Don Juan in Hell: From Man and Superman
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
An episode from Act Three of Man and Superman, "Don Juan in Hell" is often presented independently of the rest of the play. Rooted in the Don Juan legend — particularly as it appears in Mozart's opera Don Giovanni — this dream sequence forms a play within a play. It consists of a dramatic reading in which three characters from Man and Superman appear in archetypal guises: Don Juan, the libertine turned moralist; Doña Ana, the eternal female; and the Commander, a hypocrite transformed into a statue. The Devil himself joins their spirited debate on the nature of heaven and hell, of good and evil, and of human purpose, for a captivating blend of Shavian wit and Nietzschean philosophy.
George Bernard Shaw
George Bernard Shaw was born in Dublin in 1856 and moved to London in 1876. He initially wrote novels then went on to achieve fame through his career as a journalist, critic and public speaker. A committed and active socialist, he was one of the leaders of the Fabian Society. He was a prolific and much lauded playwright and was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature. He died in 1950.
Read more from George Bernard Shaw
Bernard Shaw on Religion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMrs. Warren's Profession Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Misalliance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Major Barbara Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5George Bernard Shaw - A Selection of One-Act Plays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Saint Joan: A Play Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Philanderer Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Candida Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Perfect Wagnerite Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Crime of Imprisonment Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Back to Methuselah: A Metabiological Pentateuch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Collected Works of George Bernard Shaw: Plays, Novels, Articles, Letters and Essays: Pygmalion, Mrs. Warren's Profession, Candida, Arms and The Man, Man and Superman, Caesar and Cleopatra, Androcles And The Lion, The New York Times Articles on War, Memories of Oscar Wilde and more Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaesar and Cleopatra Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBernard Shaw on Theater Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Doctor's Dilemma Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Man and Superman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Disciple Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5John Bull's Other Island Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHeartbreak House Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFanny's First Play Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5THE COLLECTED WORKS OF GEORGE BERNARD SHAW: Pygmalion, Candida, Arms and The Man, Man and Superman, Caesar and Cleopatra… Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBernard Shaw on Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBernard Shaw on Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYou Never Can Tell Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Complete Works of George Bernard Shaw Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Catherine: Whom Glory Still Adores Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Saint Joan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to Don Juan in Hell
Related ebooks
In the Boom Boom Room: A Play Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Country Scandal (Platonov) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMan and Superman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mrs. Warren's Profession Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The White Devil Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeath etc. Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond the Horizon Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Cherry Orchard by Anton Chekhov (Illustrated) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJumpers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFour Plays by Eugene O'Neill Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Salome: "The mystery of love is greater than the mystery of death." Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Three Plays by Edward Albee: The Death of Bessie Smith, The Sandbox, The American Dream Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArms and The Man Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Sea-Gull Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDrinks With Dead Poets: A Season of Poe, Whitman, Byron, and the Brontes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Misanthrope Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDangerous Liaisons (Les Liaisons Dangereuses) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Collected Works of W.B. Yeats Vol II: The Plays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Free Man of Color Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Icebound: A Play Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMonologues from Shakespeare’s First Folio for Younger Men: The Histories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFour Great Plays of Henrik Ibsen: A Doll's House, The Wild Duck, Hedda Gabler, The M Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJabber Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Candida: A Play Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Way of the World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quills and Other Plays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Inspector Hound and Other Plays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rhinoceros and Other Plays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Delicate Balance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sex Plays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Performing Arts For You
The Quite Nice and Fairly Accurate Good Omens Script Book: The Script Book Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5As You Wish: Inconceivable Tales from the Making of The Princess Bride Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5For colored girls who have considered suicide/When the rainbow is enuf Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of Storytelling: Why Stories Make Us Human and How to Tell Them Better Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Becoming Free Indeed: My Story of Disentangling Faith from Fear Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Sisters Brothers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hamlet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Importance of Being Earnest: A Play Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Macbeth (new classics) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Diamond Eye: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stories I Only Tell My Friends: An Autobiography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I'm Your Huckleberry: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Coreyography: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Robin Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lucky Dog Lessons: From Renowned Expert Dog Trainer and Host of Lucky Dog: Reunions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wuthering Heights Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes: Revised and Complete Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fifth Mountain: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Romeo and Juliet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hollywood's Dark History: Silver Screen Scandals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mash: A Novel About Three Army Doctors Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Trial Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Our Town: A Play in Three Acts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unsheltered: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Count Of Monte Cristo (Unabridged) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best Women's Monologues from New Plays, 2020 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How I Learned to Drive (Stand-Alone TCG Edition) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Strange Loop Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Whale / A Bright New Boise Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Don Juan in Hell
6 ratings6 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shaw's tour de force, this is a work that combines realism with the supernatural to create a memorable piece of work. The section known as Don Juan in hell is justifiably renowned, and is a philosophical discussion that reminds me of Montesquieu and Machiavelli's Dialogue in Hell. The philosophy of the work is pessimistic; while it still retains a flavor of the socialist ideals of the author, there is an undertone of disillusionment. The roles of the sexes are skewered, by the means of characters upholding them to the letter, showing them for how ridiculous they really are. The leisure class comes off poorly, and the institution of marriage is, as usual in works by Shaw, reduced down to a condition of bondage. An interesting read, probably much too long to stage in this day and age, and certainly the long speeches would make any modern director cringe. Well worth the extra effort for a reading.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shaw's tour de force, this is a work that combines realism with the supernatural to create a memorable piece of work. The section known as Don Juan in hell is justifiably renowned, and is a philosophical discussion that reminds me of Montesquieu and Machiavelli's Dialogue in Hell. The philosophy of the work is pessimistic; while it still retains a flavor of the socialist ideals of the author, there is an undertone of disillusionment. The roles of the sexes are skewered, by the means of characters upholding them to the letter, showing them for how ridiculous they really are. The leisure class comes off poorly, and the institution of marriage is, as usual in works by Shaw, reduced down to a condition of bondage. An interesting read, probably much too long to stage in this day and age, and certainly the long speeches would make any modern director cringe. Well worth the extra effort for a reading.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Very engaging for a long, dialogue-heavy play. Despite being sexist in his belief that women have nothing to offer outside of procreation, I generally love the ideas that Shaw puts forth, usually in Tanner's or Don Juan's words. He gives you frequent moments where you have to take a few seconds to think about the implications of a specific comment. And it's wonderful how Tanner turns societal convention and morality on its head by underlining the absurdity of his companions' reactions to various scandals. Probably my favorite line is quite an incidental comment but gives you an idea of Shaw's wit: Tanner: . . . A jealous sense of my new individuality arose in me -
Ann: You hated to be treated as a boy any longer. Poor Jack!
Tanner: Yes, because to be treated as a boy was to be taken on the old footing. I had become a new person; and those who knew the old person laughed at me. The only man who behaved sensibly was my tailor: he took my measure anew every time he saw me, whilst all the rest went on with their old measurements and expected them to fit me. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5If you remove the Don Juan in Hell sequence, this is actually an entertaining play, but GBS goes off on his tangents until you just want to slap him. Some very well-written, entertaining characters in an amusing situation.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Man and Superman, the principle drama of this book, was the weakest part. I found that I did not enjoy Shaw's play-- which is off because I usually do garnish some sense of worth about it. Nevertheless, for me, it was a disappointing read. The other two documents in this text were interesting, but not enough to bring up the book as a whole.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Man and Superman combines a dramatization of Neitsche's "ubermensch" or superman, that was believed to be the goal of creative evolution, with a romantic comedy. For that alone the play deserves five stars. That it does all of this and does it well is a remarkable achievement. The third act, Don Juan in Hell, is often played by itself. A surreal episode in the play, it is in this act that we see the realization of the play's philosophy, with the other three acts framing it with romance. Characteristic of Shaw, we see in the other three acts the Shavian inversion, where he flips commonly held notions on their head: in this case, the tradition that it is the man who is the pursuer in love. Shaw shows that in sex, it is the man who is the hunted and it is the woman who is in control.
Book preview
Don Juan in Hell - George Bernard Shaw
DOVER THRIFT EDITIONS
GENERAL EDITOR: MARY CAROLYN WALDREP
EDITOR OF THIS VOLUME: JANET BAINE KOPITO
Theatrical Rights
This Dover Thrift Edition may be used in its entirety, in adaptation, or in any other way for theatrical productions, professional and amateur, in the United States, without fee, permission, or acknowledgment. (This may not apply outside of the United States, as copyright conditions may vary.)
Bibliographical Note
This Dover edition, first published in 2006, is an unabridged republication of the text of Don Juan in Hell (from Act III of Man and Superman: A Comedy and a Philosophy), as published by Brentano’s, New York, in 1903.The Publisher’s Note, What—Shaw Again?
and Foreword were included in Don Juan in Hell, as published by Dodd, Mead & Company, New York, in 1952.
9780486159515
Manufactured in the United States of America
Dover Publications, Inc., 31 East 2nd Street, Mineola, N.Y 11501
Table of Contents
Title Page
Copyright Page
WHAT—SHAW AGAIN?
FOREWORD
PUBLISHER’S NOTE
WHAT—SHAW AGAIN?
Yes, because he makes it inescapable. Yes, because his deathless voice has once again brought our so-called living theatre to life. Yes, because in a season up to now cursed and largely overrun by the efforts of pygmies he has stood out like a colossus, an intellect among the thoughtless, a genius among hacks, and a seer among the blind.
It is the Don Juan in Hell
scene from Man and Superman,
as read by Charles Laughton, Charles Boyer, Cedric Hardwicke, and Agnes Moorehead, which leaves me with no other inclination or choice than to write about Shaw. For some time now audiences in city after city up and down the United States (and England, too) have had the opportunity to enjoy this seldom performed interlude that Shaw wrote fifty years ago. Now, at last, an underprivileged New York has been permitted to respond to its excitements.
Nothing Broadway has had to offer of recent years has been more absorbing than this theatrically unorthodox presentation of a play which is not a play in the ordinary sense. The performance is in the nature of a reading. Only a shallow forestage is used and it is backed by a black curtain. In front of this curtain are microphones and stools, and music stands to hold the bound copies of the text carried in by the actors. The three men are dressed in dinner jackets and Miss Moorehead wears an evening gown. Mr. Laughton briefly and charmingly tells the essentials of the Don Juan story and announces the cast. Thereafter he leads us into the script by letting us hear Shaw’s stage direction. As far as the trappings of production go, that is all. But what an all and what an evening it proves to be!
If any members of Local 829 managed to squeeze into the theatre where it is playing, they—and they alone—in a huge and rapt audience must have felt a certain discomfort. They must even have had a clearer understanding of Othello’s feelings when he complained his occupation was gone. For Local 829 is the United Scenic Artists. And here was Shaw proving, as Shakespeare demonstrated long ago, how unnecessary scenery is when great language sets the stage.
Anyone can cite examples of the way in which Shakespeare relied on his pen to do the brushwork most contemporary playwrights assume will be done for them by scene designers with the aid of dependable electricians. In Macbeth
the First Murderer’s The west yet glimmers with some streaks of day
; Horatio’s But look, the morn, in russet mantle clad, Walks o’er the dew of yon high eastward hill ...
; Lorenzo’s The moon shines bright. In such a night as this, When the sweet wind did gently kiss the trees And they did make no noise ...
; and Lear’s Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! rage! blow! You cataracts and hurricanoes, spout ...
are familiar instances of the kind of verbal scenery Shakespeare supplied in play after play.
Shaw’s employment of the language proves no less self-sufficient in this uncostumed and unset reading
of Don Juan in Hell.
Yet there is a striking difference. Shaw has no interest in conjuring images to evoke a physical setting. He makes fun of Dante for having described hell as a place of mud, frost, filth, fire, and venomous serpents. He is equally contemptuous of Milton for having introduced cannon and gunpowder as a means of expelling the Devil from heaven. Shaw’s hell is visually nonexistent. In his own words there is nothing; omnipresent nothing. No sky, no peaks, no light, no sound, no time nor space, utter void.
There is only somewhere the faint throbbing buzz of a Mozartian strain and a pallor which reveals a man in the void, an incorporeal but visible man, seated, absurdly enough, on nothing.
In the course of Don Juan
Shaw pays tribute to the wonders of that slowly evolved bodily organ, the eye, which has permitted the living organism to see where it was going and what was coming to help or threaten it.
But his concern is with neither the eye nor the visible world. Instead, it is with the evolving mind’s eye and its higher plane of vision which should enable us to see the purpose of Life.
He makes his hell a void so that he can fill it with ideas. His intellect sets the stage; his fervor and his wit light it. What absorbs his attention and ours is not a place but the plight of Man. It is Man’s foolishness and his potentialities; what he has been, what he is, and what he must become if he is either to justify his existence or safeguard his survival.
There are those beyond counting who expect a play to have a plot. They want it at least to tell how Jack gets Jill or Jill Jack. The story of Ann Whitefield’s pursuit and conquest of