Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Treasures From Paul: Philippians
Treasures From Paul: Philippians
Treasures From Paul: Philippians
Ebook346 pages4 hours

Treasures From Paul: Philippians

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

If one word could be used to summarise Paul’s Letter to the Philippians, it would be “joy”; and if there is one verse that encapsules the theme of the letter it would be “rejoice in the Lord always, and again I say, ‘Rejoice!’” (4:4; 1:4, 25; 2:2, 29; 4:1)
That the letter should be so redolent of laughter is astonishing, given Paul’s painful first contact with the city. The dramatic story is told in Acts 16:12-40, how Paul and Silas arrived in Philippi, preached there, were arrested for causing a public nuisance, and brutally flogged. They were then thrown into a cell, where their legs, chained into stocks, were agonisingly stretched to the point of dislocation. There, at midnight, despite their lacerated backs and tortured limbs, they sang hymns and praised God. The Lord responded by causing an earthquake to smash open the stocks and to release the prisoners from their chains.
Observing these extraordinary events, the chief jailer and his family converted to Christ and were baptised that same night, while the magistrates, learning to their horror that Paul was a Roman citizen whom they had illegally flogged, came to him and Silas, humbly apologised, and begged them to leave the city.
I remain uncertain what my reactions would have been to such an amazing sequence of misery and miracle! Would I remember mostly the pain and so look on the city with loathing thereafter? Or would my recollections be dominated by the marvellous earthquake, the delight of a family’s embrace of Christ, the satisfaction of receiving an abject apology from the city authorities, and the loving welcome of Lydia and her family? I would hope the latter! But in any case, that is what Paul did. He chose to remember the miracle of the earthquake, the love of the new Christians, the joy of a successfully planted church, and the pleasure he had found in two later visits to the city prior to writing his letter to them. And so his letter laughs!
Paul had an obvious love for the church at Philippi (1:8; 4:1). Alone among the churches to whom he wrote, he had no criticism of that church for false doctrine, or for divisions, ungodly deeds, and the like. True, there were some individuals whom he felt obliged to rebuke (1:15; 3:2, 18; 4:2), but he had no criticism to offer, only affection, which he expressed to the church as a whole. His letter was written in part to assure them of his love and his care for them, and also to deal with a handful of other matters of interest, without any special overriding theme, except perhaps gratitude. Paul was grateful for a generous gift that he had received from them, and for which he thanked them heartily. The gift was carried to him by Epaphroditus, whom Paul was particularly glad to see again (4:10, 14-18), especially because he (Epaphroditus) had only recently recovered from a serious illness (2:25-27).

LanguageEnglish
Release dateApr 7, 2015
ISBN9781311323231
Treasures From Paul: Philippians
Author

Ken Chant

Dr. Ken Chant (M.R.E. Th.D), is the President of Vision Christian College (Australia) and is on the International Board of Directors for Vision International University (USA).Dr Ken Chant is an Australian pentecostal pastor who was ordained in Melbourne in 1954. He has been actively involved in Christian ministry for over 50 years (ten of which he and his family spent in the USA). A brief summary of his ministry would include the following -He has pioneered eight churches and Pastored several others, including serving for five years as the associate pastor of what was then Australia's largest Pentecostal church (the Adelaide Crusade Centre).For several years he was the editor of two of Australia's most successful charismatic/Pentecostal journals.He has been the principal of four Bible colleges (in Australia and the USA), has taught at Christ for the Nations (Dallas), Oral Roberts University (Tulsa), Youth With a Mission (Hawaii), and spoken at crusades, conferences, and seminars in Australia, the UK, the USA, Mexico, the Philippines, Singapore, and New Zealand.Dr. Chant is the author of many of Vision's textbooks on Christian life, Doctrine and Theology.

Read more from Ken Chant

Related to Treasures From Paul

Related ebooks

Related articles

Reviews for Treasures From Paul

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Treasures From Paul - Ken Chant

    TREASURES FROM PAUL

    Philippians

    by

    KEN CHANT

    Ebook Edition

    Published by Vision Colleges at Smashwords

    ISBN 978-1-311323-23-1

    Copyright © 2012 Ken Chant.

    ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WORLDWIDE.

    P.O. BOX 84, Macquarie Fields,

    NSW 2564, AUSTRALIA

    Ph. +61 2 9603 2077

    Fx +61 2 9603 3277

    Email: contact@visoncolleges.net

    http://visionchristiancollege.com.au

    Contents

    Preface On Writers And Pilgrims

    Introduction

    Chapter One The Slaves Of Christ

    Chapter Two The Priceless Grace Of God

    Chapter Three Never Ashamed

    Chapter Four Begun – And Finished!

    Chapter Five When Bad Things Happen To Good People

    Chapter Six Whispering Hope

    Chapter Seven Made In The Image Of God

    Chapter Eight The Mystery Of The Atonement

    Chapter Nine The Five Solas

    Chapter Ten Advancing In Christ

    Chapter Eleven You Don’t Know Me

    Chapter Twelve Escaping The Past

    Chapter Thirteen Kenosis

    Chapter Fourteen Asclepius And His Ilk

    Chapter Fifteen Rejoice In The Lord

    Chapter Sixteen The Kiss Of Peace

    Chapter Seventeen Anxious About Nothing

    Chapter Eighteen Self-Sufficient

    Chapter Nineteen Strong In Christ

    Bibliography

    Poems, Plays And Hymns

    Glossary

    End Notes

    Abbreviations

    More Books by Vision Colleges

    College Information

    A NOTE ON GENDER

    It is unfortunate that the English language does not contain an adequate generic pronoun (especially in the singular number) that includes without bias both male and female. So he, him, his, himself, man, mankind, with their plurals, must often do the work for both sexes. Accordingly, wherever it is appropriate to do so in the following pages, please include the feminine gender in the masculine, and vice versa.

    FOOTNOTES

    A work once fully referenced will thereafter be noted either by ibid (the same) or op. cit. (the work previously cited).

    SCRIPTURE TRANSLATIONS

    All scripture translations in these pages are my own, unless otherwise noted.

    PREFACE

    ON WRITERS AND PILGRIMS

    Human success, says Sirach (10:5), comes from the hand of the Lord, but upon writers he confers special honour! I feel in some measure the truth of those words, for it cannot be other than a high privilege to write about the dazzling themes that are embedded in Paul’s Letter to the Philippians!

    IMPROVING A MASTERPIECE?

    Yet I ask myself, can a man increase the brightness of the sun by lighting a candle? Can a clumsy hand do other than disfigure the beauty of a masterpiece? Is it absurd to expect a bucket of gravel to increase the grandeur of a mountain, or a paper petal to enhance the beauty of a perfect rose? Dare I try? The task seems impossible. But perhaps the finger of God will touch my stuttering words and transform them into something more than they are? Perhaps I will be like David, made able to run faster than I can run, and to leap higher (Ps 18:29). Or perhaps it will be with me as it was for the old rabbi −

    As for me, I was like a canal branching out from a river to become a watercourse for a pleasure-garden. I said, I will water my garden and soak its flower-beds. But then my canal became a river and my river a sea! Again, I will make good teaching shine like the dawn, causing its light to be seen from far away. And again, I will pour out doctrine like prophecy and bequeath it to future generations. And let me assure you that my labour has not been for myself alone but for all those who crave wisdom (Sir 24:30-34).

    Sirach first sees himself as a little channel running off a great river, whose purpose is to water a lovely garden. Yet because his ideas are not his own, but come from scripture, and because he clings to sound doctrine, his words are suddenly touched by divine inspiration. He labours, not for his own pleasure but to bring knowledge to people who seek wisdom; therefore his words are fired by a spirit of prophecy. Lo! His small canal becomes a river and his river an ocean! Like the dawn, his teaching will drive back darkness, turning night into full day, and bring radiant light to many generations.

    Well, I cannot make such a bold claim for this rivulet of mine, and I do not for a moment suppose that it will reach the extraordinary longevity Sirach 1 has attained. But I can hope! And for some readers at least, this babbling brook of human thought may become a stream of divine revelation, and the stream an ocean of transforming truth.

    Yet I empathise with the cry of the great Samuel Johnson, who in 1750 launched a new journal, The Rambler. He was its main contributor, and aware of the enormity of the task he had laid upon himself, he prayed –

    Almighty God, the giver of all good things, without whose help all labour is ineffectual, and without whose grace all wisdom is folly; grant, I beseech thee, that in this undertaking thy Holy Spirit may not be withheld from me, but that I may promote thy glory, and the salvation of myself and others: grant this, O Lord, for the sake of thy son JESUS CHRIST. Amen. 2

    AN INFALLIBLE WORK?

    My task is not as onerous as Johnson’s, yet I repeat his prayer with all fervency, knowing that I must be even more dependent than he upon the Lord. 3 And if my cry is heeded, and these pages promote the glory of Christ and assist even a few readers to attain a fuller salvation, then my toil will be well requited.

    Still, prayer does not preclude the possibilities of human error. Johnson’s most famous work was his Dictionary of the English Language, published in 1755. Although not the first English dictionary, it was superior to all its predecessors, and remained in use for nearly 180 years. 4 Johnson undergirded his dictionary too with prayer, yet his pleas did not eliminate error. Thus Boswell wrote −

    A few of Johnson’s definitions must be admitted to be erroneous. … (But) it is enough to observe, that his Preface announces that he was aware there might be many such in so immense a work; nor was he at all disconcerted when an instance was pointed out to him. A lady once asked him how he came to define Pastern 5 as the knee of a horse? Instead of making an elaborate defence, as she expected, he at once answered, Ignorance, madam, pure ignorance. 6

    I too must plead a measure of ignorance, and I crave your pardon for any mistakes you may find herein, either in doctrine or in fact. I make no claim to infallibility. I hope only that the Lord has helped me to write a book that will offer some measure of spiritual enrichment to its readers.

    I must also honestly admit − although I strive to be objective and to adhere to scripture − that these pages probably display some personal prejudice. No one can altogether avoid partiality. However, I doubt that any passage shows the bias Johnson built into some of his definitions. As Boswell says –

    Talking to me upon this subject when we were at Ashbourne in 1777, he (Johnson) mentioned a still stronger instance of the predominance of his private feelings in the composition of this work, than any now to be found in it. "You know, Sir, Lord Gower forsook the old Jacobite interest. When I came to the word Renegado7 after telling that it meant ‘one who deserts to the enemy, a revolter,’ I added, ‘Sometimes we say a GOWER.’ Thus it went to the press; but the printer had more wit than I, and struck it out." 8

    WITHOUT PREJUDICE?

    Nonetheless, whether or not I am more objective, or less prejudiced, than Dr Johnson, the unhappy fact remains that a truly objective writer has never yet existed. We are all compounded of a multitude of diverse social and cultural influences that are constantly moulding us into what we are. Hence we each look through a set of eyes that differs in some measure from all others. No two people ever see anything exactly the same way, nor are they impacted by words to an equal degree. Words themselves carry a compound of sensations, memories, images, that vary for every person. An entirely detached writer, therefore, lacking all partisanship, free of any personal prejudice, simply cannot be found, nor ever will be in this life.

    So here is a reality that we must all humbly acknowledge − arguments that one person finds compelling may not be so persuasive to another. Ideas that stir me deeply may leave another unmoved. Surely, cries one, this matter is blindingly obvious! Hardly, retorts another, I don’t see it that way at all! Things that are plain to me may be obscure to others – indeed, because of whom they are and the way life has shaped them, they may be unable to see them. Or, they may see them in a different colour, or find in them a different value.

    One of the startling discoveries of modern science is that human perception of even something so basic as colour is highly subjective. That is, how people see colour, what colours they see, and how many, are strongly influenced by culture. We see what we have been trained to see by our parents and by the society in which we were raised. Colour recognition is learned, and in different cultures people learn it differently. If we humans are incapable of seeing even bright colours in the same way, it is hardly surprising if we cannot agree on vastly more profound issues!

    So no two people will ever get exactly the same meaning out of a book, even the Bible, or be impacted by it in exactly the same way. In the end, the most any interpreter of scripture can truthfully say is, This is how I understand the words of the Bible. And how each interpreter sees scripture is shaped to a greater or lesser measure by who they are – that is, by presumptions and prejudices of which they may not even be aware. So while the Bible certainly speaks with complete authority, my book, with equal certainty, does not, nor does any other. You, dear reader, must judge for yourself whether or not my reading of scripture captures its truth and meaning for you. Dogmatism belongs only to a small number of biblical ideas; for the rest, there is room for a wide diversity of opinion, interpretation, and shades of meaning.

    NO OBJECTIVE TRUTH?

    I do not mean that there is no objective truth. Some things, of course, must be true for every rational person 9 – that day and night follow each other; that we are presently alive yet must die; that food, drink, and rest are essential for life; that no new-born baby can speak fluently; and a thousand other facts. In scripture, too, certain truths are so clearly stated, and so manifestly fixed by God, that no room remains for dissent. But there are not many such. Large areas of Christian belief and practice are open to diverse understanding and application. And the more abstract the ideas under discussion, the more likely there will be dissent among Bible readers.

    The Bible is a book, and like any other it must be read intelligently, understood reasonably, and applied fairly and practically. That pathway will be trod by its readers in many different ways. It is a path I have tried to follow in my own way, and to stick to closely. But I have probably wandered unaware off the track here and there!

    The same Dr Samuel Johnson, in 1749 wrote a tragic play Irene, which survived only nine performances; about which Boswell writes –

    When asked how he felt upon the ill success of his tragedy, he replied, Like the Monument; meaning that he continued firm and unmoved as that column. And let it be remembered, as an admonition to the genus irritabile 10 of dramatic writers, that this great man, instead of peevishly complaining of the bad taste of the town, submitted to its decision without a murmur. He had, indeed, upon all occasions, a great deference for the general opinion: A man (said he) who writes a book, thinks himself wiser or wittier than the rest of mankind; he supposes that he can instruct or amuse them, and the public to whom he appeals, must, after all, be the judges of his pretensions. 11

    With those sentiments I fully agree. That is, every writer is guilty of the arrogance of supposing that he is wiser and wittier than the rest of mankind, especially if we presume to be teachers rather than mere entertainers. Yet we are rescued from pride if we willingly accede to our readers’ judgment without a murmur. Thus I am happy to show due deference to your opinion, and freely allow your right to determine for yourself whether I have written truly or not.

    TELL ME IF I’M A THIEF!

    Well-read readers may find in these pages echoes of more writings than I have actually cited. I apologise in advance for that lack of scrupulous acknowledgment. Some of what you will find here is based on memories, sometimes unconscious, of stuff that I have read or heard in books, magazines, articles, and sermons across many years, and that I never annotated. I now have no idea where those ideas came from. Wherever possible, of course, I have noted my sources, but if you find unacknowledged passages that you think should be noted, and can provide details, please tell me.

    So now, dear reader, I leave this work in your hands, hoping you will find that it has indeed lived up to its pretensions of revealing some of the marvellous treasures buried in Paul’s letter. If you do find spiritual wealth here, then let us rejoice together, for that has been my prayer and my goal. If you do not, then let the fault be mine. Yet my prayer remains the same, that you will press forward with joy in your pilgrimage to the Celestial City, walking more firmly on the gospel path, always advancing toward the goal, and striving to win the prize that belongs to our heavenly calling in Christ Jesus. (Ph 3:14)

    INTRODUCTION

    THE JOYFUL LETTER

    (Return to Top)

    If one word could be used to summarise Paul’s Letter to the Philippians, it would be joy; and if there is one verse that encapsules the theme of the letter it would be "rejoice in the Lord always, and again I say, ‘Rejoice!’" (4:4; 1:4, 25; 2:2, 29; 4:1)

    That the letter should be so redolent of laughter is astonishing, given Paul’s painful first contact with the city. The dramatic story is told in Acts 16:12-40, how Paul and Silas arrived in Philippi, preached there, were arrested for causing a public nuisance, and brutally flogged. They were then thrown into a cell, where their legs, chained into stocks, were agonisingly stretched to the point of dislocation. There, at midnight, despite their lacerated backs and tortured limbs, they sang hymns and praised God. The Lord responded by causing an earthquake to smash open the stocks and to release the prisoners from their chains.

    Observing these extraordinary events, the chief jailer and his family converted to Christ and were baptised that same night, while the magistrates, learning to their horror that Paul was a Roman citizen whom they had illegally flogged, came to him and Silas, humbly apologised, and begged them to leave the city.

    I remain uncertain what my reactions would have been to such an amazing sequence of misery and miracle! Would I remember mostly the pain and so look on the city with loathing thereafter? Or would my recollections be dominated by the marvellous earthquake, the delight of a family’s embrace of Christ, the satisfaction of receiving an abject apology from the city authorities, and the loving welcome of Lydia and her family? I would hope the latter! But in any case, that is what Paul did. He chose to remember the miracle of the earthquake, the love of the new Christians, the joy of a successfully planted church, and the pleasure he had found in two later visits to the city prior to writing his letter to them. And so his letter laughs!

    Paul had an obvious love for the church at Philippi (1:8; 4:1). Alone among the churches to whom he wrote, he had no criticism of that church for false doctrine, or for divisions, ungodly deeds, and the like. True, there were some individuals whom he felt obliged to rebuke (1:15; 3:2, 18; 4:2), but he had no criticism to offer, only affection, which he expressed to the church as a whole. His letter was written in part to assure them of his love and his care for them, and also to deal with a handful of other matters of interest, without any special overriding theme, except perhaps gratitude. Paul was grateful for a generous gift that he had received from them, and for which he thanked them heartily. The gift was carried to him by Epaphroditus, whom Paul was particularly glad to see again (4:10, 14-18), especially because he (Epaphroditus) had only recently recovered from a serious illness (2:25-27).

    While Philippians is more of a friendly letter than a treatise on dogma, it adds at least two elements to our understanding of the gospel, in the form of a passionate emphasis, and an important dogma

    1. The Emphasis No matter what he is writing about, or to whom, Paul cannot resist drawing continual attention to Christ, and to the need for every believer to live a Christ-centred life. No less than 40 times in this short letter Paul mentions the Lord Jesus Christ, involving Christ in every aspect of Christian life, witness, and service. Indeed, for Paul to live is Christ (1:21), and he could not endure the thought of life without Christ. 12

    2. The Dogma The greatest statement about Christ that Paul makes in this letter relates to a Greek word that he applies to the Lord only here (2:7), and nowhere else in the NT. The passage has given birth to a body of doctrine known as Kenotic Theory – which means only that it deals with the mystery of how Jesus, though "he was truly God, did not try to cling to his equality with God but instead emptied himself (Greek – ekenosen) and took on the form of a slave." A later chapter of this book will deal with this wonderful and mysterious kenosis of Christ.

    And now, two final comments before we begin our search for treasure. The studies that follow make no pretence of providing a full commentary on Paul’s letter to the Philippians. If you want detailed information about background, when and why the letter was written, or verse by verse exposition, then you should turn to the internet, or to any good Bible dictionary, encyclopaedia, or commentary.

    What you will find here is treasure – that is, nuggets dug out of diverse passages from the letter. The meditations draw on other parts of scripture also, and are always directed toward successful Christian life, to the enrichment of your mind and spirit, and to the enhancement of your service of Christ and the church.

    I should add that several key passages from Philippians are missing from this book, because I have already dealt with them in one or more of my other Vision Publishing books. And in reverse, there are some passages dealt with in other books that I have nonetheless included here – they seemed too important to omit. Where that has happened, you will find mention of it in a footnote.

    May you indeed be richer for reading these pages.

    ONE

    THE SLAVES OF CHRIST

    (Return to Top)

    From Paul and Timothy, slaves of Christ Jesus, to the overseers, deacons, and all the saints in Christ Jesus who are at Philippi. (Ph 1:1)

    Do we have every privilege, or none? Are we ranked higher than the archangel, 13 or should we call ourselves the offal of the earth? Are we rich or poor? Weak or strong? Are we princes or paupers, or neither, or both?

    In fact, we are at the one time both the mightiest and the least, possessing everything and owning nothing. How can this be?

    Scripture portrays us in two shapes. We are described as reigning with Christ in the heavenlies, blessed already with every imaginable blessing, royal priests who possess free access to the throne of God, people who can speak against the powers of darkness with the authority of the King himself.

    But we are also described as people who are called to endure hardship in the service of Christ, to be ready to suffer for the cause of righteousness, to be stripped of everything we possess, and to offer our lives on the altar of discipleship. Thus Paul calls himself and Timothy the slaves of Christ, implying that this appellation should be welcomed gladly by every Christian.

    The Greek word is doulos, which may be translated as servant; but it comes from a root that means to bind up or chain, so that its more usual sense is slave. What does that mean?

    A DEMAND FOR RADICAL HUMILITY

    A SLAP ON THE FACE

    Do you remember how Jesus taught that we should turn the other cheek if someone strikes us on the face? (Lu 6:29) Have you ever imagined that happening to you? Someone slaps your cheek, and at once, without retaliating, you present your other cheek for a blow! Did Jesus really expect us to behave so meekly? I suppose circumstances might alter the case. If the blow is struck as an insult to Christ, or just because you are a Christian, probably you should do exactly as Jesus says! But if it is a buffet given in mere anger, you are probably entitled to defend yourself, but not to strike back angrily. Or, if allowing violence when it is in your power to stop it will only encourage more and worse brutality, then prudence would say that you should do so. Or, if the blow is part of an assault that involves or hurts other people, then you are entitled to use as much force as necessary to prevent it. And so on. There should be reason and balance in all things. But acting merely out of spite, or taking personal revenge for some hurt, is always forbidden by Christ.

    However, there is a deeper meaning in this matter of turning the other cheek. You can strike someone on both sides of the face only by using the back of your hand for the second blow. Visualise a person standing in front of you and slapping your left cheek with the flat of his right hand. Then he swings his arm back to smite your right cheek also. He cannot turn his hand over, except with difficulty, so he will likely hit you with the back of his hand.

    In the 1963 epic film Cleopatra, Richard Burton plays Mark Anthony, and Elizabeth Taylor plays the Queen. In one scene they quarrel violently and Cleopatra slaps the Roman as hard as she can on his left cheek. He remains unmoved. She slaps him again. He still fails to react. So then she backhands him on his right cheek, and at once, deeply insulted, he retaliates furiously and knocks her to the ground. Then, as now, any slap on the face was deemed an outrage; but a back-handed blow was (and is) doubly so! Hence Jesus was not talking so much about non-retaliation

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1