Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Libraries for Users: Services in Academic Libraries
Libraries for Users: Services in Academic Libraries
Libraries for Users: Services in Academic Libraries
Ebook248 pages11 hours

Libraries for Users: Services in Academic Libraries

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

This book reviews the quality and evolution of academic library services. It revises service trends offered by academic libraries and the challenge of enhancing traditional ones such as: catalogues, repositories and digital collections, learning resources centres, virtual reference services, information literacy and 2.0 tools.
  • Studies the role of the university library in the new educational environment of higher education
  • Rethinks libraries in academic context
  • Redefines roles for academic libraries
LanguageEnglish
Release dateDec 10, 2010
ISBN9781780630519
Libraries for Users: Services in Academic Libraries
Author

Luisa Alvite

Luisa Alvite Díez, PhD is Lecturer in the Department of Library and Information Science at the University of León, Spain. She has focused her research interest on Information retrieval, Interfaces, Electronic Libraries and Electronic resources. She has published several works related to these lines in different congresses and scientific journals.

Related to Libraries for Users

Related ebooks

Language Arts & Discipline For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Libraries for Users

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Libraries for Users - Luisa Alvite

    buffl@unileon.es

    1

    Academic library services: quality and leadership

    Universities in a globalised setting

    Even though there is no agreement on the elements that comprise excellence in higher education, in the past decade we have witnessed a veritable explosion in university rankings. We can cite, for example, the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU)¹ published by the Center for World-Class Universities and the Institute of Higher Education of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. This system emphasises publications, citations and academic prizes, especially in science and technology. The QS World University Rankings² relies heavily on academic peer review (which accounts for 40 per cent). The SCImago Institutions Rankings (SIR)³ is built with data from Elsevier database Scopus. The SIR 2009 World Report ranks the best 2,000 worldwide research institutions and organisations and analyses their research performance in the period 2003–7 through five global output indicators. In turn, Webometrics Ranking of World Universities⁴ produced by the Cybermetrics Lab (National Research Council of Spain), offers information about more than 8,000 universities according to their web presence, a computerised assessment of the scholarly contents and visibility and impact of the whole university web domain.

    Obviously, the results are not all similar because of the relative weight assigned to the indicators used, which means that we can find a single institution with widely divergent rankings depending on the list chosen. A careful statistical analysis of international ranking concludes that there is broad consensus about the first 10–12 universities, but after that the lists begin to diverge. The lack of an absolute set of performance criteria may mean that ‘world class’ standing will probably be based more on academic reputation than on a set of formal standards (Mohrman et al., 2008).

    The popularity of this kind of ranking is a clear sign of the globalisation of knowledge and the internationalisation of university teaching. The more traditional comparisons among institutions within a single country have been eclipsed by observations that scrutinise a university’s position beyond the restricted political or linguistic frontiers.

    In this context, networks of excellence have arisen. The International Alliance of Research Universities (IARU)⁵ is perhaps the network that best illustrates this phenomenon. It was set up in 2006 and includes ten leading research universities: Australian National University, ETH Zurich, National University of Singapore, Peking University, University of California at Berkeley, University of Cambridge, University of Copenhagen, Oxford University, University of Tokyo and Yale University. Equally noteworthy is the fact that several universities have set up a group that they define as the ‘Emerging Global Model (EGM)’ for the university of the twenty-first century. Mohrman et al. (2008) argue that the development of the EGM is both a response to and an influence upon the major factors in contemporary society. EGM universities look worldwide for research partners, graduate students, prospective faculty and financial resources. This group of global universities will form an elite subset in a larger universe of higher education institutions. The growth of international university associations demonstrates the interdependence of EGM universities through transnational activities.

    Without downplaying the controversy over the methodology used in this kind of ranking, we believe that they are yet another element reinforcing higher education’s commitment to evaluation and quality and acting as an incentive and stimulus in the quest for excellence in institutions’ teaching and research. In European universities, the political measures aimed at intensifying research competitiveness and restructuring higher education systems have been ratcheted up in recent years. A well-known multinational organisation is the European Union’s Erasmus Mundus Programme,⁶ a cooperation and mobility initiative that enhances the quality of European higher education and promotes the European Union as a centre of excellence in learning around the world.

    The EFQM Model of Excellence was established as a guide for rating the organisations that vied for the European Quality Award created by the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM).⁷ On 29 September 2009, the results of the revision of the EFQM Excellence Model were presented and a new version of the 2010 EFQM Model was previewed at the Annual EFQM Forum in Brussels. This model will coexist with the current model dating from 2003 throughout 2010.

    Today EFQM is being accepted as a management model by organisations that are seeking institutional excellence, and it is a benchmark in Europe for excellence as its design encompasses the most up-to-date management practices within an organisation. This model is based on self-assessment and defines the parameters that must be taken into account in order to assess the maturity of the management system within any organisation.

    EFQM applies the concept of quality to higher education by defining quality as the degree to which a continuum of differentiating features inherent in higher education fulfils a given need or expectation. Quality is an asset of an institution or programme that fulfils the standards preset by an accreditation agency. In order to be properly measured, this usually involves the evaluation of teaching, learning, management and results.

    The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA)⁹ was established in 2000 to promote European cooperation in the field of quality assurance. The idea for the association originates from the European Pilot Project for Evaluating Quality in Higher Education (1994–5), which demonstrated the value of sharing and developing experiences in the area of quality assurance. Subsequently, the idea was given momentum by the Recommendation of the Council (98/561/EC of 24 September 1998) on European cooperation in quality assurance in higher education and by the Bologna Declaration of 1999. The European Commission has, through grant support, financed the activities of ENQA since the very beginning. The third edition of Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area was published in 2009 (European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education – ENQA, 2009).

    Likewise, the European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education (EQAR)¹⁰ aims at increasing the transparency of quality assurance and thus enhancing trust and confidence in European higher education. EQAR will list quality assurance agencies that operate in Europe and have proven their credibility and reliability in a review against the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance (ESG). It publishes and manages a register of quality assurance agencies that substantially comply with the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance (ESG) to provide the public with clear and reliable information on quality assurance agencies operating in Europe.

    The different European Union member states have their own national and/or regional quality evaluation and accreditation agencies with the goal of contributing to improving the quality of the higher education systems through the evaluation, certification and accreditation of their programmes, faculty, institutions and services, including libraries.¹¹

    In a competitive and internationalised context, evaluation processes can spring from a regulatory requirement – either regional or nationwide – or can be conducted on the initiative of the institution itself in an effort to consolidate or accentuate the university’s prestige. The library must have solid grounding in quality management in order to adapt to the demands of the evaluations it might be subjected to in order to support the institutional

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1