Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Measure for Measure
    Measure for Measure
    Measure for Measure
    Ebook140 pages1 hour

    Measure for Measure

    By William Shakespeare

    3.5/5

    ()

    Switch to audiobook
    Read preview

    About this ebook

    One of Shakespeare's "dark comedies," Measure for Measure is as noteworthy for its fascinating political and social implications as for its compelling characters: a duke masquerading as a monk, a would-be nun ordered to sacrifice her chastity to save her brother's life, and a self-righteous courtier, professing his incorruptibility while concealing a depraved private life.
    In this engrossing drama set in 16th-century Vienna, Duke Vincentio attempts to enforce the city's long-ignored morality laws, which results in a death sentence for Claudio, a young man accused of seducing and impregnating his fiancée. Isabella, his sister, attempts to gain a pardon for him, but refuses when she is asked to exchange her virtue for her brother's life.
    Claudio eventually is freed and utter tragedy is averted, as Shakespeare explores with force and sensitivity the basis of good government, public and private morality, and the balancing of justice and mercy, among other themes.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherDover Publications
    Release dateDec 2, 2014
    ISBN9780486159669
    Author

    William Shakespeare

    William Shakespeare (1564-1616) es ampliamente reconocido como uno de los más grandes escritores de todos los tiempos. Dramaturgo, actor y poeta, escribió casi cuarenta obras de teatro agrupadas generalmente según tres categorías: tragedias, comedias y obras históricas. Piezas como Hamlet, El rey Lear, El mercader de Venecia, Antonio y Cleopatra, Macbeth y Romeo y Julieta, por nombrar algunas de ellas, son aún a día de hoy estudiadas y representadas en todo el mundo.

    Read more from William Shakespeare

    Related to Measure for Measure

    Related ebooks

    Performing Arts For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Theatre And The Last Pandemic

      Apr 27, 2020

      Theatre And The Last Pandemic
      8 min read

    • Article

      My 21st-century Touchstone Play: Theatre Stars Share The Shows That Shook Them To The Core

      Feb 19, 2021

      Here at the Evening Standard, we recently tried to pull together the 21st-century’s greatest plays (read our list and see if you agree). But what about those plays that impact us more personally, that seem to speak to us directly and leave us getting

      7 min read

    • Article

      “Where Did You Laugh?”

      Dec 14, 2019

      “Where Did You Laugh?”
      4 min read

    • Article

      We Laughed–until We Cried

      Feb 5, 2020

      We Laughed–until We Cried
      4 min read

    • Article

      Carrie Coon Has Drawn Acclaim for Her TV Work, but Her Return to Theater in 'Mary Jane' Brings a Welcome Clarity of Character

      Oct 27, 2017

      NEW YORK - You can tell by the way Carrie Coon confidently maneuvers around the tables of a crowded Tribeca restaurant that this is an actress who has hit her stride. She recently completed two tours of television duty, receiving acclaim for her work

      6 min read

    • Article

      Pain And Love In The Backyard

      Feb 25, 2020

      In Will Arbery’s new play, five conservative Catholics in Wyoming gather late at night by a fire pit to argue, commiserate, and face the uncertain future of their faith and their country. Danya Taymor, who directed the play’s premiere at New York Cit

      8 min read

    • Article

      The 10 Best Shows

      Dec 19, 2016

      The 10 Best Shows
      3 min read

    • Article

      ‘The Humans’ Review: Stephen Karam’s Hit Play About An Unsettling Thanksgiving Comes To Showtime, Starring Amy Schumer And A Table Full Of Real Humans

      Nov 24, 2021

      ‘The Humans’ Review: Stephen Karam’s Hit Play About An Unsettling Thanksgiving Comes To Showtime, Starring Amy Schumer And A Table Full Of Real Humans
      2 min read

    • Article

      Adapting the Bard: On the Hogarth Shakespeare Project’s Diversity Problem

      Oct 5, 2017

      It is disappointing when a project aims to see “the Bard’s plays retold by acclaimed, bestselling novelists and brought to life for a contemporary readership,” yet the writers selected are not ultimately representative of all that contemporary societ

      6 min read

    • Article

      Polly Stenham

      Jun 4, 2016

      Polly Stenham
      1 min read

    • Article

      Editor’s Note

      Jul 25, 2019

      IF THE FIERCE WOMAN IN A BROCADE JACKET ON OUR cover is unfamiliar to you, allow us to correct that. Playwright Adrienne Kennedy is an American original as distinctive as any artist who’s ever walked among us. Born in 1931, she began writing her lyri

      2 min read

    • Article

      Review: Martyna Majok's Pulitzer-winning Drama 'Cost Of Living' Has Found An Ideal Home

      Nov 13, 2018

      LOS ANGELES - Two of the best productions this fall have happened at intimate theaters that are keeping up with the exciting developments in American playwriting. Earlier this season, Branden Jacobs-Jenkins' "Gloria" was presented by Echo Theater Com

      3 min read

    • Article

      Refugees

      Mar 1, 2019

      Refugees
      12 min read

    • Article

      Cathedrals Made of Bricks

      Nov 25, 2019

      Cathedrals Made of Bricks
      6 min read

    • Article

      Qui Nguyen Finds a Home in Orange County

      Apr 2, 2019

      As a playwright, I’m a little bit ADD artistically,” says Qui Nguyen. “I get bored really quickly. I put things in there that are kind of wild, just to keep myself entertained.” Nguyen’s breakthrough play, Vietgone, illustrates exactly what he’s talk

      5 min read

    • Article

      Mfa Or The Highway?

      Dec 25, 2019

      FOR YEARS, I IDENTIFIED AS A PLAY ‑ wright who wanted an MFA. I had seen those coveted three letters in almost every playwright’s bio, often attached to an illustrious university—an Ivy, or maybe a West Coast equivalent. I spent three autumns writing

      12 min read

    • Article

      Denise Gough: From Feral Brilliance In 'People, Places & Things' To A Broadway Debut In 'Angels In America'

      Dec 5, 2017

      NEW YORK - At the start of Duncan Macmillan's "People, Places & Things," which concluded its triumphant run at St. Ann's Warehouse in Brooklyn on Sunday, Emma, an actress with a serious substance abuse problem, is flailing about in Chekhov's "The Sea

      6 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Measure for Measure

    3.5/5

    577 ratings14 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      When the Duke leaves Vienna, he puts a deputy, Angelo, in charge. Angelo is a bit hard-nosed, and decides to revive some of the laws that have been largely ignored by both populace and ruler. Specifically, he imprisons a man who impregnated the woman. Despite the fact that Claudio is willing to marry this woman, Angelo orders that the law be carried out and Claudio must die. Can Claudio's sister, Isabella, convince Angelo to relent?While not one of Shakepeare's most obscure plays, Measure for Measure is also not one I had ever read for school. It does not have oft-quoted lines like Hamlet or Romeo and Juliet, though it does still have sentiments that have found its way into our popular culture (the idea of "hate the sin and love the sinner" shows up). The title is taken from Matthew 7:1-2: "Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again." In this case, our judge Angelo is the least sympathetic character in the play. Instead, you really feel for people like Claudio, who makes a mistake but wants to make it right as well as he can, and Isabella who truly loves her brother but is given an awful choice to save his life. I'm not sure I fully agree with the sentiments of the play, and I was a little surprised by the frank discussion of sex and prostitution (I'm not sure why, it's not like I never read Shakespeare before...). If not one of my favorites, it was still a thought-provoking read.
    • 3/5
      Measure for Measure is a play about lust in the sense that Claudio has been sleeping with a woman, Juliet even though they are not married. Is it love or is it lust. In my mind this is really love turned into lust because they had been married, but could not acknowledge it because of some problem with the legality. They are in love but lust creeps into the scene because they refuse wait any longer and thus they break the law.

      Angelo is passing judgement on Claudio once he gains power. He appears to be an honest, just person in the beginning of Act One. His true desire is revealed when Isabella comes to try to save her brother. Angelo than is portrayed as a creep and someone who no one would like to meet in a dark alley. He pretends to be something but he really is not. He reminds me of (the Disney) version of Claude Frollo, (I can't speak for Victor Hugo's version, as I haven't read it yet) from the Hunchback of Notre Dame, with Isabella in the place of Esmeralda, as the kind, innocent woman he lusts for and is trying to manipulate in order to get what he wants.

      The Duke believes his city is corrupt and he believes that he cannot fix the city without his people hating him because he has not enforced the law. He believes the law needs to be enforced now but he does not believe that he will be able to do it because he has been so lax in allowing the people not to follow the law. He leaves this problem to Anglo thus abdicating his responsibility. "I do fear, too dreadful:/Sith ‘twas my fault to give the people scope,/For what I bid them do: for we bid this be done/When evil deeds have their permissive pass/And not the punishment. Therefore, indeed, my father,/I have on Angelo impos’d the office;/Who may, in the ambush of my name, strike home,/And yet my nature never in the fight,/To do it slander. And to behold his sway,/I will, as ‘twere a brother of your order,/Visit both prince and people: therefore, I pr’ythee,/Supply me with the habit, and instruct me/How I may formally in person bear me/Like a true friar."

      The Duke’s true desire is to have people like him but he also wants his city to be a city of people with good morals. He believes Angelo is of good character and by leaving the city in the hands of Angelo, he is able to see if his people will live a moral life and if Angelo is a good leader who is able to get the people to follow a moral life. I also wonder if the Duke perhaps does not have an heir thus trying out Angelo as a potential heir, and therefore, in leaving him in charge of the city, yet remaining behind to watch, may have been his way of testing to see if Angelo could be a good leader. I don’t think the Duke, Vincentio, is trying to torture his citizens. He seems to want to help them and have a city that is morally good but he doesn’t think they will listen to him because he has not enforced the law so it will be too hard to change the behavior. Yet even if he had good intentions, leaving his people at the mercy of Angelo was a cowardly way to fix the problems he saw. At the very least he should have revealed himself when he learned of Angelo's corruption, and attempts to get Isabella into his bed, instead of going through the elaborate hoax to make Angelo think he had gotten what he wanted.

      The Duke is the driving force behind the play because it him who decides the city needs to change. The message Shakespeare leaves me with is that man is unconsciously immoral and there is corruption even in men who we believe are good. This is of course illustrated in Angelo who in the beginning uses Claudio as an example of immoral behavior but he himself becomes even a bigger example of immoral behavior when he tries to corrupt the good and innocent Isabella.

      I'm not entirely satisfied by the ending of the play. I admire Isabella's forgiving Angelo who wronged her so, much as I admire Immaculee Ilibagiza for forgiving the people who did her wrong, but just because Angelo was forgiven doesn't mean that he should have gotten out of punishment. Only Mariana's grief kept him from death, but I feel she deserved better than Angelo. Claudio has survived, and I'm sure that Isabella will forgive him for what he asked her to do to save his life, but will he forgive himself? Even ignoring the fact that Isabella wanted to become a nun, the tactics of manipulation Angelo was using were such that I would say he was trying to rape her, and Claudio wanted her to let him.

      I liked the way that the duke conducted himself, coming as the duke, then the friar, and then revealing himself, as the friar to be the duke, but I don't like what he asked of Isabella. She was trying to become a nun, and this play has taken place over the course of, at most, three or four days. That is not enough time to discern out of your perceived vocation. My grandma almost became a nun, but discerned that she was called to marriage, and years later, married my grandpa. (I have pictures of her in a habit dated 1947 and she got married in 1952). If I was confident that Isabella had discerned that she was called to marriage I wouldn't object to the duke asking for her hand, but four days (at the most) is not enough for her to have made that decision, especially since she was preoccupied with trying to save her brother and believed the duke to be a friar. It makes me doubt the duke's motivations in saving Isabella and her brother. Did he do it just because he wanted Isabella, not because it was the right thing to do? I haven't completely lost faith in him, but I do doubt his character now.

      The beginning of my book has summaries of all of Shakespeare's plays so that, I suppose you can read to supplement your understanding of them. I feel that Isabella would be justified to be upset with the duke's proposal, but the summary says "He himself makes Isabella his Duchess," and even Wikipedia says that "her reaction is interpreted differently in different productions: her silent acceptance of his proposal is the most common in performance. This is one of the "open silences" of the play." I find this frustrating because she wanted to become a nun and while it's possible to change your mind and discern that you're called to marriage it would take a lot of prayer and more time than was given in the play to come to that decision.

      While I liked the duke in most of the play, I found his marriage proposal to Isabella to be disrespectful to her and her vocation.

      The ending isn't a comedy, that's for sure. The only comedic part of the play was Lucio (slandering the duke, unknowingly, to his face), and he is going to prison to be executed. But all isn't lost, the main characters yet live, so it's not really a tragedy either. I describe Cyrano de Bergerac by Edmond Rostand as a Tragicomedy because, though it is subtitled 'a comedy in five acts' and until the very end of the fourth act it does seem like one, but the ending is tragic. Measure for Measure can't even have that title, as it doesn't have enough comedy or tragedy to be called either, or both.

      I liked parts of this ending, but I disliked other parts. Because of this, I did not find it satisfying.

      (this review is made up of comments I made for an online Shakespeare class)
    • 4/5
      Unlike some critics, I do not find this a "problem play" because of Isabella's refusal to save her brother by having sex with Angelo. As my teacher at Oxford pointed out, giving in to tyranny is never the best answer, and in fact we know within the play that if she had submitted Angelo would have betrayed her and killed her brother anyway.
    • 3/5
      Another one where the climactic plot resolution is a rape and counter-rape scheme. I like the portrayal of the Duke in this, though, it's one of the best "disguised ruler" roles I've read. He's in almost every scene, gets some cool comic bits and is basically kind of front and center as the protagonist despite being incognito the whole time.
    • 4/5
      I am very fond of this play. I am always moved by the horror of the situation and enjoy the machinations by which the incognito Duke restores justice. I don't care much for the complaints about its supposed uneven tone, since I regard it as a "serious" drama with a little humor.
    • 4/5
      Wow. Only Shakespeare could take such an unlikeable bunch of characters and implausible plot and create such an enjoyable play, though a fair lot of the fascination is of the “train wreck” variety – desire to see Angelo get his “just” desserts, amazement at the Duke's stupidity, and revulsion at Isabella's priorities. The scene I really missed was the one where the oh-so-holy Isabella asks Mariana to “fill in” for her with Angelo in order to save Isabella's brother. That was a request that took some gall! I found the concluding “trial” scene rather unsatisfactory, but there are some really beautiful speeches here. I read this in the Folger edition, which has decent size print and fine facing explanatory notes, and listened to the Archangel recording, which is excellent and really brought the play vividly to life.
    • 4/5
      I read this play prior to going to see it enacted onstage. (And I am glad I did - for it was an unusual interpretation!). As I started reading, I wondered why this was classified as comedy, but as I read on I understood why, even notwithstanding the topic (corruption vs purity) and things like capital punishment discussed. I almost felt Shakespeare winking at me from above... Comedy it is - even though of a darker kind. And the thing is that though the old English phraseology made me at times re-read a line or two, Shakespeare's dialogue is so witty, his language is so enchanting that it didn't take away from the joy of reading. Like this, for instance: "... Lord Angelo; a man whose blood is very snow-broth..."; and, referring to an exhaustingly long explanation in conversation: "This will last out a night in Russia, when nights are longest there..."; and last but not least, the well-known phrase: "Some rise by sin, and some by virtue fall" - which pretty much sums it all up.
    • 3/5
      Dark comedy with few if any redeeming characters
    • 2/5
      A very dark tragi-comedy. Makes the 20th century sexual revolution look chaste by comparison. Not a fave -- characters are very 2-dimensional. The Duke is cruel in his kindness. If I were Isabella, I would have slapped him rather than marry him.
    • 4/5
      While certainly not amongst my favorite of Shakespeare's plays, I did find "Measure for Measure" an enjoyable one.It's a dark comedy. Claudio and gets his fiance Juliet pregnant, so he is sentenced to death for having sex before marriage by Angelo. Claudio's sister begs for his life and the once righteous Angelo attempts to strike a horrible bargain with her. The play also featured a disguised Duke who comes to the rescue. This play is well-paced and not terribly difficult to follow. It lacks some of those great lines that have migrated into our vernacular though.
    • 4/5
      This was listed as a comedy in a collection I have of Shakespeare's plays...it didn't seem quite one to me given the basic plot element of "sleep with me or I'll kill your brother." Still, I enjoyed it more than average.
    • 4/5
      I really had no idea what this play was about when I started, and I found the first scene almost enough to make me give up - I just couldn't follow what the Duke was saying. However, it quickly became fairly easy to read and the plot pulled me in. I didn't know if this was a comedy or a tragedy, and the plot had elements of both so I was unsure until the last act whether it would end in bloodshed or smiles.

      One thing bothered me a bit, approaching it as I did with my modern-day sensibilities and morals - I find it difficult to believe or understand that Isabel really would rather die or let her brother die than to have sex with Angelo. I guess that it is my agnostic upbringing …
    • 3/5
      Measure for Measure is a play about lust in the sense that Claudio has been sleeping with a woman, Juliet even though they are not married. Is it love or is it lust. In my mind this is really love turned into lust because they had been married, but could not acknowledge it because of some problem with the legality. They are in love but lust creeps into the scene because they refuse wait any longer and thus they break the law.

      Angelo is passing judgement on Claudio once he gains power. He appears to be an honest, just person in the beginning of Act One. His true desire is revealed when Isabella comes to try to save her brother. Angelo than is portrayed as a creep and someone who no one would like to meet in a dark alley. He pretends to be something but he really is not. He reminds me of (the Disney) version of Claude Frollo, (I can't speak for Victor Hugo's version, as I haven't read it yet) from the Hunchback of Notre Dame, with Isabella in the place of Esmeralda, as the kind, innocent woman he lusts for and is trying to manipulate in order to get what he wants.

      The Duke believes his city is corrupt and he believes that he cannot fix the city without his people hating him because he has not enforced the law. He believes the law needs to be enforced now but he does not believe that he will be able to do it because he has been so lax in allowing the people not to follow the law. He leaves this problem to Anglo thus abdicating his responsibility. "I do fear, too dreadful:/Sith ‘twas my fault to give the people scope,/For what I bid them do: for we bid this be done/When evil deeds have their permissive pass/And not the punishment. Therefore, indeed, my father,/I have on Angelo impos’d the office;/Who may, in the ambush of my name, strike home,/And yet my nature never in the fight,/To do it slander. And to behold his sway,/I will, as ‘twere a brother of your order,/Visit both prince and people: therefore, I pr’ythee,/Supply me with the habit, and instruct me/How I may formally in person bear me/Like a true friar."

      The Duke’s true desire is to have people like him but he also wants his city to be a city of people with good morals. He believes Angelo is of good character and by leaving the city in the hands of Angelo, he is able to see if his people will live a moral life and if Angelo is a good leader who is able to get the people to follow a moral life. I also wonder if the Duke perhaps does not have an heir thus trying out Angelo as a potential heir, and therefore, in leaving him in charge of the city, yet remaining behind to watch, may have been his way of testing to see if Angelo could be a good leader. I don’t think the Duke, Vincentio, is trying to torture his citizens. He seems to want to help them and have a city that is morally good but he doesn’t think they will listen to him because he has not enforced the law so it will be too hard to change the behavior. Yet even if he had good intentions, leaving his people at the mercy of Angelo was a cowardly way to fix the problems he saw. At the very least he should have revealed himself when he learned of Angelo's corruption, and attempts to get Isabella into his bed, instead of going through the elaborate hoax to make Angelo think he had gotten what he wanted.

      The Duke is the driving force behind the play because it him who decides the city needs to change. The message Shakespeare leaves me with is that man is unconsciously immoral and there is corruption even in men who we believe are good. This is of course illustrated in Angelo who in the beginning uses Claudio as an example of immoral behavior but he himself becomes even a bigger example of immoral behavior when he tries to corrupt the good and innocent Isabella.

      I'm not entirely satisfied by the ending of the play. I admire Isabella's forgiving Angelo who wronged her so, much as I admire Immaculee Ilibagiza for forgiving the people who did her wrong, but just because Angelo was forgiven doesn't mean that he should have gotten out of punishment. Only Mariana's grief kept him from death, but I feel she deserved better than Angelo. Claudio has survived, and I'm sure that Isabella will forgive him for what he asked her to do to save his life, but will he forgive himself? Even ignoring the fact that Isabella wanted to become a nun, the tactics of manipulation Angelo was using were such that I would say he was trying to rape her, and Claudio wanted her to let him.

      I liked the way that the duke conducted himself, coming as the duke, then the friar, and then revealing himself, as the friar to be the duke, but I don't like what he asked of Isabella. She was trying to become a nun, and this play has taken place over the course of, at most, three or four days. That is not enough time to discern out of your perceived vocation. My grandma almost became a nun, but discerned that she was called to marriage, and years later, married my grandpa. (I have pictures of her in a habit dated 1947 and she got married in 1952). If I was confident that Isabella had discerned that she was called to marriage I wouldn't object to the duke asking for her hand, but four days (at the most) is not enough for her to have made that decision, especially since she was preoccupied with trying to save her brother and believed the duke to be a friar. It makes me doubt the duke's motivations in saving Isabella and her brother. Did he do it just because he wanted Isabella, not because it was the right thing to do? I haven't completely lost faith in him, but I do doubt his character now.

      The beginning of my book has summaries of all of Shakespeare's plays so that, I suppose you can read to supplement your understanding of them. I feel that Isabella would be justified to be upset with the duke's proposal, but the summary says "He himself makes Isabella his Duchess," and even Wikipedia says that "her reaction is interpreted differently in different productions: her silent acceptance of his proposal is the most common in performance. This is one of the "open silences" of the play." I find this frustrating because she wanted to become a nun and while it's possible to change your mind and discern that you're called to marriage it would take a lot of prayer and more time than was given in the play to come to that decision.

      While I liked the duke in most of the play, I found his marriage proposal to Isabella to be disrespectful to her and her vocation.

      The ending isn't a comedy, that's for sure. The only comedic part of the play was Lucio (slandering the duke, unknowingly, to his face), and he is going to prison to be executed. But all isn't lost, the main characters yet live, so it's not really a tragedy either. I describe Cyrano de Bergerac by Edmond Rostand as a Tragicomedy because, though it is subtitled 'a comedy in five acts' and until the very end of the fourth act it does seem like one, but the ending is tragic. Measure for Measure can't even have that title, as it doesn't have enough comedy or tragedy to be called either, or both.

      I liked parts of this ending, but I disliked other parts. Because of this, I did not find it satisfying.

      (this review is made up of comments I made for an online Shakespeare class)
    • 4/5
      A Duke decides to test the character of one of his trusted aides, and at the same time get away from the heavy load of Dukedom. The aide decides that the law is not being enforced strictly enough and puts a man in jail, condemned to death, for getting a woman (not his wife) with child. Then he (the aide) succumbs to temptation and tries to corrupt the condemned man's sister, hiding his failure by killing the man and denying the truth of the sister's complaint. The Duke is working behind the scenes trying to right the wrongs; balancing the law, justice and mercy.Shakespeare weaves it all so much better than I, just go read the play.

    Book preview

    Measure for Measure - William Shakespeare

    ACT I.

    SCENE I. An Apartment in the Duke’s Palace.

    Enter DUKE, ESCALUS, Lords, and Attendants

    DUKE.Escalus.

    ESCAL.My lord.

    DUKE.Of government the properties to unfold,

    Would seem in me to affect speech¹ and discourse;

    Since I am put to know² that your own science

    Exceeds, in that, the lists of all advice

    My strength can give you: then no more remains,

    But that to your sufficiency..........

    ...............as your worth is able,

    And let them work.³ The nature of our people,

    Our city’s institutions, and the terms

    For common justice,⁴ you re as pregnant in

    As art and practice⁵ hath enriched any

    That we remember. There is our commission,

    From which we would not have you warp. Call hither,

    I say, bid come before us Angelo.

    [Exit an Attendant.

    What figure of us⁶ think you he will bear?

    For you must know, we have with special soul⁷

    Elected him our absence to supply;

    Lent him our terror, dress’d him with our love,

    And given his deputation all the organs

    Of our own power: what think you of it?

    ESCAL.If any in Vienna be of worth

    To undergo such ample grace and honour,

    It is Lord Angelo.

    DUKE.Look where he comes.

    Enter ANGELO

    ANG.Always obedient to your Grace’s will,

    I come to know your pleasure.

    DUKE.Angelo,

    There is a kind of character in thy life,

    That to th’ observer doth thy history

    Fully unfold. Thyself and thy belongings

    Are not thine own so proper,⁸ as to waste

    Thyself upon thy virtues, they on thee.

    Heaven doth with us as we with torches do,

    Not light them for themselves; for if our virtues

    Did not go forth of us, ’t were all alike

    As if we had them not. Spirits are not finely touched

    But to fine issues;⁹ nor Nature never lends

    The smallest scruple of her excellence,

    But, like a thrifty goddess, she determines

    Herself the glory of a creditor,

    Both thanks and use.¹⁰ But I do bend my speech

    To one that can my part in him advertise;¹¹

    Hold therefore, Angelo: —

    In our remove¹² be thou at full ourself;

    Mortality and mercy¹³ in Vienna

    Live in thy tongue and heart: old Escalus,

    Though first in question, is thy secondary.¹⁴

    Take thy commission.

    ANG.Now, good my lord,

    Let there be some more test made of my metal,

    Before so noble and so great a figure

    Be stampe’d upon it.

    DUKE.No more evasion:

    We have with a leaven’d¹⁵ and prepared choice

    Proceeded to you; therefore take your honours.

    Our haste from hence is of so quick condition,

    That it prefers itself, and leaves unquestione’d¹⁶

    Matters of needful value. We shall write to you,

    As time and our concernings shall importune,

    How it goes with us; and do look to know

    What doth befall you here. So, fare you well:

    To the hopeful execution do I leave you

    Of your commissions.

    ANG.Yet, give leave, my lord,

    That we may bring you something on the way.

    DUKE.My haste may not admit it;

    Nor need you, on mine honour, have to do

    With any scruple; your scope is as mine own,

    So to enforce or qualify the laws

    As to your soul seems good. Give me your hand:

    I’ll privily away. I love the people,¹⁷

    But do not like to stage me to their eyes:

    Though it do well, I do not relish well

    Their loud applause and Aves vehement;

    Nor do I think the man of safe discretion

    That does affect it. Once more, fare you well.

    ANG.The heavens give safety to your purposes!

    ESCAL.Lead forth and bring you back in happiness!

    DUKE.I thank you. Fare you well.

    [Exit.

    ESCAL.I shall desire you, sir, to give me leave

    To have free speech with you; and it concerns me

    To look into the bottom of my place:

    A power I have, but of what strength and nature

    I am not yet instructed.

    ANG.’T is so with me. Let us withdraw together,

    And we may soon our satisfaction have

    Touching that point.

    ESCAL.I’ll wait upon your honour.

    [Exeunt.

    SCENE II. A Street.

    Enter LUCIO and two Gentlemen

    LUCIO.If the Duke, with the other dukes, come not to composition with the King of Hungary, why then all the dukes fall upon the king.

    FIRST GENT. Heaven grant us its peace, but not the King of Hungary’s!

    SEC.GENT. Amen.

    LUCIO.Thou concludest like the sanctimonious pirate, that went to sea with the Ten Commandments, but scraped one out of the table.

    SEC.GENT. Thou shalt not steal?

    LUCIO.Ay, that he razed.

    FIRST GENT. Why, ’t was a commandment to command the captain and all the rest from their functions: they put forth to steal. There’s not a soldier of us all, that, in the thanksgiving before meat, do relish the petition well that prays for peace.

    SEC.GENT. I never heard any soldier dislike¹⁸ it.

    LUCIO.I believe thee; for I think thou never wast where grace was said.

    SEC.GENT. No? a dozen times at least.

    FIRST GENT. What, in metre?

    LUCIO.In any proportion¹⁹ or in any language.

    FIRST GENT. I think, or in any religion.

    LUCIO.Ay, why not? Grace is grace, despite of all controversy: as, for example, thou thyself art a wicked villain, despite of all grace.

    FIRST GENT. Well, there went but a pair of shears between us.²⁰

    LUCIO.I grant; as there may between the lists and the velvet. Thou art the list.

    FIRST GENT. And thou the velvet: thou art good velvet; thou’rt a three-piled²¹ piece, I warrant thee: I had as lief be a list of an English kersey, as be piled, as thou art piled, for a French velvet.²² Do I speak feelingly now?

    LUCIO.I think thou dost; and, indeed, with most painful feeling of thy speech: I will, out of thine own confession, learn to begin thy health;²³ but, whilst I live, forget to drink after thee.

    FIRST GENT. I think I have done myself wrong, have I not?

    SEC.GENT. Yes, that thou hast, whether thou art tainted or free.

    LUCIO.Behold, behold, where Madam Mitigation comes! I have purchased as many diseases under her roof as come to —

    SEC.GENT. To what, I pray?

    LUCIO.Judge.

    SEC.GENT. To three thousand dolours a year.

    FIRST GENT. Ay, and more.

    LUCIO.A French crown²⁴ more.

    FIRST GENT. Thou art always figuring diseases in me; but thou art full of error; I am sound.

    LUCIO.Nay, not as one would say, healthy; but so sound as things that are hollow: thy bones are hollow; impiety has made a feast of thee.

    Enter MISTRESS OVERDONE

    FIRST GENT. HOW now! which of your hips has the most profound sciatica?

    MRS.OV. Well, well; there’s one yonder arrested and carried to prison as worth five thousand of you all.

    SEC.GENT. Who’s that, I pray thee?

    MRS.OV. Marry, sir, that’s Claudio, Signior Claudio.

    FIRST GENT. Claudio to prison? ’t is not so.

    MRS.OV. Nay, but I know ’t is so: I saw him arrested; saw him carried away; and, which is more, within these three days his head to be chopped off.

    LUCIO.But, after all this fooling, I would not have it so. Art thou sure of this?

    MRS.OV. I am too sure of it: and it is for getting Madam Julietta with child.

    LUCIO.Believe me, this may be: he promised to meet me two hours since, and he was ever precise in promise-keeping.

    SEC. GENT. Besides, you know, it draws something near to the speech we had to such a purpose.

    FIRST GENT. But, most of all, agreeing with the proclamation.

    LUCIO.Away! let’s go learn the truth of it.

    [Exeunt LUCIO and Gentlemen.

    MRS.OV. Thus, what with the war, what with the sweat,²⁵ what with the gallows, and what with poverty, I am custom-shrunk.

    Enter POMPEY

    How now! what’s the news with you?

    POM.Yonder man is carried to prison.

    MRS.OV. Well; what has he done?

    POM.A woman.

    MRS.OV. But what’s his offence?

    POM.Groping for trouts in a peculiar²⁶ river.

    MRS.OV. What, is there a maid with child by him?

    POM.No, but there’s a woman with maid by him. You have not heard of the proclamation, have you?

    MRS.OV. What proclamation, man?

    POM.All houses in the suburbs of Vienna must be plucked down.

    MRS.OV. And what shall become of those in the city?

    POM.They shall stand for seed: they had gone down too, but that a wise burgher put in for them.

    MRS.OV. But shall all our houses of resort in the suburbs²⁷ be pulled down?

    POM.TO the ground, mistress.

    MRS.OV. Why, here’s a change indeed in the commonwealth! What shall become of me?

    POM.Come; fear not you: good counsellors lack no clients: though you change your place, you need

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1