Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Road to Darkness
The Road to Darkness
The Road to Darkness
Ebook173 pages1 hour

The Road to Darkness

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

The Road to Darkness contains two decadent and highly controversial novels; Daniel Jesus (first published in 1905) and Severin (first published in 1914) and the short story The ghost of the Jewish Ghetto (first published in 1914).

"A series of disgusting orgies with some mystical drivel wrapped round the obscenities." Arthur Eloesser.

In this book Paul Leppin captures the mysterious and erotic atmosphere of old Prague.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJan 13, 2012
ISBN9781907650635
The Road to Darkness

Related to The Road to Darkness

Related ebooks

Classics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Road to Darkness

Rating: 3.4375 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

16 ratings21 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Paul Leppin was a German-speaking postal clerk from Prague. His writings were heavily influenced by those of Gustav Meyrink, an older writer associated with Prague, and they show a strong similarity with those of Joris-Karl Huysmans, the most famous novelist of the Decadent movement.The Road to Darkness is a collection containing three works: Daniel Jesus, a novella first published in 1905, Severin's Road to Darkness, a short novel first published 1914, and "The Ghost of the Jewish Ghetto," a story first published 1914 or 1915. Each of these works is set in Prague and provides a sumptuously detailed look at the city during the waning hours of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy.In Daniel Jesus the title character is a wealthy, embittered hunchback who delights in corrupting people with his money and his strange seductive power. He breaks up relationships, destroys marriages, and shatters people's religious faith. Those who don't succumb to him are driven to suicide. The climactic scene is a masked ball (masks being the only thing worn) where it becomes obvious that Daniel Jesus is none other than Satan himself.Severin's Road to Darkness is probably autobiographical to some extent. Severin is a young clerk who finds his thoughts driven--for reasons he can never understand--in an ever darker direction towards despair, murder and suicide. This despite the fact that he is so attractive that he can have almost any woman he wants. He dumps each girlfriend in succession for one more exotic and dangerous than the last, only to become sated, bored, and depressed. Severin haunts the smoke-filled Bohemian cafés where others live a dissolute and purposeless nocturnal existence. When he finally encounters a woman who doesn't bore him, he finds himself treated by her as he has treated others."The Ghost of the Jewish Ghetto" is a brief depiction of the government's destruction of Prague's Jewish ghetto around 1900 as seen through the despairing eyes of a syphilitic prostitute. (Leppin himself would die of syphilis in 1945.)Daniel Jesus has the most entertaining plot of the three pieces, but all three of these works are most notable for their depiction of a unique place and time.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This story holds up remarkably well, at least in part because the narrator is excellent :)
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Written originally in French, in 1908, this book is considered to be one of the very first locked-room mysteries. As i am a bit of a locked-room buff, this book went to the top of my TBR pile. Gaston Leroux is also the same man who wrote the famous Phantom of the Opera, which further ignited my curiosity.

    In the beginning i found the translation & names a bit awkward, but i soon adapted & got into the swing of the story. It also helped that i made up a list of characters & their relationship to each other.

    In short, a young reporter is sent to investigate the secrets of a well respected family & write a piece for his paper on the attempted murder of the daughter. The criminal tries to kill her and somehow manages to escape from her locked bedroom without being seen by her father & his assistant who were right outside. It is only a matter of time before he tries again. Everyone is baffled as to who he is and his motive. There are numerous twists & turns in the plot & for those who enjoy solving puzzles, Leroux drops many clues along the way.

    A quick read once you get into the rhythm of the book. I enjoyed the subtle french humour which Leroux injects into the story when comparing the young reporter & the older "famous" detective who has been assigned to the case. Solid 3.5 stars
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is one of the most celebrated classic locked room mystery stories. A young lady, Mlle Stangerson, is assaulted and nearly killed in her locked bedchamber, from which there are no means of escape, but there is no one there when her father and a servant in a neighbouring room break into the bedchamber. The mystery is eventually solved by a very young newspaper reporter Joseph Rouletabille, after numerous convolutions and red herrings. The intellectualisation of the mystery is very clever, though Rouletabille as a character lacks the impact of a Sherlock Holmes or an Hercule Poirot, and I thought the story slightly dragged and became a little absurd in places. I noticed that Stangerson, the victim here, is also the name of one of the murder victims in the first Sherlock Holmes story, A Study in Scarlet, published a few years before this novel. Deservedly a classic of the genre, despite its minor weaknesses. 4/5
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A smart, cleverly paced, and well-written thriller. I look forward to reading more of Leroux's Rouletabille mysteries after this one.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    An interesting look back to the beginnings of the mystery genre. There are a couple of points I'm not convinced really worked - especially if the character Larssen was as prominent and well-known as I thought he was supposed to be. Despite that, I still found the story to be engaging and challenging.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I expected something a little more from the resolution... not sure what though.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I docked half a star for the not quite neat and tidy ending, but otherwise mostly enjoyed this. I liked the young journalist as the central character, competing with the stereotypical detective and their coming to different, competing conclusions. The murderer could have done things more wisely and logically in a few instances, where the author had him do some purposely contorted things in order to make events more mysterious; this device was a bit too transparent. I've an even greater appreciation for Agatha Christie now, who rose head and shoulders above this precedent. Rouletabille is a likeable character, but I don't think we'll be crossing paths again.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I really wanted to like this book, but it seems to drag on and on without any conclusion and I eventually gave up and read the plot on Wikipedia and was glad I didn't finish since the ending seems very far fetched.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "The presbytery has lost none of its charm; nor the garden its brightness."These enigmatic words are just one of the many tantalizing clues scattered throughout Gaston Leroux's famous detective novel, The Mystery of the Yellow Room. Published in serial form in 1907 and in its entirety in 1908, this book has become one of the pivotal works in the genre, and is the great-grandfather (or at least the great-uncle!) of all "locked room" mysteries. In an isolated chateau in the French countryside, the beautiful Mademoiselle Stangerson is attacked in her locked chamber. When her father and servant break into the room in response to her desperate cries for help, they find no trace of her assailant — though there is just one door, all the windows have grills, and there is nowhere in the small room for the would-be murderer to hide. It is a most perplexing case for the police... but not for the young reporter Joseph Rouletabille, who manages to insinuate himself into the household to unravel the baffling case. Many of the hallmarks of the mystery genre are present in this story. The tale is narrated by Rouletabille's friend St. Clair, who is very like Holmes' Watson: slow on the uptake and providing a perfect foil to the detective's genius. He is us, of course, carried along wondering at the detective's crazy fancies which all turn out to be spot-on. Naturally! In addition to the stock character of the clueless friend, Rouletabille also has a professional rival in the famous detective Frederic Larsan, who has been called in specially for the case. Rouletabille is keen to prove his mettle to the older and more experienced Larsan. Rouletabille's particular forte is not, like Holmes', a vast knowledge of the minutiae of crime-scene evidence. Rather, Rouletabille's methods are based on what he calls "pure reason," and on taking that reason "by the right end." Leroux, who is probably better known for The Phantom of the Opera, certainly has a gift for creating haunting ideas. There is something so creepy about his description of the "cry of the Good Lord's Beast," and the recurring hint of the "perfume of the Lady in Black" (which is the title of the book's sequel). Leroux is not afraid to hint at supernatural occurrences, but he never overdoes it and the result is quite pleasingly atmospheric. There are certainly several very improbable coincidences that happen along the way to make the mystery possible, but they are forgivable. This translation (which I believe is the older American one) has a few lamentable mistakes in grammar, with several dangling modifiers and awkward constructions. This translation also repeatedly calls Mlle. Stangerson's assailant "the murderer," though the term is technically incorrect according to the events of the story. I found it slightly annoying, but ignorable. I would have given this book four stars if it were not for these issues. I listened to this on audiobook, read by Robert Whitfield, and enjoyed his reading very much. I loved his French pronunciations of the characters' names. It's interesting to think that I absorbed this story in much the same fashion as it was first published: in serial form. I listened to it for an hour a day on my commute. The technology changes but the stories don't. I would recommend this to fans of mysteries, but not to those looking for a good place to start in the genre. I have a high tolerance for ramblers, and this narrative does ramble at times. But I'm looking forward to the next two books in the series; though Rouletabille lacks the straightforward charm of a Roderick Alleyn or Lord Peter Wimsey, I found his youthful exuberance and boldness amusing. And I confess, now I'm curious about the perfume of the Lady in Black! Overall, this is an enjoyable tale that keeps its secrets till the very end.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I have no ambition to be an author. An author is always something of a romancer, and God knows, the mystery of The Yellow Room is quite full enough of real tragic horror to require no aid from literary effects.Gaston Leroux, The Mystery of the Yellow Room2017 is here, and I've kicked off a new year of reading with The Mystery of the Yellow Room. This early twentieth century novel is a classic locked-room mystery by Gaston Leroux. Leroux is probably best known as the author of The Phantom of the Opera, but he also wrote several mysteries featuring the reporter Joseph Rouletabille, including The Perfume of the Lady in Black and The Secret of the Night.As you can see in this summary from the publisher, The Mystery of the Yellow Room has all the typical characteristics of an early twentieth-century mystery:A frightful act of malice committed in Paris: the dastardly attempted assassination of the daughter of a famed scientist who was working late in his laboratory with an assistant when the attack took place in the adjacent room. A locked chamber, windows barred, no one hiding inside. The poor young lady unconscious, covered with blood, violent marks on her throat and a wound at her temple. The scientist’s revolver removed from its cabinet and sealed in the room with her. The only trace of her assailant is a large, bloody handprint on the wall.At a loss, the chief of the Sûreté telegraphs for the famous detective Frédéric Larsan to be assigned to the seemingly unsolvable case. A genre-defining novel, The Mystery of the Yellow Room follows the investigation step by step, with thorough descriptions of the crime scene to allow the reader access to the same opaque clues to the crime that the detectives have.Like a lot of early detective fiction, this story focuses more on the puzzle than on character development or theme, but the puzzle itself was enough to keep me reading. Leroux does a fine job, too, of creating a suspenseful atmosphere, and I enjoyed the voice of the narrator, Sainclair the lawyer. One of my favorite lines of the story is when he takes a jab at his profession:I was helping to save the life of a woman, and even a lawyer may do that conscientiously.The Mystery of the Yellow Room was chosen as the third best locked-room mystery of all time in a poll of mystery writers and reviewers, and for good reason. It's well worth a read, especially for fans of early detective fiction and locked-room mysteries.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This is one of the classic ‘locked room’ mystery stories, that has prompted scores of imitations over the years, including John Dickson Carr’s homage, ‘The Hollow Man’. The basic premise is very simple: Mademoiselle Sangerson had retired to bed in The Yellow Room, which she locked behind her. Shortly afterwards she was heard screaming, having been grievously attacked. Her father, Professor Sangerson, and his servant come running to assist and find the room still locked from the inside. When they eventually gain access to the room they find the wounded woman, but no sign of her assailant. The strange circumstances of the attack excite the more sensational end of the press and the story becomes a talking point all around France. Frederick Larsan, most famous detective from the Surêté is appointed to investigate the case. In the meantime, however, ingenious journalist, Rouletabille, decides to launch his own investigation, accompanied by his friend Sainclair (who narrates the novel). Sainclair is suitably astonished and impressed throughout, in similar vein to Watson as companion to Sherlock Holmes. Sadly, the relationship between the super sleuth and sidekick is not developed with the same humorous scope that attends the Sherlock Holmes stories. The plot may be just as ingenious as anything that Conan Doyle came up with, (and I was certainly fooled, even though all the necessary clues are there), but it never quite gripped me much as I had thought it might.It is well written and (presumably) well translated – the version I read was definitely very readable, and had none of the drawbacks that often attend books from that period (it was published, I believe, in 1906)
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This mystery has an ingenious plot, even if certain elements are slightly implausible. The writing style is rather dry, but the story is very interesting—it reminds me of Poe's Dupin mysteries.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I always find locked-room mysteries highly contrived, but since that's a given for this type of story I always expect it and never let it get in the way of my enjoyment of it. That being said, I found the solution to this one even more convoluted and outside the bounds of reality. It's as if Leroux took a bet that he couldn't devise a plot so dependent on the outlandish and make it work. Maybe all authors who write locked-room mysteries make bets like that. In any case, I had to re-read parts of the explanation because I kept mentally saying "what?". I guess if you allow for some fine acting on the part of the victim and serious observational deficiencies on the part of the rescuers it works, but jeez it's a stretch.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    When I was about twelve, someone mentioned that this is the greatest locked room mystery ever written. Since then, I'd kept it in the back of my mind and was excited when I saw that it was in Project Gutenberg. But, in the end, the story is almost anticlimactic and the resolution seems completely artificial. I didn't guess the whodonit, which I often do, so it gets points for that. But, at the same time, it hardly felt like a mystery that anyone would have solved anyway. Perhaps at the time it was written, the audience would have been more accepting than me in 2012.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A woman, the daughter of a famous French professor, utters a chilling scream. She is locked into her bedroom, and by the time the door is broken down, she is found unconscious, almost dead, with a terrible head wound. But who could have been her attacker? He could have had no means of entering or exiting the room unseen, and the only clues he's left behind are his victim and a bloody handprint on the wall. The young reporter Joseph Rouletabille makes his way to the scene of the crime with the firm intention of solving the mystery. Slow and plodding step by slow and plodding step. This book is famous as having been is one of the first locked room mystery crime fiction novels, published in France in 1907. Agatha Christie was reportedly an admirer of the novel and early on in her writing career said she'd like to write something taking a similar approach. I was certainly intrigued at the beginning and found the various elements of the story intriguing, such as the place of the crime: a French château, and the main protagonists: a woman well passed her prime, working as a scientist and soon to be married; her suspected fiancé; Rouletabille, the 18-year-old journalist. I guess I don't have the makings of a locked room mystery fan, because I got bored with all the minute details of the story and found the ending anticlimactic at best.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I enjoyed The Mystery of the Yellow Room very much and I can certainly see why it is considered one of the classics of the mystery genre - and especially of the locked room.Joseph Rouletabille, the journalist from a French newspaper covering the mystery, is a very likeable and intelligent "detective." He matches his wits against one of the finest detectives from the Sûreté, Frederic Larsan.Although this book was written over 100 years ago, I did not feel that it was dated. Of course, there were none of the modern techniques at play, but this was a book of puzzles and intellect over modern science - the classic "whodunit."I obtained my copy from Project Gutenberg, an English translation from the original French, and although most of the story was translated very well, there were a few times when I was left wondering if the meaning of the original had come through correctly. Fortunately, this did not happen often and I was able to enjoy the book.I think I will definitely read more of Leroux's mysteries. I am interested in the further adventures of Joseph Rouletabille.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    My husband bought this book for me for one of my Christmas gifts, and to tease me, he gave me a clue - phantom of the opera. I knew he had bought me books (easy to tell even in their wrapping paper), but since I had nothing on my list that had to do with that show or book, I was stumped. As soon as I unwrapped this one, though, I figured it out. Gaston Leroux, who knew that he wrote mystery books? Of course, I did put this book in my wish list, but that was because it was touted in another mystery novel as being a classic of the genre and I was curious; I never paid much attention to the author. After my moment of enlightenment, I read the synopsis on the back of the book to remind myself why I wanted this particular title - my wish list is ridiculously large - and was then very excited to have it.The story is a locked room mystery. That means that a crime, generally murder, is committed in a room that is lock and thoroughly secure from the inside, but when help arrives and breaks the door down, they only find the victim inside, no attacker. In this instance, the young lady assaulted is not killed, but near death, and yet the containment of the room is such that those who find her wonder if the villain couldn't have magically disappeared. Leroux's book is lauded as one of the best locked room mysteries available, and I agree.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "The presbytery has lost none of its charm; nor the garden its brightness."These enigmatic words are just one of the many tantalizing clues scattered throughout Gaston Leroux's famous detective novel, The Mystery of the Yellow Room. Published in serial form in 1907 and in its entirety in 1908, this book has become one of the pivotal works in the genre, and is the great-grandfather (or at least the great-uncle!) of all "locked room" mysteries. In an isolated chateau in the French countryside, the beautiful Mademoiselle Stangerson is attacked in her locked chamber. When her father and servant break into the room in response to her desperate cries for help, they find no trace of her assailant — though there is just one door, all the windows have grills, and there is nowhere in the small room for the would-be murderer to hide. It is a most perplexing case for the police... but not for the young reporter Joseph Rouletabille, who manages to insinuate himself into the household to unravel the baffling case. Many of the hallmarks of the mystery genre are present in this story. The tale is narrated by Rouletabille's friend St. Clair, who is very like Holmes' Watson: slow on the uptake and providing a perfect foil to the detective's genius. He is us, of course, carried along wondering at the detective's crazy fancies which all turn out to be spot-on. Naturally! In addition to the stock character of the clueless friend, Rouletabille also has a professional rival in the famous detective Frederic Larsan, who has been called in specially for the case. Rouletabille is keen to prove his mettle to the older and more experienced Larsan. Rouletabille's particular forte is not, like Holmes', a vast knowledge of the minutiae of crime-scene evidence. Rather, Rouletabille's methods are based on what he calls "pure reason," and on taking that reason "by the right end." Leroux, who is probably better known for The Phantom of the Opera, certainly has a gift for creating haunting ideas. There is something so creepy about his description of the "cry of the Good Lord's Beast," and the recurring hint of the "perfume of the Lady in Black" (which is the title of the book's sequel). Leroux is not afraid to hint at supernatural occurrences, but he never overdoes it and the result is quite pleasingly atmospheric. There are certainly several very improbable coincidences that happen along the way to make the mystery possible, but they are forgivable. This translation (which I believe is the older American one) has a few lamentable mistakes in grammar, with several dangling modifiers and awkward constructions. This translation also repeatedly calls Mlle. Stangerson's assailant "the murderer," though the term is technically incorrect according to the events of the story. I found it slightly annoying, but ignorable. I would have given this book four stars if it were not for these issues. I listened to this on audiobook, read by Robert Whitfield, and enjoyed his reading very much. I loved his French pronunciations of the characters' names. It's interesting to think that I absorbed this story in much the same fashion as it was first published: in serial form. I listened to it for an hour a day on my commute. The technology changes but the stories don't. I would recommend this to fans of mysteries, but not to those looking for a good place to start in the genre. I have a high tolerance for ramblers, and this narrative does ramble at times. But I'm looking forward to the next two books in the series; though Rouletabille lacks the straightforward charm of a Roderick Alleyn or Lord Peter Wimsey, I found his youthful exuberance and boldness amusing. And I confess, now I'm curious about the perfume of the Lady in Black! Overall, this is an enjoyable tale that keeps its secrets till the very end.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Finally I brought myself to finish the lauded short novel 'The Mystery of the Yellow Room' by Gaston Leroux. It is hailed as one of the most original works of mystery fiction written and has been named as one of the pioneers of the locked room genre. We are introduced to the young journalist Joseph Rouletabille who throws himself into the investigation of a mysterious murder at Chateau du Glandier. A murder that takes place in a room that has been locked from the inside with no possible means of escape. Right away we are introduced to one of the many plot holes in the novel. There is no murder. Miss Stangerson who is the target of the attack and who is discovered with a bump on her head in the room after she screams murder, isn't actually killed. In fact she is assaulted no less than three times in various forms and by the end of the novel she has gone quite insane but is still alive. Not once in the novel is poor Miss Stangerson properly interviewed and asked what happened. Furthermore she seems to never actually say anything anywhere in the novel. As the most prominent piece of evidence she is blatantly ignored, something even the most mysoginistic Victorian didn't do.The Mystery of the Yellow Room was first published as a novel in 1908, 40 years after Wilkie Collins published his mystery: The Moontone. I'm comparing Leroux's work to that of Collins because even though Collins was clearly experimenting with the genre, he had a much firmer grasp than Leroux ever did. Leroux breaks one of the most important rules in the mystery business: you have to give the reader all the information that is available to the detective before the reveal. In the case of the Yellow Room we are given everything we need to know, which is a large amount of information, after the explanation of the plot. Even though the mechanism by which the 'murder' is committed appears to be very mature and innovating, it relies on so many assumptions and improbable events that it loses much of it's entertainment value when it is finally revealed.It took me three weeks to finish this book. Most of that was spent trying to figure out who all the characters in the novel are and where they are at various times (the novel includes maps and diagrams that don't help). For someone who wrote the very human The Phantom of the Opera, the Yellow Room one has very few real people in it. Not only does the over enthusiastic detective not feel very human, he's not even remotely likable. Unlike Sherlock Holmes who was quite the unpleasant character who fascinates readers to this day.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    First written in 1908, The Mystery of the Yellow Room is considered one of the classics of the "locked-room"/impossible crime genre. Believe me, by the time you finish reading about the crime (never mind the rest of the book), you'll be scratching your head saying "how on earth did this just happen?"It seems that one Mathilde Stangerson goes off to her room (called The Yellow Room) in a pavilion where she and her father work at scientific experiments. The door is locked -- then she is heard to scream, followed by 2 gun shots. As her father and one of the servants rush to the door, they break it open and find only Mathilde, with fresh strangulation marks, a lump on the head and bloody handprints on the walls. But that's it. There's no one else there, and there's no way in the world whoever did this could have possibly escaped. Thus begins a very strange mystery. I can't say any more about it because I will totally wreck it if anyone's interested in reading it.The characters are rather interesting, especially the main character, young (18) journalist with the paper "L'Epoque" -- a journalist with a detective bent. He shares his information with a M. Sinclair, the narrator of the story. Mathilde Stangerson is a woman with many secrets, and nothing is revealed until the end, keeping you hanging on. There are several suspects, many red herrings and multiple clues, so if you are okay with a somewhat rambling narrative (I think it can be excused given the date the book was written), you'll probably find this one to be quite well done. It's likely that modern readers may find this one a bit tedious since we often like to get to the point quickly. In this book, the who, how and why are not divulged until the last minute.Overall, it's a bit rambly, but it's still a fine mystery and you're really just dying by the end to find out everything. Recommended for people who enjoy classic mysteries and locked-room mysteries.

Book preview

The Road to Darkness - Paul Leppin

JESUS

1

It was a long, aimless street down which Daniel Jesus was going in pursuit of an ugly evening. It kept in front of him; he could not catch up with it on his thin, aching legs which cast a hurried, flickering shadow on the wet cobblestones, irritating him and putting him in an ill temper. The evening ran before him like a mad, vicious animal, and he could not catch hold of it with his skinny fingers, could not grasp it by its tangled hair and stare long and hard into its dissolute eyes, feeling its hot breath streaming over his twitching eyelashes. For years his constant thought, his most intense yearning had been: If one could only strangle the evening! For evening was evil. Of course one had to be cautious, remain unobserved, approach it with simple, friendly words, smile and caress it as one would caress a woman. Oh, he would go about it cleverly! His hatred would glow inside him like an inspiration, helping him to find the right way to master the evening and kill it. He would abandon himself to it like a new-born babe, would be tender, passionate, lascivious. His eager hands would run over the flesh of that whore, making her sleepy, arousing her lust, until his fingers felt the black veins throbbing in her neck, hot with her lifeblood. Then they would close, suddenly, convulsively, pitilessly, and on her face the horrible expression would appear of which he dreamt every night. Oh God, why must he always think of it? But it was an image he could not escape. It was in every mirror he looked into, in every window he went past it hung like a mask. It was a pale, frightened face, cruelly marked with festering sores by an insidious disease. Under the throttling pressure of his wrists the face was filled with an impotent fear that was forcing her eyes out of their sockets. And out of her gasping throat her decomposing tongue came creeping like an entrail, endless, growing longer and longer, bigger and bigger until it broke through the glass of the windows he had to pass. The street was aimless and long, the poisonous tongue was stretching out towards him, licking at his coat, coming closer and closer. Oh, dear God! There it was! Away, and for God’s sake don’t turn round!

Daniel Jesus was running, scurrying along with short, jerky steps, and the sweat ran down in pale drops into his sparse beard. He ran until his diseased lung forced him to come to a rasping halt. He leant against a lamp-post and rested. Thank God, the panic had passed, he no longer felt afraid. He really should go and see a doctor soon, he was having visions. The evening wasn’t dead at all, it was still going down the street in front of him, dancing a polka round each of the electric lamps, skipping scornfully from one side of the street to the other, peeping into the ground-floor apartments. He hadn’t strangled it, that was why there was no need to be frightened of that face. But he would strangle it if he could, and damn the consequences, even if the foul face should drive him to his grave. He hated evening. It had made fun of his hunchback in a hundred shadows on the walls of the houses, distorted and grotesque caricatures, comic and mean.

Every time he came to a lamp he could see his hunchback with its crooked point reflected two or three times on the wall and on the ground, in many different variations of shade and shape. The sun was honest and showed him his defect, but the evening mocked it. He would not be mocked! He was Daniel Jesus, a man of wealth and substance to whom, if he wanted, people bowed low and kissed his hand.

With bitter groans he continued on his way. The life he was leading was no life at all. It had no goal, no end, just like the road stretching out in front of him. It consisted of nothing but dreary dissipation, a hollow sham with nothing to satisfy the cravings of a deep-feeling heart. The orgy he had given in his house last night for young Baron Sterben’s twentieth birthday, did it have the grandeur, the cruelty, even the slightest flicker of the great glory of iniquity? Fire and sin? Destruction? No and no! It had not even been shameless. A few naked girls who had got drunk on champagne and been sick on his beautiful, blood-red carpet that was worth a king’s ransom. Where in that was the blind infamy that would alone be worthy of him? He should have found a princess! A princess of the soul, chaste and pure, to give the whole affair a touch of tragedy, a hint of force, violation and sin. There should have been a saint sitting on his knees, stark naked, strewing roses over his ugly hunchback with her white hands, kissing his deformed feet and offering Baron Sterben a glass of champagne. But all it had been was stupid and boring. These little bourgeoises had no soul. Nothing moved them, nothing roused them, they felt no thrill at such an evening. Nothing screamed out inside them, nothing froze, there was no crime, no great wickedness, no ecstasy of self-abasement, no intoxication and no yearning.

He needed to see souls when they were naked and drunk. He loved that. Fuddled and fervent, debauched and delirious. Driven out of their minds by a god or a beast. That was why he was heading for the little house by the railway viaduct where he had not been for a long time. He would get a chilly reception from them, from Anton the cobbler and his band of worshippers. They always knew everything he did. They were like his bad conscience. They would certainly already know that he had sinned again the previous evening, that he had opened his doors to the Devil. How Anton found out all these things was a mystery to him, but find them out he did.

In a fever of apprehension he climbed the wooden steps. He opened the door quietly and entered the room.

They were singing a hymn to Mary, the hymn of the sorrowing heart. Round a long, bare wooden table a crowd of people were standing with hymn-books in their hot hands; their voices rose up like a bitter, broken cry, wearing themselves hoarse against the low ceiling. All their hearts were filled with the hymn alone; they scarcely had room in their souls for anything happening outside. At the head of the table stood Anton, the cobbler. He knew the hymn by heart, had folded his immense, hard red hands in prayer and was singing. It was like a distress call at sea. His ship had been wrecked in the dark night of sin, was drifting rudderless, seeking God. He called out into the darkness, ceaselessly, louder and louder, senselessly, trustingly. The head on top of his massive body was wild and proud; defiantly, austerely clean-shaven and with a mouth that was like a sword-cut in his scarred face.

Beside him stood his wife. As tall and massive as the cobbler, with wonderful, flaming, fiery red hair. She twisted and bent her powerful body as she sang, wrestling with sin. She shouted out the song into the room so that it tumbled out into the street like a lost, strangled sobbing that made the old women shiver and cross themselves. But it was to no avail. She could not silence the throbbing of her blood, the hymn did not fill her heart as it did the hearts of the others. Even between the verses she felt herself yearning for a devouring fire. Her love for God was puny and weak, it was not a raging storm, as was Anton’s love. He was a messiah and redeemer and she was a poor, weak woman. But she needed a fire to burn in her soul and make her blood dry up, like a puddle in the sun. There was much within her that needed a purifying flame. She hated her blood and her great body, which she could not subdue. She felt a dull, lustful fear of her body. She sang, it was like a distress call at sea.

‘Christ! Christ!’ came the cry within her.

She sent her wide, devouring eyes along the smoky walls and past the contorted faces of the congregation, but the hymn would not fill her soul.

Then all at once, among the dreams and visions, the flames and phantasms of her singing, she suddenly saw, like the shadow behind a candle, Daniel Jesus standing in the room. He looked at her and her eyes were absorbed. Naked and shameless, like a woman entering her lover’s bed, her eyes entered his. And sin, huge and ugly like the evening outside that Daniel Jesus could not catch, stepped into the hymn. Daniel Jesus felt as if an icy hand were passing over his hunchback. He drank in the look from the penitent like a beautiful, base iniquity. He knew that there was a princess heading towards him. She was still far off, and her horses were travelling slowly.

But the evening will bring us together, Anton. For the evening is evil.

No one had seen the shameless look apart from the groaning gypsy woman lying on the floor before Anton scraping her knees on the bare boards until the blood ran down. Her lips covered in foam, she kissed the cobbler’s feet, straightened up and pounced on his hard hands; she was as hot as boiling snow.

But his hands did not pull back. He raised her up, high and alone above all the people, higher and higher, far beyond them, to God.

2

Baron Sterben was a very good man and a very bad man. He was completely unaware of it. The good within him was the source of all the noble impulses which even he at times loved about himself; the bad gave his soul a particular mean and shabby note which he was often at a loss to understand. He himself took no active part in all this. He did not resist the evil within him, nor did he do anything to encourage his finer side. He was twenty years old and had already seen through the glittering façade of life to its sterile depths. Now he went along with anything that had a taste of the singular, the aloof, with any adventure as long as the price was high, with any sin, if he still found a thrill in it. That is to say, it was not he who did all that, it was the things themselves whose lives were carried on through his, who passed through him as through an open door. Sometimes his soul did something, his hand or someone else, but never he himself; he believed he had lost his self in the unhealthy dreams of his youth. He was passive, and the days did with him as they liked.

He loved Hagar, the young gypsy girl. He had discovered her a few weeks ago at a fair outside the city where she performed childish jigs for the grubby coppers the people threw her. She had attracted him because she danced barefoot and was small and lean, like a wildcat. By the time had been watching her for fifteen minutes he was shivering, he knew that it was all in vain, that his poor body, tormented by love, would compel him to possess her. She had large, thin gold rings in her ears over which her hair fell like a curtain. For years now large, slim rings framing a pale woman’s face had been his fetish. It was a wild, rainy day in early spring and his teeth were chattering feverishly. He was dimly, hopelessly aware that there was something dangerous and evil in Hagar’s eyes, something that was destined to torment his young life like the lash of a scourge. But it was precisely that which, leaden, ineluctable, imperious, cast its spell over him. There was no escaping it.

Thus Hagar became the Baron’s mistress.

She had gone with him in mute amazement. She did not quite know what to do with this man whose lips twitched as he spoke to her, whose features were shuddering under waves of fever like corn in the wind. He was delighted that she was called Hagar, it was a name that had captivated him at school, the fate of the Biblical Hagar had touched him as if she had been his own mother. Now she was to be his mistress and he was taking her to his house. He had bought her for a hundred crowns from a greasy showman who would have presumably been happy with twenty, so hungry he was, having gone without meat for days.

She walked through the streets beside him, quiet and sub-missive, and the people looked round and smiled when they recognised the Baron. She was wearing a faded dark-red dress and went barefoot. When they reached his home, he picked her up in his arms and sang a little, slightly ironic tune he had once heard from a woman at a strange moment in his life. With the tip of his patent-leather shoe he pushed open a beautiful, wide door and lay the mute Hagar down on his bed of silk. He pushed a costly, sad, deep-blue pillow under her brown neck, then knelt down by the bed and, breathing slowly, began to take off her clothes, one by one.

At that Hagar turned her head towards him and looked at him. Then she

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1