Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Shadow Catcher: A Novel
The Shadow Catcher: A Novel
The Shadow Catcher: A Novel
Ebook327 pages6 hours

The Shadow Catcher: A Novel

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Following her National Book Award finalist, Evidence of Things Unseen, Marianne Wiggins turns her extraordinary literary imagination to the American West, where the life of legendary photographer Edward S. Curtis is the basis for a resonant exploration of history and family, landscape and legacy.

The Shadow Catcher dramatically inhabits the space where past and present intersect, seamlessly interweaving narratives from two different eras: the first fraught passion between turn-of-the-twentieth-century icon Edward Curtis (1868-1952) and his muse-wife, Clara; and a twenty-first-century journey of redemption.

Narrated in the first person by a reimagined writer named Marianne Wiggins, the novel begins in Hollywood, where top producers are eager to sentimentalize the complicated life of Edward Curtis as a sunny biopic: "It's got the outdoors. It's got adventure. It's got the do-good element." Yet, contrary to Curtis's esteemed public reputation as servant to his nation, the artist was an absent husband and disappearing father. Jump to the next generation, when Marianne's own father, John Wiggins (1920-1970), would live and die in equal thrall to the impulse of wanderlust.

Were the two men running from or running to? Dodging the false beacons of memory and legend, Marianne amasses disparate clues -- photographs and hospital records, newspaper clippings and a rare white turquoise bracelet -- to recover those moments that went unrecorded, "to hear the words only the silent ones can speak." The Shadow Catcher, fueled by the great American passions for love and land and family, chases the silhouettes of our collective history into the bright light of the present.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJun 5, 2007
ISBN9781416561835
The Shadow Catcher: A Novel
Author

Marianne Wiggins

Marianne Wiggins is the author of eight novels, including John Dollar and Evidence of Things Unseen, which was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction and the National Book Award. She has won a Whiting Award, a National Endowment for the Arts fellowship, the Heidinger Kafka Prize, and was shortlisted for the Women's Prize for Fiction. She lives in Venice, California. 

Read more from Marianne Wiggins

Related to The Shadow Catcher

Related ebooks

Historical Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Shadow Catcher

Rating: 3.8510638680851064 out of 5 stars
4/5

94 ratings14 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Hmmm, a difficult one to review. The story of Edward Curtis and the separate story of Marianne Wiggins were both very interesting concepts. I loved the story of Edward Curtis but felt that the author did not go into enough detail for me. I was frustrated at the way she seemed to summarise a lot of it and gloss over a lot that, I felt, was important to this part of the story. This story should have been a book in itself and I would have loved to read it.On the other side, the current story of Marianne Wiggins was over done. It had an interesting baseline, the loss of her father and the mistaken/stolen identity of her father. I thought she rambled on too much about what was going around in her mind which did not add anything to the story the book was trying to tell. I was also left with so many unanswered questions, why Curtis Edwards stole the identity, who was Clarita and how was she related to Edward Curtis and Clara and so many more. Still a fairly interesting read and it will make a good book group discussion but not one that I would say everyone should rush out and read.3 out of 5 for me.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This book has everything needed to inspire our awe and gratitude. Not only does it contain two related story lines set a hundred years apart, memorable and sometimes hilarious dialog, and vivid storytelling, it also reverberates with lofty and elegant tropes, one of which is the author's lengthy and convincing intrusion. Marianne Wiggins, the honored author of "Evidence of Things Unseen" hits an even deeper home run with "The Shadow Catcher."The paired story lines follow Edward S. Curtis, visionary photographer of nature and Native Americans at the turn of the 20th Century, and one Marianne Wiggins, a character in her own book - portrayed as an aspiring screenwriter working on a potential biopic of - Edward S. Curtis. Early in the book, the author describes Curtis's life and how potentially ripe it would be for a screenplay. She seems fairly convinced any film Hollywood would produce on Curtis would miss the mark badly, and then proceeds with the Curtis narrative, which proves why she's right. The Edward-and-Clara Curtis plotline is first-rate storytelling (not quite to the level of Ray and Opal Foster, but then, what is?). We watch as Clara and Edward form a partnership and a marriage; Edward becomes famous and acquainted with early conservationists, and Teddy Roosevelt (for whose daughter's wedding he was the official photographer), and J. P. Morgan. Clara deals with the three children and the household (mortgaged to the eaves by his grand schemes); her lot is nothing as fortunate as Curtis's own (which is in fact not very fortunate at all).Ms. Wiggins propounds the theme of abandonment in both stories. Curtis leaves his wife and children for years at a stretch, and Wiggins's father left his own lonely marriage to commit suicide thirty-some years prior to the events in this book. She deals very immediately with the syndrome of "lighting out for the territories." Some people - she cites Huck Finn and his bete noir, the civilizing Aunt Sally - find they must run from some monster or other. Eventually, for both Curtis and Marianne's father, it is a loveless, lonesome marriage.Ms. Wiggins intersperses some of Curtis's classic photographs in the text, and this adds power and immediacy to the book. Her canny tricks and tromps for her reader add an echoing depth, and challenge him or her to find the boundaries of belief. This is not gratuitous fun for our dazzling author. This is serious business, in the service of serious ideas. It thrills as it entertains as it makes us reflect on the moral implications. Can't say enough good things about this. I could never get it to the end of my own thoughts. Pick it up and see what you think!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I am going through this book much too quickly. In reading it, I have the strange sense that the author and I are friends in some parallel universe. Like her I am drawn to the west and to the native cultures that flourished there. Like her, I react in much the same way to our modern world. I like her humour. I like her offhand observations which are part of the book but more like asides to the reader as she takes a break from the narrative of her story, or stories. It is at once a biographyh of Edward Curtis, famous for his photographs of Native American Indians, and the story of hte narrator, who wrote a book about Curtis which is possibly going to be made into a movie. I am in the middle, where an odd case of mistaken identity is bringing an element of mystery to the book. What am I doing typing here when I'm dying to pick that book back up again? MOre later...
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Wiggins wrote so many things that rang true. Memory and history, the stories we tell ourselves. Responsibility or freedom to follow our passion.She kept coming back to the phrase "the sound my nation makes." This was an aspect I'd never identified before but also have known the power inherent in a trains' whistle. It was a unifying thread to the separated life stories: Curtis and his parents/siblings, his wife Clara and her brother, the author and her dead father, the stranger in the hospital his Shadow and the Colonel.This novel was so much more than just lives. Wiggins shared concepts about music, art, perspective, and myths that made me think.Now that I've finished, I want to research Curtis' life myself to see where (or if) Wiggins went beyond reality.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    What a way to start a new year of reading—with a great book! I've never read anything by Wiggins and this book was a delight. She is very inventive and brought a lot to the table about Edward Curtis that was so new and fresh to me. It was great to read this excellent piece of fiction after having just read Timothy Egan's great book about Curtis, Short Nights of the Shadow Catcher. I can only hope that her other titles are as good—because I'm sure to take some of them out for a spin in the future.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is my first Marianne Wiggins book and I was delighted. It was complex and nicely wove several stories together. Loved her use of language and descriptions of places and feelings. I'm on to Evidence of Things Unseen.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Never would have read her except for my Salman Rushdie fetish, and what a satisfying novel this turned out to be. It was incredibly fast, sweeping, and impeccably crafted. I''m looking forward to reading more of her works, but right now this is the only title available for the Kindle. Boo.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A terrific book and interesting approach. The only reason I didn't give it give stars is because I didn't love it as much as I did Evidence of Things Unseen.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Book club January 2010 selection..............What an amazing writer! Marianne Wiggins is able to layer a story so well that the reader is left pondering it long after putting the book down. This story is both historical fiction and memoir, it is about fathers, about the search for identity of a person and a nation, love, marriage, the ties that bind, and the list just keeps on going. On top of that, i think Wiggins writes beautifully, so that it is a pleasure just to take in the words!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The semi-historical fictional story of Edward Curtis, famous photographer of Indians west of the Mississippi, that parallels that of the author's father. Beautiful prose, as usual from Wiggins and surprising humor. Excellent read.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    There were parts of this book I loved a lot, but the ending seemed a bit too contrived, and I didn't like how the historical part of the book was quickly wrapped up, like there wasn't time to properly close both storylines. I would recommend it though, I really enjoyed the first half or more.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    For two years Marianne Wiggins traveled the country doggedly researching Edward Curtis, the famous and highly controversial American Indian photographer and ethnologist. Wiggins wanted to write a novel about this man. She wanted to get inside him—understand him, and write a novel that exposed the real human being behind the legend. Curtis’ life only recently became public domain: he is dead and all his children are dead. Now, he is fair fodder for historical novelists. But Wiggins is not a genre historical novelist. She is a gifted literary novelist, a Pulitzer Prize nominee, a writer of formidable originality. Why would she undertake a project like this? What alchemy did she have in mind? When she began her quest to dig into Curtis’ life, Wiggins was in love with the idea of the man—the handsome, creative, rugged, bigger-than-life, self-made frontiersman. But the more she researched, the more she began to dislike him—the more she wanted to drop the project altogether. But she persisted, and this persistence actually becomes an integral part of the novel. In looking for the story in Curtis, she finds the story in herself, her own life, her own relationship to her father. Wiggins’ historical novel about Edward Curtis eventually leads us deep into the psychology of magical explaining—of myth making for mental health’s sake. The result is pure literary gold. So what alchemy does Wiggins ultimately deliver in this novel? The work is actually two novels in one: one set in Curtis’ early years and the other set in the author’s present. The construction is liberating—pure magic pops up unexpectedly throughout. Wiggins creates a compelling, transcendent, soaring work of fiction. So breathtaking is Wiggins’ prose, that at times I found myself stopping, closing my eyes, and just savoring the aching perfection of a passage. Here is prose that is sparkling, humorous, ironic, soaring, transcendent—and yet at the same time it is prose that finds room for snapping social commentary and for me, most enjoyable of all, life-affirming thematic insights. I was spellbound from the first few pages.Wiggins begins her novel in the present day, with herself as the first-person narrator. Wiggins (the character) has written a book about Edward Curtis and her agent arranges an appointment with some Hollywood types who want to option her book for a movie. She arrives home after the interview, to find a series of mysterious messages from a hospital in Las Vegas. They have an unconscious, near-death patient in their ICU who the hospital identifies as Wiggins’ father. But Wiggins knows that her father unmistakably committed suicide decades earlier. Who is this imposter? Why has he stolen her father’s identity? Why does he carry a newspaper article about her in his wallet? And so the mystery begins.But in this short opening section, Wiggins also pulls out the stops—she entertains the reader with a full symphony of literary talents. The overture is a soaring love song to America, the country in her heart, and to Los Angeles, the city in her soul. She follows this with humorous and biting social commentary about the movie-making business. If you read this brief opening section and are not thoroughly won over by this novel…well, all I can say is that this work is not for you. But it had me from the first page!Enveloped inside this present-day story, we find the other novel. This second novel is presented in two long sections, with a brief visit to the present-day story in between. The inner novel is a third-person narrative written in a completely different tone—somber, haunting, slow. The focus is full-on characterization. This is prototypical, heart-wrenching, transcendent historical fiction and it tells the early life of Edward Curtis from the point of view of his long-suffering wife, Clara. Through Clara’s life, from the woman’s point of view, Wiggins is able to unmask part, but not all, of the man who Curtis was underneath the legend. Clara’s life with Curtis was brief. Wiggins uses her present-day narrative to explain important aspects of Curtis’ later years. Ultimately, she uses this plot line to provide the evidence that finally pulls the curtain aside and reveals what may only have been guessed at before. In the end, this is a novel about myth-making, magical explaining—what we all do, everyday, to maintain our mental health. How we reinvent the truth, so we can live within it. This is a book about children of absent fathers, how these children desperately cling to myths about their fathers in order to help them live with the reality of their abandonment. It is also about how these children are destined forever to try to win their fathers’ attention and approval. It is a novel about the impossibility of knowing anyone’s motives, even one’s own. It is a novel about how the Curtis children saw their father as a man who could do no harm, even when wrong was all he ever did. It is novel about how our species creates whatever stories we need just so we can cope. In the end, Marianne Wiggins does a magnificent job of bringing the complex portrait of Edward Curtis to life. When the book ends, we feel we know this man—his personality, what drives him. As a bonus, we start questioning our own lives—trying to uncover the magical explaining in our own everyday lives. Do our myths truly help us, or are we better off knowing and living with the real truth? Can we ever know the truth? This is not a book for everyone. Some readers will be offended by the license that Wiggins takes with Curtis’ life. Others will be put off by the thematic digressions that move the reader away from the compelling plot. These same readers will probably be unimpressed with the great richness these thematic digressions provide. I predict that women will love this novel more than men because it gives an unabashedly woman’s point of view about significant matters of the heart. All this being said, I recommend this work highly. I can easily see why Wiggins was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize (for another, earlier work). I have no doubt that she will go on to achieve greater national recognition in the future.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    the author tries a different format: introducing photo's into text; fictionalizing her life and the life of historical photographer Edward Curtis.Neither the story or the writing engaged me.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I enjoyed the story of Edward Curtis, but just as I was really getting into it, it ended. I found other the story of the modern characters tedious and uninteresting. And, the author dropped little tidbits about Curtis which were very interesting and then didn't follow up on the significance of those facts, which was very frustrating. I met the author 6/18/07 at Powell's and she was very kind and very good to listen to--she'd probably make a good professor because she speaks so well, but I don't want to read any more of her books.

Book preview

The Shadow Catcher - Marianne Wiggins

take fountain

All writers have these moments—all people do—when Realization forms from air.

I associate the phenomenon with finding a perfect word, a telling gesture, an insight into character, a crux on which a plot must turn. But that’s because most of my Realizations strike during work and are related to the shape of my profession. My work is strung on moments when I realize something—a novel is, by nature, one long Realization, which is not to say other pursuits aren’t dependent on discovery: sailing is. Cooking is. Playing music is. Sex always is. Loving is a series of discoveries: it starts, significantly, with a Realization: that moment when you know that you’re in love. If writing were as exciting as falling in love, I’d get a lot more written, but most of my Realizations come as pinpoints of light while staring at the dismal tundra of an empty page. Given my average event horizon, most of my ideas don’t have the bursts, the color spectra of world-altering discoveries like Newton’s did, or Galileo’s. Mine are minor stellar occurrences, but strung up as a necklace of small lights, my bright ideas dot the boundaries that define my life. When one occurs, then, it’s a Birth Day, like the birth of a new star far off in the universe.

Won’t necessitate the reinvention of the calendar.

But it makes another piece of heaven, all the same.

So when one of these Realizations struck one day when I was crossing Melrose after lunch with my friend David, I thanked my lucky star(s).

David likes to go to Angeli’s on Melrose, where, at lunch, only the sound of steam from the espresso maker at the bar enlivens the lacunae in the sullen dialogues between distracted screenwriters, including between me and David. He was well and truly disillusioned with writing for Hollywood that afternoon, as was I, and I was seriously planning to start picketing the studios to CUT THE CRAP and start funding films with socially responsible story lines. Stop being pipelines for product placement, a propaganda machine for consumer consumption. Stop waving guns and tits at everybody. Between the two of us, though, David made the more convincing opponent to the way Hollywood is operating these days, because he’d actually written scripts that had been made into films, whereas all I’d done was write, get the boot, and grouse. His complaints had validity, whereas mine gave off the scent of sour grapes. I had tried to work, and failed. He, at least, had worked with Hitchcock. In another century.

When we finally wandered out into the hyper-daylight, pausing, curbside, waiting for the light to change, David said, "Hey. Where are you? You’ve left your face.

"Are you writing? Christ. Can’t it wait ’til you get home?"

Actually, I confessed, I was trying to decide if it’s better to take Highland to the 101, or quicker to take Crescent Heights.

George Burns story.

I looked at him.

"George Burns is in a restaurant, and there’s a kid busing tables, just in from, let’s say Nebraska. Recognizes Burns, goes over to his table. ‘Excuse me, Mr. Burns, I’ve admired you all my life,’ he says. ‘I’ve just come to Hollywood from Omaha to be an actor, Mr. Burns, and I wonder if there’s some advice you’d care to give?’ Burns takes a puff on the cigar and—not even looking up—says, ‘Take Fountain.’

This is no split-your-sides laughing kind of story, it’s a corny story, but because I understood the punch line, A Realization struck me: I’m an Angelena, subject to the whims of Pacific coastal heat inversions, San Andreas fault temblors, and—more to the point—subject to the traffic. Subject to the unwanted obsession of shaving minutes off the time I spend in traffic, in my car. Shortcuts are printed money—gold—and anyone who drives on Sunset, Hollywood, or Santa Monica Boulevards thinks she’s struck the motherlode when she discovers Fountain running parallel, in between those three other avenues, and she actually believes nobody else has ever thought of taking Fountain, even though every other sentient being in town has made the same discovery years ago.

Every shortcut in Los Angeles was glutted long before I got here, but I spend my journeys—and time before, and after, too—calculating odds.

The only remedy is to avoid the freeways whenever other cars are on them, never travel when it’s raining, and never under any circs make an appointment to leave the house at lunchtime or when kindergarten’s letting out or there’s a Lakers’ game or a terrorist alert or some celebrity’s on trial for murdering his wife in Santa Monica.

I’ve pretty much got it down to a system where no matter where I’m going outside my neighborhood I’m going to need an hour in my car to get there. There are a few exceptions, but even they harbor the potential for delay. I can get to the beach and the Pacific Ocean, to Malibu, in half an hour but only if a massive block of siltstone hasn’t splattered overnight in the roadway off the rock face of the canyon or if Topanga Creek hasn’t made a mess of itself, gorged, like a bulimic, and thrown up. I can get to a back lot at Universal Studios in forty minutes, but only if there are no breakdowns or other minor irritations on the 101. But to get from my house to Beverly Hills or UCLA, USC, LAX, the Burbank Airport or Union Station, I’ve got to plan on being in my car for at least an hour. There’s a bus route a mile and a half from my house that services Ventura Boulevard, and if I were a better human being and lived by my principles vis-à-vis the depletion of this planet’s fossil fuels, I would walk the mile and a half to the bus, as legions of day workers do, but what I do, instead, is I try to limit how many times I use my car. Which is why I hadn’t used my car this week, hadn’t driven since last Friday, four days ago, and why I failed to notice the slow leak in a front tire until I got in the car this morning to go to the Hotel Bel Air for a lunch meeting with my agent and a producer, right on schedule, with what I thought was an hour-plus time to spare, when halfway down my street, I feel the barge tow on the steering. By the time I top the tire up, I’m still on schedule, because I always factor in a five-to ten-minute buffer zone when I plan to wander far (2 or more miles) from home.

And then I hit the 101.

Well, hardly hit it. I zip up the ramp into a horizontally stacked parking lot, into a line of steaming metal units coupled end to end like discarded boxcars shunted to a siding, waiting for a train to happen.

And now another Realization dawns:

Jon, my agent at Creative Artists, has exhausted a quantitative amount of accrued goodwill to land this lunch for me with a woman who’s the head of a star’s production company who claims to have read my work (doubtful) and says she’s interested in developing a project based on a novel I’ve written about the photographer Edward S. Curtis. Most writers who have no film credits to their name (like me), no actual films produced from their screenplays, would probably admit they would have spent the night in the front seat of their car in the parking lot of the Hotel Bel Air to make certain they would be on time for an opportunity like this, unlike me, who gave herself only an hour (and a little +) and who is now going to be very, very late.

Or maybe not.

Maybe, as so often happens, this will start to thin for no apparent reason and I can still get there on time. This valley, the San Fernando, holds several million people at this very moment, of which at least a hundred thousand are with me on this highway; stalled. Passengers on plates. 240 billion years ago the west coast of America was somewhere slightly west of what is now Las Vegas and Vegas was the city by a sea. The coastline ran north/northeast from the Mojave Desert past Las Vegas, past our national Nuclear Test Site, into Utah. The great American craton floated uneventfully on the great North American plate, and everything within eyesight from where I sit, here, moldering in traffic, was at the bottom of an ocean, until wham. Two tectonic plates collided, pushing up these coastal ranges in crescendo—the Los Padres, Verdugas, Santa Monicas, San Gabriels, San Bernadinos, Panamints—climaxing in the Sierra Nevadas. From where I sit right now looking east toward the Verdugas, the San Andreas fault is ahead of me, its two opposing sides making better surface time than I am. I and my fellow stalled commuters sit on the Pacific Plate, drifting, even while we sit here, two inches a year toward San Francisco. Between us and the San Andreas there are three other major faults—the Elsinore, San Jacinto, and Glen Helen—but it’s the San Andreas fault that defines California more than any other natural feature, more than the half domes at Yosemite or the fumaroles above Mt. Shasta or the beaches at Big Sur. San Andreas is right lateral, which means no matter which of its two sides you’re on, the other one is moving to the right. San Francisco, up the coast to my left four hundred miles, is on the North American plate, along with Fargo, North Dakota; Albany, New York; and Tampa, Florida. L.A. is on the Pacific plate, drifting north. In two hundred million years, L.A. will pass the Golden Gate and Nob Hill, L.A. on the western side, San Fran on the east, which is more than any two seemingly immobile masses will be doing soon in any of the eight lanes on the 101.

And now: I’m very very late.

Lunch will start in twenty minutes whether I’m there or not, and there’s nothing I can do about it, except to try to wait it out to the next exit and get off the highway onto ordinary (I hope) less congested surface streets.

One of the draws of living in the West is the lure of these dramatic landscapes, the pull of these wide-open spaces evoking narratives of ancient geologic time, narratives of passage, disappearance, death; persistence. Up to my right on the Mulholland ridge above Tarzana, there’s a scenic overview where you can park your car and sit on a bench and look out across the whole San Fernando Valley. Seven miles wide, at its widest, and twenty miles long, the valley’s like an island surrounded not by water, but by mountains, and I like to sit up on the Mulholland ridge and imagine what it looked like five hundred years ago before the Spanish came. I put my thumb up the way actors playing painters do, to crop the foreground, blot out the bank buildings at Sepulveda, the rides at Universal, the black glass Blue Cross/Blue Shield headquarters in Canoga Park, and I try to imagine what this place looked like before the horse. Before the train. Before the car. That’s the game The West invites, the game everybody plays out West: pretending we can see the past, here, in the present. Pretending we can call down the impossible, invalidate the present, and convince ourselves we’re in another time, another century. The West—true West—attaches to you like a shadow. I don’t think this happens in the East—I don’t think the landscape summons an imagined past the way the land does here. I don’t think people in Manhattan, Boston or Atlanta turn a corner, see an eighteenth-century graveyard and make an easy leap into imagining the past. In European cities, yes, you can come around a corner and intersect another century, stand in a limestone sanctuary and imagine you are seeing light through stained glass the way it looked six hundred years ago, but in the west, at the cities’ edges, there is the very real encroachment of the older Eden, the original one, the land in its unaltered state. You can see it from the windows of your car without leaving L.A. County. Drive out to Red Rock Canyon or the Vasquez Rocks or take a hike up Mt. Calabasas and you’re in the wild, in another time, entirely. There are places, here, in the valley, where you can go, where there’s not a building or another person within sight. Unlike the crowded basin beyond the mountains to my right, there are streets here that expire into dust beside an old adobe, but everywhere you’ll go within the confines of this valley, you will feel its thirst. The mountains block the cool marine air from the coast and pose a permanent rain shadow. Streams form in winter, but they rapidly evaporate in spring and by summer they are rock-strewn baked arroyos. Two stubborn narrow ones join in Canoga Park behind the high school football stands and it is there, in a concrete crib, that the Los Angeles River shapes its unlikely identity. It’s nothing, really—in any other town east of the Rockies it would be a joke, the kind of miserable low velocity ditch into which any city with a decent river would toss junk. Real L.A. is on the other side of the mountains to my right, and just like the L.A. River I need to find a way through their walls if I’m going to get to Bel Air at all, but because the faults tend north/northeast along the present coast, the coastal ranges follow that direction, slicing L.A. County’s loaf into individually prepackaged servings. If you’re on the 101 heading east—or not heading, as I am—and you want to get off the freeway and take surface streets from the valley side of the Santa Monicas over the hills to the other side, to the basinette of the real L.A., you can’t just zigzag, you can’t just improvise, you have to follow the geology, you have to take either the canyons or the passes, and, from west to east, you have only these six choices:

Take Topanga Canyon.

Take Sepulveda Pass.

Take Beverly Glen, Coldwater or Laurel Canyon.

Or take Cahuenga Pass.

I take Beverly Glen, which means first I have to take the Winnetka exit to Ventura Boulevard which takes an added fifteen minutes because a Dodge Dart with a half-a-dozen 12-step decals plastered on it overheats on the exit ramp, its slogans asking What Would Jesus Do? which is not the existential exercise I need right now because, let’s face it, ain’t Jesus running late, Himself? What would Jesus take is what I want to know, and having called the Hotel Bel Air once already from the 101 to say I’ll be slightly delayed, I now call again to say I’ll be there in ten minutes but when I get to Beverly Glen I have to downshift into first behind a long slow line of similarly-minded-short-cut-takers and I inch uphill behind a Saturn with a vanity plate that reads UP4PART. And maybe it’s because at this point I’m already forty minutes late, maybe because at this point I’ve blown the possibility of salvaging this meeting at the Hotel Bel Air, that I entertain the very real possibility of DOING SOMETHING CRAZY, doing something crazier than sitting in traffic for two hours for the ridiculous proposition of AUDITIONING, because that’s what this meeting is: another Up 4 Part. Another loony desperate writer coondoggin’ the shiny penny, and maybe it’s because in my standard transmission vintage model PT Cruiser I can either go uphill or I can turn the AC on, but never both at the same time, which means I’ve been breathing fossil fuel exhaust for the better part of ninety minutes with the windows down and the sunroof gaping, or maybe it’s because there’s just something about THE WEST, the CALL OF THE WILD and the prospect of ANOTHER ARTIST screwing up, that suddenly I want less to know what Jesus would do than what would Dr. Gonzo do? The question What would Hunter S. Thompson do? presents itself as a reasonable fallback strategy as I take the turn into Stone Canyon at 40 mph, leave the keys with some kind of valet posing as a mariachi guy and rush (what’s this? a footbridge? are those swans?) through the full faux Alhambra of foliage into the faux provençal dining nook toward the table, breathless, rumpled and apologetic, with my hair all EINSTEINED, giving off its own exhaust, mascara/lipstick smeared and bargain Nordstrom Rack linen/rayon MADE IN INDONESIA jacket rutched across my tits to encounter THEM: two women in Armani, militantly trim and toned.

ME: So so sorry, I’m so late.

They smile and show their pearly whites. JON, my agent, signals I have lipstick on my teeth. STACEY, the producer for the star, has brought along MICHELLE, a young assistant They have finished eating their chopped greens. A WAITER comes to take my order and to take their plates away. I notice my manuscript lying between them, faceup. I can read the title upside down. THE SHADOW CATCHER. From her briefcase Stacey extracts a phonebook-thick paperback feathered with yellow Post-it notes. I know it well, this book, it’s the Taschen paperback edition of Edward S. Curtis’s COLLECTED WORKS.

—what can I say? she says. EDWARD S. CURTIS. What passion! What personal courage! She layers her palms on top of the book, as a NUN would, on a BREVIARY, and breathes, There’s a movie in here!

And she wants to turn it loose, I can tell, like an exorcist on call. That would be a great idea for a movie is only ever meant to be a compliment. Not only here in Tinseltown but all across America. It was like a movie always means something happened, you saw something happen right in front of you in an emotionally charged larger-than-life context. It was like a movie can only ever mean that you’re a camera. It can only ever mean that while you’re looking at what’s happening in front of you, you’ve also managed to step back from the experience, you’ve willed yourself into the position of spectator, you’ve willed yourself to be detached in the observance of performance. But There’s a movie in here means the stuff is still a little messy, too messy to be construed as entertainment. Too messy to offer up a possibility for profit, for a lesson or a parable. It’s not art. It’s life. And if you were Cartier-Bresson you’d move yourself into position, you’d align yourself along the arc of possibility and wait for a decisive moment when life, itself, composes into art. Or, if you’re Edward Curtis, you dress the mess to play the part. You disguise the truth to make the image that you want. You find the movie in there at any cost.

Of course ever since we’ve been attending Sundance—how many years is it now, Michelle, thirteen? fourteen?—there’s been a writer in Park City flogging a new Curtis project.

Mine isn’t a new Curtis project, I put in, surprised by what I hear as a little trill of stridency in my voice. Mine is a novel.

Well of course it is, she smiles. Which is why I knew we had to have first look.

She pats my manuscript and I realize, with relief, she hasn’t read it. Jon must have brought it with him to the table.

‘The Shadow Catcher.’ It’s the name the Indians called him, no? The name they gave him when he showed them pictures of themselves?

That’s the legend, yes.

My voice seems to be coming through a mask.

Look, I want to be honest with you, I say as a way to help her crib my work Curtis lived a long, long time. Eighty-four years. He had a very complicated life. I gesture toward THE COLLECTED WORKS. The time he spent taking photographs of Indians is only one of many chapters in his long and complicated life, and the story that I’ve written might not be the story that you want.

I look at Jon, and Jon looks pained.

Curtis is dead, I continue. His children are all dead. His life has passed into public domain. You could hire someone to write the script you’re looking for. You don’t need to option my version of his life.

"I’m paid for picking winners," she tells me.

She pushes Curtis’s self-portrait toward me.

How could someone who looks like this and risks his life to make gorgeous images of Indians not be perfect for a movie? How tall was he?

Six feet.

Blue eyes?

I nod.

"As I was telling Jon before you came, we’ve had our sights on a Curtis project for years—but nothing’s been right for us so far. What we’re looking for is a story that combines all the elements—the outdoors—adventure—romance—plus it’s got to have the do-good message. No one would ever know the history of these tribes, what they wore and how they lived, if Curtis hadn’t risked his life to track them down and make these photographs."

I blink a couple times. I, too, have brought along some books and now I place them on the table.

I don’t know if Jon has told you, but I researched the book for several years before I started writing it. So I’ve become something of an expert on his life…

"—the expert," Jon puts in.

I started out with admiration toward the body of this work, these stunning photographs, the breadth of their achievement, and toward the man who was responsible for making them. You could say I fell a little bit in love with him.

Me, too, Stacey confesses.

Who wouldn’t? her assistant comforts her.

What’s not to love? Jon poses.

I thought, as you obviously still do, I continue, "‘Gosh, what a hero, what a masterpiece of service to his nation.’ Here’s a guy, no formal training, no formal education, who builds his first camera from scratch, learns through trial and error, on his own, what was then still considered the science of photography, not the art, and not only masters the technical difficulties of recording light but turns the processes of capturing it into works that are noble and magnificent and beautiful to behold. A man who, out of the blue, out of a commitment to his nation, sets himself the task of photographing every native tribe west of the Mississippi, every one of them, including the natives of Alaska, before they vanished to dust, before their tribal customs disappeared under the burden of colonization, under the weight of the white man’s coming. And then—on top of all of that—miraculously—gets the job done."

I’m loving this guy more and more, Stacey confides.

Let me ask you something, I propose. When do you think these photographs were taken?

I push one forward.

This is Red Cloud, I point out. Revered Sioux warrior. When do you think Curtis made this picture? Or this one, I suggest. These are Apaches.

Michelle suggests, Around the Civil War?

That seems right, Stacey agrees. I’d say…mid-nineteenth century?

Twentieth, I emphasize. "Every one of these. Taken, not as you believe, or as you’re led to believe, when the tribes were roaming the Plains, hunting buffalo, camping by rivers in their tipis, but after they’d been neutralized, confined in high-security encampments, herded onto reservations, deprived of their livelihoods, forced into the manufacture of ‘Indian-ized’ tourist junk, their children forcibly assimilated into Christian schools. After every one of them was no longer a free individual but a prisoner of war. Curtis didn’t risk his life finding them—he paid the Bureau of Indian Affairs a fee to photograph inside the reservations, that he drove to, in most cases, in his car. This is a test exposure that he took—"

I push an image toward her. It’s a photograph Curtis made of his Ford parked next to a Sioux tipi.

It’s a car next to a tipi…so what? she says.

I push another image forward.

"—this is the image of that location that he published in The North American Indian. See the difference? No car."

I show her a print of two Piegan braves seated in their tipi with a prized clock between them; and then I place Curtis’s preferred version of that print, the one he published, next to it. The clock has been erased, manipulated in the darkroom.

Curtis would take one Indian from one tribe, a Piegan, let’s say, and dress him up in Assiniboin regalia, and that was fine by him. Dressing Navajos as Siouxes. But if there was any totem of modernity—a car, a clock, a zipper or a waistcoat, Curtis would do everything he could to guarantee it was erased.

"So what’s your point?"

"—my ‘point’? My point is these photographs have been constructed for a purpose. An artistic purpose, yes—they’re beautiful to look at. But they’re lies. They’re propaganda."

Oh come on—look at these faces. These faces don’t lie. These faces are beautiful. And they’re full of truth…

…I

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1