A Primer on Classical Political Philosophy
By Razie Mah
()
About this ebook
Why a series of primers?
These primers provide in depth coverage of the nested form constructs in the book: How to Define the Word “Religion”.
Primers 1 and 2 developed the category-based nested forms discussed in “the meaning underlying the word ‘religion’”.
The next several primers address “the presence underlying the word ‘religion’”. This presence can be appreciated through a fully differentiated model of “humans in our current Lebenswelt”. Humans exist in society. Humans organize. Human live as individuals in community. Each of these modes of existence relate to one another as a nested form:
Society( Organization( potential of Individual in Community))
Primer 3 diagrams the individual in community. Primers 4 and 5 present the organization tier. Primer 6 introduces the institution level of the society tier, starting with an example, the family. Primer 7 reviews How Institutions Think (1986) by British anthropologist Mary Douglas. Primer 8 presents the idea of an infrasovereign religion, using a contemporary political movement as an example. Primer 9 discusses classical political philosophy.
Razie Mah
See website for bio.
Read more from Razie Mah
Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on the Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12-19 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Natural Signs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Five Views in the Book (2020) "Original Sin and the Fall" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mansoureh Tajik’s Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLessons 1-12 for Instructor’s Guide to An Archaeology of the Fall and Related Scriptures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeculations on Thomism and Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James V. Schall S.J.’s (2017) Political Philosophy and Catholicism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mariusz Tabaczek’s Essay (2019) "What do God and Creatures Really Do in an Evolutionary Change?" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky's Book (2016) Why Only Us? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on George Weigel’s Book (2007) Faith, Reason and the War against Jihadism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Inevitable Twist: Comments on Lamoureux’s Question Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Giovanni Maddalena's Essay (2017) "Jung and Peirce" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to A Primer on Classical Political Philosophy
Related ebooks
A Primer on How Institutions Think Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow the Social Sciences Think about the World's Social: Outline of a Critique Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Another Infrasovereign Religion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Real Great RESET Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHijacking Reality: The Reprogramming & Reorganization of Human Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFree-Market Champions: Belief? Ideology? Philosophy? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExplaining Things: Inventing Ourselves and Our Worlds Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Millennial Mind: A Survival Guide for All Generations in the Digital Age. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings2084: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What Is Social Imaginary?: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Behavior of Crowds A Psychological Study Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFifteen Paths: How to Tune Out Noise, Turn On Imagination and Find Wisdom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStuck in a Bind: The Internal Contradictions and Conflicts of Our Modern Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Paradox of the Subject Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgreeable Connexions: Scottish Enlightenment Links with France Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLimbo Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays in Humanism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Philosophy and The Social Problem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInterpretation and Social Knowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Carlos Blanco-Perez's Essay (2018) "On the Principles of a Social Theory" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Thinkers: Simple tools from sixty great thinkers to improve your life today Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5We Live in Social Space: A Window to a New Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Fr. Dan Pattee’s Essay (2016) Social Justice and Catholic Social Thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMulticultural Marketing Is Your Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Gregory Sandstrom’s Book (2014) "Human Extension" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Sensible and Social Construction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Of "The Interpretation Of Cultures" By Clifford Geertz: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Zen and the Art of Funk Capitalism: A General Theory of Fallibility Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeaning: the History of Western Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Social Science For You
Come As You Are: Revised and Updated: The Surprising New Science That Will Transform Your Sex Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Men Explain Things to Me Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sun Does Shine: How I Found Life and Freedom on Death Row (Oprah's Book Club Selection) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Witty Banter: Be Clever, Quick, & Magnetic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Like Switch: An Ex-FBI Agent's Guide to Influencing, Attracting, and Winning People Over Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fourth Turning Is Here: What the Seasons of History Tell Us about How and When This Crisis Will End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Just Mercy: a story of justice and redemption Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Close Encounters with Addiction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Song of the Cell: An Exploration of Medicine and the New Human Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Don't Want to Talk About It: Overcoming the Secret Legacy of Male Depression Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You're Not Listening: What You're Missing and Why It Matters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for A Primer on Classical Political Philosophy
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
A Primer on Classical Political Philosophy - Razie Mah
A Primer on Classical Political Philosophy
Razie Mah
Published for Smashwords
7815 U0’
2015 AD
Notes on Text
The ninth primer concerns the society tier. It contemplates three essays by classical philosopher Leo Strauss. The three essays appear in What is Political Philosophy and Other Studies (7759 U0').
Single quotes and italics are used to group words together.
In order to convert Ubaid Zero Prime (U0') to Anno Domini (AD), subtract 5800.
Table of Contents
Looking Back to Meaning
An Unnatural Question
The Question of Classical Philosophy
Two Questions Rolled into One
Politics, Politics, Politics
Objections to Classical Political Philosophy
On Classical Philosophy
Good Things
Political Philosophy and History
My Response to Historicism
Conclusion
Looking Back to Meaning
0001 In How to Define the Word Religion
, sensible and social construction are described in the chapter on the meaning.
0002 What do I learn from this chapter?
Sensible construction differs from social construction.
0003 Consider the evolution of talk.
Long before the first singularity, sensible construction stands on its own beneath the perspective of reference. Manual-brachial gestures image and point to things. Each hand-talk word refers to a thing. So, gestural-words always make sense, because I can see the gesture and correctly guess what is being imaged or pointed to. The referent is built into the icon and the index. When a fellow team-member hand-talks, sensible construction is always indicated.
Here is a picture.
0004 The symbolic orders of language (parole and langue) develop within the perspective of reference. Eventually, symbolic operations (grammar) allow fully linguistic hand-talk statements that are sensical (since the gesture-words are icons and indexes), but do not make sense (due to the grammar). For example, one can hand talk the statement, for a lunar eclipse, A wolf (image) the moon (index) eats.
Of course, no wolf can eat the moon. The statement is both grammatically proper and impossible.
When a sensical hand-talk statement is grammatically correct and counter-intuitive, then sensible construction is not enough. Social construction is an adaptation to the niche of statements, bearing realistic words, but in grammatical configurations that rule out sensible construction.
0005 After the first singularity, we (fallen humans) live in a dream world where we think that sensible construction situates sensical words. But, it does not. Speech-alone words cannot be sensical, because they do not image or point to anything. They are not icons or indexes.
0006 What do we sense in speech-alone talk?
We sense easily distinguished combinations of formant sound-frequencies. A formant
is like an envelope of sound that starts and ends in time. Each spoken word has a distinct set of formant frequencies.
0007 So, how do we connect any particular envelope of sound (or parole) with its referent?
Well, we project meaning, presence and message onto each spoken word. Every spoken word begins as a perspective-level reference2c socially constructed3b on a content-level reference2a. A content-level reference2a triggers an innate expectation that there must be... um... a referent. I hear a spoken parole. So, there must be a langue to go with this parole. But, if I am not acquainted with the spoken word,