False Color of Authority: Government Hit Men

FALSE COLOR OF AUTHORITY

Government Hit Men

By Phillip M. Duse Sr.

Government Victim

Smashwords ebook edition

No part of this eBook may be reproduced or shared by any electronic or mechanical means, including but not limited to printing, file sharing, and email, without prior written permission from Fideli Publishing.

Smashwords Edition, License Notes

This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each person you share it with. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then you should return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

Copyright © 2010 by Phillip M. Duse Sr.

Library of Congress Control Number: 2006908684

ISBN: 978-1-60414-294-5

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.

To order printed copies of this book, contact:

Orders@Xlibris.com

Is It The People's Responsibility

To Denigrate Phil Duse, a law abiding citizen?

Or

Should They Tell Government Animositors*

Denigration Activity Must Be Supported by:

Empirical Conclusions Based on Experience or Observation that is

Verifiable or Disprovable

And Not: Systems or Theories Based on Fruits of Mental Masturbation

[See 2004: Phil Duse Versus the Tyranny of DOD/DOJ, Xlibris]

*Animositor: Any individual who attempts to degrade or defame another through display of ill will under the direction or hidden agenda of another—aka Government perpetrators doltish behavior.

This book is dedicated to the tens of thousands of individuals (complainants) fooled into referring aggrieved complaints to the EEOC and civil courts, too, believing it would be given unbiased adjudication reference in civil and EEOC statues governing processing of issues alleged to be discriminatory.

Know that your were among a large group certainly fooled into utilizing a process that by evidence of results was fraught with the hidden injustices now made known in this book. The information in this book is for edification of future complaints to prevent continuation of support for unjust judicial processes.

Work to change the existing system through incorporation of latest truth detection technology Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fmri)

Brain Fingerprinting to ensure what defendants falsely claim is detectable so that the truth rules—resulting in true justice.

FOREWORD

In this book's presentation of Government tactics depicting actions to Get Phil Duse by any means possible an empirical bottom line is uncovered, Government supported investigative/police action under a False Color 0f Authority. To reasonable minds, without question, the book uncovers racism by mental masturbation [source of reasoning and tactics] as applied in this new millennium—no change from the previous. Whatever perpetrators claim, it is still merely a kill the messenger process, of no merit.

False Color Racism? Yes, it is easily discernable in this book from observational deductions and analysis of supposed We're so smart i.e., doltish Governmental mindsets. So smart government activity says who/why? The realities presented in this book; the supposed so smart mindsets are primary violators of civil rights guaranteed under out constitutional system. Stay with the story to discover how the obfuscations and permissiveness inherent in the current civil system are purposely craft to placate and fool victims into seeking justice that does not exist. By the end of the last chapter, you come to a hard to deny realization that our civil system is not and never was a system intended to protect victim civil rights: it is just a game stupid, but now you can discover how they play the game.

The unfortunate Bottom Line is the surrealistic (dream) nature of this system and its continued existence in the new millennia. The story describes how the design of the civil system by we are so smart drafters permit dogged pursuits by Governmental entities with no true onus of intent to hold alleged violators of your rights responsible. For example, of the multiple tens of thousands of complaints lodged annually and the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) was the judicator, practically none [maybe 4 %] were ever adjudicated in favor of aggrieved complainants. This imbalance in the statistical results alone strongly indicate protections stated as guarantees in EEOC statue's and the fourth amendment as it relates to improper perpetrator activity are a kind of eye candy facade hiding a legal chameleon. Similar in effect to the arbite macht £rei [work makes free] motto used by WWII animositors who led millions of victims who thought they were going for a cleansing shower to their end in gas chambers.

The author proffers that in spite of perceptions of positive change in recent years the existing system can be qualified as a system playing one legal tune with two discernable versions, one for each side of a two-sided system mouth. There is a mental masturbation side and a politically connected side. You will soon discover how verifiable empirical truths are not prerequisites for Government fact finders i.e., EEOC, Courts when they deal with connected defendants brought before the system. Moreover, nor is the truth the objective pursued by fact finders under. rules proffered within the system—such claimed truths of complainants are too easily ignored or obfuscated to fall under a prior precedence upholding defendant positions—a legal coin with heads on both sides and only the fact finders can make the heads or tails call.

Why is this so, you may ask! Try this analogy: listen to the music (results) played by those empowered to ensure equity in our civil complaint processes, when it does not pass the basic smell test, because you/victims of the process have no cause to dance to the resulting legal musical beat, yet others (connected defendants) too often smile and snap their fingers in tune. You quickly realize results, primarily, are on sufficiency of money and connections that pump up the resulting musical beat to toe tapping heights for listeners aligned to hear one side of the legal mouth. That would be individuals within our U.S. cultural appeased by a reality that too often upholds one-sided individual rights.

Note rights affirmed, statistically speaking, are rights for those individuals who easily qualify as mindsets known to dance within the U.S. culture with a box in hand with a sectioned off space for others to dance in even though they can't fathom the necessity for hand clapping or toe tapping to the one sided musical beat. After all, there is no empirical reasoning justifying a toe-tapping dance step by the more or less 95% of litigants listening to the legal tune.

The toe tapers, on the other hand, dance with system enforcers conditioned to reliance on a demonizing kill the messenger process as the only acceptable result therefore the mandated outcome. A process most toe tapers can readily pursue when clashes with musical writings (presumed guarantees of rights) intended for one listening side are taken up by complainers as applicable to their side too. It is only then that you discover the tune(s) have a slanted meaning fostering differing conclusions on the musical score relevant law—the songs were never intended to satisfy all listeners only those who know how to dance in step with the music, it is not to hard to correctly guess which listeners side that would be.

Why does this system continue to exist with scant change from years gone by?

Glad you asked. Know that there's a purposeful shrouding of one side's reality, with exception of those with tone deft ears or happen to be one of the few members of the connected minority to where the music does not apply to them, might be a Supreme Court Justice. Otherwise, there is a twisted reality created by drafters of our system's rules that easily misconstrue complainer complaints to fall under a prior precedence decision overwhelmingly in defendants favor. This renders complainer complainant positions to appear to be a result of deft, blind or dumbness; complainers who got out of the American control box expecting to dance to the same music as America's connected box holders.

The We're so smart civil system message: This civil music is an American reality tune depicting a surreal process not intended for the unconnected—get back in the box complainer and tap dance on command; the civil equity you seek is not a reality—it is something that can't or won't be easily changed, regardless of merit!

So they say. But I and for certain most Americans, too, need to remind all animositors that this is still the USA where a positive change will be certain, after the obfuscating side of the legal mouth is made to heel to the truth—I view Brain Fingerprinting Technology as the solution. We need only to use the author Phil Duse as the example empirical proof of a law-abiding citizen who followed the civil system's rules [EEOC/Courts] only to discover they led to obfuscating nowhere at great personal expense. In following mandated processes, though, he uncovers the reality of our Government's routine use of blatantly false color authority to avoid responsibility for otherwise unlawful actions of defendants [including repeated hit-men retaliatory acts in the author's case] regardless of merit, blaming the victims is name of the game.

This area constitutes an ongoing struggle for dignity of all law-abiding citizens; the legal system still needs updating to address false color activity. Updating that pulls our culture's law-abiding citizens in a direction that more appropriately honors and values all American rights equally, or at least more appropriately than the current system.

The law-abiding people need to eliminate or quash, amongst other ridiculous notions that come to mind, the understanding within too many communities of things you [minorities in general] have to do to stay out of trouble and you're not the head of your household [Black Males] when such things are insulting and not in the law. Apparently, there is a law in play (unwritten) supported by a toe taping dance tune favored by one-sided listeners. The author says it is eminently more appropriate to interpret things you need to do as things or notions to be taught to all non-law abiders; we know they are like the poor and win be amongst us forever, but we can all agree non-law abiders deserve no protections in line with law-abiding citizens.

When our culture understands the need for and benefit of Brain Fingerprinting Technology, those who have not spoken truthfully or are operating under a false color of authority can be readily identified and held accountable, to include Government Animositors at all levels—regardless of obfuscating counsel—to ensure the truth rules.

What is a classical example of animositors use of chicanery tactics under a false color of authority? They simply employ ruse tactics where they—perpetrators in general—employ meretricious acting females and other conniving ruse resources to appear to look like victims at risk e/g., smiling fakers awaiting an apP19acl.t by their target, rather than people who are in reality victimizing law abiders through the continual perpetration of no merit ruses. The law-abiding target is the true and only victim and has no option to prevent scenarios portraying him as the villain—again Brain Fingerprinting technology is the answer.

This area of discussion [false color of authority] appears to he • new genre that needs clarification as to proper empirical authority, [due process] unrelated to American style racism permitting animositors to expend Governmental resources on pernicious pursuits without possible consequence of challenge from or liability to their aggrieved law-abiding victims.

Specifica1ly in chat animositors in the author's case have continually engaged in hit man activity —victimizing all parties involved directly or indirectly—the victims certainly deserve a countering option independent of perpetrator obfuscations—fives are placed in undue jeopardy. Brain fingerprinting technology is the answer and the best solution. Only then can we correct this glaring de6ciencywithin our civil system to get out of the kill the messenger business. A damage award would be or should be appropriate to counteract blatantly erroneous mental masturbation conclusions of supposed we're so smart animositors who do not attune to reality—let them learn how to dance to the truth.

CHAPTER 1

Writings on a New Genre

This is the third book by the author challenging Governmental actions initiated under false color of authority to cause physical harm and psychological damage to the author's business and family interest e.g., acts of chicanery and cynical falsehoods in retaliation for the author's civil suit activity. Law-abiding individuals similarly affected should speak out, too, as we are victims of Government perpetrators operating under a false color of authority. We need to be proactive to get a handle on the scope of the activity within the American culture, so we can join forces to facilitate corrective action and pursue punitive financial award against the perpetrating entities as appropriate.

The author's intent in his writings is to expose Governmental blatant expenditures of resources. i.e., people and money, to engage in perpetrator chicanery and subterfuge through cynical falsehoods of no true legal value and, more importantly for law abiders, without proper empirical fact based authority. To those who are reluctant to believe our government engages in this kind of malfeasance, wake up! Yes in deed. U.S. Governmental entities routinely engage in chicanery activity against law-abiding citizens, primarily because the current civil system has systemic faults that permit the activity. The reality of the current system: there is no reasonable legal consequence for victims to bring to bear to chastise improper Governmental perpetrator chicanery and ruse activity. The author is the proof of sufferance from the activity and changing the current chicanery permitting civil system is this new genre's primary challenge.

In that Governmental entities continue to malign the author's character i.e., interfere in legal business pursuits to retard book sales for example and to damage family affiliations as well as continue to engage in dastardly ruses, activity engaged in before and after completion of a civil suit process. Such activity is disturbing to supposed civil protections—fourth amendment—victims need a countering civil action outside of the blocking reach of Government obfuscations, such as Brain fingerprinting test.

In that in this instance the official bottom line of Government reasoning can only be blatant retaliation for the author's vigorous pursuit of justice through the EEOC [Equal Employment Opportunity Commission] and the Federal Court civil suit process, pursued all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. This victim and indeed all others similarly situated need to hear that we are finally at a juncture in time where we all can stand up to seek restitution for civil damages. How can we is the next obvious question.

Response: Upon our successful challenge of perpetrator authority under Brain Fingerprinting Technology—the author agrees to be the leading plaintiff. The brain fingerprinting technology has