MUYBRIDGE: THE EYE IN MOTION
()
About this ebook
Stephen Barber
Stephen Barber is Professor of Global Affairs at Regent’s University London, Senior Fellow at the Global Policy Institute, Board Member of the International Public Management Network, and Visiting Professor at the University of Cagliari.
Read more from Stephen Barber
Art, Riot, Terror: The 60s Tokyo Avant-Garde: Mishima, Hijikata, Oshima Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Hijikata: Revolt Of The Body Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5ARTAUD: BLOWS AND BOMBS: The Biography Of Antonin Artaud Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Caligula: Divine Carnage: Atrocities Of The Roman Emperors Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5TOKYO VERTIGO: Megacity Sex And Semiology Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Artaud: The Screaming Body: Film, Drawings, Recordings 1924-1948 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGladiator: Orgy Of Death: The Unexpurgated Text Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Massacre Game: Pasolini: Terminal Film, Text, Words Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5ENGLAND'S DARKNESS Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuiseley Terriers: A Small Part in the Great War: A History of the 1/6th Battalion, Duke of Wellington's (West Riding) Regiment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art Of Destruction: The Films Of The Vienna Aktion Group Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Residues, Part Two: Collected Writings 1990-2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCITIES OF OBLIVION Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTHE WALLS OF BERLIN: Architecture And Oblivion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuyotat: A Vital Aberration: Writings On Pierre Guyotat 1994-2010 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Residues, Part One: Collected Writings 1990-2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReclaiming the Revolution: Extraordinary Adventures in Politics and Leadership at the Inflection Point of Industry 4.0 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTragedy of Riches: How Our Politics Has Failed Us and Why We Need a New Economic Destiny Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to MUYBRIDGE
Related ebooks
Muybridge and Mobility Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCinema in the Digital Age Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cubism and Futurism: Spiritual Machines and the Cinematic Effect Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cinemagritte: René Magritte within the Frame of Film History, Theory, and Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilip Gefter: Photography After Frank Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDada Defined Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Zones of Anxiety: Movement, Musidora, and the Crime Serials of Louis Feuillade Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Staying Up Much Too Late: Edward Hopper's Nighthawks and the Dark Side of the American Psyche Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Visions of Avant-Garde Film: Polish Cinematic Experiments from Expressionism to Constructivism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAuguste Renoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Men with the Movie Camera: The Poetics of Visual Style in Soviet Avant-Garde Cinema of the 1920s Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFélix Vallotton Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Hollywood Lighting from the Silent Era to Film Noi Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Derek Jarman - Moving Pictures of a Painter: Home Movies, Super 8 Films and Other Small Gestures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Extraordinary Image: Orson Welles, Alfred Hitchcock, Stanley Kubrick, and the Reimagining of Cinema Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5American Grotesque: The Life and Art of William Mortensen Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Camille Corot: 110 Master Drawings and Etchings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKlimt: Drawings 126 Colour Plates Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Male and Female Figure in Motion: 60 Classic Photographic Sequences Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5American Drawings and Prints: From Benjamin West to Edward Hopper Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Japanese Fairy World - Stories From The Wonder-Lore Of Japan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Naked Truth: Viennese Modernism and the Body Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Human Figure in Motion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sum of His Syndromes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Decisive Network: Magnum Photos and the Postwar Image Market Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Visceral Screen: Between the Cinemas of John Cassavetes and David Cronenberg Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Worlds of Enchantment: The Art of Maxfield Parrish Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Rodin Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Point and Line to Plane Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Performing Arts For You
Lucky Dog Lessons: From Renowned Expert Dog Trainer and Host of Lucky Dog: Reunions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best Women's Monologues from New Plays, 2020 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The History of Sketch Comedy: A Journey through the Art and Craft of Humor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHollywood's Dark History: Silver Screen Scandals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Romeo and Juliet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Storyworthy: Engage, Teach, Persuade, and Change Your Life through the Power of Storytelling Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Hamlet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Confessions of a Prairie Bitch: How I Survived Nellie Oleson and Learned to Love Being Hated Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Woman Is No Man: A Read with Jenna Pick Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Dramatic Writing: Its Basis in the Creative Interpretation of Human Motives Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes: Revised and Complete Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of Storytelling: Why Stories Make Us Human and How to Tell Them Better Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Quite Nice and Fairly Accurate Good Omens Script Book: The Script Book Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Becoming Free Indeed: My Story of Disentangling Faith from Fear Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Wuthering Heights Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Whale / A Bright New Boise Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Agatha Christie Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Town: A Play in Three Acts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Dolls House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Importance of Being Earnest: A Play Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The World Turned Upside Down: Finding the Gospel in Stranger Things Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stories I Only Tell My Friends: An Autobiography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Diamond Eye: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Is This Anything? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Coreyography: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Robin Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5For colored girls who have considered suicide/When the rainbow is enuf Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Trial Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for MUYBRIDGE
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
MUYBRIDGE - Stephen Barber
credits
MUYBRIDGE: THE EYE IN MOTION
BY STEPHEN BARBER
AN EBOOK
ISBN 978-1-909923-45-4
PUBLISHED BY ELEKTRON EBOOKS
COPYRIGHT 2013 ELEKTRON EBOOKS
www.elektron-ebooks.com
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a database or retrieval system, posted on any internet site, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright holders. Any such copyright infringement of this publication may result in civil prosecution
PART ONE: MUYBRIDGE'S EYE IN MOTION
i) VISUALISING MEMORY
1. INTRODUCTION: MUYBRIDGE’S EYE IN MOTION
Eadweard Muybridge’s seminal body of work forms a vital presence – in many ways, the determining force – in envisaging the future, and remembering the past, of experiments in visual culture and media forms: above all, the medium of film. Composed of innumerable fragments of images and texts, it is a body of work with total immediacy, excessively charged into the contemporary moment, and transmitting itself from that moment throughout all temporal, as well as spatial, dimensions. The documents of Muybridge’s work and of his working process, particularly those documents that he assembled himself and saw as carrying his work’s traces into the future, form invaluable means to understand and explore its intricate, multiple itinerary. Pre-eminent among those documents is Muybridge’s Scrapbook, in which he amassed every trace he viewed as essential about his work, across a span of over thirty years, so that it accumulated into an extraordinary memory-book that interrogated and overspilled time and its own parameters. In Muybridge’s work, the eye – that of Muybridge himself, of the visualised eye, and of his work’s spectator – is perpetually in movement across those newly torn-open zones in corporeal time and space.
This first part of the book explores Muybridge’s work through a wide range of events, texts and images, but pre-eminently through that unique oracular object of his Scrapbook: an aberrant vision-machine as well as a time-machine, and an irreducible archive in its own right, that holds revelations not only about Muybridge’s work, but also into the origins of film, the future of digital culture, and the perception of urban and corporeal forms. The second part of the book examines the close and revealing connections between Muybridge’s work and that of two key but neglected instigators of cinema, Max and Emil Skladanowsky, who undertook the first-ever public screening in Europe of celluloid-based films for a paying audience (using a projector, the ‘Bioskop’, they had built themselves, and showing films they had shot themselves, with a film-camera they had constructed themselves), on 1 November 1895, at a hotel in Berlin, two years after Muybridge’s formative glass-disc projection events in his Zoopraxographical Hall at the Chicago World’s Columbian Exposition, and at around the same time that Muybridge, abandoning his photographic experiments and projections, began work on his final work: the Scrapbook. The third part of the book interrogates that pivotal memory-document of Muybridge’s work – in many ways, a crucial document for the understanding of how contemporary visual cultures originated – by disassembling it into the fragments from which it was created, in order to probe the all-encompassing ocular and corporeal processes at stake in Muybridge’s work.
In many ways, Muybridge’s eye in motion – in envisioning the origins of cinema – visualises forms for film and for cinematic space which are at profound variance with the way in which film and its spaces subsequently developed, especially after the rise and dominance of narrative, sound film and its industrial forms, in the late 1920s. Muybridge’s work forms the fragmentation of human vision. His conceptions of corporeal image-sequences and the spaces in which to project them follow a more peripheral, subterranean course for most of film’s history, as though they existed in a parallel world from dominant genres and industries of film.
Those conceptions have immediate connections to the 1920s and early 30s Surrealist filmmaking of Luis Buñuel, Man Ray and Antonin Artaud, with its emphasis on ocular experimentation and on cinemas as experimental arenas of perception; to the Europe-wide city-filmmaking initiatives, also of the late 1920s and early 30s, such as Dziga Vertov’s Man with the Movie Camera, in which human and urban movement is multiply captured and disassembled for the spectating eye; to American experimental and underground film of the 1960s and 70s, such as that of Kenneth Anger and Hollis Frampton (who wrote one of the most perceptive essays on Muybridge’s work), and to Japanese avant-garde filmmaking of the same era, notably that of Toshio Matsumoto and Takahiko Iimura, that undertook exhaustive experimentation into the work of the eye, into the time of the image, and into the spatial and perceptual boundaries of cinematic spaces; and also, finally, to contemporary work in digital film-animation and motion-capture, especially within feature films of dystopic urban environments in which all coherent reality has disintegrated, and only fragments of movements, aligned with hallucination and excess, survive and captivate the eye. Muybridge’s work, in its movement into the future, pre-emptively elides almost the entire history of cinema – as though in contempt at its banalities – before vitally connecting with contemporary digital image-making and its environments.
Muybridge’s pervasive inspiration extends far beyond the domain of film and photography, encompassing visual art, poetry, performance, fiction, digital media, choreography, and theory. It so pervades and activates Francis Bacon’s work that at times it appears that Bacon’s overriding desire is to comprehensively transmutate Muybridge’s sequences from the medium of photography into that of painting, and also to wrench the male human body, and its sensorial and sexual resonances, across that abyss between media, too. Such inspirations are rarely a response to an exposure to Muybridge’s work in its totality, since that work is profligately vast and expansive, wilfully so, and many of its traces are scattered across archival collections. More often, as with Bacon’s approach (with Muybridge’s images torn from the catalogues or albums of his work, and affixed to the studio walls or trodden underfoot), it is an exposure to isolated images or sequences drawn out of more extensive works. Contemporary culture has, engrained deep within it, an infinity of responses to Muybridge’s images of bodies in motion, from more than a century’s exposure to that work: responses endlessly amended and transformed, and inflected by that contact with flashes or shards of images. In the future, whenever all of the traces of Muybridge’s work – such as his Scrapbook – are digitised and immediately accessible, that body of work will necessarily generate other, unforeseen dimensions of response, in visual culture and beyond. But Muybridge’s work also presents a profound challenge to digitisation, and to the pervasive spectatorial ‘ease’ of viewing, since it always resistantly exceeds the medium that surrounds it, and demands that the medium itself must be overhauled, destabilised, reworked, or returned to zero, in order to hold and project that work. In its compulsive preoccupation with variants and repetitions, Muybridge’s work also prefigures digital culture’s proliferations and amassings, together with its bindings of the image to the eye, but simultaneously subjects them to the same interrogations and erasures which his experiments of the 1870s and 80s exacted upon photography and corporeal perception.
The permanent creative incitation embodied in Muybridge’s work is that it never accepts or replicates what has gone before. In all of the dimensions of his work – the devising of image-sequences and spaces that are prescient of film and its cinematic projection, the rendering of urban landscape, and the exploration of corporeal speed and gesture – he obstinately began from scratch, utilising as ready-made media only the basic technical infrastructures of photography and image-projection, to comprehensively overhaul them, often disregarding their originally intended purpose, in order to formulate (often by improvisation, using materials such as cigar-box lids and sewing-machine handles) the required media with which to carry forward his preoccupations. In many ways, Muybridge’s work forms a set of inventive fractures, rather than an accumulation of linear consolidations, and those formative moments of fracture, in which existing media are abruptly engulfed or reconceived, leave their traces in the archival memory of his work, above all in his Scrapbook: memories of immediacies and instants often of creative exhilaration, that interrogate the future far more than the past. Muybridge’s work has always been seen as mixing innovation with the obstinate pursuit of dead-ends, such as the animated sequences he traced in paint over images drawn from photographic reality, on his glass discs for public projection; in Muybridge’s work, whatever appears a misfired dead-end also has the capacity to mutate – as it expands in time and intersects with the future, such as that of contemporary digital animation – into finetuned prescience.
Muybridge’s envisaging of the future forms of the visual image and of human perception were met in his era with an oscillation between bewilderment and acclaim. Documents such as his Scrapbook seize the delicate hairsbreadth boundary between the dual perception, across those decades, of his work as unacceptably perverse and wrong, and as unique and unprecedented both as spectacle and human erudition. Beyond its public reception, but crucial to its development, Muybridge’s work is also marked by two traumatic events, one of which he was subjected to, the other initiated and inflicted by himself; in both instances, the body stops dead. The first was a stagecoach crash of 1860 in Texas, during a coast-to-coast journey across the USA, in which he suffered severe brain injuries after the horses ran wild and he was propelled at speed from the carriage, his forehead striking a rock. The second was his merciless and pre-meditated shooting-dead, fourteen years later, of his wife’s lover, Harry Larkyns, at a mine building in Calistoga, after pursuing him by ferryboat and train from San Francisco; at his trial, Muybridge was exonerated and released without punishment. The first event comprised a private, occluded one, rarely evoked by Muybridge himself, but which left deep neural and sensory damage; the second, a spectacular media furore focused principally upon the figure of the self-confessed and defiant murderer Muybridge himself, rather than on his work. The two events only coincided at Muybridge’s murder trial, at which, facing either hanging or acquittal, he evoked the stagecoach crash in his evidence. Although those two extreme moments, of cerebral trauma and murderous frenzy, appear entirely mismatched with the correspondingly extreme moments of unrestrained glory and adulation he subsequently experienced – through his work’s worldwide acclaim by royalty, artists and eminent scientists – they are embedded into each other. In order for his work to survive and undergo public scrutiny, Muybridge rigorously consigned those ‘negative’ events into oblivion and absence (they appear nowhere in his Scrapbook), as though they belonged to another lifetime or to someone else’s life, but those catastrophic moments form intimately conjoined presences with his moments of innovation, operating like the dual lenses of early film-projectors (such as the Skladanowsky Brothers’ Bioskop projector), one lens obscured by a rotating device while the other lens projected, but both ultimately impacting upon the eye.
Muybridge designed his own projector, the ‘Zoopraxiscope’, in 1879, and began public spectacles in San Francisco of his image-sequences, projected from glass discs, before rapidly expanding those events across the USA and Europe. In Muybridge’s work, everything that emerges, at every moment (beyond those two determinedly screened-away moments of cerebral-trauma and murder), must result in projection, performance and spectacle, and be directed, in repetition, towards the spectating eye and that eye’s overhauling through a new vision; the surviving traces and documents of his work invariably engage and challenge the eye, and propel it into motion. Even his Scrapbook, compiled in relative solitude and obscurity during Muybridge’s final years, forms an intricately edited and visually-oriented body of ocular documentation, intended for the perception of his work in the contemporary moment, and closely allied to his Zoopraxiscope, in projecting that work more dynamically, through its multiple fragments of images, texts, and corporeal figures, than any linear, narrational chronology.
This first part of the book begins with an exploration of how Muybridge’s work forms an aperture into the ways in which memory operates, and how a multiplicitous body of work such as that of Muybridge is visualised and incorporated primarily though its memory-traces and residues. In a contemporary era of rapid transmutation, in which effacement and oblivion are pre-eminent elements of visual culture, documents of memory become ever more precious – but also fragile and endangered – artefacts, subject to loss. Muybridge’s work operates with a dynamic framework of immediacy, both in its seizing of instantaneous movement through image-sequences and in its compulsion perpetually to innovate or else face obliteration, and that desire for immediacy is imparted to the ways in which his memory-traces are perceived. In that context, residual scraps and fragments become more vital than ‘completed’ works, in seizing the memory of Muybridge’s work.
This first part of the book then goes on to analyse a sequence of especially significant moments in Muybridge’s work, as puncture-points into the multiple layers and depths of its itinerary, such as his photographing of San Francisco panoramas, his proliferating experiments into human movement in Philadelphia, his formulation of image-projection events within a specially designed space in Chicago, and his terminal project to amass the memory of his own work on his eventual return to Kingston. Alongside the desire for propulsive innovation, Muybridge is also fully cognisant of the allied power of sheer repetition, and his Scrapbook incorporates both of those strands of his work in mapping the zigzagging, aberrant course of his experiments alongside the repetition with which he relentlessly promoted, represented and projected those experiments. Crucial to such representations, alongside the power of repetition, is also the power of deletion: Muybridge is a prescient manipulator of enforced oblivions, deployed above all to ensure that negative reports of his work could, to the maximum extent, be erased from sight or else engulfed by positive reports, at least in the traces of it which he himself controlled. In that sense, documents of Muybridge’s work, such his Scrapbook – which he conceived of specifically as a ‘book’ of that work – never narrate it; they fragment, reinvent and propel it, beyond narrative.
This part of the book also examines the archival, preservational implications of Muybridge’s work and its own movement into the future, as a body of work whose contrary amalgam is fused by preoccupations with loss, speed, perception, projection, corporeality, vision and the ‘tactile’ eye. In many ways, those preoccupations are exactly those of contemporary digital culture, and connect with archival issues around the uniqueness and potential reproducibility of objects, through such processes as digitisation. While forming a seminal presence for contemporary culture, Muybridge’s work, in its non-replicating resistance to assimilation, also necessitates an archive of its own. In a parallel way, his Scrapbook, itself a self-archiving by Muybridge of his work’s fragmentary traces in texts and images, also demands the formulation of an archive consisting of one unique artefact, in the way that Jacques Derrida, in his final interviews, envisaged objects of such all-consuming resonance that they required a tangible separation and a distinct space of their own, in order more intensively to then impact upon and reveal the surrounding worlds, and their visual cultures; in that sense, no object deserves its ‘sacrosanct’ one-artefact archive more than Muybridge’s Scrapbook. And among those visual cultures, that of film is pre-eminent in its sensitised response to Muybridge’s work.
Since that work forms a volatile originating presence in film and cinematic space, it must necessarily then also be an equally essential presence within film’s contemporary vanishing.
2. DOCUMENTING FILM’S ORIGINS: THE SCRAPBOOK
Muybridge’s Scrapbook forms a document of the origins of cinema that simultaneously looks back, and projects the future; it also bears the traces of the vast ongoing expansion in filmmaking and cinema-projections that took place during the same years