Meeting the Needs of Student Users in Academic Libraries: Reaching Across the Great Divide
By Michele Crump and LeiLani Freund
()
About this ebook
- Takes an honest look at learning commons in academic libraries and discusses what is working and what is not
- Explores behind the statistics as to why users come to the library; does the librarians’ concept of ‘the library as place’ match user perception?
- Looks at the anthropology of the user to gauge satisfaction with the services and space provided by the library via recent survey findings
Michele Crump
Michele J. Crump is the head of Access Support for the George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida, USA. Her research focuses on user-centered services such as unmediated interlibrary loans, patron driven acquisitions, and emerging technologies in the library. Michele has served in various technical services positions, including Emerging Technologies Librarian, interim Director of Technical Services Division, and chair of the Acquisitions and Licensing Department.
Related to Meeting the Needs of Student Users in Academic Libraries
Related ebooks
Managing Scientific Information and Research Data Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDigital Humanities, Libraries, and Partnerships: A Critical Examination of Labor, Networks, and Community Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSuccessful Fundraising for the Academic Library: Philanthropy in Higher Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsService Science and the Information Professional Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemystifying the Engineering PhD Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew Roles for Research Librarians: Meeting the Expectations for Research Support Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Experiential Library: Transforming Academic and Research Libraries through the Power of Experiential Learning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInformation Literacy and Cultural Heritage: Developing a Model for Lifelong Learning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond Mentoring: A Guide for Librarians and Information Professionals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLibrary 3.0: Intelligent Libraries and Apomediation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarketing the 21st Century Library: The Time Is Now Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEverything You Always Wanted to Know About Information Literacy But Were Afraid to Google Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe 21st Century Academic Library: Global Patterns of Organization and Discourse Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDiversity Programming and Outreach for Academic Libraries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Elements of Library Research: What Every Student Needs to Know Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Transformative Library and Information Work: Profiles in Social Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLibrary Instruction Design: Learning from Google and Apple Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarketing Services and Resources in Information Organizations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Transforming Your STEM Career Through Leadership and Innovation: Inspiration and Strategies for Women Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConversations with Leading Academic and Research Library Directors: International Perspectives on Library Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBuilding Communities: Social Networking for Academic Libraries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Neuroscience of Empathy, Compassion, and Self-Compassion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Childhood in a Sri Lankan Village: Shaping Hierarchy and Desire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSocial Justice and Library Work: A Guide to Theory and Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSomething’s Gotta Give: Charleston Conference Proceedings, 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntellectual Disability: Ethics, Dehumanization, and a New Moral Community Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Book Proposal Book: A Guide for Scholarly Authors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiterary Mathematics: Quantitative Theory for Textual Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience Interrupted: Rethinking Research Practice with Bureaucracy, Agroforestry, and Ethnography Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNetworkologies: A Philosophy of Networks for a Hyperconnected Age - A Manifesto Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Language Arts & Discipline For You
Get to the Point!: Sharpen Your Message and Make Your Words Matter Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I Will Judge You by Your Bookshelf Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Writing Well, 30th Anniversary Edition: An Informal Guide to Writing Nonfiction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Everything Sign Language Book: American Sign Language Made Easy... All new photos! Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5It's the Way You Say It: Becoming Articulate, Well-spoken, and Clear Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Elements of Style, Fourth Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Learn Sign Language in a Hurry: Grasp the Basics of American Sign Language Quickly and Easily Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Show, Don't Tell: How to Write Vivid Descriptions, Handle Backstory, and Describe Your Characters’ Emotions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Writing Fiction: A Guide to Narrative Craft Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Need to Talk: How to Have Conversations That Matter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Writing to Learn: How to Write - and Think - Clearly About Any Subject at All Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Metaphors We Live By Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Craft of Research, Fourth Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Catcher in the Rye: A Reader's Guide to the J.D. Salinger Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5500 Beautiful Words You Should Know Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Lost Art of Handwriting: Rediscover the Beauty and Power of Penmanship Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Talk Like TED: The 9 Public-Speaking Secrets of the World's Top Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Dramatic Writing: Its Basis in the Creative Interpretation of Human Motives Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Road Not Taken and other Selected Poems Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speed Reading: How to Read a Book a Day - Simple Tricks to Explode Your Reading Speed and Comprehension Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Lessons in Chemistry Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Barron's American Sign Language: A Comprehensive Guide to ASL 1 and 2 with Online Video Practice Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Chicago Guide to Grammar, Usage, and Punctuation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Talk Dirty Spanish: Beyond Mierda: The curses, slang, and street lingo you need to Know when you speak espanol Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Meeting the Needs of Student Users in Academic Libraries
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Meeting the Needs of Student Users in Academic Libraries - Michele Crump
learning.
1
The divide as we see it
Michele J. Crump and LeiLani S. Freund
Abstract:
The book is aimed at academic librarians and administrators primarily but will be applicable to all levels of library staff and library and information science students. The introduction is a white paper on what the authors’ assumptions are about librarians and library users. The authors work from the following premises: libraries are moving to the digital model; the traditional library catalog is dead; mobility is king; students should be able to access the information anywhere. In the context of this environment, libraries need to look to the user-centric movement and beyond to guide our progress forward.
Key words
information commons (IC)
learning commons
librarian perceptions
librarian survey
student perceptions
user experience
user survey
"It’s gone away in yesterday
Now I find myself on the mountainside
Where the rivers change direction
Across the Great Divide
– K. Wolf (1980) Across the Great Divide"
Introduction
We have opened our doors for service and they are coming in! We have full-service working computers, emerging technologies to try, printers for class assignments, media software for projects, comfortable chairs, and lattes too. Library gate counts are on the rise as students lounge in the ambience of renovated or brand new spaces that librarians have named information or learning commons.¹ Librarians at the reference desk see students collaborating with other students, communicating with their instructors by email or online course software, and even calling their parents, yet completely by passing the reference librarian who stands ready to facilitate the research process and point the way to free, reliable library resources. Are we or are we not a part of the collective academic process? Library statistical reports and surveys muddy the waters, often conflicting with one another or with our local results. What are we to believe, what should guide our progress forward?
The 2010 Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) survey Perceptions of Libraries: Context and Community makes us feel better with its report that Library use is the lifestyle activity with the largest increase for all Americans
(De Rosa et al., 2011, p. 26) This is particularly true of the economically vulnerable. However, our confusion returns when we read further that 78 percent of the college students surveyed believe that the librarian adds value to the search process but they overwhelmingly (82 percent) use search engines like Google and Wikipedia to start their research. All the library activities that students engage in are down from a very similar OCLC 2005 survey. For example, using online databases is down 13 percent and using assistance for research is down 20 percent even though 65 percent of students acknowledge that Wikipedia is less trustworthy than library sources. Moreover, library researchers have reported that the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) statistics show a steady decline in reference questions asked from 1991 to the present. Many, though not all, individual library case studies have cited similar figures. The OCLC study gives us some interesting facts about virtual library resources as well. In 2005, only 1 percent of all participants surveyed (that is all ages and all types of library users) visited their library’s website first when starting their research. In 2010, not a single person out of the 2229 respondents began their information search on a library website (De Rosa et al., 2011, p. 32). Academic students in particular eventually made their way to the website or were told to go there and some said they would go back to it, but not one started there. This statistic should make librarians think very hard about the design of our home pages or portals to online library resources and where we are placing our efforts.
We hoped that the information commons (IC) would revitalize our libraries and indeed they have, in many ways. Libraries frequently report a significant and sometimes astonishing upturn in gate counts after establishment of an IC. We know that the students love our spaces and that the library as place
is alive and filled with a renewed energy that is palpable. So why is the library journal literature rife with articles that express our insecurity with our role in the digital world?
There are probably as many IC configurations as there are libraries, but they all share the common theme of providing resources that support the users’ needs from start to finish of their academic projects and papers. With the advent of the IC, libraries moved from providing and storing the information to providing access and assistance in the gathering, organization, and packaging of information. Needless to say, this has resulted in a profound effect on the library staff operating in this multi-dimensional and highly technical environment and has also called into question services that have existed for several decades. It is no wonder that librarians who have been in the business for 20 or 30 or even as little as 10 years are feeling uncomfortable. In the context of the IC we begin to think about how much our users need or want us to be there. When questions do come in, they are often of a routine directional or technical nature. The directional questions could be answered by a student assistant or volunteer. The technical questions can be downright scary. It’s reassuring to read the OCLC report that tells us we are trusted and valued and especially needed in trying economic times, but for every comforting statistic, we see several others that directly contradict the notion that we have a purpose and instead scream our obsolescence. How comforting is it to pick up a copy of USA Today and read a headline that blurts out the bad news (as if we didn’t know) Study: College students rarely use librarians’ expertise
? (Kolowich, 2011). To add insult to injury, we can read the whole paper, because we have plenty of time to read while sitting at the reference desk on the lonely 10 am shift! What is going on here? If they trust us so much, why aren’t they lining up at the