Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Reason and Rationality
Reason and Rationality
Reason and Rationality
Ebook44 pages34 minutes

Reason and Rationality

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

One of the world's most important political philosophers, Jon Elster is a leading thinker on reason and rationality and their roles in politics and public life. In this short book, he crystallizes and advances his work, bridging the gap between philosophers who use the idea of reason to assess human behavior from a normative point of view and social scientists who use the idea of rationality to explain behavior. In place of these approaches, Elster proposes a unified conceptual framework for the study of behavior.


Drawing on classical moralists as well as modern scholarship, and using a wealth of historical and contemporary illustrations, Reason and Rationality marks a new development in Elster's thinking while at the same time providing a brief, elegant, and accessible introduction to his work.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateDec 29, 2008
ISBN9781400833177

Related to Reason and Rationality

Related ebooks

Philosophy For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Reason and Rationality

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
4/5

3 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Reason and Rationality - Jon Elster

    Cover: Reason and Rationality by Jon Elster

    Reason

    and

    Rationality

    Reason

    and

    Rationality

    Jon Elster

    Translated by Steven Rendall

    Princeton University Press

    Princeton & Oxford

    Copyright © 2009 by Princeton University Press

    Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street

    Princeton, New Jersey 08540

    In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press,

    6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW

    All Rights Reserved

    Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

    Elster, Jon, 1940–

    [Raison et raisons. English]

    Reason and rationality / Jon Elster ; translated by Steven

    Rendall.

    p. cm.

    Includes bibliographical references.

    ISBN 978-0-691-13900-5 (hardcover : alk. paper)

    1. Practical reason. 2. Rational choice theory.

    3. Philosophy and social sciences. I. Title.

    BC177.E4713 2009

    128'.33—dc22 2008029705

    British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available

    This book has been composed in Adobe Garamond and

    Goudy Trajan

    Printed on acid-free paper.∞

    press.princeton.edu

    Printed in the United States of America

    1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2

    Contents

    Reason and Rationality

    Works Cited

    Reason

    and

    Rationality


    In analytical approaches to human behaviors, the same Latin word, ratio, is at the root of two intellectual traditions that are at once very different and interconnected.

    On the one hand, there is the tradition that opposes reason to the passions and, more recently, to interests. Seneca’s treatise On Anger, for instance, is organized around the opposition between reason and passion, whereas the French moralists of the seventeenth century added the notion of self-interest. La Bruyère, in a famous passage, summed up their mutual relationships this way: Nothing is easier for passion than to overcome reason, but its greatest triumph is to conquer a man’s own interest.¹ The idea of reason is intimately connected to that of the common good.

    On the other hand, there is the still more recent idea of rational choice, which is opposed to the diverse forms of irrationality. The rational actor is one who acts for sufficient reasons. These reasons are the beliefs and desires in light of which the action appears to be appropriate in a sense that I shall discuss at length. The idea of rationality is often but wrongly related to that of the actor’s private good or self-interest in the moralists’ sense. Anyone who is pursuing the common good can—and even ought to—do so in a rational manner.

    Acting in conformity with reason, in the singular, and acting for good reasons, in the plural, are two different things insofar as reason is objective, whereas reasons are subjective. From an external point of view, we can evaluate a policy as being in conformity with reason or not. From an internal point of view, one can evaluate an action as being rational or not.² From this difference it follows that only rationality can be used for explanatory ends. It is only insofar as the agent has made

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1