Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
Ebook33 pages30 minutes

Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars

5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Does Civil Rule 12(h)(3) require that a court must decide a question of jurisdiction before it?
Does patent statute 35 USC 261 bar a court's jurisdiction to void the assignment of United States Patents by operation of California State laws? Does judgement lien statute 28 USC 1962 bar a court's jurisdiction to hear a suit to void the assignment of United States patents by operation of California State laws?

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJul 5, 2013
ISBN9781301253265
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963
Author

James Constant

writes on law, government, mathematics and science, as they are and as they should be

Read more from James Constant

Related to Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963

Titles in the series (10)

View More

Related ebooks

Constitutional Law For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
5/5

2 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963 - James Constant

    Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782

    - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3)

    Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963

    By James Constant

    Smashwords Edition

    Copyright © 1994 by James Constant

    Smashwords Edition, License Notes

    This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

    No. 94-782

    IN THE

    SUPREME COURT OF THE

    UNITED STATES

    October Term, 1994

    ________________________________________________________

    In Re: JAMES CONSTANT,

    Debtor.

    ________________________________________________________

    ARGEREY CONSTANT, JAMES CONSTANT

    Petitioners,

    V.

    DAVID L. RAY, SALTZBURG, RAY & BERGMAN,

    Respondents.

    ________________________________________

    PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

    TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

    Argerey Constant

    James Constant

    Pro-per Petitioners

    i

    QUESTIONS PRESENTED

    Should this Court resolve direct conflicts between the court of appeal's decision on jurisdiction and decisions on jurisdiction of this Court and other Circuit Courts on the following matters:

    Does Civil Rule 12(h)(3) require that a court must decide a question of jurisdiction before it?

    Does patent statute 35 USC 261 bar a court's jurisdiction to void the assignment of United States Patents by operation of California State laws?

    Does judgement lien statute 28 USC 1962 bar a court's jurisdiction to hear a suit to void the assignment of United States patents by operation of California State laws?

    ii

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Page

    OPINIONS BELOW

    JURISDICTION

    STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED

    STATEMENT OF THE CASE

    REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT

    A. Civil Rule 12(h)(3) Requires That A Court Must Decide A Question of Jurisdiction

    Before It

    B. Patent Statute 35

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1