Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Union of Their Dreams: Power, Hope, and Struggle in Cesar Chavez's Farm Worker Movement
The Union of Their Dreams: Power, Hope, and Struggle in Cesar Chavez's Farm Worker Movement
The Union of Their Dreams: Power, Hope, and Struggle in Cesar Chavez's Farm Worker Movement
Ebook525 pages6 hours

The Union of Their Dreams: Power, Hope, and Struggle in Cesar Chavez's Farm Worker Movement

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A generation of Americans came of age boycotting grapes, swept up in a movement that vanquished California's most powerful industry and accomplished the unthinkable: dignity and contracts for farm workers. Four decades later, Cesar Chavez's likeness graces postage stamps, and dozens of schools and streets have been renamed in his honor. But the real story of Chavez's farm workers' movement-both its historic triumphs and its tragic disintegration-has remained buried beneath the hagiography.
Drawing on a rich trove of original documents, tapes, and interviews, Miriam Pawel chronicles the rise of the UFW during the heady days of civil rights struggles, the antiwar movement, and student activism in the 1960s and '70s. From the fields, the churches, and the classrooms, hundreds were drawn to la causa by the charismatic Chavez, a brilliant risk-taker who mobilized popular support for a noble cause. But as Miriam Pawel shows, the UFW was ripped apart by the same man who built it, as Chavez proved unable to make the transition from movement icon to union leader. Pawel traces the lives of several key members of the crusade, using their stories to weave together a powerful portrait of a movement and the people who made it.
A tour de force of reporting and a spellbinding narrative, The Union of Their Dreams explores an important and untold chapter in the history of labor, civil rights, and immigration in modern America.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateOct 20, 2009
ISBN9781608191734
The Union of Their Dreams: Power, Hope, and Struggle in Cesar Chavez's Farm Worker Movement
Author

Miriam Pawel

Miriam Pawel is an award-winning reporter and editor who spent twenty-five years working for Newsday and the Los Angeles Times. She was recently an Alicia Patterson Foundation Fellow and a John Jacobs Fellow at the Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies.

Related to The Union of Their Dreams

Related ebooks

United States History For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Union of Their Dreams

Rating: 4.0588235294117645 out of 5 stars
4/5

17 ratings15 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Miriam Pawel presents an incomplete but illuminating history of the United Farm Workers (UFW) from 1965 through 1989. The book focuses tightly on the experiences of eight people in the movement, including boycott organizers, attorneys, a minister, and farmworkers who became team leaders and union organizers. Although Cesar Chavez is a dominant figure in the story, he is presented at a distance, always through others' eyes, and Pawel spends virtually no time explaining his background. For the reader, as for the focal characters, Chavez' leadership and legendary status is a given from the outset. This stylistic choice makes it easier to grasp how, for so long, movement and union members could defer to Chavez and overlook his flaws, while giving greatly of themselves to realize his dreams.For students of advocacy movements, the central lesson of the story is that Chavez was a charismatic and idealistic movement leader, and a terrible administrator. Once the movement won -- institutionalizing, through state legislation in 1975, the right of workers to form a union -- Chavez should have stepped away from the fledgling UFW, turning it over to the gifted organizers and managers he had recruited. That would have freed him to build new movements -- a broad campaign for poor people, a utopian spiritual community, a community services organization. Instead, Chavez tried to have it all, refusing to hand over control of the union, but neglecting union business to pursue a series of experimental initiatives. The story Pawel tells is a tragedy -- for Chavez, who destroyed much of what he had built and turned on staff who loved him; for the farmworkers, many of whom lost contracts they had fought hard to win; and especially for committed union staffers forced out in a series of emotionally brutal purges. While this book will benefit anyone interested in labor or advocacy movements, it has too narrow a focus to serve as the definitive account of the entire UFW. For example, Dolores Huerta comes across in this book as Cesar Chavez' hatchet woman, though she has had a distinguished career in Sacramento as a lobbyist for workers. Richard Chavez, Cesar's brother, comes across as a Cassandra who repeatedly warns Cesar against his mistakes but is ignored. The book is simply silent on Richard and Dolores' long-running relationship, which could hardly be overlooked in a book that wanted to address all facets of the UFW's history. In later chapters, Chavez' son Paul and son-in-law Arturo Rodriguez climb to leadership positions in the union, but are never sketched with any depth. The book also gives little sense of how the union has evolved since Cesar Chavez' unexpected death in 1993 (although Pawel published a long and highly critical article on that in the Los Angeles Times in 2006). Pawel has little to say about the theory of organizing, another dimension of the story that would have been interesting to understand better. But, with respect to its purpose -- capturing the experience of working for Cesar Chavez during the UFW's initial rise and fall -- the Union of Their Dreams does an excellent job.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Union of Their Dreams presents a unique perspective of the farm worker movement, with individual chapters focused on some of the integral members of the movement that do not get much attention. Pawel does a good job portraying both the strengths and the faults of Chavez and the movement.I would recommend The Union of Their Dreams to anyone that is interested in social movements or the history of the period.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Miriam Pawel deftly captures the wild tapestry of movement politics and the transition to farm worker unionization in The Union of Their Dreams. The story begins in the mid-1960s in the grape fields of the San Joaquin Valley in California. There is no Internet, no email, no cell phones. The Vietnam anti-war movement is going national with the march on Washington in the spring of 1965. The Watts riots took place in the summer of 1965. Pawel presents the stories of individuals who were involved with beginnings of the United Farm Workers union (UFW). Her writing style is engaging, the narrative moves along quickly. Pawel's journalism background comes through with endnotes that are source notes.The heady enthusiasm and devotion of the early activists is abundantly evident in this book. In the late 1970s when the UFW shifted direction, the disillusionment of these individuals is understandable and sad. Some individuals stayed with the union for decades. It is hard to estimate how many young people were touched and influenced by this particular movement. In the Epilogue updates are provided for some of early organizers. Many are still working for social justice.Union of Their Dreams is particularly relevant today. While the social and political unrest today pales in comparison to the 60s and 70s, it is a time for movement politics. Individuals who did not experience the antiwar and social justice movements of the past, will learn a lot from this book. Despite the advances in communications technology, they are no replacement for commitment, struggle, or having "fire in the belly."Students of movement politics and union politics will find much to cogitate in this book. Lettuce boycotters of the 1970s will get a glimpse of goings-on behind the scenes, not all of it pretty. Pawel displays the essence of those times in her dedication: "For those who believe they can change the world." This book is a worthwhile addition to the history of the UFW.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This was the first Early Reviewer book that I actually liked! It was a wonderful exploration of the people and issues (social, extrinsic political, and intrinsic political) that made of the farm worker's union and movement. It was well-written and a pleasure to read. As an activist and as an attorney, I was particularly interested in the tale of what went wrong with Chavez's movement. Well done!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This is a wonderfully told story about Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers as seen through the experiences of eight people who were either with Chavez from the birth of the union or who held key positions at critical junctures in the union's history. Idealists first and foremost, organizers, teachers, farmworkers and ministers second, they devoted a significant portion of their adult lives working for little or no pay simply to be part of that cause. However, as so often happens with idealistic visions, reality inevitably sets in and the result to the psyche is seldom pretty. Unfortunately in this case, the weaknesses and mistakes of Chavez (who is not portrayed sympathetically by the author) are exposed and offered as the main reason the union ultimately failed, and why all eight eventually parted ways with Chavez, some on their own terms, some unwillingly, all unhappily.Nonetheless, the book ends on a positive note. The final pages are devoted to a "Where are they now?" recap. There we find no regrets over the time each worked for the UFW, despite the pain and bitternes of their final days. All feel the time spent at the UFW influenced their lives in significant, permanent ways. Sandy Nathan, one of the eight, carried in his wallet a quote from Dostoyevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" which sums up perfectly their attitude and the real message of this book: "...still let us remember how good it was once here, when we were all together, united by a good and kind feeling which made us...better perhaps than we are."
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Miriam Pawel's The Union of Their Dreams is a fascinating book. I came to her work with no knowledge of Cesar Chavez or the United Farm Workers (UFW) beyond the fact that they existed; I leave with a sense that the UFW would have been a practical, effective union had Chavez let it go in the early 70's. At the same time, I can see that what drew the highly skilled and talented union organizers to the UFW was, in fact, Chavez himself, and that without his charisma, the leadership would not have been as successful. Even so, that charisma was also the union's, and Chavez', downfall.Pawel charts the history of the UFW and the Chavez movement through the documents and recollections of those who were there, shifting from one viewpoint to another as the story progresses. The story she tells is fascinating: Chavez began agitating for the workers, but as the years went by, he seemed unable or unwilling to relinquish that power, choosing instead to put it to a use which it could not then support: a "poor people's union" and a back-to-the-land movement. The Chavez of this work eventually achieved a messianic status for some of his followers, alienated the rest, and seems largely to have forgotten the farm workers whose actual labor (and labor stoppage) gave him that power.Unfortunately, the one voice that Pawel leaves out is Chavez's own. As such, I found myself questioning the validity of this portrait. Almost everyone she uses as a source grew disillusioned with Chavez; as such, their documents, whether contemporary with the period she's describing or collected some years later, remain colored by bad blood and negative experiences. Had Pawel incorporated more of Chavez' own voice and justification, the portrait of the rise and fragmentation of the UFW would have been more well-rounded. As a result, I must look elsewhere for even the basics of Chavez' own reasoning for his actions--especially his messianic tendencies; his adoration of the Synanon movement; and his (to me quite odd) paranoia toward Marxists, leftists, and other "assholes" (his words), whom he felt would ruin the movement almost as much as paying his union workers would ruin it. In all, The Union of Their Dreams is an excellent book, worth reading for anyone who wants a reminder that charisma, like leadership, should be shared, lest the concentration of either lead to the destruction of both.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a very readable history of the United Farm Workers union--a true organizational history and not a more general history of farmworkers or the labor movement. Through the perspectives of a handful of union workers, Pawel tells the story of the early, unexpected success of the movement, which was due in large part to Cesar Chavez's ability to inspire volunteers. Once the union got off the ground, though, Chavez was unable to consolidate that success. He lacked organizational skills and was unwilling to relinquish any power to those who could have done a better job, and the result was that the union fell apart. I did not know much at all about this subject before reading this book, but I thought the story was very interesting both as an analysis of organizational failures in a political movement and as a history of one segment of the labor movement. Although the end of the story is depressing--the complete failure to protect the farmworkers after such a promising start--the stories of the individuals who worked with the movement are more uplifting. Some of them were farmworkers who learned how to organize and how to speak on behalf of the other workers. Others were college students, ministers, etc. who wanted an opportunity to make a difference.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book tells the story of Cesar Chavez and the UFW through the personal stories of some of the lesser-known people involved. While the book describes the UFW's well-known successes, it also spends a lot of time on what the author clearly sees as the failure to follow up on these successes, the internal chaos that both caused and resulted from this failure, and the near-collapse of the UFW.Before reading the book, I was only familiar in vague outline with Chavez and the UFW, so it's hard for me to analyze the accuracy of the portrayal. But the book, which tells its story chiefly through the interwoven stories of a number of less-well-known UFW activists, makes its argument clearly and compellingly, and left me wanting to know more.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I've never known much about Cesar Chávez and the United Farm Worker's union so I was pleased to receive a free copy of this book from the Library Thing Early Reviewers program. The book is not about Chávez directly although his presence hovers over the events covered in this book for both good and ill. Instead Pawel focuses on the stories of nine individuals who dedicated their lives to the farm worker movement - field hands, organizers, lawyers and a ministers. Their overlapping stories offer a glimpse into the movement's rise and fall from the 1960s to the 1980s.At first it's an inspiring story of boycotts, strikes and union elections where the union prevails against the growers (and their Teamster thugs) as well as scoring legislative victories. Chávez becomes a national hero for his inspiration, non-violent leadership. Unfortunately like many organizations the UFW is torn apart by internal conflicts and Chávez only exacerbates the problems. Pawel details how these close friend and colleagues of Chávez see him becoming increasingly paranoid, micromanaging and megalomaniac, purging the union of people on specious grounds and making life miserable for those who remain.This book is ultimately heartbreaking but there are glimpses of hope nevertheless. It's inspiring that despite all the difficulties these nine people dedicated themselves to an ideal and a cause. While shattering the myth of Chávez the hero, this book still illustrates the good that can be done by ordinary people working for social justice.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Union of their Dreams is a history of Cesar Chavez's United Farm Worker (UFW) movement: its development and early successes followed by its quick and unfortunate demise. As a movement it had great appeal, and drew many talented and idealistic folks into its camp. Chavez as a leader inspired thousands of people, including the farmworkers whose plight he was pushing to improve. But his co-conspirators and co-dreamers were just as responsible for some of UFW's draw AND successes, which is why Chavez's paranoia and inability to delegate tasks eventually killed the movement by driving those same key players out of the game.Any history this charged with scandal and controversy is hard to present objectively, but author Miriam Pawel manages to keep herself out of it. It's evident that she gathered ALL the information she could, to the point that she apologizes to her sources in the Acknowledgments section for grilling them on so many details... Then, in the book, she presents just the facts as she can cite and support them. All opinions expressed are those of UFW founding members or long-time participants who personally witnessed the collapse of the UFW. And, let me tell you, the story is so shocking that it borders on exposé. A warning that Union of their Dreams is pretty lengthy and detailed. It's the kind of book you have to sit down and enjoy in solitude, because it doesn't really lend itself to distractions. And then you might have to read it over a second time because you didn't catch it all the first time through. (I skimmed some paragraphs just so I wouldn't end up drowning in the details.) Still, DEFinitely worth reading, especially if you've ever heard of Cesar Chavez and wondered, hey whatever happened there, anyway? You won't find out by looking it up on Wikipedia--that's how ground-breaking Pawel's book is. I highly recommend it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Pawel’s book presents a compelling narrative constructed of the many voices and lives that contributed to “Chavez’s” farm worker movement. As a contrast point to other reviewers, I liked the organization of the book by person. I think it contributes to the view of involved workers as whole people who handed their lives over to a cause in large or small ways. The book is a qualitative and impartial overview from many viewpoints of the movement. An appreciated read. :D
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    In The Union of Their Dreams, Miriam Pawel relates the history of Cesar Chavez’s United Farm Workers (UFW), 1965-1989, primarily through the stories of eight people who were involved in the union. Although this is an interesting approach, the organization of the book leaves much to be desired. The surnames of the eight people are given when they are first introduced but their first names only are used throughout the narrative. The title for each chapter is followed by the beginning date; the chapter is then arranged by character such as Eliseo, Chris, or Jerry. This arrangement tends to get choppy; in one chapter, the narrative might go from one character to another back to the first. The history would be easier to follow if either the surnames or full names were used, especially since many other people are mentioned in passing in the history. Moreover, the persons whose stories are told are not identified until the Acknowledg-ments at the end of the book. The Prologue tells a moving story about the death of Jessica Govea, who was involved in the union. It leads one to want to read more about her, but she is only mentioned occasionally; her story is not told.Although he is not highlighted with a personal narrative, Cesar Chavez is the central character throughout the book. He was the person who founded the union, set the policy, micromanaged the union, and was centrally involved in its disintegration. The history shows how many idealistic people who had worked well together initially became each other’s enemies in the years of the union’s decline.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Miriam Pawel’s The Union of Their Dreams: Power, Hope, and Struggle in Cesar Chavez’s Farm Worker Movement is a complicated telling of an important story, the rise and fall of the National Farm Workers Association. Looking at their story we see the success of the underdog labor movement struggling against powerful growers and the Teamsters union who were brought in by the growers to undermine the NFWA organizing and boycotting activities, and we see the movements self inflicted failure after achieving an level of unprecedented success.The book’s organization is a major hurdle for the reader to overcome. Although the main chapters are laid out in chronological order they are broken into sections headlined only by a persons first name. Following the story is difficult due to the lack of full names and titles. “Reverend Chris Hartmire” would stick in the readers mind as a uniquely identified person quicker than just “Chris”. Why use an individual’s names for the headings anyway? I have seen this method used in oral histories but this is not an oral history. Although Pawel did speak to many of these people in her research these are not the person’s own words. In spite of the organization the book is worth reading. Seeing Chavez’s failures allows us to see what can happen when the perfect becomes the enemy of the good. The story of the NFWA illustrates both the advantages and the dangers inherent with charismatic leadership. Chavez built and destroyed the union and, in large part because of the cult of personality built around him, even people who saw his errors were unwilling to correct him.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Union of Their Dreams by Miriam Pawel is an examination of the United Farm Workers (UFW) rise as a economic and political force as an agricultural union in California in the 1960s and 1970. This book takes as its premise that the often glowing accounts of the UFW, which focus mainly on the personality of its founder Cesar Chavez, tell an incomplete and inaccurate story of the union. Pawel’s premise is that while Chavez accomplish med much, much more could have been accomplished if it was not for Chavez’s management style and seemingly paranoia about people in the union who would actually betray its ideals.Pawel’s method of unfolding her story is by focusing on various people who eventually became disaffiliated from the union, mostly through the use of purges of union leadership. Through the use of interviews of eight former members who were all victims of these purges, Pawel pieces together an alternative vision of the rise of the UFW that is not expressed in standard accounts of the UFW.There are a number of important contributions that Pawel has made to the often complex picture that has become the UFW. First, she shows the dynamic group of people who were all part of the union’s rise. By not focusing solely on Chavez, Pawel shows how a whole group of people,- idealist lawyers and college students, ministers, and farm workers- contributed to the often startling successes of the UFW. In addition, she does not hesitate to show Chavez in solely glowing terms. This account gives a more realistic picture to the person of Cesar Chavez.However, this positive also becomes a negative. This book should also not be seen as an objective account of the UFW. Rather, it has its own understanding and biases which are shown through her methodology. All of her primary sources are people who, in one way or another, feel that they were victims of these purges. In other words, her sources are not wholly objective either. A far different account of the union would be shown if she included in her sources others who were not disaffiliated with the union. However, I do not believe that this is her purpose for the book. It is not to provide an objective account, but rather an account from a certain point of view.In addition, there are two aspects of her writing that I find problematic. First, is the way the various chapters are broken up. Rather then being told in a narrative form, the chapters are broken by the person speaking. This way of writing was at times confusing with characters coming in and out of the story at various times. From an organization standpoint, I found this extremely confusing. From a standpoint of respecting each individuals distinctive voice it is commendable. In this case, I would have preferred clarity however. Second, there is one serious act which I find to be more on gossip mongering then actual reporting. Pawel’s account of the death of Cleofas Guzman insinuates that Cesar Chavez had wanted his death is startling. Providing nothing but rumors her account seemed to wallow in the rumors of people who she did not speak to nor could their account be evenly remotely proved. It seemed that rather then just tell the account of former union members, Pawel also desired to denounce a person for the sake of denouncing them.Would I recommend this book? My answer is maybe. I would not recommend it for a person who knows nothing about Chavez or the union. The book, while not focusing on Chavez, also focuses a lot on Chavez. Other members of the leadership and their part in the union are barely mentioned or within a completely one-sided way, most important would be Delores Huerta. I would recommend this book if one has some familiarity with the union and its various accounts. I believe that a person would need to have some background in the general development of the union before one reads this book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Miriam Pawel’s book, The Union of Their Dreams, takes a different-and successful- tack to illustrate the life of Cesar Chavez and the Union movement in agriculture. I think with other biographical endeavors, the author places the “star” at the center of the story and builds around that person. In this case, we jump right into the story of the development of the union and Chavez’s work. We learn more about the union and about Chavez himself, by seeing, hearing, and experiencing events through the eyes and mouths of those less heralded supporters and pioneers with the union. I found it to be a fascinating history of the movement in that era and I found the dispersion of sources from these less known builders of the Agricultural union movement to be innovative and illustrative.

Book preview

The Union of Their Dreams - Miriam Pawel

The Union of Their Dreams

For those who believe they can change the world.

¡Que vivan!

Contents

Map

Preface

Prologue

Part I: The Grape Strike,

September 1965–July 1970

1. Huelga

2. Showdown at DiGiorgio

3. Out of the Fields, Into the Streets

4. The Fast

5. Please Don’t Eat Grapes

6. Making History

Part II: Growing Pains,

August 1970–April 1973

7. Strike in the Salad Bowl of the World

8. The Union Is Not La Paz

9. Back to the Boycott

Part III: War, Again, April 1973–June 1975

10. Holy Week

10. Holy Week

11. Fill the Jails

12. The New Union

13. Dark Days

14. The Best Labor Law in the Country

Part IV: The New World,

June 1975–March 1977

15. Elections in the Fields

16. Transitions

17. The Crusades

18. The Cultural Revolution

Part V: A Movement or a Union?,

April 1977–July 1978

19. The Purges

20. In the Trenches

21. Visions Collide

Part VI: Up from the Fields,

July 1978–January 1989

22. Quiet Before the Storm

23. The Dream Strike

24. Victory in Salinas

25. A Different Union

26. You’re With Us or Against Us

27. Malignant Forces

28. A Dream Deferred

Epilogue

Acknowledgments

Notes

Bibliography

Preface

The history of the United Farm Workers union begins and ends with Cesar Chavez, who had the audacity to single-handedly challenge California’s most powerful industry, and the will to keep fighting for three decades. By the time he died in 1993, he stood alone again.

In the intervening years, thousands embraced Chavez’s vision and joined the charismatic leader on his improbable journey. Together, they transformed the union into a vibrant community that became an intrepid experiment in organizing and a force for change.

This is the story of eight people who joined Cesar Chavez’s crusade. They came into the movement from the fields, the classrooms, and the churches; they left as organizers and activists, their lives irrevocably altered by the first successful attempt to unionize farmworkers. These eight are but one cast of characters, not necessarily the most important or the most central. Each has a compelling personal story, and each also represents an archetype of the worlds that came together in a unique collaboration.

When they left the UFW, each lost something. Their lives had changed in ways they had never imagined. But they failed to pass that experience on to future generations of farmworkers, as they had hoped and planned to do. They carry that loss with them decades later, sometimes near the surface, sometimes deep down, each coping in a different way. I wrote this book to tell their story and, through them, to paint the broader, complex, grand, often messy, but supremely human story of Cesar Chavez and the farm worker movement.

In writing the book, I melded two disciplines—history and journalism. The narrative is based largely on primary source materials from libraries, garages, and attics across the country. All quotations come from letters, memoranda, notes, court files, newspaper stories, and diaries written at the time. In addition, I listened to more than six hundred hours of tapes of meetings, rallies, and interviews recorded between 1969 and 1980. The interactions captured on those tapes were a rich resource that shaped the overall narrative, as well as a source of direct quotations. To help bring the historical documents to life, I conducted dozens of additional interviews with people who lived through these events. Each of the main characters spoke with me at great length, many times, over several years. All accounts of their feelings and thoughts at the time derive from those interviews. Where not otherwise indicated in the text or footnotes, descriptions of events and conversations also are based on interviews. Where written documentation was not available, I have spoken to more than one person to verify accounts whenever possible.

Almost all previous writings about Cesar Chavez have hewed close to his version of history. This book offers a reevaluation of his legacy. His ultimate shortcomings as a labor leader do not diminish his accomplishments or his influence. The real story may be less neat than the hagiography but no less impressive.

Many books could and should be written about the history of the United Farm Workers. Many significant events and players beyond the scope of this book merit deep examination. This is the story of a different set of winners, a significant chapter of American history that deserves to be told in all its complicated glory.

Prologue

The squat four-year-old stares into the camera, pigtail hanging over her left shoulder, right foot perched on the blade of a shovel, arm wrapped around the handle that stretches far above her head. Maria de Jesus Govea, 1951, poised to pick cotton in the California fields.

One year later she entered kindergarten, where school officials decided Maria de Jesus was too difficult to pronounce. So they changed her name. Two years after that, Jessica Govea met Cesar Chavez.

Chavez was still more than a decade away from international fame when he mapped out strategy in the Goveas’ backyard, sitting in a circle of chairs on dry, hot summer nights in Bakersfield, California. Jessica listened to the grown-ups make plans to register voters, organize English classes, and file police brutality suits. The details went over her head, but the purpose and the passion were clear: empower Mexican Americans to fight a racist system. I grew up seeing poor people take charge of their destiny, Jessica wrote many years later.

As a child, she scratched chalk marks in front of the homes of potential voters, a bird dog pointing the way for adults who followed with registration forms. As a teenager, she starred on the debate team, where her favorite speech, The Man with the Hoe, scored points for delivery but demerits for its radical message about desperation in the fields. At nineteen, she jettisoned her father’s dream of law school and dropped out of college to spend a year working for Cesar Chavez’s fledgling union. One year turned into sixteen. She went abroad, fell in love, ran union elections, organized a health clinic across the Mexican border. She rose to become a member of the executive board of the United Farm Workers of America. Then she was drummed out of the organization that had become her life.

At fifty-eight, after a decade-long battle with cancer she believed came from pesticides in the fields where she had worked as a child, Jessica Govea Thorbourne died.

Like many funerals, Jessica’s memorial was a celebration of what was and a mourning for what might have been.

From across the country, the old UFW team assembled once more in Salinas, the salad bowl of the world, the hub of their union at its moment of greatest strength. They gathered on April 9, 2005, at the National Steinbeck Center, the museum dedicated to the writer whose portrait of misery in the fields still rang true seventy years later. Many of the mourners had not seen one another for decades, though they once were virtually inseparable. The picture of the pigtailed girl with the shovel greeted guests as they arrived.

They returned to Salinas to remember Jessica’s beautiful voice, her fighting spirit, her intricate quilts, her straightforward compassion, and her preference for mixing cinnamon in her coffee. And they came to Salinas for the cause, for a time long ago and a movement long gone that transformed them forever. Today they are union leaders, community activists, labor lawyers, teachers, judges, environmentalists. The time they shared remains for many, as it was for Jessica, the most important in their lives. In Cesar Chavez’s union they met husbands, wives, and best friends. They found work that had meaning, and discovered hope, betrayal, and disillusionment.

Jessica had asked that Jerry Cohen officiate at her service. The sixty-four-year-old lawyer looked as rumpled as ever, shirttail hanging out. He spoke of the day almost forty years earlier when the legal department of the farm workers union was in the kitchen of a cramped house and he was a rookie who didn’t know which writ to file. Jessica, his twenty-year-old assistant, suggested he flip a coin. Good case, wrong writ, the judge said. We were at our most dangerous when we were laughing loudest, Jerry recalled.

Eliseo Medina, a teenage farmworker when he met Jessica, noted how she had brought people together in death, just as she did in life. What brought us into this union? What were those common beliefs and values that we shared? he asked softly, standing at the lectern in the trademark purple shirt of the service Employees International Union that he helped lead.

The colors of the UFW were on display at the far side of the room, where the union’s current leaders mingled awkwardly with a handful of supporters dutifully holding red and black flags.

On the walls hung some of Jessica’s quilts, including the baby blanket she had made for Gretchen Laue’s first son. Gretchen had grabbed the quilt at the last minute as she left her home in El Centro, the border town where she first befriended Jessica during a strike that shut down the California lettuce fields. Gretchen had not known Spanish then; now, she spoke nothing else on the eight-hour drive to Salinas with Mario Bustamante, who once cut lettuce faster than anyone, and Rosario Pelayo, who used to pack broccoli during the day and work for the union at night.

Jessica fought with her heart, hands, and mind, Pelayo told the mourners. Then she paid tribute to all of them. I know there are so many people here who left half their lives, fighting for this cause.

Like many in the room, Chris Hartmire had thought he would fight for la causa forever, but forever turned out to be twenty-seven years. The Presbyterian minister had apologized since then for many things he had done in the name of helping farmworkers. He remembered the time Jessica was scared by ugly rifts within the movement. She had reached out to Chris, worried about her boyfriend’s safety. Chris had cavalierly dismissed her fears. He was glad he had told Jessica he was sorry, long before she fell ill.

The memorial ended with a recording of Jessica singing La Paloma at a funeral for Fred Ross, the organizer who had recruited and trained Cesar Chavez. Cu curu curu, cu curu curu, Jessica sang, echoing the plaintive cry of the dove. The first time Ellen Eggers heard Jessica sing that song was a summer night in 1972 at the union headquarters, a place that Ellen thought the most exciting spot in the world. She was a wide-eyed twenty-year-old from Indiana, and Jessica seemed so confident and accomplished, though only five years older.

Ellen was one of thousands drawn to the cause. They were young and fearless and often naïve, buoyed by moral outrage that bordered on arrogance, bound together by the conviction that their cause was not only righteous but more important than any other, and intoxicated by the discovery of their own power. At the height of the boycott, seventeen million Americans stopped eating grapes so that farmworkers in California could win better wages and working conditions.

At the end of his eulogy, Eliseo talked about being a scared twenty-one-year-old farmworker thousands of miles from home, pursuing a mission that would have seemed impossible if he had stopped long enough to think. Within a few years he and an army of volunteers in a ragtag operation would force the most powerful industry in California to sign union contracts.

We won, Eliseo recalled in his eulogy. We won. And when we did that, we captured the imagination and the hearts of millions and millions and millions of people throughout this world. But we also raised the hopes of millions of workers around this country, who saw what farmworkers had done and said, ‘Maybe I, too, can do the same thing, and if I fight, I can help change my life and create a better life for myself and my children.’

Sabino Lopez was an irrigator with a grade school education when he went on strike in 1970. Now he was the first farmworker on the board of the Steinbeck Center. He looked around the room with pride, and sadness. Sabino thought about Jessica, how she had left her soul in Salinas, decades before she died. He thought about the lost force that had once toppled giants and transformed thousands of lives. Lost, he thought, because of some human failings. He looked at his teachers and mentors and heroes and comrades, together again, but fighting no more. They were the ones in the fields with him, fighting for the workers, day after day. Cesar Chavez was the symbol, Sabino thought. He was not the union. The story of the farm worker movement was not just his story, but also theirs.

PART I

The Grape Strike

September 1965–July 1970

CHAPTER 1

Huelga

September 1965

Eliseo

Eliseo Medina was stuck at home, watching reruns of I Love Lucy. You can’t pick grapes with a broken leg, and there was not much else to do in Delano, California.

Life in the small San Joaquin Valley town was as monotonous as the flat landscape and as predictable as the streets that ran from west to east in alphabetical order. One-story bungalows and pastel-colored ranch houses barely broke the horizon, tapering off into miles of fields. There was only one clear boundary in Delano—the railroad tracks that split the town in two.

The serious teenager with the disarming smile lived two blocks west of the tracks, where the sidewalks stopped and the run-down housing started, and immigration agents knocked on doors in the middle of the night. Eliseo lived with his mother, two sisters, brother-in-law, niece and nephew at 418 Fremont Street, three generations in a two-bedroom frame house with a bathroom and shower out back. Behind the house ran the alley they used as a shortcut to the candy store and People’s Bar, where Eliseo learned to play pool. A mile the other direction was Fremont Elementary School, where Eliseo had landed in fourth grade, speaking only Spanish after two years on the streets of Tijuana. His intelligence and curiosity propelled him to success even in a school that saw little value in educating Mexicans. He graduated from eighth grade with honors, then left school after guidance counselors explained that the Mexican students about to enter high school should all take shop classes.

The career options in Delano for a Mexican kid were simple: You could be a farmworker, or a foreman.

At age nineteen, Eliseo had been working in the fields full time for four years, summers and weekends for five years before that. He was skilled at trimming clusters of grapes, though so clumsy at spotting tomatoes when they were ready to pick (still green with just a hint of red) that people often thought him color-blind. He enjoyed the oranges best. He could find a shady, secluded perch inside a tree, where he could pick and eat at his own pace. He hated digging out potatoes, the way the rocks and roots and parched earth raked your fingertips. On those days he would wake up hoping for rain.

In the summer of 1965 rumblings of unrest broke the monotony of another season in the Delano fields. In the Coachella Valley vineyards almost three hundred miles to the southeast, Filipino farmworkers went on strike. Eliseo’s mother, Guadalupe, followed the strike with keen interest. She had been orphaned young, her parents killed in the Mexican Revolution, and she grew up with a passion for social justice. The Medinas talked about how the Filipinos were better organized than the Mexicans, and they wondered if the strike would succeed.

Table grapes ripen first in the Coachella desert, kicking off the California harvest. Those early spring grapes were a prized commodity, shipped across the country to consumers who paid top dollar for the first Thompson seedless of the year. The Coachella growers had a short season and couldn’t risk a lengthy strike. So they met the demands from the small Filipino workers’ union and upped wages to $1.40 an hour from $1.25. By August the Filipino workers had migrated north with the harvest, expecting the same wages for the same work in the San Joaquin Valley. But the Delano grape growers weren’t paying.

Rumors of an impending strike spread, expectation crackling in the dry, hot valley air. Though they toiled side by side in the vineyards, the Mexican and Filipino workers did not mix. Mexicans picked the grapes and Filipinos packed them, a job growers thought too difficult for Mexicans. On the morning of September 8, the Mexicans found out when they showed up for work that the Filipinos had refused to leave their camps. Guadalupe Medina and her daughters burst in the house that afternoon with the announcement that jolted Eliseo away from I Love Lucy, his favorite television show: The strike had arrived in Delano.

Eliseo hopped out on crutches the next day to look at a picket line thrown up by the Filipino union. A few days later he watched a couple hundred Mexicans and white supporters march down Eleventh Avenue, waving red flags with a stylized black eagle and inviting workers to a Thursday night meeting. They urged bystanders to join their group, the National Farm Workers Association, which they did not even call a union yet for fear of scaring workers.

Eliseo was intrigued. He had always loved to read; as a child he had read cereal boxes when there was nothing else around. Lately he had become a faithful reader of El Malcriado, the ten-cent newspaper the Farm Workers Association published in Spanish and English. The name meant the unruly child, and the paper championed farmworkers, shamed labor contractors, and lampooned growers with biting cartoons and spirited satire. Eliseo followed with particular satisfaction the saga of Jimmy Hronis, a notorious labor contractor caught cheating sugar beet workers after El Malcriado revealed he had paid them only fifty cents an hour. The newspaper stories triggered a state investigation, a rare case of a powerful Anglo contractor forced to answer for mistreatment.

That power impressed Eliseo, his curiosity tempered by trepidation. He believed in taking important risks, but not unnecessary ones. (Though his caution sometimes backfired: He had broken his leg when a friend who was driving drunk refused to relinquish the wheel. Eliseo insisted on getting out to walk. His friend drove off, then looped back to give Eliseo a ride but accidently sent him flying over the hood.)

That Thursday night, Eliseo went alone to the meeting in Our Lady of Guadalupe Church. He squeezed into the back of the large hall next door to the sanctuary—even the second-story balcony in back was overflowing. The workers came because they had been cheated out of wages more times than they could count. They had worked in fields with no drinking water or bathrooms. They had been injured on the job, sprayed with pesticides, fired for being too slow, too old, or too outspoken. They were excluded from unemployment insurance and overtime, denied holidays, vacations, and health insurance. They endured the most backbreaking labor—with none of the basic protections and rights afforded almost all other workers in America.

A short, unimposing man rose to address the crowd. Eliseo had only read about Cesar Chavez. The teenager was disappointed by the leader’s unimpressive appearance. Then the soft-spoken thirty-eight-year-old began to speak. He talked about the harshness of the fields. His own family had been driven off their Arizona farm during the Depression. He spent his childhood in and out of dozens of schools and fields, sleeping in tents, cars, and hovels. He spoke with anger about how Mexicans were treated. He told the workers things could be different if they fought together.

Chavez had started his union in Delano because he had family there. He also chose Delano because grapevines, unlike vegetables, stay in the ground all year, a permanent backdrop for strikes and protests.¹Chavez was just as calculating in his choice of dates for this historic meeting, September 16, Mexican Independence Day. He used the holiday to drive home his revolutionary message. Think of the parallels to Mexican Independence, he told the workers in the church. They too struggled to overthrow oppressive rulers. The Mexican workers must decide, he said, whether to join the strike started by the Filipinos.

Huelga, huelga, huelga, the crowd chanted, the Spanish word for strike, soon to be emblazoned on picket signs and seared in the collective memory of Delano. The meeting ended with traditional Mexican tributes to fire up the crowd. The leader called out a vivalong live—and the crowd chanted the slogan back. Viva la huelga. Viva Mexico. And viva Cesar Chavez.²

Eliseo went home caught up in the fervor, enticed by the hope. He had spent too many Sundays camped outside the office of a labor contractor, wasting his one day off to collect his wages. He had seen his mother and sisters work without a single bathroom in the fields, forced to seek a shred of privacy by shielding one another. He had watched his father be fired because he could no longer keep up with the younger men in the fields.

The shy teenager from Zacatecas with a shock of dark hair tended to deliberate carefully before acting. Once he made a decision, Eliseo embraced the path with focused enthusiasm and a big, contagious grin. He went home after the meeting at the church and cracked open his piggy bank. He didn’t know what a contract was, but he counted out ten dollars and fifty cents. The next day, he drove to the headquarters at 102 Albany Street, handed three months dues to Helen Chavez, and joined her husband’s union.

Chris

The same day, Cesar Chavez placed a call to a young Presbyterian minister in Los Angeles. On the eve of a strike he was unprepared to wage, Chavez could count on only a few people for help. Chris Hartmire topped the list.

From a fifth-floor office on Olympic Boulevard, Chris ran the California Migrant Ministry, a largely ignored stepchild of the Council of Churches. For decades, the small Protestant ministry had offered spiritual counseling to farmworkers and toys to their children, visiting bleak migrant camps in a fleet of station wagons named the Harvesters. Quietly, Chris had been engineering a radical shift in the ministry’s approach. The catalyst for that change was the man now calling from Delano for help.

Cesar Chavez had been one of the first people Chris sought out in 1961, when the young pastor moved reluctantly to California. Chris had loved his job in New York, running a youth ministry in East Harlem. But when his wife was mugged in the elevator of their apartment building, their two-year-old in her arms, he knew they had to move. The offer to run the California Migrant Ministry seemed serendipitous, yet unappealing. Chris dreaded the tedium of an administrative job.

He made lists, in his neat script. California: Assets. California: Liabilities. Even after he accepted the job, his doubts persisted. Never before have I felt so helpless and so small, he wrote church officials, explaining apologetically that he could not promise to stay more than two years. To himself he wrote: "Perhaps God arranged the pressure of events knowing that I was too timid to say yes under other circumstances. Perhaps this is His will for me at this time in history."³

He drove cross-country with his wife, Jane, his best friend since seventh grade, better known by her nickname, Pudge. The Hartmires settled in the Los Angeles County suburb of Culver City. They came to appreciate a backyard for the kids and even, over time, to root for the Dodgers. The day Cesar Chavez outlined his vision of community organizing over lunch in an East Los Angeles café, Chris began to think his destiny was in California after all. He was captivated by the idea of a ministry that helped poor people organize themselves.

Chavez sketched out the work he did as director of the Community Service organization (CSO), a grassroots group that organized citizenship classes, voter registration drives, and lobbying campaigns in poor Mexican neighborhoods across California. Chris met Fred Ross, the lanky founder of CSO, who had discovered Chavez and taught him how to organize. Then Chavez and Ross installed Chris in a dilapidated rooming-house in Stockton for a month, so the young minister could see for himself how CSO taught Mexican Americans to take on the powerful institutions that denied them education, justice, and civil rights.

Even as Chris embraced the CSO model, Chavez was growing frustrated by its limitations. The CSO board refused to organize farmworkers. The CSO members, once empowered, increasingly voiced middle-class aspirations, more concerned with their own advancement than with helping the poor. Their attitude infuriated Chavez. Poor people were what he cared about, and farmworkers were the poor whom Chavez knew best. Chris was in the audience at the CSO convention in March 1962 when Chavez rose to announce his resignation. Chris couldn’t understand why people didn’t beg the leader to stay.

Chavez struck off on his own and founded the National Farm Workers Association. The Migrant Ministry loaned him a mimeograph machine. Chris’s aides drove Chavez to key appointments and handed him their credit cards when his money ran out. The Migrant Ministry hosted the Chavez family at the group’s bimonthly retreats. Gradually, Chris began to assign his staff to work as organizers. He rejected the ministry’s historic milk-and-cookies approach as dishonest attempts to salve conscience while hanging onto an unjust social system which benefits ‘our kind of people’ at the expense of the poor.

From his mother, Wayne C. Hartmire Jr. had learned to embrace the underdog. From his father, he had learned to love baseball. Chris grew up in a working-class family in a Philadelphia suburb, the middle child of an insecure mother and an emotionally absent father. Chris was short, as undistinguished at sports as he was outstanding at academics. He won a scholarship to Princeton and graduated Phi Beta Kappa in engineering, but decided science offered little opportunity to help others. After three years as a navy engineer, he entered the seminary. When he began to work with Chavez, Chris felt he had finally found his calling.

Chris found Chavez an irresistible force, a presence that belied his slight stature. Chavez was dark-complexioned with faintly Mexican Indian features, his dark hair parted on the left, slicked back or occasionally falling over his penetrating, perpetually tired eyes. He used those eyes when he wanted something, looking right at you, but otherwise he glanced down a lot. Sometimes a brief smile flashed across his face, or a mischievous grin. He dressed in work clothes, donning a shirt with a Nehru collar or embroidery for special occasions, never a tie. His speech, like his appearance, was unremarkable; his profound thoughts delivered in a flat voice, with run-on sentences often punctuated by you know. He was at his best in small groups, a good listener who left his audience convinced that their words mattered—even as he listened intently to make sure his points had gotten through.

Chris had an earnest, boyish innocence that made the minister seem much younger than his thirty-three years. Chavez needed that youthful sincerity. The Migrant Ministry had resources. And Chavez knew Chris would never say no. He was fast becoming a disciple, ready to risk it all for a cause he believed in. So the day after the crowd roared its approval in Our Lady of Guadalupe Church, Chavez summoned Chris to Delano to help turn the shouts of huelga into action.

That Friday, Chris drove 140 miles north from Los Angeles, over the Tejon Pass and down to the lush floor of the San Joaquin Valley, nothing but farmland on all sides. In Delano he mediated a meeting on Sunday between the Mexicans and the Filipinos at the Stardust Motel. The Farm Workers Association agreed to join the strike on Monday morning.

Chavez had been building his union slowly for three years. He had less than one hundred dollars in the treasury, a small credit union managed by his wife, and a death benefit program for the handful of members who paid $3.50 a month in dues. He didn’t believe his tiny union was ready for a strike. He had always said a union should strike only after organizing workers. But like many decisions that would follow, this one was made for him.

Chris helped Chavez and the Filipino union forge a tentative alliance and pledged support from the ministry: cash for gas and phones, food and rent money for strikers, and clergy to walk picket lines. Chris knew his early support earned him a position of trust. So with no sense of the consequences, no agonizing or making lists, almost overnight Chris turned the Protestant ministry into an adjunct of Cesar Chavez’s union.

Eliseo

Este hogar es católico, no aceptamos propaganda protestante nideotras sectas read the sign on Eliseo’s front door, a common warning on Delano’s west side. This is a Catholic home, we don’t accept propaganda from Protestants or other sects. Eliseo was not sure what to expect from Protestants and uncertain he had ever actually met one. Certainly not a Communist or a Jew. Wide-eyed, he watched in the fall of 1965 as they flocked to Delano—college dropouts, families, nuns, Communists, Protestants, Jews, long-haired guys, and Berkeley girls.

Help poured in as soon as the strike began, transforming the anonymous farming town of twelve thousand people into the new cause célèbre. White civil rights activists casting about for another cause after the Mississippi Summer were drawn to the farmworkers’ struggle. Delano was only 250 miles from the University of California at Berkeley, where Jerry Rubin organized teach-ins against the Vietnam War and students burned their draft cards. Each Friday after the strike began, Delano’s population swelled with weekend volunteers from the Bay Area and food caravans that delivered provisions to the communal strike kitchen.

The only white people Eliseo had known before the strike were growers and teachers. Now the west side of Delano filled with more white people than he had ever seen. They lived among the Mexicans on the wrong side of the tracks and at night they drank beer and played pool at People’s Bar, around the corner from Eliseo’s home.

As alien as the out-of-towners were to Eliseo, the civil protests that drew them to Delano were even more foreign. And equally alluring. A few weeks into the strike, the teenager heard the union was paying people to picket. He went to inquire with his friend. The two walked uncertainly into Filipino Hall, a community center that served as strike headquarters. Follow me, an old man said, grabbing some of the big, round strike signs that looked like giant lollipops. They jumped into his car, and he deftly navigated through the acres of vines, taking them to the field of a company where workers were breaking the strike. Police cars followed close behind. Eliseo was sure he would be arrested, maybe even deported. His mother had waited almost two years in Tijuana until she could bring her children across the border legally. The memory of swearing to uphold the laws when he entered the country was still vivid.

The old man got out and stood beside a field, shouting at the workers in the vineyard and urging them to honor the strike. Some heeded the message and walked off the job. The police just observed. Eliseo’s fear dissolved into relief, then awe. In his world, there was only one way to protest working conditions: quit. The seductive power of this public challenge quickly overcame his fright. After that, Eliseo went out on the picket lines every day, even though the rumored payments never materialized.

Within weeks he became a picket captain. In the disorganized and understaffed union, eagerness quickly translated into greater responsibility. Each morning, Eliseo assembled his crew and received his assignment. The union called strikes at more than two dozen ranches spread over several hundred square miles. To select strategic locations to picket, volunteers with two-way radios drove around the fields each morning before dawn. They tailed crews to figure out where strikebreakers were working and radioed the information back to headquarters so coordinators could dispatch picket crews. Police followed the picketers, took pictures, and opened files. Just a few weeks into the strike the FBI opened a probe into Communist Infiltration of the National Farm Workers Association.

Eliseo led his crew each morning in a caravan of cars to the designated field. They stood in the road at the edge of a vineyard, about twenty strong, and exhorted workers to join the strike. Sometimes they used megaphones; usually they just shouted from the road or the tops of cars. Often the supervisor moved a crew out of earshot. That was a partial victory—vines that needed picking were left untended, and ripe grapes quickly rot. Sometimes workers dropped their tools and walked out of the fields. They were welcomed with cheers.

As hard as Eliseo was fighting to coax workers out of the vineyards, Martin Zaninovich was fighting to keep them in. Zaninovich had grown up on the vineyard he now ran. He belonged to the second generation of one of the many interlocking Slav families that had settled in Delano in the 1930s. Grape growers from the island of Hvar off the coast of Croatia, they had picked Delano because the soil and climate nurtured the same grapes they had farmed back home. The Slavs owned the bulk of the seventy vineyards around Delano, all but two family-owned. Martin Zaninovich’s Jasmine Vineyards was a few hundred feet down the road from another Slav ranch, Dan Tudor and Sons, where Eliseo had picked grapes before he broke his leg. The Monday when the Mexicans joined the strike was the first time Zaninovich saw the red flag with the black eagle, alongside the round sign that said Huelga. He had no idea what the word meant.

Zaninovich’s Delano was the peaceful United Nations of the Valley featured in Chamber of Commerce literature: Slav, Italian, and Armenian growers, an Asian-American school board president, a Mexican American police chief, and a stable workforce of comparatively well-paid farmworkers. Suddenly, hippies marched down Main Street. Students, religious liberals, and labor organizers lectured those who made their living off the land. Zaninovich saw them as ignorant, spoiled children of the middle class on a crusade to upend the economic and social order. They yelled threats and obscenities at workers who did not walk out on strike, workers whose lives the outsiders could not possibly comprehend.

The Delano growers had to recruit additional workers from Mexico to replace the strikers. But most of the workers stayed in the fields, out of either necessity or fear. Many who had walked out soon returned to work. Forced to choose between the cause and the job, workers overwhelmingly picked the latter. After a few weeks Eliseo was one of the only farmworkers still on the picket lines. One day Eliseo even ran into his friend who had started picketing with him, working in a field. Astonished, Eliseo ran over to talk, but the police blocked the entrance to the vineyard, and his friend disappeared.

Eventually Eliseo, too, needed a paying job. He waited till the grape harvest ended and the fields were almost empty, to lessen the impact of his departure. Then he took a job at a nursery, away from the strike. The work seemed even more tedious than before. The highlight of his week was always the Friday night union meeting, timed so that weekend visitors could take part. Filipino Hall filled with the smells of fish soup and adobo, the warm camaraderie of shared struggle, and the spirited voices of all ages, joined in traditional songs of protest. Speakers told jokes to punctuate reports about the picket lines, food bank, garage, and health clinic. Chavez acknowledged setbacks, but always looked ahead to the next success. He understood the importance of giving people victories to hold on to. The Teatro Campesino drew laughter with improvised skits that mocked growers and esquiroles, scabs. Eliseo and his mother were among the contingent of faithful Delano supporters, but the audience, like the picket lines, had more students and volunteers than farm workers.

The Reverend Jim Drake often opened the meetings with a prayer and sometimes presided when Chavez was away. Drake worked for the Migrant Ministry, but his office was a desk built over a toilet in a bathroom of 102 Albany Street. A few months into the strike, a nurse from the Bay Area walked into the union headquarters for a weekend visit. Drake looked up and asked if she could type. Marion Moses nodded. He handed her a form letter to type and address to twenty-five supporters. Moses soon returned to Delano to volunteer for a week. She paid the fifty dollars’ rent on her San Francisco apartment for two more months but never went back. The first in her family to go past high school, Moses put her plan for premed studies on hold. She worked in a makeshift health clinic in a bedroom and slept on the floor of a nearby house for months before a bed opened up.

Doug Adair, a liberal Republican graduate student, had ended up in Delano because of a political argument with Moses on the Berkeley campus when she was recruiting volunteers. She had challenged him to see how farmworkers lived. The twenty-two-year-old Adair ended up picking plums and moving to Delano when the strike began. Doug pronounced in a Spanish accent became Duck. Soon everyone just called him Pato, the Spanish word for duck. The son of a prominent American historian, Pato worked for El Malcriado, first delivering the paper and then writing and editing stories.

To Martin Zaninovich, the young people looking for a cause were proof the strike was not a labor dispute but a civil rights action, fueled by outside agitators.

To Eliseo, who began to befriend the outsiders on picket lines and at Friday night meetings, they were an exotic community, an eclectic mix united in their single-minded focus to help Cesar Chavez and to fight for the cause they always called the Union, as if there were no other.

Chris

Chavez was counting on Chris to deliver something largely absent from the passionate army of volunteers: credibility.

Chris first aimed his earnest entreaties at religious supporters. He appealed for Christmas presents to offer children of strikers and public commitments to bolster morale. He cloaked the cause in an unambiguous

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1