of the twentieth century. You can read it as a social history as long as you remember what Alexander Masters writes in the foreword to the book; 'as an objective, trustworthy analysis, Abyss won’t do at all'.In 1902 Jack London moves temporarily into East End, disguised as a poor inhabitant. He observes and tells us about how the poor in East End live and how they go about their daily chores.Even if not everything in the book is considered trustworthy the stories tell us a lot of the persistence of social inequality in Britain. The atmosphere is vividly described and all that happens in the book seems genuine.Besides the stories of different people there are statistics, all showing the misery the working class lived in during the first years of the twentieth century.All together the book is absolutely worth reading, especially if you are interested in the history of England.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The old adage, "You can't judge a book by it's cover" certainly applies in the case of this particular book. Hesperus have put together a really lovely thick cover and good quality pages. I wanted to like it, I really did, and it initially started off well, being about poverty in London in the early 1900's. I wanted to be interested because my grandparents were born around 1910, and so not so far into the future of London's study of the people of London, which was 1902. I felt that he barely touched the surface of the people of the East End's lives, he wrote about the dire circumstances in which those people lived, and although you could sense his anger, I felt that all the time he was comparing our lives to those of those living in poverty in America, who he considered to be much better off. The book ended up being a chore to read and I forced myself to finish the last quarter of it, although I'm sure I didn't take much of it in.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    First off let me say how much I like Hesperus Press editions. They are sturdy, well-made paperbacks, whose covers have been lengthened an inch or so and then turned in, like a book jacket. The paper is good and the print excellent. I have a set of their Dickens Christmas anthologies, which include the contributions by other people, and they are excellent. I have to say I didn't enjoy this one as much as those.If you've read Orwell - Road to Wigan Pier and Down and Out in Paris and London - or Henry Meyhew - London labour and the London Poor, you'll have found the same information better presented. Jack London was a poverty tourist, he dipped his toe into the tide of human misery but made sure he could scuttle back to better living pretty sharpish. That's not to say there aren't some good things, the stories of the individuals he met, his compassion for the underworld (by which he meant the underclass rather than criminals) and his perception that, once a person began the fall from even relative prosperity, it was next to impossible to get out of the Abyss. Less successful - his quoting of more systematic researchers and a rather brash Yankee triumphalism - he is forever claiming that the American poor did much better, though it is plain by this he meant white Americans, I doubt African-, Native- and Chinese-Americans of the period would have been quite so sanguine.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In 1899 Jack London travelled to London and immersed himself in the worker neighborhoods of the East End. What follows is a horrifying account of daily life in the Industrial Age. The homeless paid to sleep in wooden coffins at night. Starving men ate used cigarette butts and rotten orange peels from off the dirty streets. Suicide and infanticide were rampant; some parents even maimed their children at birth so that they'd have better luck begging on the streets. Recommended for anyone who's merely curious, and invaluable to the social historian.

Book preview

The People of the Abyss - Jack London

The People of the Abyss, by Jack London

The Project Gutenberg eBook, The People of the Abyss, by Jack London

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with

almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or

re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included

with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net

Title: The People of the Abyss

Author: Jack London

Release Date: March 20, 2005 [eBook #1688]

[Last updated May 3, 2011]

Language: English

Character set encoding: ISO-646-US (US-ASCII)

***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PEOPLE OF THE ABYSS***

Transcribed from the Thomas Nelson and Sons edition by David Price, email ccx074@coventry.ac.uk

THE PEOPLE OF THE ABYSS

The chief priests and rulers cry:-

"O Lord and Master, not ours the guilt,

We build but as our fathers built;

Behold thine images how they stand

Sovereign and sole through all our land.

"Our task is hard—with sword and flame,

To hold thine earth forever the same,

And with sharp crooks of steel to keep,

Still as thou leftest them, thy sheep."

Then Christ sought out an artisan,

A low-browed, stunted, haggard man,

And a motherless girl whose fingers thin

Crushed from her faintly want and sin.

These set he in the midst of them,

And as they drew back their garment hem

For fear of defilement, Lo, here, said he,

The images ye have made of me.

JAMES RUSSELL LOWELL.

PREFACE

The experiences related in this volume fell to me in the summer of 1902.  I went down into the under-world of London with an attitude of mind which I may best liken to that of the explorer.  I was open to be convinced by the evidence of my eyes, rather than by the teachings of those who had not seen, or by the words of those who had seen and gone before.  Further, I took with me certain simple criteria with which to measure the life of the under-world.  That which made for more life, for physical and spiritual health, was good; that which made for less life, which hurt, and dwarfed, and distorted life, was bad.

It will be readily apparent to the reader that I saw much that was bad.  Yet it must not be forgotten that the time of which I write was considered good times in England.  The starvation and lack of shelter I encountered constituted a chronic condition of misery which is never wiped out, even in the periods of greatest prosperity.

Following the summer in question came a hard winter.  Great numbers of the unemployed formed into processions, as many as a dozen at a time, and daily marched through the streets of London crying for bread.  Mr. Justin McCarthy, writing in the month of January 1903, to the New York Independent, briefly epitomises the situation as follows:-

The workhouses have no space left in which to pack the starving crowds who are craving every day and night at their doors for food and shelter.  All the charitable institutions have exhausted their means in trying to raise supplies of food for the famishing residents of the garrets and cellars of London lanes and alleys.  The quarters of the Salvation Army in various parts of London are nightly besieged by hosts of the unemployed and the hungry for whom neither shelter nor the means of sustenance can be provided.

It has been urged that the criticism I have passed on things as they are in England is too pessimistic.  I must say, in extenuation, that of optimists I am the most optimistic.  But I measure manhood less by political aggregations than by individuals.  Society grows, while political machines rack to pieces and become scrap.  For the English, so far as manhood and womanhood and health and happiness go, I see a broad and smiling future.  But for a great deal of the political machinery, which at present mismanages for them, I see nothing else than the scrap heap.

JACK LONDON.

PIEDMONT, CALIFORNIA.

CHAPTER I—THE DESCENT

But you can’t do it, you know, friends said, to whom I applied for assistance in the matter of sinking myself down into the East End of London.  You had better see the police for a guide, they added, on second thought, painfully endeavouring to adjust themselves to the psychological processes of a madman who had come to them with better credentials than brains.

But I don’t want to see the police, I protested.  What I wish to do is to go down into the East End and see things for myself.  I wish to know how those people are living there, and why they are living there, and what they are living for.  In short, I am going to live there myself.

"You don’t want to live down there! everybody said, with disapprobation writ large upon their faces.  Why, it is said there are places where a man’s life isn’t worth tu’pence."

The very places I wish to see, I broke in.

But you can’t, you know, was the unfailing rejoinder.

Which is not what I came to see you about, I answered brusquely, somewhat nettled by their incomprehension.  I am a stranger here, and I want you to tell me what you know of the East End, in order that I may have something to start on.

But we know nothing of the East End.  It is over there, somewhere.  And they waved their hands vaguely in the direction where the sun on rare occasions may be seen to rise.

Then I shall go to Cook’s, I announced.

Oh yes, they said, with relief.  Cook’s will be sure to know.

But O Cook, O Thomas Cook & Son, path-finders and trail-clearers, living sign-posts to all the world, and bestowers of first aid to bewildered travellers—unhesitatingly and instantly, with ease and celerity, could you send me to Darkest Africa or Innermost Thibet, but to the East End of London, barely a stone’s throw distant from Ludgate Circus, you know not the way!

You can’t do it, you know, said the human emporium of routes and fares at Cook’s Cheapside branch.  It is so—hem—so unusual.

Consult the police, he concluded authoritatively, when I had persisted.  We are not accustomed to taking travellers to the East End; we receive no call to take them there, and we know nothing whatsoever about the place at all.

Never mind that, I interposed, to save myself from being swept out of the office by his flood of negations.  Here’s something you can do for me.  I wish you to understand in advance what I intend doing, so that in case of trouble you may be able to identify me.

Ah, I see! should you be murdered, we would be in position to identify the corpse.

He said it so cheerfully and cold-bloodedly that on the instant I saw my stark and mutilated cadaver stretched upon a slab where cool waters trickle ceaselessly, and him I saw bending over and sadly and patiently identifying it as the body of the insane American who would see the East End.

No, no, I answered; merely to identify me in case I get into a scrape with the ’bobbies.’  This last I said with a thrill; truly, I was gripping hold of the vernacular.

That, he said, is a matter for the consideration of the Chief Office.

It is so unprecedented, you know, he added apologetically.

The man at the Chief Office hemmed and hawed.  We make it a rule, he explained, to give no information concerning our clients.

But in this case, I urged, it is the client who requests you to give the information concerning himself.

Again he hemmed and hawed.

Of course, I hastily anticipated, I know it is unprecedented, but—

As I was about to remark, he went on steadily, it is unprecedented, and I don’t think we can do anything for you.

However, I departed with the address of a detective who lived in the East End, and took my way to the American consul-general.  And here, at last, I found a man with whom I could do business.  There was no hemming and hawing, no lifted brows, open incredulity, or blank amazement.  In one minute I explained myself and my project, which he accepted as a matter of course.  In the second minute he asked my age, height, and weight, and looked me over.  And in the third minute, as we shook hands at parting, he said: All right, Jack.  I’ll remember you and keep track.

I breathed a sigh of relief.  Having burnt my ships behind me, I was now free to plunge into that human wilderness of which nobody seemed to know anything.  But at once I encountered a new difficulty in the shape of my cabby, a grey-whiskered and eminently decorous personage who had imperturbably driven me for several hours about the City.

Drive me down to the East End, I ordered, taking my seat.

Where, sir? he demanded with frank surprise.

To the East End, anywhere.  Go on.

The hansom pursued an aimless way for several minutes, then came to a puzzled stop.  The aperture above my head was uncovered, and the cabman peered down perplexedly at me.

I say, he said, wot plyce yer wanter go?

East End, I repeated.  Nowhere in particular.  Just drive me around anywhere.

But wot’s the haddress, sir?

See here! I thundered.  Drive me down to the East End, and at once!

It was evident that he did not understand, but he withdrew his head, and grumblingly started his horse.

Nowhere in the streets of London may one escape the sight of abject poverty, while five minutes’ walk from almost any point will bring one to a slum; but the region my hansom was now penetrating was one unending slum.  The streets were filled with a new and different race of people, short of stature, and of wretched or beer-sodden appearance.  We rolled along through miles of bricks and squalor, and from each cross street and alley flashed long vistas of bricks and misery.  Here and there lurched a drunken man or woman, and the air was obscene with sounds of jangling and squabbling.  At a market, tottery old men and women were searching in the garbage thrown in the mud for rotten potatoes, beans, and vegetables, while little children clustered like flies around a festering mass of fruit, thrusting their arms to the shoulders into the liquid corruption, and drawing forth morsels but partially decayed, which they devoured on the spot.

Not a hansom did I meet with in all my drive, while mine was like an apparition from another and better world, the way the children ran after it and alongside.  And as far as I could see were the solid walls of brick, the slimy pavements, and the screaming streets; and for the first time in my life the fear of the crowd smote me.  It was like the fear of the sea; and the miserable multitudes, street upon street, seemed so many waves of a vast and malodorous sea, lapping about me and threatening to well up and over me.

Stepney, sir; Stepney Station, the cabby called down.

I looked about.  It was really a railroad station, and he had driven desperately to it as the one familiar spot he had ever heard of in all that wilderness.

Well, I said.

He spluttered unintelligibly, shook his head, and looked very miserable.  I’m a strynger ’ere, he managed to articulate.  An’ if yer don’t want Stepney Station, I’m blessed if I know wotcher do want.

I’ll tell you what I want, I said.  You drive along and keep your eye out for a shop where old clothes are sold.  Now, when you see such a shop, drive right on till you turn the corner, then stop and let me out.

I could see that he was growing dubious of his fare, but not long afterwards he pulled up to the curb and informed me that an old-clothes shop was to be found a bit of the way back.

Won’tcher py me? he pleaded.  There’s seven an’ six owin’ me.

Yes, I laughed, and it would be the last I’d see of you.

Lord lumme, but it’ll be the last I see of you if yer don’t py me, he retorted.

But a crowd of ragged onlookers had already gathered around the cab, and I laughed again and walked back to the old-clothes shop.

Here the chief difficulty was in making the shopman understand that I really and truly wanted old clothes.  But after fruitless attempts to press upon me new and impossible coats and trousers, he began to bring to light heaps of old ones, looking mysterious the while and hinting darkly.  This he did with the palpable intention of letting me know that he had piped my lay, in order to bulldose me, through fear of exposure, into paying heavily for my purchases.  A man in trouble, or a high-class criminal from across the water, was what he took my measure for—in either case, a person anxious to avoid the police.

But I disputed with him over the outrageous difference between prices and values, till I quite disabused him of the notion, and he settled down to drive a hard bargain with a hard customer.  In the end I selected a pair of stout though well-worn trousers, a frayed jacket with one remaining button, a pair of brogans which had plainly seen service where coal was shovelled, a thin leather belt, and a very dirty cloth cap.  My underclothing and socks, however, were new and warm, but of the sort that any American waif, down in his luck, could acquire in the ordinary course of events.

I must sy yer a sharp ’un, he said, with counterfeit admiration, as I handed over the ten shillings finally agreed upon for the outfit.  Blimey, if you ain’t ben up an’ down Petticut Lane afore now.  Yer trouseys is wuth five bob to hany man, an’ a docker ’ud give two an’ six for the shoes, to sy nothin’ of the coat an’ cap an’ new stoker’s singlet an’ hother things.

How much will you give me for them? I demanded suddenly.  I paid you ten bob for the lot, and I’ll sell them back to you, right now, for eight!  Come, it’s a go!

But he grinned and shook his head, and though I had made a good bargain, I was unpleasantly aware that he had made a better one.

I found the cabby and a policeman with their heads together, but the latter, after looking me over sharply, and particularly scrutinizing the bundle under my arm, turned away and left the cabby to wax mutinous by himself.  And not a step would he budge till I paid him the seven shillings and sixpence owing him.  Whereupon he was willing to drive me to the ends of the earth, apologising profusely for his insistence, and explaining that one ran across queer customers in London Town.

But he drove me only to Highbury Vale, in North London, where my luggage was waiting for me.  Here, next day, I took off my shoes (not without regret for their lightness and comfort), and my soft, grey travelling suit, and, in fact, all my clothing; and proceeded to array myself in the clothes of the other and unimaginable men, who must have been indeed unfortunate to have had to part with such rags for the pitiable sums obtainable from a dealer.

Inside my stoker’s singlet, in the armpit, I sewed a gold sovereign (an emergency sum certainly of modest proportions); and inside my stoker’s singlet I put myself.  And then I sat down and moralised upon the fair years and fat, which had made my skin soft and brought the nerves close to the surface; for the singlet was rough and raspy as a hair shirt, and I am confident that the most rigorous of ascetics suffer no more than I did in the ensuing twenty-four hours.

The remainder of my costume was fairly easy to put on, though the brogans, or brogues, were quite a problem.  As stiff and hard as if made of wood, it was only after a prolonged pounding of the uppers with my fists that I was able to get my feet into them at all.  Then, with a few shillings, a knife, a handkerchief, and some brown papers and flake tobacco stowed away in my pockets, I thumped down the stairs and said good-bye to my foreboding friends.  As I paused out of the door, the help, a comely middle-aged woman, could not conquer a grin that twisted her lips and separated them till the throat, out of involuntary sympathy, made the uncouth animal noises we are wont to designate as laughter.

No sooner was I out on the streets than I was impressed by the difference in status effected by my clothes.  All servility vanished from the demeanour of the common people with whom I came in contact.  Presto! in the twinkling of an eye, so to say, I had become one of them.  My frayed and out-at-elbows jacket was the badge and advertisement of my class, which was their class.  It made me of like kind, and in place of the fawning and too respectful attention I had hitherto received, I now shared with them a comradeship.  The man in corduroy and dirty neckerchief no longer addressed me as sir or governor.  It was mate now—and a fine and hearty word, with a tingle to it, and a warmth and gladness, which the other term does not possess.  Governor!  It smacks of mastery, and power, and high authority—the tribute of the man who is under to the man on top, delivered in the hope that he will let up a bit and ease his weight, which is another way of saying that it is an appeal for alms.

This brings me to a delight I experienced in my rags and tatters which is denied the average American abroad.  The European traveller from the States, who is not a Croesus, speedily finds himself reduced to a chronic state of self-conscious sordidness by the hordes of cringing robbers who clutter his steps from dawn till dark, and deplete his pocket-book in a way that puts compound interest to the blush.

In my rags and tatters I escaped the pestilence of tipping, and encountered men on a basis of equality.  Nay, before the day was out I turned the tables, and said, most gratefully, Thank you, sir, to a gentleman whose horse I held, and who dropped a penny into my eager palm.

Other changes I discovered were wrought in my condition by my new garb.  In crossing crowded thoroughfares I found I had to be, if anything, more lively in avoiding vehicles, and it was strikingly impressed upon me that my life had cheapened in direct ratio with my clothes.  When before I inquired the way of a policeman, I was usually asked, Bus or ’ansom, sir?  But now the query became, Walk or ride?  Also, at the railway stations, a third-class ticket was now shoved out to me as a matter of course.

But there was compensation for it all.  For the first time I met the English lower classes face to face, and knew them for

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1