A Primer on How Institutions Think
By Razie Mah
()
About this ebook
Why a series of primers?
These primers provide in depth coverage of the nested form constructs in the book: How to Define the Word “Religion”.
Primers 1 and 2 developed the category-based nested forms discussed in “the meaning underlying the word ‘religion’”.
The next several primer address “the presence underlying the word ‘religion’”. This presence can be appreciated through a fully differentiated model of “humans in our current Lebenswelt”. Humans exist in society. Humans organize. Human live as individuals in community. Each of these modes of existence relate to one another as a nested form:
Society( Organization( potential of Individual in Community))
Primer 3 diagrams the individual in community. Primers 4 and 5 present the organization tier. Primer 6 introduces the institution level of the society tier, starting with an example, the family. Primer 7 reviews How Institutions Think (1986) by British anthropologist Mary Douglas.
Razie Mah
See website for bio.
Read more from Razie Mah
Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on the Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Five Views in the Book (2020) "Original Sin and the Fall" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mansoureh Tajik’s Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Natural Signs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky's Book (2016) Why Only Us? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12-19 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe First Primer on the Organization Tier Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James V. Schall S.J.’s (2017) Political Philosophy and Catholicism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on “A Bio-Cultural-Historical Approach to the Study of Development (2016)” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeculations on Thomism and Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Derek Bickerton's Book (2014) More than Nature Needs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Fr. Dan Pattee’s Essay (2016) Social Justice and Catholic Social Thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Individual In Community Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to A Primer on How Institutions Think
Related ebooks
Comments on Donna West’s Essay (2019) "Thirdness along the Intuitional Path" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSesame and Lilies (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Poems in Prose Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe English Humourists: "A good laugh is sunshine in the house." Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Psmith in the City Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClassic of History (Part 1 & 2: The Book of Thang & The Books of Yü) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThus Spoke Zarathustra Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Middling Romanticism: Reading in the Gaps, from Kant to Ashbery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWithin an Inch of His Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Unexplained Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Medieval Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Gooseberry Fool Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOxford Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Land of Mist Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Word Portraits of Famous Writers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sources of Religious Insight Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complete Poetical Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge Vol I and II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Where Have All the Heavens Gone?: Galileo’s Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClarissa Harlowe; or the history of a young lady — Volume 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nature of Things Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeaves in the Wind Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Essays of George Eliot Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSilverpoints Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGale Researcher Guide for: Wallace Stevens's Lyric Modernism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsÆsthetic as science of expression and general linguistic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGrowth of the Soil Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Life of Wisdom in Rousseau's "Reveries of the Solitary Walker" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAverroism between the 15th and 17th century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIllustrated Biography of William Shakespeare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Social Science For You
My Secret Garden: Women's Sexual Fantasies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Body Is Not an Apology, Second Edition: The Power of Radical Self-Love Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Witty Banter: Be Clever, Quick, & Magnetic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sun Does Shine: How I Found Life and Freedom on Death Row (Oprah's Book Club Selection) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Come As You Are: Revised and Updated: The Surprising New Science That Will Transform Your Sex Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Like Switch: An Ex-FBI Agent's Guide to Influencing, Attracting, and Winning People Over Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5100 Amazing Facts About the Negro with Complete Proof Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dreamland: The True Tale of America's Opiate Epidemic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fervent: A Woman's Battle Plan to Serious, Specific, and Strategic Prayer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You're Not Listening: What You're Missing and Why It Matters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Song of the Cell: An Exploration of Medicine and the New Human Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Barracoon: The Story of the Last "Black Cargo" Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Just Mercy: a story of justice and redemption Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I Don't Want to Talk About It: Overcoming the Secret Legacy of Male Depression Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for A Primer on How Institutions Think
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
A Primer on How Institutions Think - Razie Mah
A Primer on How Institutions Think
Razie Mah
Published for Smashwords
7815 U0’
2015 AD
Notes on Text
The seventh primer further develops the institution level of the society tier, by reviewing How Institutions Think by Mary Douglas (1986: Syracuse University Press).
Note: Single quotes and italics are used to group words together for easier reading.
Note: To translate from Ubaid Zero prime (U0') to Anno Domini (AD), subtract 5800
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 in My Own Words
Chapter 2 in My Own Words
Fleck’s Terminology Comes to Life
Signs of the Real
Concluding Chapter 2
Chapter 3 in My Own Words
Conclusion of Chapter 3
The Remaining Chapters Turn the Paradigm Around
Conclusion
Chapter 1 in My Own Words
0001 Thirty years ago, in 7785 U0’, the British social anthropologist Mary Douglas presents the sixth Abrams’ lecture at Syracuse University.
Frank W. Abrams was a lifelong leader in support of higher education. He played key roles in the Council for Financial Aid to Education, the Ford Foundation’s Fund for the Advancement of Education, and the Alfred E. Sloan Foundation. Undoubtedly, Mr. Abrams was a Progressive, like most leaders of his time. He would not have viewed Mary Douglas as subversive, even though she is.
Mary Douglas (7721-7807 U0') is that good.
0002 Her lectures aim to discredit rational choice theory. In its place, she proposes a hybrid of Emile Durkheim's and Ludwik Fleck’s ideas.
Emile Durkheim (7658-7717 U0’) is a French anthropologist interested in comprehending so-called primitive peoples. Ludwik Fleck (7696-7761 U0’) is a Polish and Israeli microbiologist interested in comprehending how scientific facts are established.
From these divergent starting points, both arrive at a sociology of institutional thought. My intent is to re-articulate Douglas’s argument within the framework of the three-tiered diagram of the presence underlying the word, religion
.
Emile Durkheim
0003 Durkheim is interested in the social origins of human thought. Utility may account for some thought, but that is limited to sensible thinking. Utility makes sense in a sensical world. But, the world is not always sensical. There are many features of our world that make no sense at all. So the question might be phrased like this: How do people make the world sensical enough for utilitarian (sensible) action?
What do I mean by people
?
Do I mean individuals?
By Durkheim’s time, the concept of the individual has been removed from its original illumination (by early medieval Christians) and placed on its own altar, as a dynamic of post-religionist [enlightenment] theology. The actuality of the individual no longer emerges from and situates the potential of a mystical union with God. Rather, the individual embodies the potential of human fulfillment.
Post-religionist ideas and institutions emerge from and situate the potential of individual fulfillment.
0004 This history explains why modern sociologists dismiss Durkheim.
Durkheim’s theories account for the actuality of individual thought in terms of the potential of ‘something’ that may be called social
. To me, the image of