Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

A Primer on a Contemporary Infrasovereign Religion
A Primer on a Contemporary Infrasovereign Religion
A Primer on a Contemporary Infrasovereign Religion
Ebook75 pages36 minutes

A Primer on a Contemporary Infrasovereign Religion

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Why a series of primers?
These primers provide in depth coverage of the nested form constructs in the book: How to Define the Word “Religion”.
Primers 1 and 2 developed the category-based nested forms discussed in “the meaning underlying the word ‘religion’”.
The next several primer address “the presence underlying the word ‘religion’”. This presence can be appreciated through a fully differentiated model of “humans in our current Lebenswelt”. Humans exist in society. Humans organize. Human live as individuals in community. Each of these modes of existence relate to one another as a nested form:
Society( Organization( potential of Individual in Community))
Primer 3 diagrams the individual in community. Primers 4 and 5 present the organization tier. Primer 6 introduces the institution level of the society tier, starting with an example, the family. Primer 7 reviews How Institutions Think (1986) by British anthropologist Mary Douglas. Primer 8 presents the idea of an infrasovereign religion, using a contemporary political movement as an example.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherRazie Mah
Release dateJun 6, 2015
ISBN9781942824114
A Primer on a Contemporary Infrasovereign Religion
Author

Razie Mah

See website for bio.

Read more from Razie Mah

Related to A Primer on a Contemporary Infrasovereign Religion

Related ebooks

Social Science For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for A Primer on a Contemporary Infrasovereign Religion

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    A Primer on a Contemporary Infrasovereign Religion - Razie Mah

    A Primer on an Infrasovereign Religion

    Razie Mah

    Published for Smashwords

    7815 U0’

    2015 AD

    Notes on Text

    The eighth in the primer series concerns the institution and the sovereign levels of the society tier.

    This primer considers an politically and emotionally charged example of an infrasovereign religion: America’s homosexual activism as a branch of big government (il)liberalism.

    Note: Single quotes and italics are used to group words together for easier reading.

    In order to calculate year in AD (Anno Domini), subtract 5800 from U0' (Ubaid Zero Prime).

    Table of Contents

    A Situation

    A Perspective

    The Sovereign As Nested Form

    A Historical Interlude

    The Institution in Action

    The Question

    Fetishes and Accusations

    America’s Unique Historic Fusion of Slavery and Race

    Back to the Question

    The Strengths and Weaknesses of Slogans

    What Is Natural?

    A Short Wrap Up

    Where Do We Go From Here?

    A Situation

    0001 The year is 7815 U0’. Corporate media reports from the state of Oregon. Activist homosexual couples troll Christian services (bakeries, florists, and others) in order to out the homophobes. When a business refuses to serve a homosexual wedding, the owner is sued, as if the owner refuses service on the basis of race.

    The Christian owner faces a stark choice between involuntary participation in an idolatrous religious service or bankruptcy. Judges award large payments to redress the pain and suffering of the homosexual couple. Christian owners face loss of property and business.

    0002 The legal bait-and-switch goes like this: The modern homosexual should be afforded the same civil rights as an American of African descent. Sexual orientation fits into the same legal basket as race, in a nation where race once demarked the condition of being a slave.

    Christians are at a loss because the vocabulary of civil rights has been usurped and applied to entirely different conditions. Attempts by state legislatures to prevent this legal predation flounder. According to Big Government (il)Liberalism, the so-called human rights of the homosexual outweigh a business owner’s right to practice his religion. Here, the term, religion, is defined as a Christian faction.

    A Perspective

    0003 Two worldviews face one another. One belongs to America’s (il)liberal big government legal system, the aggressive homosexual couple, and fellow travelers. The second belongs to Christian citizens, along with their state representatives. To me, this particular confrontation serves as a point of departure for contemplating one of the two types of religion. What follows is an exploration of the type of religion that pursues sovereign power.

    0004 Both perspectives are postreligionist in this manner: The first is postreligionist according to the French tradition, where not religious means not belonging to any Christian faction. The second is postreligionist in the American tradition, where the federal (union) government is limited in scope. One of the limitations is that the federal government shall not establish a religion.

    So, how do we define the word, religion?

    For both postreligionist movements, the term, religion, points to Christian factions, since there are no other religious factions at the time of the French and American revolutions.

    In the French

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1