Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

(2004/11: Phil Duse versus the Tyranny of DoD/DOJ) and its Intelligence and Investigative Agencies
(2004/11: Phil Duse versus the Tyranny of DoD/DOJ) and its Intelligence and Investigative Agencies
(2004/11: Phil Duse versus the Tyranny of DoD/DOJ) and its Intelligence and Investigative Agencies
Ebook336 pages5 hours

(2004/11: Phil Duse versus the Tyranny of DoD/DOJ) and its Intelligence and Investigative Agencies

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A David vs Goliath story, this book is directed towards law-abiding people of the Western world, particularly teachers and students. It shares horrific experiences of its author who was forced to deal with and intellectually counter unlawful actions of U.S. Government and local investigative entities. They continue to perpetrate an amalgamation of ruse scenarios in attempts to harm him. Why?

LanguageEnglish
Release dateDec 30, 2010
ISBN9781604143072
(2004/11: Phil Duse versus the Tyranny of DoD/DOJ) and its Intelligence and Investigative Agencies
Author

Phillip M. Duse, Sr

The author is a native of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and a U.S. Army Chief Warrant Officer (CW2) Retired. He traveled extensively throughout the U.S. Europe and Asia, and attended five universities during off duty hours State side and during overseas assignments. The effort earned in excess of 100 credit hours resulting in the award of an AA degree from the "University of Maryland" European Division. After retiring from the US Army, his initial civilian employment was as a logistical supervisor with "Bendix Field Engineering" outside of Baltimore Md. Then he held a Government position, Property Administrator with the Defense Logistics Agency's Contract Management Command, Silver Springs, Md. Next assignment was with the US Navy's Naval Air Systems Command, VA, where he served as the senior Property Manager. Then he returned to the Defense Logistics Agency's Contract Management Command employed in the "Special contract [Black Box] office, retiring from Government employment in 1997. He continued his writing education through completion of courses offered by the "Institute of Children's Literature" and a Free Lance Writing Course offered by "Hardcourt Learning Direct" before publishing his first book "Phil Duse Versus the Tyranny of DOD/DOJ and its Intelligence and Investigative Agencies". He has written or contributed to authorship of several logistics related manuals, published by the Department of Defense. He is also the author of "EEOC: The Real Deal" (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) and "New Short Stories and Three Hand Pinochle" before authoring this book "False Color of Authority" all published by Xlibris. Phillip Duse is the author of "EEOC: The Real Deal - Do They Really Support Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act?, "False Color of Authority - Government Hit Men" and "US Government Quacks and Dolts - Engaging in Defamation/Entrapment Strategies to Get Phil Duse."

Read more from Phillip M. Duse, Sr

Related to (2004/11

Related ebooks

Biography & Memoir For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for (2004/11

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    (2004/11 - Phillip M. Duse, Sr

    (2004/11: Phil Duse versus the Tyranny of DoD/DOJ) and its Intelligence and Investigative Agencies

    (A David Vs Goliath story)

    By Phillip M. Duse Sr.

    (2011 ebook update on Government ruses)

    ebook published by Fideli Publishing Inc.

    Copyright 2011 Phillip M. Duse Sr.

    No part of this eBook may be reproduced or shared by any electronic or mechanical means, including but not limited to printing, file sharing, and email, without prior written permission from Fideli Publishing.

    License Notes

    This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each person you share it with. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then you should return to the point of purchase and buy your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

    ISBN: 978-1-60414-307-2

    FOREWORD

    The story you are about to read is drawn from the harrowing personal experiences of its author, Phillip M. Duse. The story has been revised extensively since its first publication in 1998. This 2011 ebook version improves on the original language [where necessary] and, more importantly, reports significant ruse events occurring since 1998. This updated version of events also includes summations and conclusions that clearly bring out the retaliatory nature of Government ruse actions. You will also note that the rules of the supposed protector of your rights EEOCare in fact so suspect as to their true intent that there is no or very little proven value to the vast majority of complainants—recent estimates show that more than 85-95% lose. Why? The rules are too easily undermined and/or ignored by Government obfuscations and its network of perpetrating allies who, as shown in this book, often operate under a false color of authority with the primary goal to kill the messenger. Harm to the messenger is the actual and typical effect of the EEOC process, in spite of its claim to be a fair arbitrator of complaints.

    WHY THIS BOOK: to inform America’s youth and teachers world wide about how our system of freedoms actually work—to expose the illusion of fairness for the fraud that it is. Background: It is not widely known but Mr. Duse (the author) was the only black male to have had broad ranging access to top-secret United States Programs dealing with weaponry classified top secret under procurement contracts administered by the former Defense Contract Management Command (DCMC), a former subordinate activity of the Defense Logistics Agency, the starting point of our story that is yet to end.

    This nonfiction story is worthy of the interest of all law-abiding individuals, especially minorities curious or suspicious of investigative tactics employed by our federal Government against law-abiding citizens—Phil Duse is the example. The story seeks to address the unresolved questions regarding: is there a hidden goal within our Government to prevent minority access to certain non-political top-secret Government positions because of their minority status alone? It is obvious that one’s minority status alone is not a proper disqualifying reason. But, according to Phil, Government engages in ruses that are problematic in merit that should be preceded by a formal legal finding of probable cause justifiable on merits other than mental masturbation—or not allowed. This is at the bottom line of the aggrieved issues shared in this book!

    To address this issue and its attendant questions, the replay of events will explore numerous examples of underhanded-unethical tactics routinely employed, allegedly, by Government perpetrators against its citizenry—certainly as experienced by Phil a proud law-abiding Black male. Through an exploratory process Phil highlights and exposes not only how our Government appears to commission others to act under a false color of authority, but also show how they pursue entrapment scenarios as if they are justified when they can’t possibly be justified, thus the resulting ruse activity has no true legal underpinning and, in the final analysis, constitutes blatant acts of retaliation. But, the author also describes how law-abiding citizens have no viable recourse to challenge improper ruse activity initiated by Government entities operating under a false color of authority—a shameful reality. The unsavory issues are exposed in this ebook so they can be dealt with by U.S. law abiders.

    The Government’s unjustifiable investigative goal: Attempt to impugn to innocents criminal and or immoral conduct unrelated to the reality of the innocent’s existence and they attempt to do so with undeserved immunity—it is a Gestapo like process hidden from public view. The defamation effect of this activity has been experienced first hand by Mr. Phil Duse. It is an unjustifiable underhanded process too prevalent in the Government’s investigative community and select doltish minded investigative departments of local governments who meekly claim we have justification (this was stated in response to a challenge of its propriety in the civil suit on this issue) when such justification does not and can not exist but, so far, can’t be successfully challenged either.

    Altoona, PA and Stafford, VA (Including nearby Army officer clubs) are alleged to be striking examples of where dated logic resident in mindsets of demented local civilians has been exploited by Government to perpetually perpetrate wacko girly ruse scenarios of absolutely no merit. The activity occurs regardless of no true merit to justify the activity; therefore, it can be held as shining examples of demented locals who appear to claim an inherent right to support their longstanding negative (un-merited) cultural habits and stereotypical beliefs, at the expense of the truth? Yes, it is understood that the activity is not limited to the two mentioned cultures, but it is depicted here as examples because our Government is alleged to be the protagonist engaged in what can be called clear profound ridiculousness silly to an unbelievable extreme.

    The Author attempts to answer larger more vital questions about ruses and underhanded tactics in general, to show how Government routinely utilizes witting and unwitting innocents to function as antagonist against others: for example, staging restaurant employees as bait supported by dolt logic reasoning i.e., young white and black females; to include teenage neighbors as well as older females, to accomplish un-merited entrapment goals. It doesn’t stop there! Ruse perpetrators direct ruses perpetrated by local out to lunch black males, too (who haven’t a clue as to why they attempt to support the activity)—all misguided by our Government (FBI and local dolts?) on a path to nowhere, other than the defamation of their target’s character.

    The reasoning why they are permitted to engage in this activity without justification is found in the term "Mental Masturbation"? The term appears to be the underpinning for justification(s) used by perpetrators searching for reasons to base pre conceived beliefs on to enact harm. The author demonstrates, through noteworthy examples, how Government perpetrators of noted ruses are not even close to being the good guys—and they can’t be successfully challenged—even when their ruses are exposed or can be shown to have no merit!

    The author notes how they are even permitted to continue unwarranted ruse activity when their ruses can be conclusively shown to be of no recuperative value and ridiculous on their face: never successful, circa mid 80s till present-2011, as will be shown. Therefore, it must be stated with moral conviction that the relentless nature of the activity constitutes a clear case of defamation of character through some demented form of logic in a quest to get Phil the successful Black guy. Activity declared null and void by modern legislation and presumed modern practices, consistent with expressions in our Bill of Rights and the US constitution.

    It is more than merely just unfortunate that the activity occurs without legal recourse to the targeted citizen/minority, it is something the collective we must correct as it smells like vigilante justice practiced and sanctioned by the very U.S. Government that is supposed to protect our rights? Follow the story.

    In the replay of unsavory events you’ll discover just how the parent of the agencies involved, our Government, choose to unabashedly violate presumed constitutional and civil rights of a law-abiding citizen. Then quickly maneuver out of sight to duck from legal consequences or imminent exposure to obfuscate the issues under a claim of immunity—(or we have reasons) when the activity is challenged in a suit process. Then, continue the perpetration of the activity with vigor, as if they are above the rule of law—something the collective we can’t permit to continue. It is nigh time to expose this unjustifiable activity for the edification of the U.S. public and in deed all free people.

    In this story, issues of immunity and questionable unsavory actions are brought to the attention of the American people, for their consideration of corrective measures to prevent themselves and love ones from becoming unwitting victims of ruses that deny justice to ruse victim(s).

    Corrective measure: we must mandate the authorization and use of polygraph test and or brain fingerprinting examinations, when so requested by "persons targeted for ruses" and not otherwise limited to only when requested by the Government’s perpetrators—obviously they never expose their own unlawful activity. Test results that are clear in their exclusion of ruse targets in criminality should result in a finding of mandatory compensation, for defamation of character, against those directing the ruses.

    The author believes there are issues here that are so extraordinarily grievous and profoundly disturbing that they must be litigated before juries in civil courts, in a let-the-chips-fall-where-they-may manner—not the EEOC before going to a civil court. But the author is also aware this end goal can’t be achieved because the justice presumed available in EEOC litigation is not permitted to prevail by a thoroughly tainted process—that, for example, accepts unmerited Agency Articulations as truths, a reality that must be changed. Reliance on the EEOC system of justice is a part of the problem and not even close to being a viable solution.

    Ultimately, though, those of you concerned with the issues presented here have a share of the responsibility to at least assist in the initiation of the above referenced corrective measures to give notice that it is the people’s will to effect correcting changes. For certain you can voice opposition against improper ruses in general, especially if the perpetrators can’t be held to account legally for unwarranted ruse actions. The issue of perpetrators being held to account should apply to all Government ruses perpetrated under a false color of authority, particularly when it can be shown that the intent of the activity is to "impugn the innocent without letting the facts get in the way. A collective failure by the US citizenry to engage this serious issue at its roots would suggest the collective we need to lower our heads and accept a sorry reality that we" are, in fact, a witting party to this identifiable injustice.

    The author suggests perpetrators at fault for improper actions can be exposed and held accountable by their own investigative results, e.g., interview of witting and unwitting participants, to gage why the ruses were deemed justifiable—when not based on facts just mere mental masturbation(s). The perpetrators should be publicly identified as dolts or a similar appropriate qualifying term: vigilantes; mental masturbators; to name a couple and their victims adequately compensated by Government for civil rights violation and defamation. Action as suggested here would go a long way towards preventing future un-merited activity.

    Americans, especially teachers, students, and news organizations, as well as other concerned citizens in general, who agree with the need for a corrective posture can act; they are encouraged to spread the word against the bottom line defamatory nature of ruse activity perpetrated by our Government against innocents. To become more knowledgeable on these issues, to voice an informed-constructive opinion, read up on the issues in this ebook and the other Phil Duse ebooks [US Government Quacks and Dolts; False Color of Authority] published by Fideli Publishing as well as hard cover books such as EEOC: The Real Deal—published by Xlibris—then spread the word with active fervor! Let-the-chips-fall wherever.

    Yes, there has been a civil suit: David [Phil Duse] Vs Goliath [Department of Defense, Department of Justice, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission] filed and pursued pro se to the Supreme Court by Writ of Certiorari, Case No. 00-1437, CA-99-1400-A. All of the issues and the Government’s obfuscation tactics are now available for third party perusal. The play-by-play results of the first suit are shared in EEOC: The Real Deal.

    Once you discover how astounding the unsavory incidents are, directed at a professional Logistician/Industrial Property manager, your inherent inquisitiveness must ask your sense of justice why has this been permitted to happen and no one punished?

    More background info: The ruse incidents, which are ongoing, reached their highest and most dastardly point after Phil accepted a top-secret position in the Defense Logistics Agency’s, Defense Contract Management Command’s (DCMC) Black Box organization. DCMC had the contractual research and development responsibilities for Government Black Box top-secret programs, such as the B-2 Bomber and the F117 Stealth Fighter now in the U.S. inventory.

    Black Box programs deal with the cutting edge of weaponry and associated technology, whereby mere knowledge of the weaponry under development has to be tightly controlled. The knowledge is limited to those with a requisite top-secret clearance coupled with a demonstrated professional need-to-know directly related to the specific Black Box program at issue.

    At the time of the unsolicited job offer, Phil Duse was a GM-13 level Property Manager for the Naval Air Systems Command. He was lured from this Naval Air position to return to DCMC by the Black Box’s senior civilian manager. A manager whom he knew well as a result of working for him for three years, when employed by DCMC two years earlier. As bait to get him to accept the position in the Black Box environment, this manager tabled a promotion promise from GM-13 to a 14 level grade.

    The author accepted his offer and returned to the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), the then parent organization of DCMC. DLA, initially, hired him some nine years earlier as a GS-11 to work out of their Silver Springs, Maryland property office. He was later promoted to a GS-12 level position when assigned to work out of their Manassas, VA office, headed by the person who later became the Black Box manager. Prior to his acceptance of the Silver Springs, MD, Government job, he was employed by Bendix Field Engineering as an inventory management supervisor responsible for provisioning materials in support of the National Aeronautics and Space Agency’s (NASA), satellite tracking network. Bendix hired him as a consultant, three days after he retired from the U.S. Army; three months later they created a supervisory position to retain his services.

    In that the story describes, in vivid detail, a series of contentious events. The veracity of Phil’s statements can be made available for verification by: the newer technology of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fmri) and or typical Polygraph examination to amongst other concerns thwart denials of alleged perpetrators. An unqualified request for the examination was made to: (1) the Society of Retired FBI agents; (2) Maryland Institute of Criminal Justice and: and (3) the Virginia Criminal Investigators, they have, so far, refused to conduct an examination. Their refusal notwithstanding forces Phil to agree to be tested by any qualified source of the federal/state or local investigative community—when he passes whatever test is decided on, government should be held to pay damages as appropriate.

    The story reveals the names of those contacted, so-called professional polygraph examiners who refused to give the examination. They have an open opportunity to either challenge or verify Phil’s truthfulness regarding the issues, situations and allegations described in this book. Phil agrees to be available for examination by any qualified source; as long as the results can be revealed before a national audience, hopefully as a prelude to compensation.

    Phil still waits for a qualified source to schedule an examination and will also request an opportunity for the examination be extended to any party who believes they have been damaged by their exposure in this book. But Phil clearly recognizes that it is probable other parties may be somewhat reluctant to agree to an examination that may expose the questionable activities of their current or former employers or provide conclusive proof backing his veracity. Phil does not otherwise claim to have documented proof or admissions of guilt to a legal certainty; but he can provide the previously submitted written report of the ruse activity at issue that was provided to DCMC management and the civil suit process.

    An example of a specific but typical ruse incident occurring in 2003: On September 26, 2003, the author had been living under years of ruses plus suffering tracking devices in his cars and tapping of his phones to where the activity had become a typical part of daily life. The author understood that perpetrators routinely establish their ruses from surreptitious information gained through phone tapping coupled with mental masturbation beliefs on propensity for criminal behavior. Phil decided to paper trail the local Officer’s club being a party to the ruses, by following up on information provided by antivirus software of his new computer system. The system on numerous occasions informed: A remote system is attempting to access Microsoft Generic Host Process for Win32 Services on your computer. What do you want to do? The options: permit access or block. And, on several instances when in the process of shutting down the system: others are on your system are you sure you want to shut down? Others.? Never qualified and the question on its face may not have any harm intent, the author wasn’t sure.

    Realizing hackers, presumed to be Government perpetrators, are again hacking into his computer system, probably to access the 2004 updated version of the 1998 book, he decided to insert a misleading statement in the foreword of the book (part he was working on) that suggests he didn’t believe Army military installations were engaged as witting participants in the ongoing ruses. He then made reservations [via the presumably tapped phone] for dinner [26 Sep 03] at the Ft Belvoir Officers Club where he had been a member for over 25 years. Would the perpetrators view this information as an opportunity to engage in staging ruse activity? He assumed they would, thus had a pre-staged opportunity from which to view whatever wacko activity they would clandestinely attempt to engage in presented its self.

    His anti-virus software listed: 203 197 199 185 32804 as the hacker’s address, the hacker probably wasn’t aware that he was on to this surreptitious activity, if that’s what it is, and would soon uncover who the address belongs to, possibly exposing the identity of a perpetrator for others who may have an interest in hacking the hackers, or maybe it’s merely an anomaly of this new computer system he couldn’t really say?

    The perpetrators jumped on the bait like unwanted flies at a barbecue. The author and his wife arrived at the Officer’s Club, 4:30 pm, and sat in the newly renovated bar area. He spoke briefly with a German waitress whom he have known for the last 25 years and a few minutes later spoke with the club manager who he had recently provided a copy on his book EEOC: The Real Deal for the small Library situated on a shelf in the bar area. Totally out of character, the club manager was unusually tentative and avoided engaging in the small talk which was his norm—the first clue that perpetrators were present and modified his chitchat posture as it related to interfacing with the author; therefore, Phil was firm in expectation that he would experience a ruse of some sort.

    Then an individual sporting a pig tail hair style, sitting a couple of tables away, looked at the author brandishing a silly smile (fake?) said hello, how are you doing. This gratuitous action on his part was a second clue that perpetrators were present and he could have been one of them as he made no such greeting to other patrons (10-15) sitting nearby. Plus, the term hello how are you doing has an added significance which will be explained as to its apparent connection to ruses later, Chapter 8, but at any rate the greeting is a possible ruse clue.

    At 5:30 p.m. the author and his wife went to the spacious anti-room area of the first floor dinning room to await the 6: p.m. opening of the doors to the dinning area. Around 5:45, two ladies, over 50, I would guess, and a boy of 10 or so entered the anti-room area from the closed doors that otherwise restricted access to the dinning area until 6: p.m. The young boy and the younger of the two ladies immediately began to engage Phil in conversation, as if they were long lost friends or more than just casual acquaintances—unusual behavior, Phil thought, she was a total stranger to him and his wife. The action was not on its face an obvious ruse, because they were in an Army Officer’s Club where people are expected to more openly chit-chat socialize. Phil smiled and nodded agreement to her flimsy but cheerful explanation of why she was coming into the anti-room from the dinning area wondering why she considered it to be a concern of interest to him; his wife chitchatted amicably with the other two people in her group as they engaged her in small talk.

    Then, the lady held up the tall glass of a clear liquid and ice she carried and announced this looks like water but it is actually Vodka? The author began to wonder why she wanted him to believe she was consuming what then would appear to be, if he believed her, an excessive amount of alcohol! It was obvious, though, from his close in vantage point that it was merely a tall glass of water and ice! But, again, he had to wonder, what’s the true intent of this staging of excessive drinking and overt friendliness to a complete stranger? What was Phil supposed to do? Yes this is a typical ruse scenario repeated by perpetrators over the years!

    Phil and most others who frequent the Officer club knew the bartenders wouldn’t serve anyone, in particular two elderly ladies with a kid, a tall glass of Vodka filled to the brim. Apparently, she and whoever directed her behavior wasn’t aware of this small but significant fact of Officer Club life. The author concluded that, in deed, this was a ruse in the making staged by terribly bad acting perpetrators, why remains to be the unanswered question what are they trying to pull off at his expense?

    He smiled at her antics and walked a few steps away to avoid further contact with her, as well as her mother, and her young son, if that’s who the others in her group were. Whatever the intent of the ruse, it came in with her and left the same way, dolts in action—the author thinks so. Nevertheless, owing to his computer’s antivirus software, he was able to predict the probable occurrence of this ruse; no the antivirus software didn’t inhibit the hackers but the author might be able to add copyright infringement to the issues in this story?

    The readers will be enlightened and titillated by the first hand knowledge the author has on deception techniques, such as examples shown in this book, they have been significantly updated here and in Chapter 8 from their initial reporting in 1998. Ruses, allegedly, employed by even the sleuth of sleuths Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); Defense and Naval Criminal Investigative Services (DCIS/NCIS); their sister organization, Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI); as well as local doltish police and sheriff forces.

    The story begins with more specific information on the author’s work background and then goes to the initial discussion of the job offer with the Black Box manager. Enjoy.

    CHAPTER 1

    Special Contract Programs, a.k.a. Black Box Programs--Muckraking the Issues

    This story is true and ongoing. It describes the Defense Department’s Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) unrelenting hostile treatment of a Black male they solicited to accept a top-secret General Management (GM) position, Senior Industrial Property Manager, in their Special Contracts Program office. [a.k.a. Black Box] The home base of the story is the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.

    Background: At the time of the discussion of the job offer, Phil was gainfully employed as the senior (GM-13) Industrial Property Manager of the U.S. Navy's Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR-119) then located in Crystal City, VA. This job had no involvement with DOD’s intelligence community, yet persons under the direction of the Navel and or Defense Criminal Investigative Services (NCIS/DCIS) directed continual ruse entrapment attempts at him during, before, and after his normal work hours, no explanation was ever provided. His position in NAVAIR was one of high visibility within the Navy’s contract and property management community; he worked out of the policy administration office responsible for NAVAIR contract owned property in the hands of contractors.

    The Genesis: One of the obvious questions to be raised is why did the DCMC Black Box manager solicit Phil for employment? There couldn’t have been any concerns regarding the sensitive top-secret nature of the position, or the hiring manager would have looked for someone else to fill the position! So, why was he deemed to be the individual with the requisite talent they were looking for? Other Defense Contract Management Command property management personnel were available within DCMC to fill the position, too.

    Phil believes answers can be found in his impeccable technical credentials and hands-on experience within the logistics and property management community not typical of other Government employees. He was a U.S. Army retiree, Chief Warrant Officer, and had demonstrated excellent management skills in addition to being recognized for successfully interacting with racially diverse workforces typical of Government workplaces. Were these traits that would prove useful in the new job? Or, perhaps his property management background alone would bring a wealth of needed expertise to the Black Box environment? The hiring manager knew of his work capabilities, from his previous three years of observation and rating of his work at the highest possible level.

    Of note, Phil had previous work assignments that involved being entrusted with highly sensitive responsibilities: for example; (1) For more than three years he was personally responsible for the receipt storage and issue of all Narcotics and Precious Metals earmarked for U.S. Army activities located in the Pacific Northwest states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana; (2) He was assigned to a Lieutenant Colonel's position (0-5) when he was only a Warrant Officer one (W-1), the lowest Officer grade in the military; (3) He had been promoted through the enlisted grades of Private (E-3) to Sergeant First Class (E-7) in the shortest period ever, four years and 11 months, a record that stands until this day i.e.2004; (4) His area of responsibility within the Black Box organization would include the same kinds of managerial oversight he exercised over NAVAIR personnel located at several large aircraft and engine manufacturers: McDonnell Douglas, Sikorsky, Grumman and Westinghouse. It was obvious that an individual with this background would be effective in a Black Box environment that never had the benefit of a professional, property manager!

    The job offer: Phil, I've created a new grade 14 Industrial Property Management position that I want you to apply for, said the manager of the top-secret, Defense Logistics Agency, Special Contract Programs office, a.k.a. Black Box. Phil stared at

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1