Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Textual Criticism of Luke 3:22: A Response to Bart Ehrman, An Argument Supporting the Traditional Reading
Textual Criticism of Luke 3:22: A Response to Bart Ehrman, An Argument Supporting the Traditional Reading
Textual Criticism of Luke 3:22: A Response to Bart Ehrman, An Argument Supporting the Traditional Reading
Ebook48 pages44 minutes

Textual Criticism of Luke 3:22: A Response to Bart Ehrman, An Argument Supporting the Traditional Reading

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Textual Criticism of Luke 3:22: A Response to Bart Ehrman, An Argument Supporting the Traditional Reading, by Robert Alan King is a book with over 8,800 words. This book first presents the argument of Ehrman regarding the textual variant in Luke 3:22, then discusses and defines the meaning of Psalms 2:7, and afterwards explores the Sonship theology in Luke. What then follows is a brief look at the manuscript evidence, an examination of the early gospels used by the Hebrews relevant to the variant, and then finally a thorough exploration of the patristic evidence. All this will be wrapped up with King's conclusion, based on the evidence presented here, that the traditional reading found in most Greek manuscripts is in fact the original text composed by Luke. King is an ordained minister through Calvary Chapel and runs the website BibleCommentator.com.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateDec 17, 2014
ISBN9781310633645
Textual Criticism of Luke 3:22: A Response to Bart Ehrman, An Argument Supporting the Traditional Reading
Author

Robert Alan King

Robert Alan King is an ordained minister through Calvary Chapel who has written numerous theological and inspirational articles for a variety of publications, including Advocate, The Church Herald & Holiness Banner, Companions, The Priest, Proclaim, Pulpit Helps, Vista, War Cry, and Decision Magazine. He also has authored numerous printed books and dozens of eBooks.King has a Master of Arts Degree Sum Cum Laude in Psychology from Touro University Worldwide with an 4.0 institutional GPA, a Bachelor of Science Degree Cum Laude in Bible and Theology from Lee University with an 4.0 institutional GPA, and an Associate of Arts Degree with an emphasis in Science from Coastline Community College. He has a total of at least 256 units of education from universities, seminaries or colleges. This includes at least 130 units of Bible and theology related classes from Lee University, Calvary Chapel Bible College, and Chafer Theological Seminary.

Read more from Robert Alan King

Related to Textual Criticism of Luke 3:22

Related ebooks

Christianity For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Textual Criticism of Luke 3:22

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Textual Criticism of Luke 3:22 - Robert Alan King

    Textual Criticism of Luke 3:22: A Response to Bart Ehrman

    An Argument Supporting the Traditional Reading

    By Robert Alan King

    Smashwords Edition

    Copyright 2014 by King & Associates. All Rights Reserved.

    Most quotations of the early church fathers are from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Roberts & Donaldson, 1885-96; and Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Roberts & Donaldson, 1887-1900. However, I have altered most of the archaic English words into their modern form.

    Published by King & Associates, Casa Grande, Arizona.

    For a complete catalog of books and publications by Robert Alan King, visit BibleCommentator.com. This site also provides you with news on his upcoming titles. In addition, you can read many articles by King on a wide variety of biblical issues. And by signing up and registering for our newsletter, you can get eBooks, articles and other biblically related content for free, often before it is even available to the general public.

    ****

    Table of Contents

    Introduction

    The Argument

    The Meaning of Psalms 2:7

    Sonship Theology in Luke

    The Manuscript Evidence

    The Early Hebrew Gospels

    The Patristic Literature

    Conclusion

    Footnotes

    ****

    Introduction

    While reading Dr. Bart Ehrman's book Misquoting Jesus, I came across his discussion regarding the variant reading of Luke 3:22 that quotes Psalm 2:7. It was the catalyst that began my research into the original texts and other sources to discover what was the correct reading. Since I do not have any specific position on this matter that I need to affirm in order to feel comfortable, I hope that I have undertaken this task with objectivity and without bias. I find either reading of Luke 3:22 acceptable with my faith (in coincidence with the Apostle's Creed) and easily explainable as conforming to the norms of traditional Christianity.

    This book first presents the argument of Ehrman regarding the textual variant in Luke 3:22, then discusses and defines the meaning of Psalms 2:7, and afterwards explores the Sonship theology in Luke. What then follows is a brief look at the manuscript evidence, an examination of the early gospels used by the Hebrews relevant to the variant, and then finally a thorough exploration of the patristic evidence. All this will be wrapped up with my conclusion, based on the evidence presented here, that the traditional reading found in most Greek manuscripts is in fact the original text composed by Luke.

    ****

    The Argument

    Dr. Ehrman insists that the following text referencing Psalms 2:7 is the original reading in Luke 3:22:

    υιος μου ει συ εγω σημερον γεγεννηκα σε (Luke 3:22 D)

    You are my Son, today I have begotten you.

    My position is that the traditional text below is the original reading:

    σὺ εἶ ὁ υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός, ἐν σοὶ εὐδόκησα. (Luke 3:22)

    You are my beloved Son, in you I am well pleased.

    Before we examine Ehrman's claim against the evidence, it is first crucial that we explore the interpretation of Psalms 2:7 both from the Jewish perspective before the incarnation and the later Christian understanding that follows.

    ****

    The Meaning of Psalms 2:7

    I will surely tell of the

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1