Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Brontes Went to Woolworths: A Novel
The Brontes Went to Woolworths: A Novel
The Brontes Went to Woolworths: A Novel
Ebook200 pages3 hours

The Brontes Went to Woolworths: A Novel

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

'How I loathe that kind of novel which is about a lot of sisters'; so proclaims Deirdre at the beginning of The Brontës Went to Woolworths, one of three sisters.

London, 1931. As growing up looms large in the lives of the Carne sisters, Deirdre, Katrine and young Sheil still share an insatiable appetite for the fantastic. Eldest sister Deirdre is a journalist, Katrine a fledgling actress and young Sheil is still with her governess; together they live a life unchecked by their mother in their bohemian town house. Irrepressibly imaginative, the sisters cannot resist making up stories as they have done since childhood; from their talking nursery toys, Ironface the Doll and Dion Saffyn the pierrot, to their fulsomely-imagined friendship with real high-court Judge Toddington who, since Mrs Carne did jury duty, they affectionately called Toddy.

However, when Deirdre meets Toddy's real-life wife at a charity bazaar, the sisters are forced to confront the subject of their imaginings. Will the sisters cast off the fantasies of childhood forever? Will Toddy and his wife, Lady Mildred, accept these charmingly eccentric girls? And when fancy and reality collide, who can tell whether Ironface can really talk, whether Judge Toddington truly wears lavender silk pyjamas or whether the Brontës did indeed go to Woolworths?

The Brontës Went to Woolworths is part of The Bloomsbury Group, a new library of books from the early twentieth-century chosen by readers for readers.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateDec 1, 2010
ISBN9781608191840
The Brontes Went to Woolworths: A Novel
Author

Rachel Ferguson

Rachel Ferguson was born in 1893 in Hampton Wick. Rachel was educated privately, before being sent to finishing school in Italy. She flaunted her traditional upbringing to become a vigorous campaigner for women's rights and member of the WSPU. In 1911 Rachel Ferguson became a student at the Academy of Dramatic Art. She enjoyed a brief though varied career on the stage, cut short by the First World War. After service in the Women's Volunteer Reserve she began writing in earnest. Working as a journalist at the same time as writing fiction, Rachel Ferguson started out as 'Columbine', drama critic on the Sunday Chronicle. False Goddesses, her first novel, was published in 1923. A second novel The Bröntes Went to Woolworths did not appear until 1931, but its wide acclaim confirmed Rachel Ferguson's position in the public eye. Over the next two decades she wrote extensively and published eight more novels. Rachel Ferguson lived in Kensington until her death in 1957.

Related to The Brontes Went to Woolworths

Related ebooks

Historical Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for The Brontes Went to Woolworths

Rating: 3.787878787878788 out of 5 stars
4/5

33 ratings32 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Although this book did make me chuckle from time to time, it really wasn't my cup of tea. In my teen years, my good friend Ruthie and I had a routine of nonsense that we could banter back and forth with for hours; anyone eavesdropping on our conversations would have thought we were certifiably nuts, and would have made no sense of it whatsoever. We populated our private world with characters from radio programs, books and movies, quoted comedy routines at odd moments, and seamlessly mixed fact with fantasy. The feeling I had much of the time while reading this book was that I was on the outside of just such a private conversation, chock full of inside jokes I wasn't party to. I remember it being so much more fun than this.Review written in 2008
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I bought this on the strength of the title and the first page, knowing nothing else about it.Deirdre (a journalist), Katrine (an actress-in-training), Sheil (their eleven year old sister) and their mother have a habit of talking, amongst themselves, as if they were closely acquainted with people who they have never met.They tell each other stories about these supposed-friends, about what their friends do and say, and it is very confusing for Sheil's poor governess. And the reader, who has to read between the lines to distinguish between reality and fantasy.And then it becomes confusing for the Carne family, once they actually become acquainted with some of their previously-imaginary friends.Not quite what I was expecting, but I was glad I read it, if only because it was so very different from everything else.A woman at one of mother's parties once said to me, "Do you like reading?" which smote us all to silence, for how could one tell her that books are like having a bath, or sleeping, or eating bread - absolute necessities which one never thinks of in terms of appreciation.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The book is charming and different from the normal book.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I'm glad I stuck to this book so I could see where the story was going, even though a shaky beginning had me wondering whether I should. I can see why this story would appeal to some readers, and it might have appealed to me more as well, at some other time. The story is about a family of three sisters and their mother; bohemian sorts who have fun play-acting as though various people they may or may not personally know take part in their daily lives. Am I not explaining this clearly? This may be because I had a bit of difficulty grasping this myself. I mostly had trouble differentiating between what was 'real' and what was 'play'. I know in my own family we gave complex personalities to our dogs, or pieces of furniture and an antique wood-stove which even had a name—Gertrude. We pretended they had feelings and made conversation with us, or random observations about life. So I'm not sure why it's such a stretch for me to imagine that the Carne family did this with real people, such a judge Toddington, whom they are positively enamoured with and like to pretend calls on them every day, going into great detail about what his daily life with his wife and assistant must be like. All this flight of imagination comes up against a bit of a hurdle when they actually meet their beloved "Toddy" in person and truly become friends with the judge and his wife, at first having to adapt to what the real people are like, though Deirdre Carne, the eldest, goes on to explain to them who much they have been part of their lives already, at which the judge and wife decide to play along. There is a governess in all this who ends up losing her mind, especially when the Brontë sisters—that is, their ghosts—actually show up in the Carne house one night while the family is away. All good fun, but very confusing to me, and then there were what seemed like lots of inside jokes or references to things purely English maybe (?) of simply very much of the time the book was published (1931)?. Not sure. I'm glad I finally read it because I'd had this book sitting among my endless piles for ages, and now I know what it's all about, sort of. Perhaps I should hang on to it; now I know the gist of the story I may want to revisit it sometime when I'm in the right mental disposition to get more out of it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    'If you're frightfully interested in people, you begin to KNOW things about them',, May 1, 2014This review is from: The Brontes Went to Woolworths (The Bloomsbury Group) (Kindle Edition)Selected as a relaxing, light-relief kind of read, this is a lovely but highly eccentric novel. Somewhat of the 'I capture the Castle' (Dodie Smith) school, but a lot more peculiar.Written in 1931, this follows three fairly well-to-do sisters in London. Katrine, the eldest, is forging a career on the stage; 11 year old Sheil has a governess - the unhappy and excluded Miss Martin - and middle daughter and narrator Deirdre, is a journalist and would-be authoress. The close family relationship is intensified by the girls' habit of crafting personalities for people they've only seen in the distance, until these characters become vividly alive to them...When they become introduced to Judge Toddington (who has long been the imagined character 'Toddy'), how will the acquaintance pan out?Three sisters, lonely governess, would-be author, make-believe world... the Brontes do come into it, but you'll have to read it and see how.Weird but highly entertaining.

    1 person found this helpful

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Brontës Went to Woolworths by Rachel Ferguson ~ 1931. This edition: Bloomsbury, 2010. Softcover. ISBN: 978-1-60819-053-9. 188 pages. My rating: 7.5/10. Cleverly imagined, if a bit high-strung. I found it rather a sad story, behind the relentlessly bright chatter of the heroines. ***** How to start with this one? Well, first off, I must confess that I had a truly difficult time finding my stride here. I started reading one night when I was, admittedly, very tired, and made it to Chapter 5, about twenty-five pages in, when I gave up in utter dismay. What was this frenetically paced, brittle, self-complimentary mess all about, anyway? And who in their right mind would recommend it?! A few days later, in a much less sleep-deprived state of mind, I tried again, starting from the very beginning, a thing I seldom do – most books get one chance and one chance only – but I really wanted to see what this one was all about, because I’d heard it praised so highly be several other bloggers whose tastes I often share: Shannon, Jenny, and Simon Savidge, to name just a few. ***** Three fatherless sisters and their recently widowed mother live an upper middle-class life in the London of the time between the two World Wars. The eldest, Deirdre, is an aspiring novelist with a day job as a newspaper writer. Middle sister Katrine is a drama student, and young Sheil (not short for Sheila, by the way, but rather named for the Scottish birthplace of her father) is a schoolgirl under the tutelage of an earnest governess, Miss Agatha Martin. The three sisters, as well as their gently witty mother, Mrs. Carne, are doing the best they can after the death of their obviously beloved father and husband. They have created a vivid fantasy world which runs parallel to their real world; they make no distinction between the real and the imagined in their conversations with each other, and the reader is thrown into the melee with few only a few clues to go by that this is not all as it seems. I sympathized with the sober governess Miss Martin, who continually tried to make sense of the nonsense, until finally giving up in dismay and fleeing to a more traditional, if bleaker, refuge as a parish worker, two-thirds of the way through the story Imaginary members of the Carne circle are Dion Saffyn, based on a real-life figure of a pierrot entertainer glimpsed during a summer holiday, and his family, and the imaginary Ironface, a childhood doll, who has morphed into the snobbish wife of a member of the French nobility. Even the family’s raffish terrier, Crellie, leads a double existence as the Pope, with some off-putting doggish habits and tendencies. But the most elaborate of the characters the Carnes have created is a take-off on the very real Judge Herbert Toddington, “Toddy” as they familiarly style him, ever since Mrs. Carne’s jury duty brought the elderly justice into their focus. When Deidre meets the real Judge Toddington, through his wife Lady Mildred’s attendance at a charity bazaar which Deidre is covering for her newspaper, fantasy becomes something much more solid. All of the nonsense and make-believe are, it seems to me, a way for the four Carnes to deal with their deep grief at the loss of their fifth member. Deidre makes no secret of her interest in placing Toddy in the role of an auxiliary “man of the family”, as she has felt her own fulfillment of that position extremely difficult. The fairy tale aspect of the story has its sobering moments, brought into focus by the confused governess Miss Martin, who cannot cope with the continued “weirdness” of her charge, the sisters, and Mrs. Carne, who plays along with the rest of the family in their complex game. Once Miss Martin flees in despair, a replacement, Miss Ainslie, is reduced to confusion in her turn, being soundly snubbed when she seeks to play along. And that brings me to the only thing I did not like about the Carne family, once I allowed myself to enter their story: their extreme snobbishness. I realize that this was a commonplace trait of people in their position and their time, but it bothered me that they were so scornful in attitude to people like their governesses, not giving them any sort of explanation as to the goings on with the imaginary characters, and relentlessly shutting them out of the game. And when Katrine falls in love with a truly good man of a decidedly lower social class, her elder sister advises her to harden her heart, which Katrine obediently does – “It just wouldn’t do” seems an acceptable reason to deny what seems like true love. The Brontës come into the story in a rather mysterious way towards the end of the book, and if you make it that far their appearance will make sense, as you’ll have suspended your considerable disbelief and will be enjoying the hectic ride which this novel takes you on. I ended up liking this book much more than I thought I would from my initial experience with it. It will be given a permanent position on my shelf, though I would like to read some of the author’s other novels before I allow myself to claim any sort of Rachel Ferguson fandom. Often compared to classics such as I Capture the Castle (Dodie Smith, 1949), and Cold Comfort Farm (Stella Gibbons, 1932), I will admit a certain resemblance, but feel this novel is not as sincere as the first, and not as satirical as the second. It is in the same genre, though – young heroines muddling their way into their inevitably adult lives. Recommended, with reservations. Not for everyone, and may take a few tries to fully engage.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I'm beserk about this book. I reread it often and every time it strikes me differently. I loved it from go even though it took two rereads for me to finally grasp everything about it and to notice that the narrator is both a snob and kind of a bitch. So glad it's back in print so I can foist extra copies on friends. Though when I recommend it I sort of drool and my eyes roll around ... that's how much I love it.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Although Rachel Ferguson’s The Brontës Went to Woolworths opens with the exclamation “How I loathe that kind of novel which is about a lot of sisters,” the book is in fact about three sisters—Deirdre, Katrine, and Sheil Carne—who live with their widowed mother in a small London house. Deirdre, the eldest, is our narrator; she is also a journalist and aspiring novelist, and she thanks me very kindly for not describing her as a “modern girl” (“What I can never get my editors to realize is that every soul who is alive is modern, and that when they use the word they privily mean depraved or racketty”). Katrine attends dramatic school, while Sheil still has a governess and spends her days in the schoolroom. The three, along with their mother, play a constant game in which they pretend to be visited by real-life celebrities as well as their anthropomorphized dolls and toys. One of their favorites is the eminent high court Judge Toddington, whom they affectionately refer to as “Toddy.” Only imagine the confusion when Deirdre meets Toddy’s real-life wife Mildred at a charity function, only to be invited home with her! Will this be the tragic end of the Carnes’ make-believe, or will it merely spell the beginning of new adventures?Sounds charming, does it not? So I thought when I read the summary provided by the Bloomsbury Group and marveled at the adorable cover art (which I think is actually superior to the novel itself). And when it arrived in the mail, I couldn’t resist taking a peak the first chapter. I immediately thought I had stumbled upon a comic masterwork. After all, how can one not become excited about a novel that opens with such gems as these? (Excuse me as I quote liberally.)A woman at one of mother’s parties once said to me, ‘Do you like reading?’ which smote us all to silence, for how could one tell her that books are like having a bath or sleeping, or eating bread—absolute necessities which one never thinks of in terms of appreciation. (p. 1)Poor Katrine is absolutely sick of elocuting indecencies, and always says that when anybody gets taken pornographic in Shakespeare’s plays, the part is allotted to her automatically. We hope it will break her in for the time when she plays in drawing-room comedies in the West End. Mother and I often get a rise out of her when we meet suddenly, and say: Pox! How my guts do boil!or, Now by my morning sickness! – I have lost My virtue to this rude and rammish clown.And once mother forgot, and when there were people to dinner called out to Katrine, ‘Well, my lamb, how many times did you mislay your virtue this morning?’ (p. 2)Three years ago I was proposed to. I couldn’t accept the man, much as I liked him, because I was in love with Sherlock Holmes. For Holmes and his personality and brains I had a force of feeling which, for the time, converted living men to shadows.After all, isn’t most love the worship of an idea or an illusion? Isn’t flesh and blood the least part of the business?I’m through with Holmes now, but I often think that he and I could have hit off wonderfully well in Baker Street, as I am not at all demanding, and rather love old clothes and arm-chairs, and silence, and smoking, and dispassionate flights of pure reason. (p. 4)There are little funnies like this throughout the novel, and the narrative voice is certainly quite ingratiating. But when, a few months after that first salivating glance, I actually picked up the book and began to read in earnest, my reaction quickly changed from charmed to confused. It really is maddening to try to keep up with all of the Carne’s imaginary acquaintances—it took me forever, for instance, to figure out who “Saffy” was. At first, I thought he was their butler; later, one of their old toys; and it was only when I was well into the novel that I discovered he was a famous clown. I recommend reading with a dictionary handy: it helps to minimize the confusion, for there are many period-specific words and phrases here.The only spot where the story seems to regain some of the magic of the opening chapters occurs when the Carnes finally do encounter the Toddingtons. It is really a fascinating situation—finding people being at once so like and so unlike one imagined them—and Mildred and Toddy are such dears, one can’t help but fall for them at once.But given the fascinating situation Ferguson created for her characters, she never seems to make up her mind about the value (or danger) of make-believe. Miss Martin, the first of two governesses that Sheil has in this book, is on reflection not one of those people whose lives are “graced by dreams,” as Frank Capra would say, but I think she is right in worrying about the Carnes’ grasp of reality. As for the second governess, Helen Ainslie, she tries to join in on the Carnes’ game, but because she doesn’t know the rules, they shut her out of it—rather like spoilt children, I’m afraid to say. It definitely lends a sour note to the ending.And although the book made me want to read more of and about the Brontës, I’m not thrilled with the way Ferguson worked them in. There’s an element of the supernatural that seems out of place here. Whether you believe in the supernatural or not, I don’t think it should be used merely as a self-conscious literary device, especially in a work contrasting reality with pretending.I give it two and a half stars for the lovely artwork (bravo, Penelope Beech and the Bloomsbury Group!), the wonderful opening chapters, the Toddingtons, and all the Brontë references. Otherwise, not a keeper.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This is one of the most delightful, charming, eccentric and hard-to-explain books I have ever read; I'd put it on a spiritual par with 'I Capture the Castle' and 'The Constant Nymph' - it has very little actually in common with those books, but there is something of the same feel to it. The main characters are the three Carne sisters – drama student Katrine, journalist Deirdre and schoolgirl Sheil – who, with their mother, live in London in the early 1930s and share their lives with an eclectic assortment of characters, some real, some imaginary, some part one, part the other: Ironface the doll, who married into French society and gives herself airs; Crellie the dog, who helped relieve Mafeking and who has religious leanings; a seaside pierrot known to the girls as 'Saffy', whose real life they have given a full and imaginary extra dimension of their own; and a High Court Judge, who they have (again, in their imaginations), more or less adopted as a replacement father. Woven in amongst all this are some elements of the supernatural: Deirdre has seen her father since his death; Sheil encounters a 'nature spirit' on a visit to Skye … and then there are the Brontës …Other characters get their say from time to time; the Carne's present governess, Miss Martin, for example, who finds the family's eccentricities far from charming and, although she has woes of her own to which Deirdre, at least, is not unsympathetic, eventually has to be driven away by Emily and Charlotte. Then there is the lovely, down-to-earth Mildred, wife of Lord Toddington, the judge, who turns out to be an unexpected kindred spirit.It won't be a book for everyone; I've seen a number of reviewers complain of the Carnes' snobbery, for instance. It's nothing of the kind, of course, it's simply the attitude prevalent in the period, and the book has to be read as being of its time – as does anything. I loved it almost unreservedly (although I did think it petered out rather suddenly and disappointingly), wish I had discovered it years ago, and shall most certainly reread it for comfort in times of trouble.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I really wanted to like this book, but I just couldn't get past my dislike of the Carne family. The three sisters and their mother are almost incapable of distinguishing fantasy from reality, are terrible snobs, and their treatment of the youngest daughter's governesses borders on the cruel.On the positive side, the Toddingtons are utterly charming, if slightly eccentric, characters and the book has more than a few wonderfully lines. My personal favorite: "The Bronte family has been, like Switzerland, too much stamped over, and virtues have been discovered in all their work which I, personally, won't admit it always possessed" (p. 90).
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I think this quote from the book sums up the story of three sisters in 1930's England, "...no emotion, no personality, ever really dies, but hangs about in the atmosphere waiting for one to get into touch again."Like other reviewers I was confused at first. I had no idea that some of the characters were toys or people the sisters had never met. It took three attempts at the book before the story clicked.What made a difference? Facebook. I started to think about how today we are engrossed in Social Media. People play games on Facebook and have imaginary friends who are celebrities. Maybe it's not as odd as we think to follow the lives of others and feel as if we know people we have never met. This realization connected me more to the story.Deirdre feels unable to let go of her thoughts and sometimes feels depressed. She turns down a marriage proposal because she's in love with Sherlock Holmes. "His personality and brain...converted living men to shadows." When she finally meets and gets to know someone she has followed, the story takes a turn as fantasy meets reality. I won't tell you what happens but it's fun to follow.Deirdre and her sisters also maintain contact with the departed who become part of their lives. I loved how the Bronte sisters were interwoven into the story. Charlotte Bronte is described as, "...one of those sort of writers who sounded as if they ought to be dead before they really were." Emily Bronte is writing, "Swithering Depths."Perhaps the main message to all this is that a dose of fantasy can lead to a happy life.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    What an odd little book! The Carne sisters enjoy a rich fantasy life, full of characters they've invented based on real people. When sister Deirdre actually meets and becomes friendly with one of those real people, it becomes difficult to reconcile the real world with the fantasy. And then, of course, the ghosts show up. All in all, a rather confusing book to follow, and not nearly as amusing or charming as I had anticipated--it's too precious by half. But, as they say in Shakespeare in Love, good title!
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    What to say? Loved the title, but the rest of the book just didn't live up to it. It tells the tale of the Carne family - three sisters and their mother - who seem to seem to do little else except fantasise about both real life people that they know of but have not met, and the lives their childhood toys might have lived if they were real. They create detailed stories about their lives which are discussed ad nauseum as if they were real, causing consternation for the live-in governess who struggles to separate fact from fiction. I struggled through the first half of the book, having to put it aside for a lengthy period at one stage before convincing myself to finish it. At the mid-way point I would have described it as downright stupid; by the end, mildly entertaining but really rather silly. I found the central characters more bland than charming, and the Toddingtons (the main object of their fantasising) decidedly unbelievable when, upon meeting the Carnes, they simply decided to play along with their fantasies. This is a book that some people could undoubtedly enjoy, but I'm afraid I'm not one of them!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book was a bit a contradiction for me. On one hand it was fun and amusing, and on the other hand it was quite odd. But, that's alright, because I like odd. The story revolves around the Carne sisters, Deirdre, Katrine and Shiel. The girls have been wild storytellers since childhood. They indulge in completely imaginary stories, in addition to imaginary stories about real people who they pretend to know. Fantasy meets reality one day when Deirdre meets one of the real people from their stories. I really enjoyed this book. The sisters were well written and had a strong bond that was nice to read. Toddy and his wife were delightful as well. Overall, a good fun read.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I really did not enjoy this novel. It was incredibly difficult to decipher which characters were real and which were not. About one third of the way through the book, I realized that the family had some sort of psychic abilities and could converse with dead people. It was incredibly frustrating, and I did not start to engage with the characters until the last half. Some of the characters were mildly amusing, but overall I found them underdeveloped.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Talk about your unreliable narrators! It's very difficult to tell, at first, what is actually happening in the novel, and what is part of the almost excessive imaginary life of the narrator and her family. Eventually the reader gets the hang of it - Miss Martin is real, the pierrot Saffy is not - but it almost seems like too much work. Eventually the narrator meets one of the people around whom her family has built a huge, complicated, imaginary story, and hilarity (or maybe whimsy?) is meant to ensue, but doesn't quite make it.I wanted to like this book much more than I did. It is maybe the kind of book that one has to be in exactly the right kind of mood in order to enjoy it fully. For me, it was almost too cutesy and oh-aren't-we-clever. The events that take place after the meeting between the Toddingtons and Deirdre were just too much. It was sad, in a way, to read about the two older sisters, and how they take refuge in these pretend relationships with people to get away from the real world, which isn't all that nice to them, really.The best part of the novel is when the ghosts of the Bronte sisters show up. More novels should feature the ghosts of the Brontes, really.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The world of imaginary friendships with real people (and imaginary friendships with imaginary people) that, with family and sisterhood, is much of the focus of The Brontes Went to Woolworths is drawn with an almost disturbing accuracy by Rachel Ferguson. It was like reading about my young teenage self if I had never grown out of that phase of my life, and had in fact been encouraged to continue participating in it. Indeed, the first part of the book was almost depressing because of the narrator Deirdre's desire to remove herself from the real, grown-up world in which she is now supposed to be a participant in as a young adult and (sometimes) working journalist. Though the book is confusing at times (especially when imaginary relationships give way to non-imaginary ghosts?), it was a very entertaining read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Three middle to upper class sisters in pre-War England, one widowed mother, and a host of imaginary friends, which makes the book sound silly, but it was really a pleasantly amusing and frothy confection that I enjoyed very much. It was a little confusing at first, trying to distinguish between the real people that the family really does know, and the make-believe friends who are also real people, just not people the family actually knows. The Bronte sisters are quite a fantastical addition to this cast of characters.The narrator, Deirdre, is a journalist, the next girls studies to be an actress, and the youngest sister still has a governess at home. They are an amusing and clever family, and I enjoyed their close familial relationships. It's very well written as well. What I didn't like is the inherent class snobbery and somewhat meanspirited exclusion of certain characters who Aren't Quite Our Sort. I felt much the same way about I Capture The Castle, but then, I am an incurable romantic at heart and I dislike books where the author tries to decry class distinctions with one hand while perpetuating them with the other side of her pen, and in this book there really was't very much decrying of those distinctions as there was a kind of subtle mockery of that unfortunate class of gentlewomen forced to earn their living as governesses. Other than this flaw, a very fun light read..
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "How I loathe that kind of novel which is about a lot of sisters." So begins The Brontës Went to Woolworths with a touch of playful irony, as this happens to be a novel very much about sisters. The oldest (who also happens to be the narrator) is Deirdre Carne, who works as a journalist and has been attempting to get a novel published. Katherine, who is a little younger, is an actress still trying to achieve success in her career. The youngest of the three is Sheil. She is still young enough to have a governess present to guide her education. All three live together with their widowed mother in a London house in the 1930s.The family members are drawn together by a very playful imaginative life. A large part of it revolves around humorous anecdotes regarding "family friends" which can be anything from childhood toys to prominent strangers. Among them is Judge Toddington, who Deirdre first saw when she had to serve jury duty. Deirdre describes these "friendships" in a such a matter-of-fact manner that I sometimes felt a little lost early in the novel, unsure as to what was real and what was not. The family appears to have built up this world in part as protection for the challenges they face. Katherine gets kicked out of her acting class and has to decide whether to join a travelling show. Deirdre agonizes over whether her novel will find a publisher. Even the fantasy realm provides some degree of discomfort. Sheil's governess considers it foolish and grows increasingly frustrated with the sisters' talk about their "friends." While on holiday, the family attends a séance, where they appear to draw some attention from a couple of mysterious phantoms.The major development comes when Deirdre gets a chance to know the real Lady Toddington during a charity bazaar. As the two become friends, the two families begin to get to know each other. The Toddingtons have no children of their own and so are flattered by the attention of the Carne family. What follows is a negotiation between imagined and real friendships. I confess I'm more familiar with this sort of shared imaginative world in somewhat darker contexts, as in Peter Jackson's "Heavenly Creatures," and so for a good part of the novel felt sure that something awful was bound to happen. The novel never takes that sort of turn, though there is a sense of the disappointments of the wider world. Deirdre's narration was very entertaining, reflecting a very sort of English literary quirkiness. (Deirdre even tells how she once turned down a marriage proposal because she was too in love with Sherlock Holmes at the time.) While the Carne's fantasy world serves to bring them together, it proves surprisingly fluid, presenting an intimate portrait of how people connect with each other.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "I shall loathe the word 'nowadays' and the phrase 'modern girl' till I am dead, and even then my heart will hear it and and beat when I'm earth in an earthy bed. What I can never get my editors to realize is that every soul who is alive is 'modern,' and that when they use the word they privily mean depraved or racketty." - The Brontes Went to Woolworths, p 12.The Brontes Went to Woolworths is the story of three sisters and their widowed mother. They are all very creative and have constructed an enormous imaginary social life for themselves -- and the story revolves around way that their life begins to imitate art, and the places where the boundaries between fantasy and reality begin to fade. It's written in a light, fun style -- and it kept me reading because the way it was structured I never had any idea whether what was happening was "really" happening or not, or what was going to happen next. It kept me curious right to the end.This book is actually a reprint, having first come out in 1931. In that, the book is kind of about "modern" women (in that the girls have careers, and go out places by themselves) -- but it isn't one of those "we beat you over the head with the message that women are just as good as men and can do stuff too" type of books. (They're not "depraved or racketty", as in the above quote.) It's significantly less about that than it is about imagination and creativity. One is a writer, one is an actress, one is a schoolgirl. It's significantly less about that than it is about imagination and creativity. They all three have "dreams", and all the dreams are threatened at certain points... I particularly sympathized with the girl whose novel gets rejected by the publisher...I suppose it would be possible to criticize this book for two of the very reasons that I liked it -- namely, the fact that it wasn't always easy to figure out what was happening, or that it was structured in such a way that it didn't have a really clear plot. It wasn't the most well-written book I've ever read (and, in fact, I'd like to say that I think it could have ended a chapter earlier and actually been a bit better) -- but nevertheless, I found it fun to read. -- Mrs. Hall
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    An Early Reviewer selection, I had hoped to receive this book based on a couple of reviews I had read. Sadly, I am not as fond of tthis book as I thought I would be. The story is recapped in many reviews--three sisters who are highly creative and imaginative about their lives suddenly meet with reality. Told by the middle sister, this "whimsy" got wearing, especially when there are elaborate machinations to preserve various fantasies for the youngest sister. There are other fantasies of this period which are more fun, and certainly easier reading--it is difficult to follow all the characters employed in the fantasies when they must conform to reality. It wasn't really my "cuppa."
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Disclaimer: I received this as part of the LT Early Reviewers. Three sisters and their mother live together in London in gentility but not wealth. The two elder sisters, Deirdre and Katrine are in that time between girlhood and womanhood while their younger sister, Sheil, is still young enough to require a governess. The most important thing about this family of women is that they have invented a life that includes detailed fantasy interactions with toys, pets and people they admire but do not know. As you read the book, it is clear that much of the dialogue is between the family members and their created friends. It is hard at first to distinguish what is real from what is fantasy, but as you read further it becomes easier. Eventually Dierdre meets a judge that they have "known" in their fantasy world for several years and it gets a little weird as he and his wife prove themselves to be different than their made up versions. For quite a while, I felt the family's fantasy life felt almost sinister and isolating, but I came to realize that it was mostly intended to be whimsical and that my feelings were perhaps a result of a modern sensibility that is used to being entertained by television, movies and the internet. The Brontes play a small but important role in the narrative. I liked the book, but didn't love it because I didn't identify with any of the characters. It is definitely worth a read because of the oddness of the narrative's interplay between reality and fantasy. Finally, there is definitely some class snobbery here which is probably normal for the time the novel was written, but which, nevertheless, I didn't really enjoy.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Set in 1930s London, this is the story of the Carnes family, three sisters who live with their widowed mother. The eldest, Dierdre, a journalist, is the narrator. Katrine is a struggling actress and Sheil is still in the schoolroom. They are not wealthy but of an educated class and the daughters of a "gentleman". The most striking their about them is the fantasy world that weaves in and out of their everyday lives. All the members of the family share imaginary friends based on dolls, toys, and sometimes real people they have briefly encountered. They have long, ongoing discussions of the daily doings of these people, discussing them as you would old friends with whom you are in daily contact. I found this very confusing to follow at first. Interspersed with this is a seance and ghostly visitors. During a vacation in Yorkshire, the Brontes make an appearance, although frankly, I had to read this portion twice to get what was happening. When her mother is called to jury duty, Dierdre is taken with the judge, Sir Herbert Toddington, and soon "Toddy" and his wife "Lady Mildred" have joined their fantasy world. But things begin to change when the family actually meets them. The story seems to shift at this point, moving at a quicker pace, and I found my interest growing. As their friendship with the Toddingtons develops, and the Brontes return with a disturbing result, the family has to look at the effect all of this is having on the youngest daughter. Although I was off to a shaky start at the beginning of the book, I found myself increasingly caught up in the story.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    How could this book have gone out of print? We need these kinds of stories! As a middle child of an imaginative family of three sisters, I felt right at home with the Carnes. I'm not sure everyone would be comfortable with the idea of how believable their made-up acquaintances were to them (though some were, in fact, flesh and blood people, as we get further reminding of as the story goes on.) I loved it, and figure those who couldn't could commiserate with the governess. For a moment, actually, the point of view threw me off, as it began with Deidre's (the middle girl) first person, then occasionally moved to third with Miss Martin and others. After a while I got into the swing of things. The story gave an answer to a number of "what ifs" I confronted when transitioning from childhood into adulthood. Also, without giving away any spoilers, coming from a less innocent time, I almost suspected something sleazy would occur between the daughters and the object of their imaginings. I'm quite glad I was wrong.Not happy to be exposed to a seance scene, which cost the book half a star. Otherwise, a highly lighthearted but not entirely sugarcoated read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Reason for Reading: I've heard much praising of this book over the years. And lamenting as it seems it was a Virago Classic at one time but went out of print. I've always wanted to read it since I enjoy early 20th century literature.Summary: The Carnes, three daughters and a mother since the father died, are not a well-to-do family but they get by and do employ a governess for the youngest, while the two elder are both in their early twenties. Katrine is an aspiring actress attending Dramatic School and Deirdre is a working journalist who works on her book at home. The family has invented a whole passel of imaginary friends (often based on real life people) and guests who have become a part of their daily lives. They've invented complete fairy tales around these subjects and live quite an extraordinary and romantic life through them. When mother must go sit as a backup for jury duty they add Judge Toddington to their assemblage, calling him Toddy, and his wife and staff. But one day Deirdre is sent to cover a charity bazaar at which she meets the real Lady Toddington and is invited to her home for tea.Comments: This really is quite some book! First I'll admit that as it starts off I found myself very confused as to who was real and who was imaginary and just what the heck was going on. It all seemed rather strange to have twenty year olds living an imaginary life and I wondered what I had got myself into reading! Little by little over the first several chapters the method of the madness is revealed and everyone is sorted out for the reader. The governess, recently hired, is a drop of reason for the reader as she writes to her sister of the "weird" family and "weird" goings on. Eventually, the sisters' characters emerge and one is smitten with them and truly engaged with the farcical goings on. Once the Toddington's (the real ones) appear on the scene the tone of the book takes a new direction and while the imaginations continue to be farcical they also become a catharsis which I can't really talk about any more as it would give away what happens. And just how the Brontes figure into things not to mention ending up at Woolworths I'm not going to tell though I will mention one word ... seance.Truly a joy to read! The second half of the book is by far the better half and I was so taken with Toddy (Sir Toddington) and the narrator of the book Deirdre. A delight to read and at less than 200 pages a quick one at that. This is certainly something very different than what is written nowadays and I recommend for those looking for a trip back to the Bohemian British thirties.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    As Miss Martin says about the Carne girls, this book is “v. weird.” And yet, I loved it. Right from the very first paragraph, you know you’re going to be in for quite a ride: “How I loathe that kind of novel which is about a lot of sister. It is usually called They Were Sisters, of Three-Not Out, and one spends one’s entire time trying to sort them all, and muttering ‘Was it Isobel who drank, or Gertie? And which was it who ran away with the gigolo, Any or Pauline? And which of their separated husbands was Lionel, Isobel’s or Amy’s?’”. How can you not continue reading, with an opening like that one? I’m glad to say that the rest of the book is just as witty and funny as that one bit is.The Brontes Went to Woolworths is told from the point of view of Deirdre, one of the Carne sisters. She’s the journalist and novelist; Katrine is the drama school student; and Sheil (not short for Sheila) is still in the schoolroom with her governess, Miss Martin, who thinks the girls very strange. For the girls have a habit of making up stories, about real people they’ve never met. If they were small children, this wouldn’t be unusual… except for the fact that the two eldest are in their twenties. Again, “v. weird.” The latest subject of their fantasies is Justice Toddington and his wife Mildred. One day, Deirdre actually meets Mildred at a charity bazaar, and the Toddintons become embroiled in the fantasy. But as always, real life intercepts.In this book, as a reader (and outsider), you often feel like Miss Martin, who never quite knows what’s going on, or what’s real and what isn’t. The girls frequently make fun of her, but I have to say that I completely empathize with her point of view—I’d get fed up with the Carnes’ behavior, too! The book is a bit confusing at times, especially since Deirdre’s narration is a bit ADD—he jumps all over the place in terms of what she talks about, sometimes within the same paragraph. But after a couple of chapters (and the chapters in this book are all very short), I got the hang of her style of talking.The Brontes Went to Woolworths is a catchy title, of course, but the Bronte bit doesn’t appear until the very end of the book and seems to come from nowhere (as does most of the plot of this book). The Carnes live in a world that is completely disconnected to real life, and it makes this novel a bit hard to follow sometimes. But I think you have to take this book for what it is: a neat, yet surreal, little fantasy.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I was immediately and completely enveloped by the life of the Carne family. They populate their world with the continuing Saga of characters whose lives, therefore, intersect with their own. Like many other solitary children, I was given from somewhere inside me a playmate, Grin, whom my parents were pleased to call "imaginary." My experiences with Grin, who often took on a life of her own, primed me to read The Brontes Went to Woolworths with a sense of kinship.Other reviewers have written about the family's reactions when they actually meet a couple of their characters in real life. They are also susceptible to a deeper, supernatural world lying just below the surface. On holiday in Yorkshire, the family in various ways come into contact with several of the Brontes - including the dog Keeper. They leave abruptly when they see Sheil, the youngest daughter, being drawn into the wrong side of their play. Results of this holiday return to haunt them as the novel continues. One result is their continuing and increasing care for Sheil. Another is the departure of Miss Agatha Martin, Sheil's governess. Miss Martin is an ambiguous figure. She appears perfectly composed and self-righteous as she tries to introduce Sheil to her version of prosaic reality. It is this presumption that she knows what is real and important that so infuriates Deirdre. On the other hand, she also indulges in a personal Saga, which brings her closer to the Carnes than she ever acknowledges and which makes her accessible to her final adventure. In their dealings with her, the Carnes show an understandable but no less regrettable lack of imagination. They are repaid by the advent of Miss Ainslie the new governess, who attempts to enter into their family world despite her lack of sensiblity.I found this book unlike anything else I've ever read, and I hope to reread it in a few years when I have a better understanding of the life of the imagination and creativity.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    17 Oct 2009 - AmazonThis book is so hard to find in Virago, the edition in which I originally read it, so when I found out from the Virago Group on LibraryThing that Bloomsbury were re-issuing it, I ordered that copy. Absolutely beautiful little book, as a first comment.I loved this. It was literally delightful. Although I'm sure I've read it before, I didn't remember much of it. In tone, style and content, it reminded me very much of Barbara Comyns - the same delightfully dotty family full of filial loyalty but what could look like barking madness from the outside. Nothing much really happens in this theatrical family, but the book is just a complete joy to read, even if reality and fiction within the fiction do tend to blend a little at times.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A beautifully droll and eccentric novel, it is a deranged version of the classic middle class family romance. Instead of a love plot, the novel centres around a family's semi-insane but wondrous curiosity and imagination which transforms their everyday environments into its whimisical double, where they invent alternative lives for pierrots and high court judges (whom they eventually meet in real life). Mainly narrated by the elder daughter, Deirdre; her narration is piercingly intercalated by sections from the point of view of the family governesses, excluded from their games and language. The novel is not simply droll for drollery's sake (not a bad thing in itself), it is also a perceptive study of the power,seductions and pitfalls of the childish imagination.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    When my husband and I were first married, we liked to imagine the lives of semi-strangers: fitness instructors, supermarket clerks, etc. Even today we are strangely fascinated by a family nearby who have a wonderful vegetable garden, visible from the street as we drive by. Sometimes we make up other details of their lives. I've always thought it was a bit silly and embarrassing ... until I read this book.The Carnes family (a mother and her three daughters) have embellished their lives with a vast array of characters they haven't actually met. And they bring old toys to life as well. Their conversations with one another are full of references to these characters, who often utter catch phrases that have taken shape out of their collective imaginations. All of this is mystifying to their governess, as well as to the reader (until you catch on). Their wild imaginations appear to be a way of coping with the loss of the father, several years before. At the center of their imagined world is a local judge, Lord Toddington, whom they fondly refer to as "Toddy." Every day ends with Toddy allegedly phoning them to check in. They monitor his court cases, and the social functions he attends with his wife Mildred. Suddenly, through a happy coincidence, they are able to meet him face-to-face. There are some humorous scenes as they try to sort out the real and fictional Lord Toddingtons, and some touching moments as Toddy begins to fill the void in their lives. This was a quirky book and, had I not indulged in similar imaginary exercises, I might have found it silly in the extreme. Instead it was an enjoyable light read.

Book preview

The Brontes Went to Woolworths - Rachel Ferguson

The Brontës Went to

Woolworths

A Novel

Rachel Ferguson

Contents

Cover

Title Page

Dedication

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

A Note on the Author

Imprint

To

Rose Geraldine Ferguson

and to our ‘Horry’

about whom we know nothing

and everything

1

HOW I loathe that kind of novel which is about a lot of sisters. It is usually called They Were Seven, or Three Not Out, and one spends one’s entire time trying to sort them all, and muttering, ‘Was it Isobel who drank, or Gertie? And which was it who ran away with the gigolo, Amy or Pauline? And which of their separated husbands was Lionel, Isobel’s or Amy’s?’

Katrine and I often grin over that sort of book, and choose which sister we’d be, and Katrine always tries to bag the drink one.

A woman at one of mother’s parties once said to me, ‘Do you like reading?’ which smote us all to silence, for how could one tell her that books are like having a bath or sleeping, or eating bread – absolute necessities which one never thinks of in terms of appreciation. And we all sat waiting for her to say that she had so little time for reading, before ruling her right out for ever and ever. And then Katrine blinked at the woman and said, ‘Yes, a little.’ And had she read the latest Ruck, and wasn’t it a pretty tale?

Katrine is great fun when she chooses, and gets no end of laughs out of the Dramatic School where she is studying. The course appears to consist of doughnuts and pickles and tongue in the basement, saying ‘Oo-er’ in the Voice Production class, and floods of tears at being given the Nurse instead of Juliet at the term-end shows. Poor Katrine is absolutely sick of elocuting indecencies, and always says that when anybody gets taken pornographic in Shakespeare’s plays, the part is allotted to her automatically. We hope it will break her in for the time when she plays in drawing-room comedies in the West End. Mother and I often get a rise out of her when we meet suddenly, and say:

Pox! how my guts do boil!

or,

Now by my morning sickness! - I have lost

My virtue to this rude and rammish clown.

And once mother forgot, and when there were people to dinner called out to Katrine, ‘Well, my lamb, how many times did you mislay your virtue this morning?’

We often wonder what Katrine’s future will be, and I suspect it will be matrimony, or tours that land up on the West Pier at Brighton. Most of the students seem to go one way or the other.

At school, Katrine and I were much worse stage-struck than anybody. We loved certain actors and actresses so that life was a misery, and Katrine got turned right out of a history class once for kissing a post card of Ainley and murmuring, ‘My dear love!’ And glorious was her martyrdom that night, with Henry under her pillow, if I know the business.

She certainly has enterprise, for about a year ago, when she was in the thick of a passion for an actor who lives quite near us, she went up to him in the street, beaming, and said, ‘Now don’t say you’ve forgotten me!’ And the actor peeled off his homburg and glove and cried heartily, ‘Well, well, well, this is charming.’ And Katrine, in great detail, reminded him of the tour of Eastern Gods, and (plunging) said wasn’t that week at Bradford the limit? And the actor said, ‘A hole, dear, a hole.’ And they fell into a perfect orgy of shop, and when they parted, he said, ‘By the way, what was the name, again?’ And Katrine actually told him her real name, and his face lighted and he said, ‘Of course! stupid of me. Well, bye-bye, dear. Remember me to Birdie.’

Katrine could do that sort of thing, although all three of us (for I am certain that Sheil is going that way, too) learn everything there is to learn about people we love. We get their papers, and follow their careers, and pick up gossip, and memorise anecdotes, and study paragraphs, and follow their moves about the country, and, as usually happens if you really mean business, often get into personal touch with their friends or business associates, all with some fresh item or atom of knowledge to add to the heap. Katrine had never even seen Eastern Gods, but she knew more about it than half the chorus, and how and where it was going.

It isn’t, of course, limited to actors. It may be anybody. And while it’s ‘on’ it’s no joke. I resent it awfully, sometimes. It takes it out of one so. Katrine once said to me, helplessly, ‘Why has one got to do it? ’ It is even apt to ruin one’s summer holidays, the going away and leaving the individual in town, or with some obsession that is probably doomed. Years ago, Katrine and I used to eye the strapped trunks, and then each other, and one of us would say, ‘Are we all clear?’ We meant, was the holiday going to be shorn of fantastic mental disturbance, and, therefore, a normal success?

Sometimes, we found conflict awaiting us, as in the Arcaly year when we both suffered a frenzy of desire to join the resident pierrot troupe, and almost projected ourselves into it by sheer concentration. And that made the return to London all wrong. But that, at least, was shared. Also, we brought Dion Saffyn, our pierrot, home with us, and established him and his wife and two daughters in Addison Road, where many and trying were their ups and downs. For gradually it appeared that ‘Saffy’ had married above his class a Mary Arbuthnot, only daughter of a Somerset squire, and when they fall out, she becomes stately and ‘county,’ and, generally speaking, makes Saffy feel his position.

But the girls are dears. Ennis designs for a famous French dressmaker, and Pauline is secretary in Saffy’s London office, and he often rings us up when Polly is being Arbuthnot, and hurries round to us to be made a fuss of. His name is Dion Saffyn, and he has two daughters, who we often saw at Arcaly, though we never traced his wife.

I wish we knew the Saffyns.

I think Katrine is working clear of it all, but I don’t believe I shall ever be free.

Three years ago I was proposed to. I couldn’t accept the man, much as I liked him, because I was in love with Sherlock Holmes. For Holmes and his personality and brain I had a force of feeling which, for the time, converted living men to shadows.

After all, isn’t most love the worship of an idea or an illusion? Isn’t flesh and blood the least part of the business?

I’m through with Holmes now, but I often think that he and I could have hit it off wonderfully well in Baker Street, as I am not at all demanding, and rather love old clothes and arm-chairs, and silence, and smoking, and dispassionate flights of pure reason.

It was Katrine who was upset over my refusing Stuart B. She sat on the edge of the bath while I washed out gloves in the basin, and said. ‘If ever I have a daughter, by God! her mind shall be a perfect blank!’

2

IT’S lovely to have a London house with a schoolroom, and somebody in it of schoolroom age. To go upstairs and find Sheil sweating over the Wars of the Roses is like stepping into a new world. It takes one’s disillusions away like magic, and I often long for an old nurse as well, because I adore the kind of bed-sitting-room they make for themselves; it always reeks of mid-Victoria and the Boer War. I wasn’t alive in those days, but I have a very strong sense of them, and I can honestly say that I prefer them to our Georgian times. Besides, I know a family which has an old nurse who has seen the boys and girls grow up into fathers and mothers, and I cultivate the family because of having tea with Lucy. And her walls are thick with Militia photographs, and her work-box has a picture of the Great Exhibition on the lid, and there is a glass ball on the mantelpiece with a snowman in it, and you shake it and there is a storm of flakes and he waves his broom. And we have jam sandwiches which nobody else ever thinks of giving one, and the tea is tawny and heartening, and afterwards, we lose ourselves in fat albums and old German picture-books with coloured cuts of Henny Penny and the pancake, and I go home simply suffocated with the feel of bygone days . . .

But with Sheil I am able to satisfy my craving to relive the best bits of childhood. Christmas trees and stockings (though we neither of us have ever been able to believe in Santa Claus); toyshops in country towns; the look of fruitballs in glass bottles in village shops; the delicious smell of children’s parties – tulle and gauze, warm candle grease and iced cake, and soft young hair, beautifully brushed; the bitter flavour of the gelatine on crackers; penny masks and fire-works in London side-street windows, and letting off harmless ‘starlights’ in the schoolroom when the governess is out of the way.

I often wonder if I am giving Sheil a fair exchange for all these things. I think I satisfy! She absolutely sees the fun of my ‘doing the grown-up’ at her parties, and handing her cream horns; knows that I am longing for one, too, and hoping that there may be a cracker left over for me; understands my keen disappointment when name after name is called to the tree, and the lights are blown out at last, and I had nothing. The twenties aren’t supposed to be interested in tiny spangled fans and drums full of little sweets. I spend all the time I can in the schoolroom. I even go through the lesson-books sometimes, and am really beginning to learn something at last, though the arithmetic and grammar is eternally beyond me. How right was Humpty-Dumpty to abuse words and then pay them on Saturday night! It was a really magnificent gesture, and one which slaves to split infinitives would do well to copy.

And then I play with Sheil’s theatre, when she is out on her afternoon walk. Our theatre (The Diadem) long ago scrapped the fairytale nonsense-literature which is written for puppets. I write our plays, and we have pantomimes with genuine illusions and ballets and properties we all make. Even Widow Twankey has her two-inch handkerchief with low-comedy fingermarks on it, in indelible ink. And we have charity matinées, because they sound so sonorous. Sometimes we invent the charities, too, and whenever I have finished a new play some benevolence springs into being. The Tabbies’ Protection Union has offices in Great Cream Street, and The Insolent Widows’ Aid (Sheil’s contribution) has premises in Crape Yard, EC. Others include The Depressed Charwomen Society and The Nautical Sailors’ Rest. As a result of a matinée for the latter, we were happy to be able to announce that our new wing of dormitories in Chatham was now completed, ‘and,’ chimed in Sheil, ‘the dear lads can now sleep in contagious rows, freed from the sadness of the sinful gutter.’ And we have a resident ballet troupe, called ‘The Kensington Palace Girls’.

I often rootle in the toy-box. Mixed with Sheil’s toys are Katrine’s and my own. As a family, we have never liked dolls, never believed in fairies and all rather hated Peter Pan. Poor Sheil, the latest victim of the whimsical, could make neither head nor tail of it, and the only doll we ever unitedly esteemed was the plainest one of the collection. Ironface. She was given to me when I was seven. Her face and forearms were of painted tin and she had a well-made kid body. Ironface, unfortunately, outgrew us. She developed an intolerably overbearing manner, married a French Count called Isidore (de la So-and-so, de la Something Else), and now lives in feudal state in France, whence, even to this day, she makes occasional descents upon us by private aeroplane-de-luxe, patronising us in an accent enragingly perfect and bearing extravagant gifts which we have to accept. Me she addresses as ‘Ah, Trotty! Ça marche, hein?’ She has composed two songs, both in praise of herself. The first, picturing the delight of heaven at the event of her death, began:

The angel at the Golden Gate

Says, ‘The Countess tarries late,

We want her hither.’

The second (immensely popular, thanks to Ironface, in the Parisian music-halls of the early nineteen-hundreds) ran:

This was one of my good-night songs, with mother tossing it off in the vaudeville manner at the foot of my bed; hands on hips, a rakish, challenging leer for the conductor. We sing it to Sheil, still. Ironface was lost, or given away, quite thirteen years ago, but it’s no good. Like the poor, she is ever with us. We’ve tried, half-heartedly, to humanise the other dolls, but their characters won’t emerge. They are rather like the servants and governesses who come and go; they won’t immortalise. But occasionally they get their own back on me. Miss Martin has only been with us about a month, but I rather think she is going to take toll of me. The devil of it is that her home is in Cheltenham, and I once spent a day there, and picked up its vibrations in no time and remember it photographically, and now the Martin has planked down her dreadful family in frames and my sympathy is going out to her quite against my will, in streamers, like seaweed. It’s a horrid nuisance. And, though we seldom talk for long together, I already know the feel of Cheltenham’s main avenue in July, and the way the light struck the teapot when, at breakfast, Captain Martin broke it to his daughters that they must clear out and earn . . . and I rather think the girls dispersed about the house and avoided talking much, that day. But they probably met in the town. One is always liable to run against people in stewpan sorts of places like Cheltenham.

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1