Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
5/5
()
About this ebook
Does Civil Rule 12(h)(3) require that a court must decide a question of jurisdiction before it?
Does patent statute 35 USC 261 bar a court's jurisdiction to void the assignment of United States Patents by operation of California State laws? Does judgement lien statute 28 USC 1962 bar a court's jurisdiction to hear a suit to void the assignment of United States patents by operation of California State laws?
James Constant
writes on law, government, mathematics and science, as they are and as they should be
Read more from James Constant
Related to Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
Titles in the series (10)
Questions Presented Supreme Court Cases Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari: Denied Without Opinion Patent Case 93-1413 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 93-1518 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 96-1178 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Extraordinary Writ Denied Without Opinion– Patent Case 94-1257 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 98-1972. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari – Patent Case 01-438 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 98-1151 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 01-438 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 98-1151 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Inexplicable Deception: A State Corruption of Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStop Judicial Abuse Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSupreme Court Petition No 10-1275 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 96-1178 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSupreme Court Eminent Domain Case 09-381 Denied Without Opinion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuestions Presented Supreme Court Cases Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShocking Judgements Delivered by the Supreme Court of United States: Full Text Judgements with Summary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBinding Promises: The Late 20th-Century Reformation of Contract Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKeeter & Sinquefield's Habeas Cite Book Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Principles of Pleading and Practice in Civil Actions in the High Court of Justice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How one of my Pro-se cases got destroyed by federal rogue judges Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 98-1972. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitution of the State of Tennessee Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Petition for Extraordinary Writ Denied Without Opinion– Patent Case 94-1257 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari: Denied Without Opinion Patent Case 93-1413 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Process a Legal Appeal Successfully Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCalifornia Supreme Court Petition: S173448 – Denied Without Opinion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5U.S. Crimes and Criminal Procedure Hyperlinked: 18 U.S.C.: Hyperlinked, #7 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 93-1518 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMass Torts in a World of Settlement Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Select Legal Topics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThat Man from Nebraska - Confronting the Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKnight's Code Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElements of Nevada Legal Theories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCopyright Law of the United States of America / Contained in Title 17 of the United States Code Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Constitutional Law For You
U.S. Constitution For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Student's Guide to the Study of Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Abortion Rights Controversy in America: A Legal Reader Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reason in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJustice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Federal Tax Returns Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Radical Mind: The Destructive Plans of the Woke Left Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Law For Dummies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Supreme Court: 20 Cases that Changed America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bill of Rights Primer: A Citizen's Guidebook to the American Bill of Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe U.S. Constitution and Related Documents Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction To Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction to Legal Reasoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Heritage Guide to the Constitution: Fully Revised Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Covid To Communism: Chronicling the Global Assault on Our Freedom and What to Do About It. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Supremes' Greatest Hits: The 44 Supreme Court Cases That Most Directly Affect Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Unwarranted: Policing Without Permission Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The US Constitution with the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confede Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Constitution of the United States of America: 1787 (Annotated) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Justice Corrupted: How the Left Weaponized Our Legal System Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Get Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5We the People: A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution and Other Writings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Constitutional Law, Law Essentials: Governing Law for Law School and Bar Exam Prep Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
2 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963 - James Constant
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782
- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3)
Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
By James Constant
Smashwords Edition
Copyright © 1994 by James Constant
Smashwords Edition, License Notes
This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.
No. 94-782
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES
October Term, 1994
________________________________________________________
In Re: JAMES CONSTANT,
Debtor.
________________________________________________________
ARGEREY CONSTANT, JAMES CONSTANT
Petitioners,
V.
DAVID L. RAY, SALTZBURG, RAY & BERGMAN,
Respondents.
________________________________________
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argerey Constant
James Constant
Pro-per Petitioners
i
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Should this Court resolve direct conflicts between the court of appeal's decision on jurisdiction and decisions on jurisdiction of this Court and other Circuit Courts on the following matters:
Does Civil Rule 12(h)(3) require that a court must decide a question of jurisdiction before it?
Does patent statute 35 USC 261 bar a court's jurisdiction to void the assignment of United States Patents by operation of California State laws?
Does judgement lien statute 28 USC 1962 bar a court's jurisdiction to hear a suit to void the assignment of United States patents by operation of California State laws?
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
OPINIONS BELOW
JURISDICTION
STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT
A. Civil Rule 12(h)(3) Requires That A Court Must Decide A Question of Jurisdiction
Before It
B. Patent Statute 35