Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Birth Of Modern Counterfire - The British And American Experience In World War I
    Birth Of Modern Counterfire - The British And American Experience In World War I
    Birth Of Modern Counterfire - The British And American Experience In World War I
    Ebook102 pages1 hour

    Birth Of Modern Counterfire - The British And American Experience In World War I

    By Major William M. Campsey

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    This study investigates the original needs for and development of counterfire techniques in World War I. Concentrating on the experiences of the British and the Americans, the examination explores techniques of counterfire and their failures or successes.
    The first chapter investigates why World War I was the first war in which modern counterfire techniques were employed. Chapter 2 describes the British experience. Chapters 3 & 4 explain how the Americans trained for and fought in the war. The last chapter analyses those techniques and principles of action that had relevance for both nations.
    The study concludes that several techniques were necessary in World War I to suppress enemy artillery. First, efforts to destroy enemy artillery before battles were not as successful as efforts to neutralize it for the duration of the battle. Second, with the enormity of details necessary to collect intelligence, assign targets, preposition ammunition, and execute the program of fire, competent staff work became critical. Third, the intelligence procedures developed in position warfare were insufficient to suppress enemy artillery as the battle line moved progressively forward. Suppression of all terrain in the zone of operations that was capable of holding enemy artillery became necessary. Finally, artillery organization and control must be centralized.
    The study also identifies two techniques necessary to exploit successful counterfire. First, surprise over the enemy would invariably gain the initiative. The enemy guns would not recover from the surprise for the duration of time that neutralization fires continued. Second, counterfire must be integrated into the overall fireplan and the infantry scheme of maneuver. It did the commander no good if counterfire was successful only to fail to exploit that success with maneuver.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherVerdun Press
    Release dateAug 15, 2014
    ISBN9781782897026
    Birth Of Modern Counterfire - The British And American Experience In World War I
    Author

    Major William M. Campsey

    See Book Description

    Related to Birth Of Modern Counterfire - The British And American Experience In World War I

    Related ebooks

    Wars & Military For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Panzerartillerie Firepower For The Panzer Divisions

      Apr 18, 2019

      Author Thomas Anderson Publisher Osprey Publishing Price £30 As the German Army formed their new doctrine of mobile warfare based around fast moving armoured columns (Blitzkrieg) in the 1930s, it became clear that artillery was going to be a major p

      1 min read

    • Article

      The Last Serving Battle Rifle G3

      Apr 27, 2020

      THE G3 IS overshadowed by its contemporaries for reasons that perhaps have more to do with politics than functionality and reliability, and could make for a good story on its own. As a battle, it is quite easily one of the best out there; it saw exte

      5 min read

    • Article

      Build an NFFX Flat Wagon

      Jul 18, 2018

      Build an NFFX Flat Wagon
      9 min read

    • Article

      Test-flying The hellcat

      Apr 5, 2022

      Test-flying The hellcat
      14 min read

    • Article

      Dr. Gatling’s Wonder Weapon

      Dec 25, 2018

      Dr. Gatling’s Wonder Weapon
      7 min read

    • Article

      Martini-henry Rifle

      Nov 7, 2017

      Martini-henry Rifle
      1 min read

    • Article

      My .303 Cast Bullet Recipe

      Oct 14, 2019

      I own two Lee-Enfields in .303 BR and over the past 10 years have discovered that both shoot cast bullets accurately. When I started out with cast bullets, first for muzzleloaders, I did a lot of reading on the subject and soon realised that cast bul

      5 min read

    • Article

      Bell P-39 Airacobra

      Feb 17, 2022

      Bell P-39 Airacobra
      3 min read

    • Article

      A FLETCHER & CO LTD

      Feb 25, 2022

      A FLETCHER & CO LTD
      10 min read

    • Article

      What They Wore

      Apr 5, 2022

      What They Wore
      3 min read

    • Article

      A Night at York in 1971

      Jan 26, 2024

      A Night at York in 1971
      11 min read

    • Article

      Operation Bodenplatte

      Feb 26, 2020

      Operation Bodenplatte
      2 min read

    • Article

      Gunroom

      Mar 18, 2020

      Gunroom
      2 min read

    • Article

      War And Peace

      Apr 29, 2022

      War And Peace
      9 min read

    • Article

      Spearhead To The Meuse

      Feb 26, 2020

      Spearhead To The Meuse
      2 min read

    • Article

      Lemat Revolver

      Jan 4, 2022

      Lemat Revolver
      1 min read

    • Article

      Why Betty Bombed

      Sep 4, 2018

      Why Betty Bombed
      10 min read

    • Article

      Hardware Merkava Mk II

      Mar 5, 2019

      Hardware Merkava Mk II
      2 min read

    • Article

      PANZER II The Forgotten Star Of Germany’s Victories

      May 14, 2020

      Panzers were the striking heart of Germany’s battle tanks during WWII. The most famous variants were the medium Panzer III and IV tanks that have dominated perceptions of German armoured warfare. However, the most numerous German tank in May 1940 was

      4 min read

    • Article

      Lend-lease And Soviet Aviation In The Second World War

      Oct 30, 2018

      by Vladimir Kotelnikov, Casemate Publishers, 2018, $89.85. More than 18,000 Allied aircraft were sent to the Soviet Union during World War II, but up until now comparatively little has been written about their operational use and ultimate fates. This

      1 min read

    • Article

      Ruff Stuff

      Oct 11, 2022

      Ruff Stuff
      9 min read

    • Article

      Britain’s Courageous Warlord

      Jul 11, 2023

      Britain’s Courageous Warlord
      3 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Birth Of Modern Counterfire - The British And American Experience In World War I

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Birth Of Modern Counterfire - The British And American Experience In World War I - Major William M. Campsey

       This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com

      To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – picklepublishing@gmail.com

      Or on Facebook

      Text originally published in 1991 under the same title.

      © Pickle Partners Publishing 2014, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.

      Publisher’s Note

      Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.

      We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.

      THE BIRTH OF MODERN COUNTERFIRE: THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN EXPERIENCE IN WORLD WAR I

      By

      MAJ William M. Campsey, USA.

      TABLE OF CONTENTS

      Contents

      TABLE OF CONTENTS 4

      ABSTRACT 5

      DEDICATION 6

      ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 7

      PREFACE 8

      CHAPTER ONE — ARTILLERY LEAVES THE LINE OF BATTLE 9

      Pre War Dogma: The Spirit of the Offense 10

      Pre War Development of Artillery 11

      Early War Artillery 14

      Early Battles 16

      CHAPTER TWO — THE BRITISH EXPERIENCE 18

      CHAPTER THREE — AMERICA PREPARES TO FIGHT 32

      CHAPTER FOUR — AMERICA FIGHTS 39

      CHAPTER FIVE — CONCLUSION 48

      LEARNING TO TAME THE ENEMY'S ARTILLERY 48

      LEARNING TO EXPLOIT SUCCESSFUL COUNTERBATTERY WORK 51

      CONCLUSION 51

      GLOSSARY 53

      REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 54

      BIBLIOGRAPHY 55

      BOOKS 55

      MAGAZINES AND PERIODICALS 56

      UNPUBLISHED WORKS 56

      ABSTRACT

      This study investigates the original needs for and development of counterfire techniques in World War I. Concentrating on the experiences of the British and the Americans, the examination explores techniques of counterfire and their failures or successes.

      The first chapter investigates why World War I was the first war in which modern counterfire techniques were employed. Chapter 2 describes the British experience. Chapters 3 & 4 explain how the Americans trained for and fought in the war. The last chapter analyses those techniques and principles of action that had relevance for both nations.

      The study concludes that several techniques were necessary in World War I to suppress enemy artillery. First, efforts to destroy enemy artillery before battles were not as successful as efforts to neutralize it for the duration of the battle. Second, with the enormity of details necessary to collect intelligence, assign targets, preposition ammunition, and execute the program of fire, competent staff work became critical. Third, the intelligence procedures developed in position warfare were insufficient to suppress enemy artillery as the battle line moved progressively forward. Suppression of all terrain in the zone of operations that was capable of holding enemy artillery became necessary. Finally, artillery organization and control must be centralized.

      The study also identifies two techniques necessary to exploit successful counterfire. First, surprise over the enemy would invariably gain the initiative. The enemy guns would not recover from the surprise for the duration of time that neutralization fires continued. Second, counterfire must be integrated into the overall fireplan and the infantry scheme of maneuver. It did the commander no good if counterfire was successful only to fail to exploit that success with maneuver.

      DEDICATION

      To Grandpa,

      my first war hero

      (even if he is a sailor)

      ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

      Many people assisted in the development of this effort. First, I must acknowledge the help of my committee, Dr. Jerold Brown, LTC John Skelton, and MAJ Dave Goebel. Their helpful, but firm guidance kept me on the right track throughout all of the months of this endeavor. My Academic Counselor and Evaluator, LTC Bob Ramsey, provided outstanding support in lending me some of his primary sources and keeping me encouraged. The archivist in the Combined Arms Research Library, Karla Norman, found many documents that assisted in my research. She also trusted me to check out some of their rare books and documents; allowing me to research even deeper some of the more obscure aspects of this thesis. Finally, my family gave over countless weekends during the best year of my life. To them I owe not only my gratitude, but I had better make up some of those weekends.

      PREFACE

      This thesis is a history paper. However, my motivation for writing on the history of counterfire is grounded in my belief that present U.S. Army tactics, techniques, and procedures are inadequate. For at least the last 15 years, the U.S. Army Field Artillery has not had a complete doctrine for counterfire. Experiences at the combat training centers, most importantly in the BCTP exercises, have precipitated our understanding of the need to develop such a doctrine. Since, until very recently, we have had virtually nothing, a hasty attempt was made to put a doctrine in the field. The Field Artillery School published a White Paper on 1 November 1989. With minor revisions the techniques presented in that White Paper were incorporated into the latest FM 6-20-30, Fire Support for Corps and Division Operations, dated 18 October 1989. A comparison of the dates of these two documents indicates that the White Paper was published after the field manual had been sent to the printer. There was no opportunity for rebuttal from the field nor, from all indications, was there any attempt to start the development of the doctrine from a historical perspective.

      The methods now published in the Field Manuals represent more than the official pronouncement of recommended procedures. In the longer term they represent the start of the search for the best methods of counterfire. They are the opening salvo wherein the school challenges the field to contribute to the development of new doctrine. This thesis addresses that challenge in that it begins the process of defining our history. For while it is true that history is not so didactic as to present us with formulas for success for our future wars, it is also true that we cannot predict where warfare will take us without first understanding from where it has brought us. We who aspire to influence the writing of procedures for a future war must understand the experiences of our predecessors. Much has changed since the artillerymen of World War I and their commanders grappled with the problems of protecting the infantrymen's advance across No Man's Land. However, the basic endeavor to protect the commander's freedom of maneuver by protecting his infantrymen from the enemy's artillery remains as valid today as it was in World War I.

      As a serving field artilleryman, I have resisted the temptation to comment in this document about the relevance of the

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1