The Best American Poetry 2012: Series Editor David Lehman
By David Lehman and Mark Doty
4/5
()
About this ebook
SHERMAN ALEXIE * KAREN LEONA ANDERSON * RAE ARMANTROUT * JULIANNA BAGGOTT * DAVID BAKER * RICK BAROTt REGINALD DWAYNE BETTS * FRANK BIDART * BRUCE BOND * STEPHANIE BROWN * ANNE CARSON * JENNIFER CHANG * JOSEPH CHAPMAN * HEATHER CHRISTLE * HENRI COLE * BILLY COLLINS * PETER COOLEY * EDUARDO C. CORRAL * ERICA DAWSON * STEPHEN DUNN * ELAINE EQUI * ROBERT GIBB * KATHLEEN GRABER * AMY GLYNN GREACEN * JAMES ALLEN HALL * TERRANCE HAYES * STEVEN HEIGHTON * BRENDA HILLMAN * JANE HIRSHFIELD * RICHARD HOWARD * MARIE HOWE * AMORAK HUEY * JENNY JOHNSON * LAWRENCE JOSEPH * FADY JOUDAH * JOY KATZ * JAMES KIMBRELL * NOELLE KOCOT * MAXINE KUMIN * SARAH LINDSAY * AMIT MAJMUDAR * DAVID MASON * KERRIN McCADDEN * HONOR MOORE * MICHAEL MORSE * CAROL MUSKE-DUKES * ANGELO NIKOLOPOULOS * MARY OLIVER * STEVE ORLEN * ALICIA OSTRIKER * ERIC PANKEY * LUCIA PERILLO * ROBERT PINSKY * DEAN RADER * SPENCER REECE * PAISLEY REKDAL * MARY RUEFLE * DON RUSS * KAY RYAN * MARY JO SALTER * LYNNE SHARON SCHWARTZ * FREDERICK SEIDEL * BRENDA SHAUGHNESSY * PETER JAY SHIPPY * TRACY K. SMITH * BRUCE SNIDER * MARK STRAND * LARISSA SZPORLUK * DANIEL TOBIN * NATASHA TRETHEWEY * SUSAN WHEELER * FRANZ WRIGHT * DAVID YEZZI * DEAN YOUNG * KEVIN YOUNG
Mark Doty
Mark Doty's books of poetry and nonfiction prose have been honored with numerous distinctions, including the National Book Critics Circle Award, the PEN/Martha Albrand Award, the Los Angeles Times Book Prize, and, in the United Kingdom, the T. S. Eliot Prize. In 2008, he won the National Book Award for Fire to Fire: New and Selected Poems. He is a professor at the University of Houston, and he lives in New York City.
Read more from David Lehman
The Best American Poetry 2023 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Best of the Best American Poetry: 1988-1997 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 2022 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSinatra's Century: One Hundred Notes on the Man and His World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Best American Poetry 2016 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 2015 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Best American Poetry 2020 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 2021 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Best American Poetry 2019 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 2013 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Best American Poetry 2017 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5When a Woman Loves a Man: Poems Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Daily Mirror Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Best American Poetry 2018 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Poems in the Manner Of Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew and Selected Poems Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Evening Sun: A Journal in Poetry Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Yeshiva Boys: Poems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Best American Poetry 2012
Related ebooks
The Best American Poetry 2013 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Best American Poetry 2017 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Best American Poetry 2011: Series Editor David Lehman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Best American Poetry 2018 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Best American Poetry 2003: Series Editor David Lehman Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Best American Poetry 2009: Series Editor David Lehman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 1997 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 2019 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 2010: Series Editor David Lehman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 2006: Series Editor David Lehman Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Best of the Best American Poetry: 25th Anniversary Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 2015 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Apple That Astonished Paris: Poems Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Best American Poetry 2020 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 2007: Series Editor David Lehman Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Best American Poetry 2005: Series Editor David Lehman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 1995 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best American Poetry 2008: Series Editor David Lehman, Guest Editor Charles Wright Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5When We Were Birds: Poems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTalk Poetry: Poems and Interviews with Nine American Poets Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Field Guide to the Poetry of Theodore Roethke Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Blue Pharmacy: Essays on Poetry and Other Transformations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Heresy and the Ideal: On Contemporary Poetry Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Open Door: 100 Poems, 100 Years of Poetry Magazine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCircling the Canon, Volume II: The Selected Book Reviews of Marjorie Perloff,1995-2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Anthology of Australian Prose Poetry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Best American Poetry 2014 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Time and Materials: Poems 1997-2005: A Pulitzer Prize Winner Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5What Light Can Do: Essays on Art, Imagination, and the Natural World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Great American Prose Poems: From Poe to the Present Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Poetry For You
Bedtime Stories for Grown-ups Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Odyssey: (The Stephen Mitchell Translation) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Things We Don't Talk About Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Love Her Wild: Poems Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Japanese Death Poems: Written by Zen Monks and Haiku Poets on the Verge of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Prophet Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Way Forward Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beyond Thoughts: An Exploration Of Who We Are Beyond Our Minds Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Odyssey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Waste Land and Other Poems Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Road Not Taken and Other Poems Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Selected Poems Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Divine Comedy: Inferno, Purgatory, and Paradise Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Twenty love poems and a song of despair Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dream Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beowulf Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Complete Poems of John Keats (with an Introduction by Robert Bridges) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You Better Be Lightning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Edgar Allan Poe: The Complete Collection Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dante's Inferno: The Divine Comedy, Book One Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Leaves of Grass: 1855 Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Divine Comedy: Inferno Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Road Not Taken and other Selected Poems Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dante's Divine Comedy: Inferno Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Canterbury Tales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Best American Poetry 2012
9 ratings1 review
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/520 of these poems are good enough to re-read. About 5 good enough to read out loud to someone else. That's really not bad for one of these anthologies. Snag a used copy of this one--as long as you're not paying full price, you won't be disappointed.
Book preview
The Best American Poetry 2012 - David Lehman
INTRODUCTION
by Mark Doty
There was in that same monastery a brother, on whom the gift of writing verses was bestowed by heaven. That sentence, originally in Latin, is from the Venerable Bede, who in 680 composed a history of the English people. It’s the subtitle of chapter XXIV, in which Bede tells the story of Caedmon: an origin myth for the art of poetry, and a fable about the nature of inspiration that remains resonant despite the passage of over thirteen hundred years.
Caedmon lived most of his life—Bede tells us he was advanced in years when we enter his story—with no skill in the art of composing verse. When a harp was passed at a party, and each guest expected to contribute a poem or a song, Caedmon would slip out of the room to avoid the humiliation of having no poem to offer his fellows. One evening he’d done just that, and gone out to the stable where he cared for the animals. He lay down to rest, and something marvelous occurred in his dream. A person appeared to him in his sleep,
Bede writes, and saluting him by his name, said ‘Caedmon, sing some song to me.’ He answered, ‘I cannot sing; for that was the reason why I left the entertainment, and retired to this place because I could not sing.’ The other who talked to him replied, ‘However, you shall sing.’ ‘What shall I sing?’ rejoined he. ‘Sing the beginning of created beings,’ said the other.
My guess is that most poets will recognize something of themselves in Caedmon’s story. He’s an inarticulate man who can’t find the right words in the company of his fellows, yet when he’s alone—in the company of beasts, which perhaps is where he feels he belongs—something provokes him, someone appears in the dark and says sing some song to me,
or, as Susan Mitchell translates the phrase in a strange and remarkable poem called Rapture,
Sing me something.
Sing me something is as good a description as I know of what the world or the dark or the visiting spirit seems to say to the poet, as if we were presented with an imperative, a request, a desire coming from somewhere. Our work is to speak back, but to whom, or to what?
Caedmon’s interlocutor has usually been understood as an angel, and that’s the tradition Denise Levertov honors in this beautiful poem from 1987.
CAEDMON
All others talked as if
talk were a dance.
Clodhopper I, with clumsy feet
would break the gliding ring.
Early I learned to
hunch myself
close by the door:
then when the talk began
I’d wipe my
mouth and wend
unnoticed back to the barn
to be with the warm beasts,
dumb among body sounds
of the simple ones.
I’d see by a twist
of lit rush the motes
of gold moving
from shadow to shadow
slow in the wake
of deep untroubled sighs.
The cows
munched or stirred or were still. I
was at home and lonely,
both in good measure. Until
the sudden angel affrighted me—light effacing
my feeble beam,
a forest of torches, feathers of flame, sparks upflying:
but the cows as before were calm, and nothing was burning,
nothing but I, as that hand of fire
touched my lips and scorched my tongue
and pulled my voice
into the ring of the dance.
Levertov’s language intensifies in heat as Caedmon’s vision kindles: first it’s the earthly fire of the motes / of gold moving / from shadow to shadow
with its calm, almost bovine chain of o’s. Then comes the conflagration: a forest of torches, feathers of flame, sparks upflying.
That phrase is dense and satisfying in the mouth, the f’s and t’s rubbing against one another, the subtle echo of torches
and feathers,
the double fl’s of flame
and upflying.
Bede himself doesn’t say that divine fire touches Caedmon’s lips or scorches his tongue, or imply the passive nature of pulled my voice,
as if poetry is something that is done to us; that’s Levertov’s vision, and a compelling one. Bede just says, . . . he presently began to sing verses to the praise of God . . .
and allows what happened between the beautiful command and Bede’s response to remain mysterious.
And Bede doesn’t actually say that the one who appears to Caedmon is an angel. He refers to the apparition as "quiddam—Latin for
someone." Someone says, sing me something. Someone, something—the statement couldn’t be much more open ended.
To what extent do we understand the process that calls a poem into being? Someone or something comes to us in the dark—literally, or in the darkness of not-knowing—and says Sing me something.
It’s the uncovering of what is to be sung, and how, which are not two separate things but an intertwining spiral, like a DNA molecule, that gives the process its tension, frustration, and, at least sometimes, elation.
The someone who speaks may be a vessel of divine fire, as Levertov says, or we might understand him as a shadow self, that side of us which is by nature in darkness, like a side of the moon, and walks a few steps ahead of us into what we don’t know yet.
Or we might construe him as the embodied form of absence, a sense of lack within: something incomplete requires our attention.
Perhaps the interlocutory angel is an incarnation of the desire for order, the pressing need to locate and define pattern in the chaos of experience.
Or perhaps he or she is a form of the desire to praise. When faced with something beautiful, Emerson says of poets, they are not content with admiring, they seek to embody it in new forms.
A little while later in Bede’s text, he provides at least a metaphoric understanding of what the poet does with the mysterious prompting, wherever it comes from. The monks tell Caedmon the sacred stories, reciting to him tales from Scripture, and the poet works: by listening to them and then memorizing it and ruminating over it, like some clean animal chewing the cud, he turned it into the most melodious verse.
Clean animal is delightful. Levertov’s Caedmon wanted to dwell
. . . with the warm beasts,
dumb among the body sounds
of the simple ones.
In the barn, he’s lulled by their deep untroubled sighs.
Poetry may be the highest use of language, speech with all its multiple powers engaged, but paradoxically it seems to like animal company, the proximity of the purely, wordlessly physical. Perhaps that’s another source of the summons: where there are no words, poetry springs into being.
Caedmon dwells among the animals, and presumably he’s with them every day, but still it’s necessary to sing about them; knowledge must be sung into place, a form of praise and of cartography. A map may show us what we already know, and point us toward what we don’t, or reveal the character of what has been obscured by familiarity. To sing of created beings
is a discipline of attention.
One could also read the silence of animals (not literally, of course, since they make all kinds of noises, but their wordlessness) as a figure for the resistance of all experience to language. Animals are themselves, but they also stand for a realm or register of being that breathes just beneath the surface of the everyday, which is monitored, shaped, and mapped by words; apart from them or beneath them is the creaturely life of the body, the momentous physical life that we are, and are surrounded by every second. I can’t think about this without calling to mind George Eliot’s remarkable, entirely disruptive aside in Middlemarch: If we had a keen vision and feeling of all ordinary human life, it would be like hearing the grass grow and the squirrel’s heart beat, and we should die of that roar which lies on the other side of silence.
Poetry is an attempt to move closer to the other side of silence.
I’ve been talking about the originating impulse of poetry as if it were all interior, a spark arising within obscure regions of the self. But one thing that makes the story of Caedmon satisfyingly complicated is the second instruction the apparition gives to the dreamer. Sing the beginning of created beings.
And thus complexity and chaos enter into the lyric, since the song that attends to created beings
can never be pure praise, not if it has allegiance to the real; that requires also lamentation, and outrage, and probably irony as well. Auden addressed the tension between the lyric and the world with characteristic eloquence. He wrote that a poem should be a verbal earthly paradise, a timeless world of pure play, which gives us delight precisely because of its contrast to our historical existence with all its insoluble problems and inescapable suffering. . . .
But Auden knows all too well that a poem cannot rest there. At the same time we want a poem to be true . . . and a poet cannot bring us any truth without introducing into his poetry the problematic, the painful, the disorderly, the ugly.
The inner spur, the breath of inspiration,
sometimes is the apprehension of just those things Auden characterizes as the characteristics of truth; that which causes pain may well be the spur which leads the poet to begin. The inner voice and the social world are in endless dialogue; like form and content, it can—and should—be difficult to tease the two apart.
So far you’d have no reason to think this essay an introduction to an anthology. This is a deliberate choice. The twenty-four distinguished poets who’ve edited one of these collections before have done a bang-up job of introducing them, and there’s little for me to add that’s specific to the project itself.
But a few things must be said.
First, the seventy-five poems I’ve placed before you here are the ones that engaged me most during a year of reading a great many poems. Best
is problematic, if unavoidable; poetry is not an Olympic competition in which there are a few coveted places at the top. Differences in the range of modes, the means of speaking, are fundamentally of value, and a wide and various field of activity is much to be preferred over a pyramidal scheme in which only a few examples can shine at the pinnacle. And even if I believed in such a thing, how would I know? The clouded vision of the present will shift, in time, whether toward clarity or toward some other kind of cloudedness. History will, inevitably, make choices among the poems of our moment, and history will revise those choices in time, if indeed there’s anyone around to read or construct canons in a few hundred years. Meanwhile, I’m happy that a range of voices is included here, as well as poems that appeared in trade magazines and in online-only journals, publications with legions of readers or a handful. Hooray for that. And the poets here are well known indeed or just setting out, or somewhere in between; they have umpteen books or no book at