The New Science of Politics: An Introduction
3.5/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
"This book must be considered one of the most enlightening essays on the character of European politics that has appeared in half a century. . . . This is a book powerful and vivid enough to make agreement or disagreement with even its main thesis relatively unimportant."—Times Literary Supplement
"Voegelin . . . is one of the most distinguished interpreters to Americans of the non-liberal streams of European thought. . . . He brings a remarkable breadth of knowledge, and a historical imagination that ranges frequently into brilliant insights and generalizations."—Francis G. Wilson, American Political Science Review
"This book is beautifully constructed . . . his erudition constantly brings a startling illumination."—Martin Wright, International Affairs
"A ledestar to thinking men who seek a restoration of political science on the classic and Christian basis . . . a significant accomplishment in the retheorization of our age."—Anthony Harrigan, Christian Century
Eric Voegelin
Eric Voegelin (1901-1985) was one of the most original and influential philosophers of our time. Born in Cologne, Germany, he studied at the University of Vienna, where he became a professor of political science in the Faculty of Law. In 1938, he and his wife, fleeing Hitler, emigrated to the United States. They became American citizens in 1944. Voegelin spent much of his career at Louisiana State University, the University of Munich, and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. During his lifetime he published many books and more than one hundred articles.
Read more from Eric Voegelin
The New Science of Politics: An Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Science, Politics and Gnosticism: Two Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to The New Science of Politics
Related ebooks
Hegel and the Infinite Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Pursuit of Unity and Perfection in History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDivining History: Prophetism, Messianism and the Development of the Spirit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFacing the Other: John Paul II, Levinas, and the Body Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesolation and Enlightenment: Political Knowledge After Total War, Totalitarianism, and the Holocaust Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGod Versus Nature: The Conflict Between Religion and Science in History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRecent Developments in European Thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPaleolithic Politics: The Human Community in Early Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCritique of Historical Theory Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Left Hemisphere: Mapping Critical Theory Today Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Left Hemisphere: Mapping Contemporary Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnd of History and the Last Man Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Recent Developments in European Thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTwentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeaning, Truth, and Reference in Historical Representation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Death of Secular Messianism: Religion and Politics in an Age of Civilizational Crisis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsActs of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Liberal Approach to the Past: A Reader Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Idea of Progress: An Inquiry Into its Origin and Growth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Origins of Judaism, Christianity and Islam Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Metaphysics of World Order: A Synthesis of Philosophy, Theology, and Politics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Through Nature to God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecolonial Love: Salvation in Colonial Modernity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEarthly Powers: The Clash of Religion and Politics in Europe, from the French Revolution to the Great War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dialectic of Enlightenment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Heresies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pure Society: From Darwin to Hitler Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Three Axial Ages: Moral, Material, Mental Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Politics For You
Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Prince Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sex Trafficking: Inside the Business of Modern Slavery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The January 6th Report Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Quest for Cosmic Justice Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ever Wonder Why?: and Other Controversial Essays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The New Science of Politics
15 ratings1 review
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5What does a book look like when it asks all the right questions, is concerned about all the right things, and is so completely and utterly conditioned by its historical moment and the author's intellectual and personal background that its answers to these questions and concerns is flat out bizarre? Like this book. Voegelin has a lot in common with Adorno: they both worry that the modern world tends to make people materialistic idiots; they both worry that high culture is being undermined; they both worry about the sort of materialistic idiots who thought Stalinism was a really great idea. They were both far too unwilling or unable to think outside the box of the post-war, Cold War world, and didn't seem to realize that a lot of their pessimism could be explained by the fact that they lived in one of the shittiest epochs of human history. They both something along the lines of "the truth isn't in history" (i.e., 'truth' can't necessarily be judged by what seems to be the case right now) and that "history is in the truth," that is, that 'truth' changes over time. They both have essentially dialectical views of culture, although they'd both deny that (e.g., Voegelin argues that the doubtfulness inherent in Christianity leads to the Gnostic search for certainty, which then undermines Christianity...)
The differences then: Adorno thinks that if you're going to do or think anything, you should probably do or think something that will make the world a better place, while admitting that you'll probably mess it up; Voegelin thinks that any effort to make the world a better place is doomed to failure, and it's better not to try. Voegelin thinks the major problem with the world is Gnosticism (that is, roughly, the tendency to treat history, subjects and God as if they were objects that we can know in the same way we know objects); Adorno thinks the major problem with the world is capitalism (that is, roughly, the tendency to treat everything as if it were a commodity and, therefore, an object). So that's a similarity and a difference.
From my perspective, both of those guys have a lot to tell us. This isn't the place to rag on Adorno, but there are some problems you should be aware of, if you plan on reading this book. First, Voegelin's argument is awfully incoherent in a number of spots, most importantly, his claims that Gnosticism ignores the 'structures of reality;' surely only a Gnostic would think there was such a thing as a knowable 'structure of reality'? Second, his insistence on the importance of political order, while perfectly understandable in the face of the second world war, can hardly be transhistorical: sometimes the breakdown of order is a good thing. Tied in to this, I'm pretty sure he's sometimes just trying to get a rise out of his reader, as, for instance, when he complains about the 'magical dream' foolishness of wanting world peace. Finally, and most obviously, his suggestion at the end of the book that the U.S., despite being founded by Gnostic Puritans, is a bastion of the 'Mediterranean' tradition, is either wishful thinking or a joke. Admit it man! Capitalism is a Gnosticism! More specifically: there is *no* force in the world which is neither 'Gnostic' nor revolutionary. Voegelin should have just bitten the bullet. If he's right, either it's all downhill from here, or there will have to be massive social change. Like Adorno, so for a consistent Voegelin: our choice is socialism or barbarism.1 person found this helpful