The Ninth Amendment: Key to Understanding the Bill of Rights
1/5
()
About this ebook
This book explains how the Ninth Amendment is the key to understanding rights in the United States. The founders created the Ninth Amendment to protect unlisted natural law rights as they were understood in their day. This amendment was never intended to allow future generations to create new rights. Rather, it was to safeguard the morality and natural rights of the founding generation. Unfortunately this understanding has been lost, and modern judges and scholars usually ignore this amendment, or misinterpret it. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has rather strangely created new rights under the Fourteenth Amendment's "due process" clause. This is a direct contradiction of the method intended by the founders to recognize unlisted rights only through the Ninth Amendment's incorporation of natural law in their day. If the court were to return to the founders' intent regarding the Ninth Amendment, confusion over such issues as abortion and gay marriage would disappear, as both would simply be denied.
Duane L. Ostler
Duane L. Ostler was raised in Southern Idaho, and has lived in Australia, Mexico, Brazil, China, Utah, the big Island of Hawaii, and—most foreign of all—New Jersey. He practiced law for over 10 years and has a PhD in legal history. He and his wife have five children and two cats.
Read more from Duane L. Ostler
How the Bill of Rights and a Lack of Virtue are Destroying America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Name is Kate and I Just Killed My Baby Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAbortion: What The Founding Fathers Thought About It Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Anti Stupidity Book Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5A Conversation about Abortion Between Justice Blackmun and the Founding Fathers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMalcolm File Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs Gay Marriage Logical? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJudicial Activism: A Way to Overcome it Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFalse Worlds Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Science Teacher is a Wizard Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Our Unvirtuous Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMiss Lydia Fairbanks and the Losers Club Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Holiday Treasure Hunt Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5My Math Teacher is a Vampire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy History Teacher is a Leprechaun Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Crazy Pete Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReport of a Takeover of Earth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsItchy Mitch and the Taming of Broken Jaw Junction Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Running for the Guv Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRights in America, Bills of Attainder and the Ninth Amendment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mystic Christmas Treasure Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBizarre Fables About Stupid Choices Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5James Madison American Prophet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDetectives in Diapers: The Mystery of the Aztec Amulet Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Gay Illusion Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Wistworth Conferences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGeorge Brown and the Protector Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wards of Clovis Gloober Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5
Related to The Ninth Amendment
Related ebooks
What Prohibition Has Done to America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSecuring Civil Rights: Freedmen, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Right to Bear Arms Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Constitution in the Supreme Court: The First Hundred Years, 1789-1888 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty - Updated Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Liberty of Contract: Rediscovering a Lost Constitutional Right Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTransitions: Legal Change, Legal Meanings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStrangers to the Constitution: Immigrants, Borders, and Fundamental Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThat Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right. Revised and Updated Edition. Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Constitution of the United States: A Primer for the People Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstructing Basic Liberties: A Defense of Substantive Due Process Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Armed or Dangerous: Unpacking the Gun Control Debate in America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Democratic Constitution: Experimentalism and Interpretation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bill of Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Living Originalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Essentials of American Constitutional Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWas Frankenstein Really Uncle Sam? Vol Ix: Notes on the State of the Declaration of Independence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJustice vs. Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012-2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeath Grip: Loosening the Law's Stranglehold over Economic Liberty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOriginalism: A Quarter-Century of Debate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Government Took My Property! A Comparison of Acquisition Law in Australia and the United States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWe, the People: Formative Documents of America's Democracy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Supreme Court vs. The Constitution Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Redskins, or, Indian and Injin: Being the Conclusion of the Littlepage Manuscripts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A War Like No Other: The Constitution in a Time of Terror Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Constitutional Law For You
The Constitution of the United States of America: 1787 (Annotated) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Bill of Rights Primer: A Citizen's Guidebook to the American Bill of Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGet Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Supremes' Greatest Hits: The 44 Supreme Court Cases That Most Directly Affect Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Unequal Protection: How Corporations Became "People"—and How You Can Fight Back Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Justice Corrupted: How the Left Weaponized Our Legal System Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5A Student's Guide to the Study of Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Second Amendment: A Biography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5U.S. Constitution For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Constitutional Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From Covid To Communism: Chronicling the Global Assault on Our Freedom and What to Do About It. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction to Legal Reasoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Law For Dummies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unwarranted: Policing Without Permission Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Constitutional Law, Law Essentials: Governing Law for Law School and Bar Exam Prep Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Heritage Guide to the Constitution: Fully Revised Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Case for Impeaching Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reason in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKindly Inquisitors: The New Attacks on Free Thought Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Loaded: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Federalist Papers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We the People: A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Federal Tax Returns Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCity Council 101: Insider's Guide for New Councilmembers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIdentity Capitalists: The Powerful Insiders Who Exploit Diversity to Maintain Inequality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution: Anti-Federalist Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related categories
Reviews for The Ninth Amendment
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
The Ninth Amendment - Duane L. Ostler
THE NINTH AMENDMENT: KEY TO UNDERSTANDING THE BILL OF RIGHTS
By Duane L. Ostler
Copyright 2014 Duane L. Ostler
This book may not be reproduced, copied or distributed without the express permission of the author. This book may not be resold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with someone, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you are reading this book and did not purchase it or have it purchased for you, please purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the work of this author.
Cover art courtesy the Library of Congress:
The flag that has waved 100 years,
by Dominique C. Fabronius, 1876
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: Introduction
CHAPTER 2: The Founders Easily Identified Ninth Amendment Rights
CHAPTER 3: What was Debated and What was Not
CHAPTER 4: Original Intent
CHAPTER 5: Examples of the Founders' Views of Natural Law
CHAPTER 6: The Right to Retain American Citizenship
CHAPTER 7: The Right to Equal Protection of the Law
CHAPTER 8: The Right to Vote
CHAPTER 9: Presumption of Innocence and Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
CHAPTER 10: The Right of Access to Federal Courts
CHAPTER 11: The Right to Associate with Others
CHAPTER 12: The Right of Privacy
CHAPTER 13: The Right to Travel Within the United States
CHAPTER 14: The Right to Marry
CHAPTER 15: The Right to Educate One's Children
CHAPTER 16: The Right to Choose and Follow a Profession
CHAPTER 17: The Right to Attend and Report on Criminal Trials
CHAPTER 18: The Right to Refuse Unwanted Medical Treatment
CHAPTER 19: Conclusion
ENDNOTES
OTHER BOOKS BY THE AUTHOR
CHAPTER ONE: Introduction
This book explains how the Ninth Amendment is the key to understanding rights in America. The Ninth Amendment states that other rights, not listed in the rest of the Bill of Rights, are also to be protected. The Ninth Amendment reads as follows: The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
This simple amendment is the key to understanding the nature of rights and protection of rights in America, as envisioned by the founders. Once a proper appreciation and understanding of the role of the Ninth Amendment is attained, the nature of rights is also clear. Likewise, with a proper perspective of the Ninth Amendment and of rights in general, the modern Supreme Court's inappropriate reliance on the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause is seen for what it truly is--a gross deviation from the way things were meant to be. But all that is needed to bring order out of the chaos created by the Supreme Court is to return to a true understanding and application of the Ninth Amendment.
In 1789 when James Madison proposed a number of changes to the Constitution--what became the Bill of Rights--he made it clear that in selecting the proposals nothing of a controvertible nature ought to be hazarded.
[1] The last thing he wanted was a protracted debate about amendments that was as likely to founder as it was to succeed.[2] Indeed, the Congressional Record confirms that the proposed provisions were not as heavily debated as some had feared.[3] The Ninth Amendment also was the focus of very little comment or debate.[4]
The early unquestioned acceptance and understanding of the Ninth Amendment stands in stark contrast to the modern debate about its meaning and how to identify the rights it was intended to protect. Scholars and judges in recent times have frequently disagreed over the proper method to identify Ninth Amendment rights.[5] Other scholars assert that the Ninth Amendment was intended as a mere restatement of states' rights, or as a limit on federal powers rather than as recognition of inherent rights.[6] As one scholar noted, many believe the Ninth Amendment appears incapable of practical interpretation. No one has yet discovered a mechanism for empowering courts to identify the 'other [rights] retained by the people . . .'
[7] Because of the difficulty modern judges and scholars have experienced in understanding the Ninth Amendment, it has largely been ignored by the courts. Only in recent years has the amendment been referenced by Supreme Court Justices, and even then, usually only as support after an independent basis for the decision at hand has been found.[8]
Yet if the Ninth Amendment is such a complicated mystery and the rights it was intended to protect are so difficult to identify, why wasn't that very point raised against it in the congressional and state debates over its ratification 200 years ago? More to the point, was it intended by the Founders that the Ninth Amendment would be ignore, out of fear of its open-ended nature, or concern over the method or theory to be used in identifying rights? Were the Founders as uncertain of its meaning as the modern generation?
This book seeks to answer these questions. Specifically, it asserts that the Founders did not consider finding rights under the Ninth Amendment difficult at all. Furthermore, if their understanding of rights and the ninth amendment had been followed the Supreme Court would not have gone as far afield as it has. For us today to know what unlisted rights were intended by the Ninth Amendment and how it was to operate, we need only consult the natural law rights understanding of the founding generation.[9]
Chapters two through four of this book will discuss the only two comments by the Founders that even hinted there could be any problem in understanding the Ninth Amendment and the rights it was intended to protect. However, it will be seen that even these references in fact do not support any supposed difficulty in finding rights or misunderstanding of the role of this amendment. These chapters will also refute the rights/powers and states' rights view of the Ninth Amendment asserted by some scholars. Finally, these chapters will discuss the original intent of the Founders and their belief that such original intent should be followed by succeeding generations, particularly regarding the identification of Ninth Amendment rights. If this intent were to be followed, abortion and gay marriage would be instantly denied by the Supreme Court without further debate.
Chapters five to nineteen will discuss specific examples of the rights understanding of the Founders and their views of natural law. These chapters will demonstrate with thirteen concrete examples that the Ninth Amendment and the natural law views of the Founders would have been a much better tool to find fundamental
rights than the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause which has been used by the Supreme Court through the years. Hence, these chapters will demonstrate how a proper use of the natural law views of the Founders under the Ninth Amendment would eliminate most accusations of judicial activism today, and would put the substantive due process rights allegedly derived from the Fourteenth Amendment by the Supreme Court in their proper place.
CHAPTER TWO: The Founders Easily Identified Ninth Amendment Rights
As noted above, there is considerable disagreement among scholars about the purpose and meaning of the Ninth Amendment, and the best way to find the rights it was intended to protect.[10] Bennett B. Patterson, one of the first modern scholars to research the Ninth Amendment, has even maintained that the unenumerated rights [in the Ninth Amendment] permit of no exact definition. To attempt to define these rights would be contrary to the obvious intent and meaning of the amendment.
[11]
The Founders would have been surprised to hear such notions. Indeed, if Ninth Amendment rights were supposedly so hard to identify, why wasn't that very point raised against it by the Founders? After all, the members of Congress who debated the Ninth Amendment, and contemporary Founders who had the opportunity to comment on it, were extremely astute men, and certainly must have understood this problem if it indeed was considered to be a problem. Yet this alleged rights identification problem with the Ninth Amendment was actually not raised at all by any member of Congress!
Indeed, the opposite notion is raised in a debate that took place in the House of Representatives on August 15, 1789 regarding the right to assemble. Representative Theodore Sedgwick asserted that listing the right to assemble in the First Amendment was inadvisable because it was a self-evident, unalienable
part of free speech that did not need to be listed separately.[12] He went on to say that such trifles
should not be included in a bill of rights. If they were, the result would be a very lengthy enumeration of rights
such as, for example, a man's "right to wear his hat if he pleased; [and] that he might get up when he pleased, and go