Ornamentation In J.S. Bach's Organ Works
()
About this ebook
Related to Ornamentation In J.S. Bach's Organ Works
Related ebooks
The Art of Accompaniment from a Thorough-Bass: As Practiced in the XVII and XVIII Centuries, Volume I Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Guide to the Registration of Church Organs - A Selection of Classic Articles on the Technical Aspects of Organ Performance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFugue Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGeorge Frideric Handel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Style of Palestrina and the Dissonance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMusic in the Baroque Era - From Monteverdi to Bach Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sixteenth Century Polyphony - A Basic For The Study Of Counterpoint Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCounterpoint The Polyphonic Vocal Sixteenth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of Fugue: Bach Fugues for Keyboard, 1715–1750 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Study of Fugue Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Schumann on Music: A Selection from the Writings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrnamentation in Baroque and Post-Baroque Music, with Special Emphasis on J.S. Bach Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Social and Religious Designs of J. S. Bach's Brandenburg Concertos Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Brandenburg Concerto No. 4 G major: BWV 1049 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDance and the Music of J. S. Bach Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Pianoforte Sonata: Its Origin and Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFive Centuries of Keyboard Music Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Organ-Stops and Their Artistic Registration Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJohann Sebastian Bach: The Organist and His Works for the Organ Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSonata Fragments: Romantic Narratives in Chopin, Schumann, and Brahms Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Performer's Guide to Seventeenth-Century Music, Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Symphony No. 4 C minor: D 417, "Tragic" Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Complete Organ Method: A Classic Text on Organ Technique Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Counterpoint: The Polyphonic Vocal Style of the Sixteenth Century Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Fitzwilliam Virginal Book, Volume Two Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsItalian Organ Music - A Classic Article on the History of Italian Organ Compositions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKeyboard Works Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJean-Philippe Rameau: His Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masterpieces of Music Before 1750 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Missa Papae Marcelli Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Music For You
Step By Step Mixing: How to Create Great Mixes Using Only 5 Plug-ins Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Mixing Engineer's Handbook 5th Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5IT'S ALL IN YOUR HEAD Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Music Theory For Beginners Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Learn Your Fretboard: The Essential Memorization Guide for Guitar (Book + Online Bonus) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Learn Jazz Piano: book 1 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Learn Guitar A Beginner's Course Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Music Theory For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/588 Piano Classics for Beginners Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Circle of Fifths: Visual Tools for Musicians, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Easyway to Play Piano: A Beginner's Best Piano Primer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Guitar For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Can I Say: Living Large, Cheating Death, and Drums, Drums, Drums Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Songwriting: Essential Guide to Lyric Form and Structure: Tools and Techniques for Writing Better Lyrics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Weird Scenes Inside The Canyon: Laurel Canyon, Covert Ops & The Dark Heart Of The Hippie Dream Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Singing For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hal Leonard Pocket Music Theory (Music Instruction): A Comprehensive and Convenient Source for All Musicians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Guitar Practice Guide: A Practice Guide for Guitarists and other Musicians Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Can't Stop Won't Stop: A History of the Hip-Hop Generation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Read Music Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Open Book Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meaning of Mariah Carey Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Everything Songwriting Book: All You Need to Create and Market Hit Songs Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Guitar Theory For Dummies: Book + Online Video & Audio Instruction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Ornamentation In J.S. Bach's Organ Works
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Ornamentation In J.S. Bach's Organ Works - Putnam Aldrich
Introduction
‘ORNAMENTATION,’ writes Paul Henry Lang in his monumental study of music in western civilization, is ‘the most typical feature of baroque style, equally prominent in all phases of baroque art.’¹ Musical ornamentation is no exception. It is now generally recognized that the ornaments form an integral part of the musical language of Bach’s time, and that a performance of his works in which the trills, turns, appoggiaturas, and mordents are omitted or interpreted incorrectly, does violence to the musical ideas he intended to express. Organists who are conscientious musicians and devoted to Bach’s works doubtless feel a sincere desire to carry out the composer’s intentions. But they are often perplexed as to just how to proceed in order to do so, being handicapped at the start by a lack of reliable guides. Modern editions of Bach’s works conflict with each other in regard to the signs and placing of the ornaments as well as in their directions for executing them. Efforts to solve the problem by consulting the works of scholars such as Pirro, Schweitzer, and Dannreuther only lead to further confusion: the experts disagree among themselves.
There are two reasons for these discrepancies and for the unreliability of editors and commentators: (1) these scholars base their interpretations upon documents that were written too late to be trustworthy guides to Bach’s practice; (2) they undertake their quest for authenticity along the lines of 19th-century research, which are not applicable to the Baroque period.
Both Pirro² and Schweitzer³ are guilty of lapses in scholarship when they base their discussions of Bach’s ornaments upon directions given by Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach, Quantz, and Türk in treatises that were not published until after Bach’s death. Dannreuther’s treatment of Bach’s ornamentation is marred by similar inconsistencies; after dealing competently with 17th-century ornamentation as exemplified in the works of Bach’s forerunners, he proceeds, in the case of Bach himself, to adduce numerous exceptions to the common practice of the period—exceptions, needless to say, that Bach had never heard of—and to introduce, arbitrarily, new ornaments such as the so-called ‘Pralltriller,’ whose invention actually dates from the following generation.⁴ Caspar Koch, the most recent contributor to the literature of this subject, falls into the same error that his predecessors did, by citing, in support of his directions, realizations of ornaments extracted from treatises by Marpurg (1750), Quantz (1752), C. P. E. Bach (1753), Leopold Mozart (1756), Dom Bedos de Celles (1778), Rellstab (1789), and Türk (1789).⁵
Now it so happens that the last half of the 18th century is precisely the period of the most rapid changes in both the composition and performance of music—changes which brought about the disintegration of the Baroque ideals and the formation of the Classic style of Mozart, Haydn, and Beethoven.⁶ Interspersed with the conventions that carry over from Bach’s lifetime are innumerable innovations presaging the new style. It becomes difficult even to distinguish a single, unified common practice for this period. It would seem evident that there is no justification for assuming that its usage is similar to Bach’s. Yet, with the exception of a short article by Wanda Landowska,⁷ the present writer knows of no published commentary on Bach’s ornaments that is based exclusively upon sources accessible to Bach himself.
Equally hazardous as the reliance upon anachronistic source materials is the use of methods of research which leave out of consideration the most important issue of all, namely, the fact that Baroque ideals of performance differed fundamentally from those of the present day. The problem, here, hinges primarily upon the attitude of the musician toward the printed or manuscript score. Nowadays, we regard the composer’s manuscript as the final authority on any debatable point of interpretation. If we wish to obtain an authentic reading of a piece by Brahms, Schumann, or even Beethoven, we can find no better procedure than to consult the autograph manuscript and follow, note for note and sign for sign, the indications that the composer set down on paper. This is known as ‘letting the music speak for itself.’ Unfortunately, however, the music of the Baroque period cannot be induced to speak for itself. At that time the division of labor which has separated composition and performance into two distinct fields of specialization had not yet come into effect. All composers were performers and all performers were composers, at least to the extent that they were called upon to collaborate with the actual composer in the re-creation of any given composition. Many details of execution were not indicated on paper at all, but supplied extemporaneously by the performer.
It follows that the autograph score is not an authentic record of how the composer or anyone else performed the piece. The method of editorial research developed by 19th-century musicology consists chiefly in tracking down autograph manuscripts and first editions and preparing an ‘Urtext’ that contains only the notes and signs actually set down by the composer. This is the procedure followed by the editors of the Bach Gesellschaft edition. Such a method is obviously quite useless, from the performer’s point of view, in a situation wherein a ‘corrupt’ score (with additions and alterations in handwritings other than the composer’s) may be more authoritative than a ‘pure’ one, and no score can be completely authoritative.
The